Abstract
Conventional irrigation methods to new methods have been altered with respect to reduction of water resources and climate change. Considering the corn cultivation development, applying modern irrigation methods namely drip irrigation with the aim of improving the efficiency of water consumption as well as the zone under cultivation has been investigated. In this research, the performance of corn (SC 704) in various managements of drip irrigation (by strip method) both in single-row and double-row planting patterns was considered with a variety of densities. This test was carried out on random complete blocks in the form of a 3-repetitive Split Design in Isfahan-Iran during the years 2018–2019. Four irrigation levels containing: 80, 100 and 120% of full water requirement with drip irrigation (strip) and 100% of water requirement with normal drip irrigation were utilized. The results indicated that applying the aforementioned drip tapes and different surface treatments with soil and water monitoring, the water consumption of corn seasonal irrigation can be saved by 81, 71, 61, 52 and 36% compared to normal drip irrigation without soil, water and root monitoring, respectively. Seasonal yield (Kc), the yield response coefficient (Ky), and pan coefficient (Kp) for corn were 0.80, 0.76 and 0.97, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Water and nutrients can be conserved by drip irrigation and improved water consumption efficiency (WCE), productivity, and yield. By declining runoff, evaporation and deep penetration, drip irrigation may decrease water shortage nearby the root area. The impact of drip irrigation on farm economics and management for various crops worldwide was investigated (Andrade et al. (1999); Eslamian et al. 2018a, b; Bansal et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021a; Ostad-Ali-Askari 2022a). Many researches have been conducted in the field of corn irrigation both in Iran and the world (Gao et al. 2021; Yan et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021b; Guo et al. 2021; Gheysari et al. 2021; Cakmakci and Sahin. 2021; Bai and Gao. 2021; Zou et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2020; Jacques et al. 2018; Shayannejad et al. 2022; Ramesh et al. 2023a, b; Ostad-Ali-Askari et al. 2017a). For instance, high plant density can obtain increased yield and water consumption efficiency of corn utilizing optimal quotas and irrigation regimes, mostly in semi-arid weather (Wang et al. 2021b). The application of various water volumes on WUE and corn yield is discussed. The impact of irrigation intervals and fertilization on energy consumption and corn grain yield was studied. The results indicated that nitrogen fertilization treatments lead to more corn energy consumption compared to field manure or zero nitrogen treatment, also coordinating water and nitrogen supply levels is an effective approach to improve crop production and crop water efficiency (QI et al. 2020). The application of various levels of irrigation water including a variety of percentage of corn water requirement was studied utilizing manifold irrigation methods and the total corn grain was more corn water application for 100% (full water requirement) (Bozkurt et al. 2011; Singh Brar et al. 2016). Some researchers have remarked that corn cultivation needs a lot of water for irrigation and mostly sensitive to drought and lack of water (Karam et al. 2003; Cucci et al. 2019; Kresović et al. 2016; Oktem 2008; Setter et al. 2001; Sah et al. 2020; Schussler and Westgate 1991; Cakir 2004; Nafchi et al. 2022). Scheduling reduced irrigation for a corn crop without declining yield is a challenging task (Lamm et al. 1995, 2014). In addition, reduction of maize yield was considered by Nesmith and Ritchie (1992) due to water deficit during the flowering period. Lack of irrigation and increased irrigation cycle decrease the yield of the crop indicating various sensitivities in different stages of growth (Oktem et al. 2003; Farre´ and Faci 2009). According to Iran is one of the dry and semi-arid regions due to the average precipitation in Iran, which is lower than the world average. In its different parts, the temporal and spatial distribution of precipitation is uneven. Water resource management is very important considering the need for irrigation for food security, (Mirzaei et al. 2019; Ostad-Ali-Askari, 2022b; Fattahi Nafchi et al. 2022; Fatahi Nafchi et al. 2021; Nafchi et al. 2021). One of the management features is considered to be the use of modern irrigation methods. Poor irrigation reduces yield and water consumption efficiency are shown in previous research compared to adequate irrigation. In areas where temperature, evaporation and transpiration are high, low irrigation should not be conducted on crops like corn (Musick and Dusek 1980). Corn yield was gained from the lowest to the highest value, respectively, in dry, low and full irrigation, (Herger and colleague 1993; Huang et al. 2002). Water consumption, efficiency of water use and corn yield have been reported in many researches (Howell et al. 1998; Hillel and Guuron 1973). Use of modern irrigation methods is recommended to enhance the efficiency of water consumption, such as drip irrigation for corn cultivation. This type of system directly transfers water and nutrients to the plants, saving water consumption and increasing crop yield (Gencoglan 1996; Tiwari et al. 2003). Placing with high uniformity on the field during the irrigation period, drip irrigation supplies the amount of water needed by the plant at the right time (El-Hendawy et al. 2008). The use of drip irrigation develops the cultivated area, crop yield and water consumption efficiency (Sivanappan 2004).
The use of drip irrigation system (strip tape) saving water consumption is a proper irrigation method for farms, mainly in corn cultivation. This article has been carried out to consider and fulfill an adequate strip irrigation system so as to decline costs and boost water use and increase crop yield and water consumption efficiency in corn cultivation.
Methodology
This study was performed on a farm in Isfahan province in Iran. The soil texture of the farm was sandy clay loam (Table 1).
The amount of irrigation was assessed based on the water requirement in each stage. Fertilization of the total amount of nitrogen (350 kg/ha), phosphorus (57 kg/ha) and potassium (22 kg/ha 71) was done according to the recommendations of the soil laboratory (Table 1). Approximately half of the phosphorus and potassium amounts were used before planting and the rest during the irrigation period. N was used as 33% of the total application at seedling, seven-leaf and flowering stages. In the strip irrigation system with 75% (T3 treatment), 100% (T2) and 125% (T1), complete irrigation is required and in the normal linear drip irrigation system with 75% (T6), 100% (T5) and 125% (T5) (T4) and surface irrigation was investigated as T7 treatment. Agricultural tools were used to conduct tillage, leveling and furrowing for drip and surface irrigation were and the field was accumulated for cultivation. The plot size was 6 m × 3.6 m (Fig. 1). The well supplies the source of water then after filtering and passing through main and secondary pipes, it entered the drip irrigation system. A 16 mm valve was used at the beginning of each tape pipe so as to manage drip systems (Fig. 1). Where, ND is the required water depth in the root zone (mm), yfc and yw are the soil water content at field capacity and measurement time (%), RD is the root depth (mm) and bulk density (g cm 73), IWR is the irrigation water requirement at the time of irrigation (mm), dn is the net water requirement to get the field capacity conditions in the root area (mm), n is the number of various days between the last (the day that was decided). for irrigation) and soil water measurement on the day of irrigation, IWV is the volume of irrigation water in liters, late, the net water requirement of corn at the beginning of the irrigation period (mm) or one day after soil water measurement (mm). Ea is the efficiency of application and A is the area under drip irrigation (m2). Data were analyzed applying ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range tests. Expressions were evaluated important at p 5 0.05 and 0.01 using the MSTAT-C.
Results and discussion
The amount of green seeds was considered to be higher than surface irrigation in drip irrigation systems (both conventional and tape). Crop yield was evaluated with Bhatt (2012) indices and stress conditions.
The highest yield of 13.92 tons per hectare was obtained which were related to the plant density of 125% and from 85,000 plants per hectare. On the other hand, with the application of low irrigation treatments, the yield decreased significantly. In a way that 0.435 tons per hectare was the minimum yield belonging to ET 50% and the plant density is 85000 plants per hectare. The results are Similar to those of Musick and Dusek (1980), as well as Howell et al. (1998). From the upper levels of the soil in the absence of water stress, food and water are absorbed for the roots of plants. 40% of the water absorbed to the plant is given in the soil profile which is considered the first 25 cm of the root zone of plants. Thus, in this research, it was considered that with better use of nutrients and water in the soil, the yield in ET treatment will increase by 125%. Also, according to the 125% ET treatment, the highest performance, the maximum yield should be obtained if 100% of the water required by the plant is given. It is possible that this yield difference could be due to the regional climatic conditions that were peculiar to obtain the actual water requirement of the corn used from the drip irrigation system, it cannot be directly calculated from the Penman-Muntit formula and the plant coefficient (Kc) use. Therefore, ET 125% is possibly measured as real requirement of corn in the region. Based on the results, the amount of irrigation less than ET 100% applying the drip irrigation system reduces the yield in subtropical and tropical areas. Therefore, it is not recommended to use drip irrigation for corn in these regions.
According to Table 2, the yield of cob corn in conventional (T4) and tape (T1) drip system with 125% irrigation is the highest value of 19.88 and 19.74 tons per hectare, respectively (Table 2). The yield of corn in the surface irrigation system (T2) is 17.21 tons per hectare, which is significantly the lowest. These results are consistent with the findings of Bozkurt et al. (2011). Karam et al. (2003) observed a decrease in grain yield under water stress conditions too. Also, the highest yield of corn fodder was considered in the regular drip system (22.93 tons per hectare) and strip system (22.58 tons per hectare). Irrigation strategies on yield and energy consumption of drip irrigated maize grown on clay soils was considered in southern Mediterranean climate of Turkey (Javadinejad, et al. 2019a; Razmi et al. 2022; Ostad-Ali-Askari 2022c, d, f). While the lowest with 50% partial root zone drying was 375 mm, the highest water consumption for drip irrigation was 677 mm. It was expressed the highest energy efficiency was 1.77 kg/m73 for drying 100% partial root area, while the lowest was for drip irrigation with 1.54 kg/m73. The obtained results for corn water consumption and WUE differed from those previously reported, possibly due to differences in soil, irrigation management, and weather conditions. Increasing corn yield are compatible in drip irrigation with the findings of Viswanatha et al. (2000), and SharanaBasava et al. (2012). Currently, 30,000 hectares of Isfahan province use a number of different irrigation systems under pressure, which are fed by the expansion of water resources. Therefore, research is required in this region where maize is cultivated in areas with low precipitation and restricted water resources during the growing period. In addition, the water requirement of corn for different pressure irrigation systems has not been investigated. The agricultural organizations, local farmers, planning and decision-making of water resource managers are considered to be necessary to anticipate the response of corn to various levels of water consumption under manifold irrigation methods.
The weight of 10 cobs was significantly impacted by drought stress (p 5.01). The lowest and highest weight of 10 ears related to T1 and T5 treatments (CFI) were 1067 and 1758 g, respectively, in 2008; and 1029 and 1706 g in 2009, respectively. No remarkable distinctions were observed based on 10-ear weight among T3, T4 and T5 treatments (CFI) in 2008 or 2009. Our results for various corn yield parameters were similarly alike to the results of Karemi and Gomrakchi (2006), Dagdelen et al. (2006) and Oktem (2008). Yield and growth are decreased in water shortage conditions. A significant decrease was investigated in the height of the plant as well as the number of leaves in surface irrigation in comparison with drip irrigation with 100% irrigation requirement. This happens when it comes to adequate water supply in drip irrigation and crop reduction in surface irrigation for water stress (based on Hariguchi 1986). Drip irrigation system saves water consumption owing to addressing the right requires of the plant in comparison with to surface irrigation. Observing in this research, in drip irrigation the soil moisture is constantly near the field's capacity because of the low frequency of irrigation. According to Table 3, the height of the corn plant is the highest in normal drip and strip irrigation systems and the lowest in surface irrigation (Table 3). The reasons why this assessment may be the use of drip irrigation is possibly absorbing more nutrients for growth effectively (Ayotamuno et al. 2007) as well as getting enough soil moisture for growth (Pattanaik et al. 2003). In this irrigation system nutrients are considered to be available to the plant (Anitta Fanish and Muthukrishnan 2011).
An important increase on the yield parameters was observed on drip irrigation treatments (length, girth and weight of ears). The surface irrigation treatment observed the lowest values of these parameters. With increasing water deficit the ear weight and length were reduced (e.g., Oktem 2008; Kirtok 1998; Jacobs and Pearson 1991; Eck 1985). Karam et al. (2003) concluded that corn yield is reduced under water deficit. The results of the present study showed (Fig. 2) that drip systems have higher net efficiency than surface irrigation (Fig. 2). Also, the highest net return for the entire variable cost was strip drip irrigation with 125% irrigation (T1) in comparison with other treatments (Similar to the results of Maisiri et al. 2005).
Conclusion
This study in a semi-arid area indicated that maize is suitable for SDT irrigation methods under various irrigation regimes with comparison with CFI methods to save water consumption and also improve grain and cob water consumption. So, instead of using CFI, farmers may use these methods to produce corn to increase their irrigation efficiency and yield. The method of strip drip irrigation with various water supply treatments is considered simple and appropriate for applying in corn production by local farmers in semi-arid areas with restricted water. T3 (80% ETa) SDT treatment showed 61% water saving (599 mm) and higher grain and cob consumption compared to T5 (100% ETa) had unsupervised CFI method (1547 mm). The most optimal method was T3 for using in regions with partially restricted water supplies. This research showed that in regions with relatively harsh water constraints, T2 treatment (60% ETa) with water savings of approximately 70% (449 mm) may be possible, and using the irrigation methods and strategies described, conventional irrigation methods with low water efficiency can be renewed and save more irrigation water. This can also result to an increase in the amount of land under corn cultivation, creating more jobs and increasing the income of local farms. Moreover, the yield response coefficient (Ky) of maize was 0.80. This amount can be utilized for irrigation management in semi-arid areas in low irrigation conditions. In fact, maize with a Ky value 51 shows a high tolerance to water deficit. Seasonal corn yield (Kc) and pan coefficients (Kp) in a semi-arid region were 0.76 and 0.97, respectively. Based on results obtained, pan evaporation of 0.97 classes can be an acceptable and practical value for the actual evapotranspiration of corn in semi-arid climate.
Data availability
All the data, including the experimental measurements, the data used for formulating empirical relations, and the code processing the data that support the findings of this study, are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Andrade FH, Vega C, Uhart S, Cirilo A, Cantarero M, Valentinuz M (1999) Kernel number determination in maize. Crop Sci 39:453–459
Anitta Fanish S, Muthukrishnan P (2011) Effect of drip fertigation and intercropping on growth, yield and water use efficiency of maize (Zea mays L.). Madras Agric J 98(7–9):238–242
Ayotamuno JM, Zuofa K, Sunday OA, Kogbara BR (2007) Response of maize and cucumber intercrop to soil moisture control through irrigation and mulching during the dry season in Nigeria. African J Biotechnol 6(5):509–515
Bai Y, Gao J (2021) Optimization of the nitrogen fertilizer schedule of maize under drip irrigation in Jilin, China, based on DSSAT and GA. Agric Water Manag 244:106555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106555
Bansal G, Mahajan A, Verma A, Singh DB (2021) A review on materialistic approach to drip irrigation system. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.546
Bhatt B (2012) Response of sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharatasturt) to sulphur and zinc fertilization. Res Crop 13(2):760
Bozkurt S, Yazar A, Mansuroglu GS (2011) Effects of different drip irrigation levels on yield and some agronomic characteristics of raised bed planted corn. African J Agric Res 6(23):5291–5300
Cakir R (2004) Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductivegrowth of maize. Field Crop Res 89:1–16
Cakmakci T, Sahin U (2021) Improving silage maize productivity using recycled wastewater under different irrigation methods. Agric Water Manag 255:107051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107051
Chen Z, Sun S, Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhang X (2020) Temporal convolution-network-based models for modeling maize evapotranspiration under mulched drip irrigation. Comput Electron Agric 169:105206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105206
Cucci G, Lacolla G, Boari F, Mastro MA, Cantore V (2019) Effect of water salinity and irrigation regime on maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated on clay loam soil and irrigated by furrow in Southern Italy. Agric Water Manag 222:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.033
Dagdelen N, Yılmaz E, Sezgin F, Gu¨rbu¨z T (2006) Water-yield relation and water use efficiency of cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.) and second crop maize (Zea mays L.) in Western Turkey. Agric Water Manag 82:63–85
Eck HV (1985) Effect of water deficit on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of irrigated corn. Agron J 78:1035–1040
El-Hendawy SE, Abd El-Lattief AE, Ahmed MS, Schmidhalter U (2008) Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield and water use efficiency of dripirrigated corn. Agric Water Manage 95:836–844
Eslamian S et al. (2018a) Saturation. In: Bobrowsky P, Marker B (eds) Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_251-1
Eslamian S et al. (2018b) Water. In: Bobrowsky P, Marker B (eds) Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_295-1
Farré I, Faci JM (2009) Deficit irrigation in maize for reducing agricultural water use in a Mediterranean environment. Agric Water Manag 96(3):383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.07.002
Fatahi Nafchi R, Yaghoobi P, Reaisi Vanani H, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Nouri J, Maghsoudlou B (2021) Eco-hydrologic stability zonation of dams and power plants using the combined models of SMCE and CEQUALW2. Appl Water Sci 11(7):109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01427-z
Fatahi Nafchi R, Samadi-Boroujeni H, Raeisi Vanani H, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Brojeni MK (2021) Laboratory investigation on erosion threshold shear stress of cohesive sediment in Karkheh Dam. Environ Earth Sci 80(19):681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09984-x
Fatahi Nafchi R, Yaghoobi P, Raeisi Vanani H, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Nouri J, Maghsoudlou B (2022) Correction to: Eco-hydrologic stability zonation of dams and power plants using the combined models of SMCE and CEQUALW2. Appl Water Sci 12(4):55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01563-6
Fattahi Nafchi R, Raeisi Vanani H, Noori K, Hosein P, Brojeni S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Investigation on the effect of inclined crest step pool on scouring protection in erodible river beds. Nat Hazards 110(3):1495–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04999-w
Gao J, Xu C, Luo N, Liu X, Huang S, Wang P (2021) Mitigating global warming potential while coordinating economic benefits by optimizing irrigation managements in maize production. J Environ Manag 298:113474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113474
Gencoglan C (1996) Water-yield relationships of corn plant, determination of root dispersion and water stress index, CERES-corn growing model. Ph.D. Thesis, Cukurova University Adana, Turkey
Gheysari M, Pirnajmedin F, Movahedrad H, Majidi MM, Zareian MJ (2021) Crop yield and irrigation water productivity of silage maize under two water stress strategies in semi-arid environment: two different pot and field experiments. Agric Water Manag 255:106999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106999
Guo Q, Huang G, Guo Y, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Duan L (2021) Optimizing irrigation and planting density of spring maize under mulch drip irrigation system in the arid region of Northwest China. Field Crop Res 266:108141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108141
Hariguchi T (1986) Effect of water deficiency on water potential and protein content of leaves. Bull Fac Agric Kagoshma Univ 36:77–81
Hillel D, Guuron Y (1973) Relation between evaporation and aspiration rate and maize yield. Water Resour Res 9(3):743–748
Howell TA, Tolk JA, Arland DS, Evertt R (1998) Evapotranspiration, yield and water use efficiency of corn hybrids differing in maturity. Agron J 90:3–9
Huang M, Zhong L, Gallichand J (2002) Irrigation treatments for corn with limited water supply in the loess plateau, China. Can Biosyst Eng 44:129–134
Jacobs BC, Pearson CJ (1991) Potential yield of maize determined by rate of growth and development of ears. Field Crop Res 27:281–298
Jacques D, Fox G, White P (2018) Farm level economic analysis of subsurface drip irrigation in Ontario corn production. Agric Water Manag 203:333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.018
Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2019a) Investigation of monthly and seasonal changes of methane gas with respect to climate change using satellite data. Appl Water Sci 9(8):180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1067-9
Karam F, Breidy J, Stephan C, Rouphael J (2003) Evapotranspiration, yield and water use efficiency of drip irrigated corn in the Bekaa Valley of Lebanon. Agric Water Manag 63(2):125–137
Karemi M, Gomrekchi A (2006) Maize water use efficiency under drip and surface drip irrigation conditions. Irrig Drain 2(1):21–31
Kirtok Y (1998) Corn production and use. Kocaoluk, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 445
Kresović B, Tapanarova A, Tomić Z, Životić L, Vujović D, Sredojević Z, Gajić B (2016) Grain yield and water use efficiency of maize as influenced by different irrigation regimes through sprinkler irrigation under temperate climate. Agric Water Manag 169:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.023
Lamm FR, Manges HL, Stone LR, Khan AH, Rogers DH (1995) Water requirement of subsurface drip-irrigated corn in Northwest Kansas. Trans ASABE 38(2):441–448. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27851
Lamm FR, Rogers DH, Aguilar J, Kisekka I (2014) Deficit irrigation of grain and oilseed crops. In: Proceedings 2014 irrigation association technical conference, Phoenix, Arizona, November 19–20. Available from the Irrigation Association, Falls Church, Virginia
Maisiri N, Senzanje A, Rockstrom J, Twomlow SJ (2005) On farm evaluation of the effect of low cost drip irrigation on water and crop productivity compared to conventional surface irrigation system. PhysChem Earth 30:783–791
Mirzaei A, Saghafian B, Mirchi A, Madani K (2019) The groundwater–energy–food nexus in Iran’s agricultural sector: implications for water security. Water 11:1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091835
Musick LT, Dusek DA (1980) Irrigated corn yield response to water. Trans ASAE 23:92–98
NeSmith DS, Ritchie JT (1992) Short- and long-term responses of corn to a pre-anthesis soil water deficit. Agron J 84(1):107–113. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400010021x
Oktem A (2008) Effects of deficit irrigation on some yield characteristics of sweet corn. Bangladesh J Botany 37(2):127–131. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v37i2.1718
Oktem A, Simsek M, Oktem AG (2003) Deficit irrigation effects on sweet corn (Zea mays var. saccharata Sturt) with drip irrigation system in a semi-arid region: I. Water–yield relationship. Agric Water Manag 61(1):63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00161-0
Ostad-Ali-Askari et al. (2017a) Deficit irrigation: optimization models. management of drought and water scarcity. In: Handbook of Drought and Water Scarcity, 1st Edn. vol 3, Taylor & Francis, Inprint: CRC Press, pp 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315226774
Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022a) Developing an optimal design model of furrow irrigation based on the minimum cost and maximum irrigation efficiency. Appl Water Sci 12(7):144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01646-y
Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022b) Management of risks substances and sustainable development. Appl Water Sci 12(4):65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01562-7
Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022c) Investigation of meteorological variables on runoff archetypal using SWAT: basic concepts and fundamentals. Appl Water Sci 12(8):177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01701-8
Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022d) Arrangement of watershed from overflowing lookout applying the SWAT prototypical and SUFI-2 (case study: Kasiliyan watershed Mazandaran Province Iran). Appl Water Sci 12(8):196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01718-z
Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022f) Correction: Investigation of meteorological variables on runoff archetypal using SWAT: basic concepts and fundamentals. Appl Water Sci 12(9):211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01732-1
Pattanaik SK, Sahu NN, Pradhan PC, Mohanty MK (2003) Response of banana to drip irrigation under different irrigation designs. J Agric Eng 40(3):29–34
QiHuSong DLTTX (2020) Effects of nitrogen application rates and irrigation regimes on grain yield and water use efficiency of maize under alternate partial root-zone irrigation. J Integr Agric 19(11):2792–2806. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63205-1
Ramesh A, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2023a) Effect of effluent and magnetized effluent on Manning roughness coefficient in furrow irrigation. Appl Water Sci 13(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01818-w
Ramesh A, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2023b) Effects of magnetized municipal effluent on some physical properties of soil in furrow irrigation. Appl Water Sci 13(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01811-3
Razmi R, Sotoudeh F, Ghane M, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Temporal–spatial analysis of drought and wet periods: case study of a wet region in Northwestern Iran (East Azerbaijan West Azerbaijan Ardebil and Zanjan provinces). Appl Water Sci 12(11):251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01765-6
Sah RP, Chakraborty M, Prasad K (2020) Impact of water deficit stress in maize: phenology and yield components. Sci Rep 10:2944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59689-7
Shayannejad M, Ghobadi M, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Modeling of Surface Flow and Infiltration During Surface Irrigation Advance Based on Numerical Solution of Saint–Venant Equations Using Preissmann's Scheme. Pure Appl Geophys 179(3):1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-02962-9
Schussler JR, Westgate ME (1991) Maize kernel set at low water potential: I. Sensitivity to reduced assimilates during early kernel growth. Crop Sci 31:1189–1195. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050023x
Setter TL, Flannigan BA, Melkonian J (2001) Loss of kernel set due to water deficit and shade in maize: carbohydrate supplies, abscisic acid, and cytokinins. Crop Sci 41:1530–1540. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.4151530x
SharanaBasava KB, Suneethadevi YS, SurendraBabu P (2012) Response of sweet corn hybrid to drip-fertigation. J Res ANGRAU 40(4):101
Singh Brar H, Kumar Vashist K, Bedi S (2016) Phenology and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under different drip irrigation regimes and planting methods. J Agric Sci Tech 18:831–843
Sivanappan K (2004) Irrigation and rainwater management for improving water use efficiency and production in cotton crop. In: Proceeding of international symposium on “strategies for sustainable cotton production. A global vision” 23–25th November, UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka
Tiwari KN, Singh RM, Mal PK (2003) Effect of drip irrigation on yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) under mulch and non-mulch conditions. Agric Water Manag 58:19–28
Viswanatha GB, Ramachandrappa BK, Nanjappa HV (2000) Effect of drip irrigation and method of planting on root and shoot biomass, tasseling silking interval, yield and economics sweet corn (Zea mays cv. Saccharata). Mysore J Agric Sci 34:134–141
Wang L, Xiao J, Huang Q, Hu Y (2021a) Effects of different drip irrigation modes on water use efficiency of pear trees in Northern China. Agric Water Manag 245:106660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106660
Wang F, Xiao J, Ming B, Xie R, Wang K, Hou P, Liu G, Zhang G, Chen J, Liu W, Yang Y, Qin A, Li S (2021b) Grain yields and evapotranspiration dynamics of drip-irrigated maize under high plant density across arid to semi-humid climates. Agric Water Manag 247:106726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106726
Yan F, Zhang F, Fan X, Fan J, Wang Y, Zou H, Wang H, Li G (2021) Determining irrigation amount and fertilization rate to simultaneously optimize grain yield, grain nitrogen accumulation and economic benefit of drip-fertigated spring maize in northwest China. Agric Water Manag 243:106440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106440
Zou H, Fan J, Zhang F, Xiang Y, Wu L, Yan S (2020) Optimization of drip irrigation and fertilization regimes for high grain yield, crop water productivity and economic benefits of spring maize in Northwest China. Agric Water Manag 230:105986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105986
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding information is not applicable. No funding was received. No grants were received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors designed the study, collected data, wrote the manuscript and revised it.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Consent to publish
All authors agree to publish this manuscript. There is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Amini Najafabadi, M., Fatahi Nafchi, R., Salami, H. et al. Effect of different managements with drip irrigation (tape). Appl Water Sci 13, 37 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01847-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01847-5