Abstract
Thermal energy is utilized as an environmentally friendly energy source for seasonal heat and cold storage on a global scale. Specifically, the aquifer thermal energy storage system is highlighted for being cost-effective in cooling and heating applications. The study assesses the sustainability of the aquifer thermal energy storage in the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin by evaluating six critical criteria: groundwater transmissivity, groundwater temperature, groundwater discharge, groundwater chemistry, population density, and per capita GDP. A multi-criteria decision analysis judgment is applied to analyze all criteria, resulting in a consistency ratio of 0.3% in the analytical hierarchy process. Consequently, the sustainability map for Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage in the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin for heating reveals that 26.45% of the area is strongly sustainable located in the north and southwestern part of the sub-basin, 73.53% is moderate in the east, central, southeast, and southern regions, 0.02% is weakly sustainable as a tiny area in the southwestern. On the other hand, the sustainability map for Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage in the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin for cooling reveals that 19% of the area is strongly sustainable located in the north, and southwestern parts of the sub-basin, 78% is moderate in the northeast, east, southeast, west, central, and southern regions, 3% is weakly sustainable as spots in the west and southwestern areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) is a sustainable and economical space heating and cooling technology. This eco-friendly technique is a great way to balance a mismatch between demand and supply in suitable aquifer system conditions. This open system needs sustainability consideration so the system works permanently and without problems and prevents depletion so it remains available in the future.
Sustainability development and energy resources significantly impact societies (Dincer and Rosen, 2001), so getting an advantage from ATES needs sustainability development to use the ATES system efficiently. Greater utilization efficiency creates a system that lasts a long time (Dincer and Rosen, 2005).
Aquifer thermal energy systems as a backup renewable source of energy have been applied worldwide for heating and cooling, and their environmental advantages have been shown in many studies (Todorov et al. 2020; Turgut et al. 2009; Paksoy et al. 2004; Fleuchaus et al. 2018; Dincer and Rosen 2011; Morofsky 2007; Andersson 2007; Bloemendal and Hartog 2018). Many researchers studied operational principles, such as Lee 2013; Todorov et al. 2020; and Nordell et al. 2015. The feasibility study is one of the most important investigations of ATES in the research (Stemmle et al. 2022; Ramos-Escudero and Bloemendal 2022; Sommer et al. 2015; Courtois et al. 2007, 2008; Paksoy et al. 2004). A Worldwide ATES potential assessment was created by (Tas et al. 2023; Bloemendal et al. 2015; Fleuchaus et al. 2018; and Lu et al. 2019a-b). ATES suitability was studied by Rauf et al. 2023. Bloemendal et al. 2016; Bloemendal et al. 2014; Hahnlein et al., 2013; Dincer and Rosen, 2004 clarified using renewable energy to achieve sustainability. More studies about the design of ATES have been done by (Bridger and Allen 2005; Andersson 2007).
Multi-criteria decision Analysis (MCDA) is a method used to identify criteria with alternative scores, weigh all the criteria, and finally combine them with the rating score, creating a solitary outcome. ArcGIS multi-spatial data is used to interconnect with MCDA to get a tremendous benefit for creating an ATES sustainability map (Rauf et al. 2023; Chen et al. 2010). One of the well-known techniques of MCDA is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) used in the study of (Saaty 1977, 1980; Saaty and Vargas 1991; Ohta et al. 2007; Marinoni et al. 2009; Drobne and Lisec 2009; Ferretti 2011; Chabuk et al. 2017; Lu et al. 2019b; Alkaradaghi et al. 2020; Eddouibi et al. 2021; Stemmle et al. 2022; Rauf et al. 2023). Integrating the Geographic Information System will improve mapping perspectives and accomplish great work (Sayl et al. 2022).
In this study, the most sustainable places will be shown in the Halabja-Khurmal Sub-basin to ensure the long-lasting usage of ATES. This work has the novelty in sustainability investigation in the Iraqi Kurdistan region, which is very important in aiming to give a guarantee to stakeholders that the application of the aquifer thermal energy storage system in the studied area is necessary and sustainable to get a benefit from the using the renewable aquifer thermal energy storage for heating and cooling. People in this area are suffering from an electricity shortage, so by applying this system and calculating its long-lasting future, people will feel comfortable and help the government find the solution to the electricity shortage. The sustainability indicator in this study is based on six criteria: groundwater transmissivity, groundwater temperature, groundwater discharge, groundwater chemistry, population density, and per capita GDP. These criteria are essential in determining the sustainability of a region.
Study area
The location of the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin is in Halabja governorate, the northeastern part of Iraq, Fig. 1, with a population of 121,785 in 2023 based on the Sulaimani Statistical Directorate. The studied area is characterized by the Mediterranean-type continental interior climate (Abdullah et al. 2019). It has a hot summer and cold winter with a temperature (3–43) °C with 622-mm average annual precipitation (Rauf et al. 2023). This sub-basin covers an area of 489 square kilometers. Technically, the region is complex and situated within the Western Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt. Geologically, the exposed lithological units are from the Triassic to the Quaternary period, Fig. 2. The initial category of aquifers encompasses intergranular, fissured, karstic, fissure-karstic, aquitard, and aquiclude types.
Geological map and testing locations of the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin. (Modified after Sissakian and Fouad 2014)
Methodology and data collection
The input criteria
The critical criteria for evaluating the ATES sustainability are six parameters combined for assessing the sustainability of the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin through groundwater transmissivity, groundwater temperature, groundwater discharge, groundwater chemistry, population density, and per capita GDP. As each parameter's effect on ATES's sustainability differs, the GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method approaches an accurate decision analysis for each criterion.
An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a well-known technique in the MCDA method due to its flexibility, simplicity, implementation within a GIS environment, and users' ability to derive the weight of criteria in maps (Malczewski 2007; Rauf et al. 2023). AHP is based on a pairwise comparison approach, which compares the criteria based on the degree of importance with each other (Ishizaka and Nemery 2013).
Many field trips in the studied sub-basin were made to investigate the area's geology, soil, lithology, and hydrogeology. Then, thirty boreholes were selected for groundwater sampling. The samples were collected in clean, sterilized 330-ml bottles. Samples were filtered at the time of collection using a preconditioned plastic filtering device with the membrane filter (0.45 µm) and then acidified with nitric acid (1 + 1). In the laboratory, calcium solution (dissolved 630 mg CaCO3 in 50 ml 1 + 5 HCl) and then diluted to 1000 ml) was added to each sample as the standard solution for each metal is 1000 mg/l, and a working standard solution prepared from (1000 mg/l) standard solution for making calibration curve, to each (100 ml) sample added (25 ml calcium solution). Iron and manganese were then analyzed using a graphite furnace. Groundwater temperatures were measured in situ at static water level and were measured monthly between April 2022 and March 2023 in 40 boreholes. Groundwater discharge and transmissivity were derived from the well-pumping test analysis of fifty boreholes in the study area. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the wells that have been tested. Data acquisition is collected from different sources to create criteria for assessing ATES's sustainability, as shown in Table 1 and Fig. 3. ArcGIS was applied to make the required maps using spatial analysis tools and then converted to a raster (30*30) pixel size. All the input criteria are depicted in Fig. 4.
Groundwater transmissivity
Groundwater transmissivity is a crucial parameter in the sustainability of the ATES system. It directly affects the system's efficiency, capacity, and overall performance in storing or retrieving thermal energy in the aquifer.
Groundwater transmissivity measures the speed at which water passes through a unit width of an aquifer under the influence of a hydraulic gradient. Transmissivity is essentially the result of multiplying hydraulic conductivity by the thickness of the reservoir.
In the ATES system, transmissivity is commonly employed to assess the aquifer's ability to supply water to a well, which determines the aquifer's capacity and plays a significant role. ATES systems store thermal energy in aquifers by injecting or extracting water from wells. Transmissivity determines how much water can flow through the aquifer under a given hydraulic gradient. It is essential for ATES systems, as the rate of water movement through the aquifer influences the heat exchange process (Ramos-Escudero and Bloemendal 2022). The heat exchange efficiency in ATES systems depends on the ability of water to move through the aquifer. Higher transmissivity allows for more effective heat exchange between the injected or extracted water and the surrounding rock or sediment. Transmissivity, the aquifer's porosity, and temperature characteristics influence the ATES system's overall capacity (Tas et al. 2023). A higher transmissivity means the aquifer can supply or absorb more water, impacting the system's storage and retrieval capabilities. Knowledge of transmissivity helps in designing wells for ATES systems. The aquifer's transmissivity influences ATES's sustainability to optimize heat exchange and system performance. The Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin has transmissivity ranges between 0.11 and 2254 square meters per day; the most transmissivity is in the north and south of the sub-basin, as illustrated in Fig. 4A.
Groundwater temperature (°C)
Aquifer thermal energy storage systems use the natural properties of ground and groundwater to reserve and restore thermal energy for heating and cooling purposes. These systems leverage that below a certain depth (usually around 10–15 m), the ground temperature remains relatively stable and equals the average annual air temperature (Lee 2013).
The process involves circulating a heat transfer water through wells to exchange heat with the ground. This extraction and storage of heat during one season and its subsequent use during the opposite season effectively creates a thermal energy storage system. Additional storage might be required if the demand for heating or cooling exceeds what is available from the stored thermal energy. Seasonal climate changes naturally facilitate natural storage systems because the ground and groundwater passively absorb thermal energy (Nordell et al. 2007).
Groundwater temperature is recorded monthly at 40 boreholes across the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin. The groundwater temperature has been almost stable in Celsius from April 2022 to March 2023. The mean groundwater temperature at the individual measuring boreholes was between 16.8 and 23.8 °C, Fig. 5. In the area of interest with the altitude of the sub-basin, the lowest groundwater temperatures occurred in the Byara district, a mountainous area. The reasonable explanation for that is that the mountainous area is colder than the other areas, and due to snow melting, the groundwater temperature in the aquifers beneath the mountain decreases. Temperatures are increasing in the central toward the southwest side of the sub-basin. The highest values were recorded in the areas close to Darbandikhan Lake as the effect of the water body on the groundwater in the surrounding area, Fig. 4B. This vital criterion was used twice with different ratings because the rating for heating purposes differs from that for cooling purposes, as shown in Table 2.
Groundwater discharge
The ATES system relies on groundwater as its primary storage medium. Ensuring a sustainable and appropriately discharged volume of groundwater is imperative for the continued and efficient operation of the ATES system. In the study area, the extraction rates observed from existing wells exhibited a notable range, spanning from less than five meters per second to an impressive over twenty meters per second. This considerable variability underscores the dynamic nature of groundwater availability in the region. Consequently, the productivity of the aquifer assumes heightened importance, emerging as a pivotal parameter that significantly influences the overall sustainability and performance of individual ATES systems within this diverse and variable hydrogeological context (Stemmle et al. 2022). This criterion, as aquifer productivity, becomes essential for optimizing pumping rates, managing water extraction, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of ATES operations tailored to the specific characteristics of the study area Fig. 4C.
Groundwater chemistry
Groundwater chemical composition significantly impacts the functionality of ATES systems and poses potential risks to their components. The most common issue encountered is the gradual clogging of wells, which results in increased water flow resistance and reduced well capacity over time. Scaling, observed as precipitation within the above-ground components and clogging within wells, gravel packs, and adjacent aquifers, diminishes aquifer permeability due to chemical precipitates. This phenomenon is frequently encountered in ATES systems, especially with the precipitation of carbonates in systems operating above 85 °C and Fe and Mn oxides forming in low-temperature systems < 40 °C (Jenne et al. 1992). Changes in water chemistry cause the precipitation of Fe and Mn oxides. Groundwater quality is an essential parameter (Khudair et al. 2021). In the studied area, the groundwater temperature is below 40 °C, so only iron and manganese, which are essential for the sustainability of the ATES system, were analyzed. Hence, in our assessment, only iron and manganese, which are essential for the sustainability of the ATES system, were analyzed. WHO (2008) recommends iron and manganese concentrations below 0.3 mg/L and 0.1 mg/L, respectively (Robey et al. 2014). In the area of interest, the total iron and manganese quantity is lower than the limit provided by WHO, Fig. 4D and E.
Population density (pop/km2)
Population density measures the number of people per unit of land area. This indicator is an exposed measure to assess sustainability, reflecting the potential living spots suitable for applying the Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage system. Typically, higher population density correlates with increased potential of the ATES system, indicating greater sustainability in such scenarios. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2023, Iraq's population density was 94.4 pop/km2. In the study area, the population density of the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin is 243.8 pop/km2. Figure 4F depicts the population density of the study area's districts population density separately.
Per capita (GDP $)
GDP per capita (current US$) represents the gross domestic product per person, obtained by dividing the GDP by the midyear population. The GDP is the total amount of products and services produced by all resident producers in an economy, accounting for taxes on products and excluding subsidies. This calculation is done without deductions for the depreciation of manufactured assets or the depletion of natural resources. The data is presented in current U.S. dollars. The information is sourced from World Bank national accounts data and OECD National Accounts data documents under a CC BY-4.0 license and aggregates using a weighted average method. This GDP per capita is an annual figure and is part of economic policy and debt, falling under national accounts in U.S. dollars at current prices.
This indicator is chosen for its adaptability in sustainability assessments, reflecting the capacity to respond effectively to unforeseen circumstances. Typically, regions with higher per capita GDP and economically developed areas tend to lean more towards utilizing clean energy than less economically developed regions (Lu et al. 2019b).
As of 2022, Iraq's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita stood at 5937.2 US dollars, Fig. 4G, and based on the Kurdistan Region Statistical Office (KRSO) in 2011, the GDP of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region is 4,452 US dollars. This figure indicates that Iraq's GDP per capita is approximately 4.7 percent of the global average (World Bank 2022). GDP affects renewable energy consumption primarily in high- and low-income countries (Omri and Nguyen 2014). Its role in fostering economic growth, emphasizing its contribution to energy security, especially for countries reliant on imported fossil fuels (Al-Mulali et al. 2013), could drive economic growth more effectively than the reverse (Shahbaz et al. 2015).
Determination of criteria rating and weighting
Determining the criteria rating and weighting involves employing the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) within multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to establish the sustainability of Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (ATES) areas. AHP, pioneered by Saaty (1980), offers a flexible approach to dissecting complex problems. MCDA permits the consideration of both subjective and objective facets in decision-making (Taherdoost 2017; Manguri and Hamza 2022). Within AHP, experts prioritize criteria based on their importance for the ATES sustainability indicator, utilizing the same scale for comparison (Eddouibi et al., 2021; Rauf et al. 2023). This study integrates six criteria in its analysis.
Initially, the six chosen criteria are juxtaposed to finalize their assigned weights, signifying the significance of ATES in the area of interest. Subsequently, the criteria weights are determined through pairwise comparisons, reflecting their relative importance to ATES. Each criterion is then subdivided, assigning suitable rating values ranging from zero to ten (Saaty 1980, 1977; Malczewski 2000). Higher ratings near ten indicate favorability for ATES sustainability, while ratings closer to zero suggest unsustainability. The criteria's rating and prioritization rely on expert decisions and an extensive review of existing literature.
The weighting for each criterion results from one-on-one pairwise comparisons among individual criterion classes, determining the importance of each class over others, following the AHP method in MCDA. It generates a hierarchical order from one to nine, derived from expert decisions (Stemmle et al. 2022; Saaty 1980) using ArcGIS-spatial MCDA-AHP. The rating and weighting of each criterion, depending on the degree of their importance, was arranged by counting on AHP as depicted in Table 2.
Table 3 illustrates the fifteen pairwise comparisons of the six criteria based on their priority.
To validate the AHP outcomes, a consistency ratio (CR) is calculated using the following formula:
(where CR is the consistency ratio, RI is the random index based on the number of criteria, Saaty 1980; Lu et al. 2019a, b). The consistency index (CI) is computed via
with n denoting the number of criteria and \({\lambda }_{max}\) representing the principal eigenvalue of the matrix obtained from the consistency measure calculations (Saaty 1980; Lu et al. 2019a, b).
Calculation of ATES sustainability map
The ATES sustainability in the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin is determined through a weighted linear combination of the six criteria using the equation:
where \({Sa}_{ATES}\) represents ATES sustainability, \({w}_{i}\) denotes the weighting factors, \({x}_{i}\) signifies the normalized rates for each criterion, and n denotes the number of criteria.
Result and discussion
The pairwise comparisons of the matrix with AHP have been calculated using formulas (1, 2, and 3). The results indicate a high level of consistency in the fifteen pairwise comparisons, with the CR value being very low (0.3%), as evidenced by the calculated RI (0.013), \({\lambda }_{max}\) (6.019), and CI (0.004) values. The study employs all criteria and their AHP-determined weights to identify the most sustainable location for ATES. Overlaying these layers in ArcGIS generates two final sustainability maps based on AHP-MCDA, one for cooling and the other for heating purposes, portraying sustainability levels in three categories: weak, moderate, and strong.
The sustainability maps highlight areas conducive to ATES heating purposes. Figure 6 is characterized by high groundwater transmissivity, discharge, temperature, good groundwater chemistry, and high population density. On the other hand, the sustainability maps highlight areas conducive to ATES cooling purposes, Fig. 7, which are characterized by high groundwater discharge, transmissivity, and good groundwater chemistry. Conversely, regions lacking these conditions are deemed weak in sustainability for ATES implementation due to temperature variation. Based on Figs. 6 and 7 most of the study sub-basin is moderately sustainable for the ATES system, which has a promising future for applying this environmentally and eco-friendly system.
Conclusion
This research employed the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-Analytical Hierarchy Process (MCDA-AHP) technique along with the ArcGIS method to generate sustainability maps for the aquifer thermal energy storage system in the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin for heating and cooling purposes. Six important data sets were integrated based on their respective influences on the sustainability of (ATES). The spatial analysis combination of the criteria yielded a consistency ratio of 0.3% in the AHP. The resultant map was classified into three categories using pixel calculation in ArcGIS, with each category's specific value dependent on the assigned weighting for individual criteria during ATES sustainability maps calculation.
The ATES sustainability heating map for the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin delineates that 26.45% of the area is strongly sustainable located in the north and southwestern part of the sub-basin, 73.53% is moderate in the east, central, southeast, and southern regions, 0.02% is weakly sustainable, as a tiny area in the southwestern for aquifer thermal energy storage technology. Favorable areas are characterized by high groundwater temperature, high transmissivity and discharge, good groundwater chemistry, and high population density, whereas regions lacking these conditions receive lower sustainability scores.
The ATES sustainability cooling map for the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin delineates that 19% of the area is strongly sustainable located in the north and southwestern parts of the sub-basin, 78% is moderate in the northeast, east, central, west, southeast, and southern regions, 3% is weakly sustainable as spots in the south and southwestern areas. Favorable areas are characterized by high transmissivity and good groundwater chemistry. Conversely, regions lacking these conditions are deemed weak in sustainability for ATES implementation.
This study introduces new criteria for assessing ATES sustainability, providing valuable insights for government and decision-makers. ATES's economic benefits and CO2 emission reduction potential in the Halabja governorate underscore the importance of its adoption. Ongoing research aims to explore different data further through comparative analysis and applying diverse indicators. Additionally, future evaluations are expected to benefit from more detailed information about ATES applicability.
Abbreviations
- NE:
-
Northeast
- MCDA:
-
Multi-criteria decision analysis
- AHP:
-
Analytic hierarchy process
- ATES:
-
Aquifer thermal energy storage
- SGD:
-
Sulaimani groundwater directorate
- GDP:
-
Gross domestic product
References
Abdullah T, Ali SS, Al-Ansari N, Knutsson S (2019) Hydrogeochemical evaluation of groundwater and its suitability for domestic uses in Halabja Saidsadiq Basin. Iraq Water 11(4):690. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040690
Alkaradaghi K, Ali SS, Al-Ansari N, Laue J (2020) Landfill site selection using GIS and multi-criteria decision-making AHP and SAW methods: a case study in sulaimaniyah governorate, Iraq. Engineering 12:254–268. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2020.124021
Al-Mulali U, Fereidouni HG, Lee JY, Sab CN (2013) Examining the bi-directional long run relationship between renewable energy consumption and GDP growth. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 22:209–222
Andersson O. (2007) Aquifer thermal energy storage. In: Paksoy HÖ (ed) Thermal energy storage for sustainable energy consumption. Springer, Dordrecht.
Bloemendal M, Hartog N (2018) Analysis of the impact of storage conditions on the thermal recovery efficiency of low-temperature ATES systems. Geothermics 71:306–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.10.009
Bloemendal M, Olsthoorn T, Boons F (2014) How to achieve optimal and sustainable use of the subsurface for aquifer thermal energy storage. Energy Policy 66(3 Suppl):104–114
Bloemendal M, Olsthoorn T, van de Ven F (2015) Combining climatic and geo-hydrological preconditions as a method to determine world potential for aquifer thermal energy storage. Sci Total Environ 538:621–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.084
Bloemendal M, Hoekstra N, Slenders H, van de Mark B, van de Ven F, Andreu A, Simmons N, Sani D (2016) Europe-wide use of sustainable energy from aquifers. Barrier Assessment. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3548.8883
Bridger DW, Allen DM (2005) Designing aquifer thermal energy storage systems. ASHRAE J 47(9):S32–S37
Chabuk A, Al-Ansari N, Hussain HM, Knutsson S, Pusch R, Laue J (2017) Combining GIS applications and method of multi-criteria decision-making (AHP)for landfill siting in al-hashimiyah qadhaa, Babylon. Iraq Sustain 9:1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111932
Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S (2010) Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ Model Softw 25(12):1582–1591
Courtois N, Petit V, Thiéry D, Grisey A, Grasselly D, Pommier F (2008) Reversible climatization of greenhouses in France unsing aquifer thermal energy storage: prefeasibility study. Acta Hortic 801:819–826
Courtois, N., Grisey, A., Grasselly, D., Menjoz, A., Noel, Y., Petit, V., Thiery, D. (2007) Application of aquifer thermal energy storage for heating and cooling of greenhouses in France: a pre-feasibility study. In: Proceedings of European Geothermal Congress 2007, Unterhaching, Germany. pp. 1–8.
Dinçer I, Rosen M (2001) Energetic, environmental, and economic aspects of thermal energy storage systems for cooling capacity. Appl Therm Eng 21:1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(00)00102-2
Dinçer I, Rosen M (2004) Exergy as a driver for achieving sustainability. Int J Green Energy 1(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1081/GE-120027881
Dinçer I, Rosen M (2005) Thermodynamic aspects of renewables and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.02.002
Dincer I, Rosen MA (2011) Thermal energy storage: systems and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Drobne S, Lisec A (2009) Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica 33(4):459–747
Eddouibi, J., Vaudreuil, S., Bounahmidi, T., and Abderafi, S. (2021) "Sites Benchmark using AHP Method for Implementing Solar Powered Thermal Desalination Plants in Morocco". In: 9th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), Morocco pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRSEC53969.2021.9741204.
Ferretti V (2011) A multi-criteria spatial decision support system development for siting a landfill in Torino (Italy) province. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 18:231–252
Fleuchaus P, Godschalk B, Stober I, Blum P (2018) Worldwide application of aquifer thermal energy storage – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:861–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.057
Hähnlein S, Bayer P, Ferguson G, Blum P (2013) Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy. Energy Policy 59:914–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.040
Ishizaka A, Nemery P (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Wiley, Chichester, p 310
Jenne, EA., Andersson, O., and Willemsen, A. (1992) Hydrogeologische und geotechnische Aspekte der Wärmespeicherung im Aquifer - potentielle Standorte. In: Proceedings of the 27th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. Ed. by EA Jenne. San Diego (C.A.), U.S. https://doi.org/10.4271/929153.
Khudair MY, Kamel AH, Sulaiman SO, Ansari NA (2022) Groundwater quality and sustainability evaluation for irrigation purposes: A case study in an arid region, Iraq. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 17(2):413–419. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170206
Kurdistan Region Statistical Office KRSO (2023) Summary of estimation GDP for KRI 2011. https://krso.gov.krd/content/upload/1/root/113.pdf.
Lee, K.S. (2013) Underground thermal energy storage. In Lee, K.S., Underground Thermal Energy Storage (pp. 15–26). London: Springer. ISBN: 978–1–4471–4272–0.
Lu H, Tian P, He L (2019a) Evaluating the global potential of aquifer thermal energy storage and determining the potential worldwide hotspots driven by socio-economic, geo-hydrologic and climatic conditions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 112:788–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.013
Lu H, Tian P, Guan Y, Yu S (2019b) Integrated suitability, vulnerability and sustainability indicators for assessing the global potential of aquifer thermal energy storage. Appl Energy 239:747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.144
Malczewski J (2000) On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: common and best practice approaches. Trans in GIS 4(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00035
Malczewski J (2007) GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508
Manguri SBH, Hamza AA (2022) Sanitary landfill site selection using spatial-AHP for Pshdar Area, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region/Iraq. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 46:1345–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00605-y
Marinoni O, Higgins A, Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2009) The multiple criteria analysis tool (MCAT): a new software tool to support environmental investment decision making Environ. Modell Softw 24(2):153–164
Morofsky E. (2007) History of Thermal Energy Storage. In Paksoy H.Ö. (ed.) Thermal Energy Storage for Sustainable Energy Consumption: Fundamentals, Case Studies and Design. Nato Science Series II, 234, 3–22.
Nordell, B., Grein, M., Kharseh, M. (2007) Large-scale utilization of renewable energy requires energy storage. In International conference for renewable energies and sustainable development (ICRESD_07), Algeria.
Nordell, B., Snijders, A., Stiles, L. (2015) The use of aquifers as thermal energy storage (TES) systems. In Cabeza, L.F. (ed.). Advances in thermal energy storage systems: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Woodhead, Elsevier, 87–115.
Ohta K, Kobashi G, Takato S, Kagaya S, Yamada H, Minakami H, Yamamura E (2007) Analysis of the geographical accessibility of neurosurgical emergency hospitals in Sapporo City using GIS and AHP. Int J Geog Inf Sci 21(6):687–698
Omri A, Nguyen DK (2014) On the determinants of renewable energy consumption: International evidence. Energy 72:554–560
Paksoy HO, Gürbüz Z, Turgut B, Dikici D, Evliya H (2004) Aquifer thermal storage (ATES) for air-conditioning of a supermarket in Turkey. Renew Energy 29(12):1991–1996
Ramos-Escudero A, Bloemendal M (2022) Assessment of potential for aquifer thermal energy storage systems for Spain. Sustain Cities Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103849
Rauf L, Ali SS, Al-Ansari N (2023) (2023) Indicator of suitability for evaluating the aquifer thermal energy storage using the GIS-based MCDA technique in the Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin. Appl Water Sci 13:117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01918-1
Robey, K., Tredoux, G., Chevallier, L. (2014) Preventing Production Borehole Clogging by In-situ Iron Removal in South African Aquifer Systems. WRC Report No. 2070/1/14. ISBN 978–1–4312–0600–1.
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15(3):234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1991) Prediction projection and forecasting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 251
Sayl KN, Sulaiman SO, Kamel AH, Al-Ansari N (2022) Towards the generation of a spatial hydrological soil group map based on the radial basis network model and spectral reflectance band recognition. Int J Des Nat Ecodynam 17(5):761–766. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.170514
Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Zeshan M, Zaman K (2015) Does renewable energy consumption add in economic growth? An application of auto-regressive distributed lag model in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:576–585
Sissakian, V.K. and Fouad, S.F. (2014) Geological Map of Sulaimaniyah Quadrangle, at scale of 1: 250 000, 2nd edition. Iraq Geological Survey (GEOSURV) Publications, Baghdad, Iraq.
Sommer W, Valstar J, Leusbrock I, Grotenhuis T, Rijnaarts H (2015) Optimization and spatial pattern of large-scale aquifer thermal energy storage. Appl Energy 137:322–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.019
Stemmle R, Hammer V, Blum P, Menberg K (2022) Potential of low-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage (LT-ATES) in Germany. Geotherm Energy 10:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-022-00234-2
Sulaimani Groundwater directorate (SGD) (2022). Archive department.
Taherdoost H. Decision making using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP); a step by step approach. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems. 2017;2.
Tas L, Simpson D, Hermans T (2023) Assessing the potential of low-transmissivity aquifers for aquifer thermal energy storage systems: a case study in Flanders (Belgium). Hydrogeol J 31:2363–2380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02696-5
Todorov O, Alanne K, Virtanen M, Kosonen R (2020) A method and analysis of aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) system for district heating and cooling: a case study in Finland. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101977
Turgut B, Dasgan HY, Abak K, Paksoy H, Evliya H, Bozdag S (2009) Aquifer thermal energy storage application in greenhouse climatization. Acta Horticult. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.807.17
U.S. Census Bureau. (2023) International Database (demographic data) and USA Trade Online (trade data); Central Intelligence Agency, The World Fact Book (country reference maps).
World Bank (2022) World Bank data. https:// www. worldbank.org. Accessed Dec. 2023.
World Health Organisation (WHO) (2008) Guidelines for drinking-water Quality: Incorporating 1st and 2nd addenda, Vol. 1, Recommendations, 3rd edition. www.WHO.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/gdwq3rev/en/.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Lulea University of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rauf, L.F., Ali, S.S., Al-Ansari, N. et al. Sustainability indicator for evaluating the ATES system in Halabja-Khurmal sub-basin NE-Iraq using GIS-based MCDA method. Appl Water Sci 14, 137 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02206-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02206-2