Introduction

The southwest of Iran constitutes one of the most prolific hydrocarbon producing habitats (Bordenave and Burwood 1990) with cumulative recoverable of 136 billion(10¹¹)barrels of oils including recent discoveries in the Kushk and Hosseinieh fields of Khuzestan province and 940 trillion(10¹²) cubic feet of associated and non-associated gas (James and Wynd 1965). Although the geology of this area is well defined (Jackson et al. 1981; Furst 1990; Sepehr and Cosgrove 2004; Less 1940), considerable uncertainty exists as to the origin of these hydrocarbons.

This story of geochemical investigation in Iran goes back to the years 1932–1941, when Less (1940) fractionated some crude oil as well as bitumen in the Fars area. The first comprehensive geochemical project in Iran was conducted by Bordenave and Sahabi (1971), Bordenave and Nili (1973), Burwood (1978), and Alizadeh et al. (2006). It was conducted to determine the characters of source rock and extent of their distribution. They also correlated the oils with probable source rocks and with tectonics of the Fars, Khuzestan and Lurestan regions.

Bordenave and Burwood (1990) carried out the important and comprehensive research work on the distribution and maturation of oils in the Zagros basin using stable isotopes on oils from the Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoirs as well as the probable source rocks in the Dezful embayment.

The probable source rock (Sargelu Formation) in the Garangan and Chilingar oil field has been analyzed by the geochemical techniques.

Stable carbon (δ¹³C) and sulfur (δ34S) isotopes are a very powerful tools for oil–oil correlation (Craig 1953; Orr 1986). For high sulfur oils, a stable sulfur isotope study is suggested (Hunt 1996). Carbon isotope ratio of whole oils is generally not used alone for correlation because of the narrow range of δ¹³C values for all oils, which are about −15 ‰, ranging from −18 to −33 ‰ (Motiei 1995). Consequently, for oil–oil correlation, in this study, oil fractions were used. In geochemical investigations, multiple tools are recommended. Thus, to achieve better and more reliable results, normal Alkane distribution, determined by gas chromatography, was supported by stable isotope results.

Geological setting

The Zagros fold-thrust belt lies on the northeastern margin of the Arabian plate. Like other fold-thrust belts, it shows an intensive shortening, close to the suture which becomes less intense toward the foreland. It is dominated by NW–SE trending folds and thrusts. The mountain belt has been divided into NW–SE trending structural zones (imbricated and simply folded Belt) parallel to the plate margin, separated by major fault zones such as the high Zagros and mountain front faults. The imbricate belt situated between the high Zagros and Zagros main reverse faults, and simply folded belt lies to the southwest of the high Zagros fault (Less 1940).

The Garangan and Chilingar oilfields are situated at the end of a simply folded zone, very close to the border of the folded zone (Southwest Iran) and unfolded zone (Arabian plate) (Fig. 1). From the middle of the Jurassic to the middle of the Cretaceous period, stratigraphy and structural geology in the Garangan and Chilingar areas were severely influenced by tectonic activities. Deposition of Sargelu Formation and Khami group took place from Middle Jurassic up to Cretaceous respectively (Shayesteh 2002). Khami group consists of Surmeh and Hith in Jurassic and Fahliyan, Gadvan and Dariyan in Cretaceous. The Batonian Sargelu formation consists of 115 m of gray and thin limestone. The Surmeh formation (Lower to Upper Jurassic is mainly composed of limestones sometimes, oolitic, with a few marly intervals (936 m). The Upper Jurassic Hith Formation (64 m thick) is dominated by anhydrite with intercalation of dolomitic limestones. The Fahliyan formation (Neocomian) which comprises slight gray limestones that are sometimes oolitic (276 m) and the Gadvan formation (Barremian), 27 m thick, is composed of porous and dolomitic limestones. The Aptian Dariyan formation consists of 57 m of gray to light brown marls and argillaceous limestones deposited in an oxic environment (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Garangan and Chilingar oilfields in the Zagros Fold-Thrust-Belt [modified from Sepehr and Cosgrove (Less 1940)]

Fig. 2
figure 2

Permian and Tertiary Stratigraphy of SW Iran (modified from Bordenave and Burwood, 1990). (I) Rocks capable of hydrocarbon generation; (II) rocks containing petroleum reservoirs; (III) rock units and horizons sealing petroleum reservoirs. (1) source rocks; (2) reservoir rocks; (3) impermeable rocks: salts (a), clay (b); (4) petroleum reservoirs; (5) washout zones: (6‐18) rock types; (6) conglomerates and siltstones; (7) sandstones; (8) alteration of sandstones and siltstones; (9) alteration of siltstones and clays; (10) clays and mudstones; (11) limestones; (12) clayey limestones; (13) alteration of limestones and clays; (14) sandy limestones; (15) dolomites; (16) marls; (17) gypsum and anhydrite; (18) alteration of limestones and anhydrites

Methods

For this study, four oil samples from producing wells of the Garangan and Chilingar oilfields were selected and analyzed using gas chromatography as well as stable isotopes of carbon and sulfur.

Sample selection

National Iranian Exploration Directorate (EXP) collected the oil samples for the present study from the selected wells all over the oilfield. Geological information, as well as chemical composition of the samples is given in Table 1.

Table 1 Geochemical data and gross chemical composition of oils

Gas chromatography

To perform Gas Chromatography (GC), asphaltene fraction from the sample was removed with n-hexane. The asphaltene free sample was injected into Gas Chromatography. Malten (Asphaltene-free oil) was injected in a heated port connected to a fused-silica cross-linked methyl silicone gum. The oven temperature was ramped from 50 to 320 °C. The biomarker peaks were identified by Flame Ionization Detector (FID).

Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS)

Sample preparation

Total oil extracts were separated into their saturate and aromatic fractions by preparative silica gel chromatography. Hexane and toluene were used as elute solutions for saturate and aromatic separation, respectively.

Stable carbon isotope (δ¹³C) analysis

Stable carbon isotope ratios were determined on whole oil and oil fractions using EA-IRMS (Elemental Analyzer Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry) in Iso-Analytical laboratories. Carbon dioxide peaks separated by a packed column gas chromatography, held at an isothermal temperature of 110 °C, were entered as the ion source tube ionized and accelerated. Carbon isotopic composition (in per mill  ‰) was reported relative to the Pee Dee Belemnite Standard (PDB) using the following equation (Ault and Jensen 1962):

$$ \delta^{13} {\text{C}}\,\permil = \,(R_{\text{sample}} /R_{\text{standard}} ) - 1 \times 1,000 $$

where R is the ratio of ¹³C–¹²C.

Stable sulfur isotope (δ34S) analysis

Sulfur δ34S analysis was undertaken by EA-IRMS. Sulfur dioxide is resolved on a packed GC-column at a temperature of 30 °C. Gas species of different masses are first separated in a magnetic field, then simultaneously measured on a Faraday cup universal collector array. Sulfur isotopic compositions (in per mill ‰) are reported relative to the standard Troilite Sulfur (FES) from the Canon Diablo meteorite using the following equation (Sofer 1988):

$$ \delta^{34} {\text{S}}\,\permil = \,(R_{\text{sample}} /R_{\text{standard}} ) - 1 \times 1,000 $$

where R is the ratio of 34S–³²S.

Results and discussion

Gas chromatography

In the studied samples, n-alkanes are high, indicating a high maturity level (Tissot and Welte 1984) for the Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoirs at Garangan and Chilingar oilfields. In order to represent compositional classification of the studied reservoirs, a ternary diagram of Tissot and Welte (1984) was used (Fig. 3). On the basis of whole oil minor cuts percentages, the studied oils show paraffinic composition with relatively higher maturity in both Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoir oils.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ternary diagram showing paraffinic composition of Fahliyan and Surmeh crude oils from the Garangan and Chilingar fields

In gas chromatograms of all four oil samples, the Carbon Preference Index (CPI) is more than one, showing high maturity in both Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoir oils (Table 2).

Table 2 Isotopic and Geochemical data of Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoir oils in Garangan and Chilingar oilfield

Organic-rich anoxic carbonate sequences in a very high reducing environment generally are from oils with a ratio of Pristane to Phytane (Pr/Ph) <2 (Didyk et al. 1978; Waples 1985; Connan and Cassou 1980). For the studied oil samples, this ratio is <1 (Table 2). To determine the source of studied oils, a plot of Pr/nC17 versus Ph/nC18 was used (Kaufman et al. 1990).

The ratios demonstrate the algal source and kerogen type II with medium, high maturity for the original organic matter. Again, these data are in accordance with our previous results. In all Fahliyan and Surmeh oil samples, the biodegradation phenomena are inactive since paraffinic is high in oil samples and also the isoprenoids (Pristane and Phytane) are quantitatively less than their adjacent normal alkanes (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Pristane/n-C17 versus Phytane/n-C18 showing the marine source (type II kerogen with strongly reducing environment) for Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoir oils in Garangan and Chilingar oilfields [After Connan and Cassou (Kaufman et al. 1990)]

To correlate oil fingerprinting of both the reservoirs and to evaluate their origin, a sensitive star diagram was used (Sofer 1984). This correlation accurately shows their unique source from which they have been generated (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Star diagram of normal alkane ratios in Fahliyan and Surmeh Reservoirs, showing significant similarity in all the oil samples from Garangan and Chilingar oilfields

Stable carbon and sulfur isotopes

The plot of δ¹³C values of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions of the oils (Chung et al. 1992) examined in this study show their sources have originated from a similar organic marine matter (Fig. 6). The difference between the two equations of terrigenous and marine oils was evaluated statistically and a statistical parameter, CV (the canonical variable),

$$ {\text{CV}} = - 2/53\,\delta^{13} C_{\text{sat}} + 2/22\delta^{13} C_{\text{aro}} - 11/65 $$

was used to distinguish between the marine and terrigenous oils. CV values larger than 0.47 indicate a predominantly terrigenous organic source for the oil, whereas CV values smaller than 0.47 indicate mostly a marine organic source (Chung et al. 1992). In this study, sulfur isotope (δ34S ‰) values were available for Chilingar well #3 Fahliyan oil = (+2.4 ‰) and Surmeh oil (−0.64 ‰) respectively. Sulfur content in Surmeh reservoir in Chilingar oil field was reported 0.5 % (MasoudShayesteh, personal communication).

Fig. 6
figure 6

A Sofer plot of δ¹³C values for the aromatic and saturate hydrocarbons in Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoirs. All δ¹³C values are in ppt (‰) relative to PBD

The ratio of Pr/Ph can show a correlation with the isotopic composition of the oil, namely with the CV. The plot of the CV data versus the log of Pr/Ph (Fig. 7) shows a positive trend between the two parameters: high Pr/Ph ratios are associated with terrigenous oils having high values of CV; low Pr/Ph ratios are associated with marine oils along with low values of CV, indicating that terrigenous sources are more commonly oxidizing in comparison with marine sources before they are incorporated into thick sedimentary sections (Chung et al. 1992).

Fig.7
figure 7

Canonical variable (CV) versus Pr/Ph

Pristane/Phytane versus stable carbon isotope ratio of whole oil can be used to support genetic relationships among oils and infer depositional environments (Galimov 1973). The plot of Pr/Ph versus whole oil stable carbon isotope ratio indicates Mesozoic argillaceous (Fig. 8). Interestingly, all samples from the Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoirs suggest a similar source rock.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Bivariate plot of δ¹³C ratio of oil versus Pr/Ph ratio

The shapes and trends of stable carbon isotope type curves (Stahl 1978) can be used to identify the relationship between different crude oils. The curves of the studied saturate, whole oil, and aromatic fractions demonstrate only one oil family (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Galimov curves for Fahliyan and Surmeh Reservoir oils

The Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoir oils in the Garangan and Chilingar oilfields represent a similar argillaceous carbonate source rock, deposited under severe reducing environment. Geochemical parameters from the studied oils in both reservoirs show middle to high maturity and inactivity of biodegradation with high-paraffinic content. Also isotopic investigations in agreement with oil biomarkers confirm existence of a reducing environment for the deposition of progenitor source rock that sourced both reservoir oils. Stable carbon isotope in whole oil and saturate as well as aromatic fractions, conducted for the first time, demonstrated distinct oil (for both Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoirs) originated from a common source rock.

Conclusion

Detailed geochemical investigations on oil samples from Fahliyan and Surmeh formations indicated that these two show close similarities in terms of unique gas chromatogram and carbon isotope signatures. These two oils from Garangan and Chilingar oil fields are paraffinic and were originated from kerogen type II shaly limestone source rock deposited in an anoxic environment. This view is inferred from normal alkane distribution, Pr/n-C17 versus Ph/n-C18, and lower pristane to phytane ratio (<1). Carbon Preference Index (CPI) was about 1, suggesting that oils were generated from a mature source rock. Stable carbon isotope analysis conducted on saturate as well as aromatic fractions demonstrated distinct oil (for both Fahliyan and Surmeh reservoirs) originated from a common argillaceous carbonate source rock.