Abstract
Plant diversification and co-evolution shaped the plant microbiome and vice versa. This resulted in a specific composition of the plant microbiome and a strong connection with the host in terms of functional interplay. Symbionts are part of the microbiota, and important for the plant’s germination and growth, nutrition, as well as stress protection. However, human activities in the Anthropocene are linked to a significant shift of diversity, evenness and specificity of the plant microbiota. In addition, and very importantly, many plant symbionts are missing or no longer functional. It will require targeted microbiome management to support and reintroduce them. In future agriculture, we should aim at replacing harmful chemicals in the field, as well as post-harvest, by using precision microbiome engineering. This is because the plant microbiome is connected across systems and crucial for human and planetary health. This commentary aims to inspire holistic studies for the development of solutions for sustainable agriculture in framework of the One Health and the Planetary Health concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Plants are holobionts and consist of the plant and its co-evolved microbiota
All plants are holobionts; they form a structural and functional unit with microorganisms (Vandenkoornhuyse et al. 2015). Plant-associated microorganisms comprise bacteria, archaea, fungi, algae and protists, the so-called plant microbiota (Berg et al. 2020). On surfaces and within plant tissues they are the plant microbiome, which can be differentiated into the phyllosphere (above ground), rhizosphere (below ground) and endosphere (inside tissues) microbiome. Plant microbiomes are diversified in each of these habitats and adapt to the specific conditions that require functional engagement (Cordovez et al. 2019). Moreover, they are specific for each plant species/genotype and each stage of development (Berg and Smalla 2009).This specificity is a result of plant-microbe coevolution (Delaux and Schornack 2021). Since plants colonized land, they have evolved a range of symbiotic associations with microorganisms that include protection mechanisms (Delaux and Schornack 2021). These symbiotic associations were likely required by plants to grow under harsh, nutrient-poor, and difficult conditions and involved symbiotic plant-microbe interactions resulting in survival and cooperation (Fig. 1).
Plant symbionts are part of the plant holobiont and live in relationships with plants. They have tremendous effects on plant growth, confer resistance to abiotic stresses and pathogens, aid in the accumulation of metabolites, and have crucial relationships with other plant-associated microorganisms (Yang et al. 2013). Although a long list of phylogenetically diverse plant symbionts has been reported, they mainly involve bacteria and fungi (Yang et al. 2013). The majority of plant-associated bacteria can be considered as beneficial; they help to acquire nutrients, rare elements and minerals, stimulate the native immune system of plants and are able to antagonize plant pathogens (Cordovez et al. 2019; Santoyo 2022). In plant microbiomes, bacterial communities show a greater degree of specificity than the entire fungal and archaeal communities (Berg and Smalla 2009; Cordovez et al. 2019). However, symbionts from all microbial lineages show a certain degree of specificity and can be vertically transmitted (Vandenkoornhuyse et al. 2015). Fungal symbionts have been classified into three types (Yang et al. 2013) (i) mycorrhizal fungi (mainly including arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi), (ii) endophytic fungi, and (iii) specific root endophytes, e.g. Piriformospora indica as well as various dark septate endophytes.
Less is known about archaea and protists and their beneficial traits, and interactions. Based on metagenomic mining and targeted amplicon sequencing, archaea have been identified in several plant microbiomes, especially under harsh conditions, e.g. bog ecosystems and saline soils, as well as some trees (Jung et al. 2020). They also occur at comparatively low abundances in crop plants (Taffner et al. 2020). Beneficial properties, related to phytohormone production, have been identified within such archaeal communities (Taffner et al. 2018). Interestingly, under extreme conditions like in the highly polluted, highly saline dried out basin of the Aral Sea, archaea can be the dominant structural and functional component of the plant microbiota (Wicaksono et al. 2022). Despite their different phylogenetic origin, all symbiotic associations share a number of highly conserved features, including specific plant symbiotic signalling pathways, root colonization strategies that circumvent plant immune responses, functional host-microbe interface formation, and the central role of phytohormones in symbiosis-associated root developmental pathways (Harman 2011; Yang et al. 2013). Moreover, they fulfill functions including nutrition that usually depends on fair trade between both partners – the plant and its microbes. Thus plant-associated microbes often provide protection against biotic and abiotic stress (Cordovez et al. 2019) and resilience traits achieved by an intense metabolic interplay and exchange of (secondary) metabolites. This interplay was disentangled by Carrión et al. (2019) who showed that endophytic symbionts protected plant roots against pathogens. The resistome is a term that describes all antimicrobial resistances (AMR) within a microbiome that are encoded in antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in the genome of microorganisms or on mobile genetic elements (Berg et al. 2020). In addition to AMR, the resistome mediates resilience by providing the required plasticity for the plant holobiont (Obermeier et al. 2021). Finally, native plant microbiomes often harbor a high diversity of ARGs (Berg and Cernava 2022). The functions of plant-derived resistomes remain poorly understood, and targeted approaches will be needed in the future to decipher their importance and ubiquity.
2 The anthropogenic impact changed the plant microbiome: more plant pathogens and less symbionts?
Anthropogenic activities have shaped our planet in such a drastic way that they have resulted in the definition of a human-dominated geological epoch, the Anthropocene (Lewis and Maslin 2015). Intense agriculture in interplay with continuous human population growth is one of the major drivers of the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene is also reflected in the planetary boundary concept. Five of the nine boundaries have already been crossed: extinction rate, deforestation, climate change, the flux of nitrogen and phosphorus, and the introduction of novel entities (Persson et al. 2022; Steffen et al. 2015). These are all factors that influence the plant microbiota either on local scale (e.g. over-fertilization) or global scale (e.g. climate change) and are connected with changes in the environmental microbiota (Cavicchioli et al. 2019). Despite this, the impact of these anthropogenic factors on the various host-associated and inter-linked microbiomes and the consequences for our planet are not well understood (Flandroy et al. 2018). Changes on a global scale are expected to have a substantial impact on the functioning of ecosystems, which could affect the health of their inhabitants. Therefore, it will be of utmost importance to take countermeasures to maintain various microbiomes in their native state.
Berg and Cernava (2022) suggest that human activities have already substantially affected the plant microbiome (see Fig. 2). This impact is reflected by a shift of diversity and evenness of the plant microbiota, which characterized by a decrease of host specificity, and an increase of r-strategic microbes (copiotrophic, fast growing microbes according to the r/K selection theory), pathogens, and hypermutators (strains with substantially increased mutation rates) (Berg and Cernava 2022). The resistome, anchored in the microbiome, follows this shift by an increase of specific AMR mechanisms as well as an increase of plasmid-associated resistance genes. This typical microbiome signature of the Anthropocene is often associated with dysbiosis and loss of resilience. It leads to frequent pathogen outbreaks.
Climate change, nitrogen, and phosphorus (over)fertilization, chemical pollution, biodiversity loss, as well as stratospheric ozone depletion have influenced the environmental microbiome in different ways, but they follow the same direction as described above (Berg and Cernava 2022: see Fig. 2). Although understanding, and predicting, the impacts of anthropogenically-driven climate change on plant–associated microbiota is important (Hacquard et al. 2022), the combined, and synergistic effects have also to be considered (Rillig et al. 2019).
Microbiota shifts have been found in studies that address the consequences of climate change. Fast selection processes were described in situations where the taxonomy of selected species showed variations, but there was also a clear tendency towards enrichment of pathogens and spore-forming organisms (Ning et al. 2020), especially when various parameters were combined (Guerra et al. 2021; Roux et al. 2021). Baldrian et al. (2022) performed a meta-study on the effect of global change including the increase of CO2 concentration, temperature, change of precipitation, and nitrogen (N) deposition on fungal species and communities in terrestrial ecosystems. They found that the plant-mutualistic fungal guilds – ectomycorrhizal fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi – appear to be especially responsive to global change factors with N deposition and warming having the strongest adverse effects (Baldrian et al. 2022). They also reported an increase in the abundance and dispersal of plant pathogenic fungi. Thus, it can be concluded that the entire ecosystem was weakened by global change-induced phenomena, such as drought, and consequently was more vulnerable to pathogen outbreaks.
Emerging and potential pathogens have been reported in recent years. Delgado-Baquerizo et al. (2020) predicted the occurrence of new pathogens into agricultural production areas, especially fungal plant pathogens. Experimental evidence for the impact of global warming on pathogens was provided using Prunus padua. This study showed a significantly increased abundance of pathogenic fungi and infections (Liu and He 2021). An increase of spore-forming bacteria and pathogens was also observed after increased UV-B radiation in the peanut phyllosphere; predominant UV-tolerant bacteria were identified as Bacillus coagulans, Clavibacter michiganensis, and Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens (Jacobs and Sundin 2001). The increase of pathogens also involves a migration polewards and expansion of the areas affected (Bebber et al. 2013). This phenomenon will have to be given additional attention in the future to ensure the nutrition of a growing world population under increasingly adverse conditions.
In contrast, a decrease of symbionts has been reported involving decreasing diversity, abundance and functioning. For example, Carrell et al. (2019) noted a microbiome shift in Sphagnum connected with a decreased diversity of bacteria and diazotrophs as well as a reduced nitrogen fixation rate. Long-term warming also induced microbiome shifts and affected nifH gene abundance for another common moss species Racomitrium lanuginosum in the sub-Arctic tundra (Klarenberg et al. 2022). The excessive use of nitrogen-containing fertilizers is particularly damaging, because a substantial amount of the nitrogen, that is not taken up by plants, is transformed into nitrate which is easily leached. Moreover, N as well as P fertilizer usage results in the loss of important functions provided by the mycorrhiza and plant-associated bacteria. In forests, nitrogen fertilization has a strong effect on soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities (Berthrong et al. 2014). For example, in pine forests, N fertilization has a strong effect on the nifH-associated bacterial community structure and suppressed the diversity and abundance of N-fixing bacteria.
Babalola et al. (2022) showed that nitrogen fertilisation disrupts the temporal dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae but not spore density and community composition in a wheat fields. On the other hand, one-time inorganic phosphate amendments caused shifts in soil bacterial and fungal communities and reduced mycorrhization rate in ryegrass (Ikoyi et al. 2018). Long-term nitrogen fertilization was shown to affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities while long-term phosphorous fertilization limited phosphorous provision to plants (Williams et al. 2017). Thus, both, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization consistently favour pathogenic over mutualistic fungi in grassland soils (Lekberg et al. 2021).
Chemical pesticide treatments were also shown to affect plant symbioses. For example, neonicotinoid seed treatments induced shifts in the phyllosphere and soil microbial communities in soybean-corn agroecosystems. The microbiota shifts were reflected by a decline in the relative abundance of some potentially beneficial soil bacteria (bacteria involved in the N cycle) in response to pesticide applications (Parizadeh et al. 2021). The engineered nanomaterials SiO2, TiO2, and Fe3O4 induced a reduction of N-fixing bacteria and iron-redox bacteria in the maize rhizosphere along microbiome shifts; however, the occurrence of plant growth promoting bacteria was enhanced (Zhang et al. 2020). These disruptions must be more considered in the future when fertilization and plant protection strategies are developed.
The seed microbiome is of special importance because it mainly consists of a core of plant beneficial bacteria (Bergna et al. 2018) and can be vertically transmitted symbionts (Gundel et al. 2017). The composition of the seed microbiota reflects the anthropogenic impact as well. Especially breeding activities were previously shown to have changed the composition and abundance of native microbial communities (Kim et al. 2020; Matsumoto et al. 2021; Rybakova et al. 2017). Moreover, chemical seed treatments were found to reduce bacterial diversity even before the onset of germination (Chen et al. 2020). Counteracting such changes could facilitate sustainability in agriculture.
3 Symbionts—the key for sustainable agriculture?
The plant microbiome, is already affected by the Anthropocene, and has led to missing symbionts in modern crop varieties that require targeted microbiome management strategies. There is a need for the development and application of microbiome-based products. The latter would help to replace harmful agrochemicals in the future for a more sustainable agriculture. This is not only a vision, it’s a strategic aim of the European Green Deal, and anchored in the WHO Global Strategy for maintenance of antimicrobial resistance and the UNO Sustainable Development Goals.
In general, microbiomes can be managed directly by applying (i) microbiome transplants, (ii) microbes with beneficial properties, or (iii) microbiota-active metabolites, or indirectly by changing environmental conditions in a way that microbiomes also shift their structure and function from dysbiosis into a healthy state (Berg et al. 2020). Studying native symbioses is a key to understand a healthy plant microbiome and its functioning, but can also help to isolate microorganisms with unique traits, design microbial transplants or microbiota-derived metabolites for use in sustainable agriculture (Fig. 2).
Native plants are a reservoir for plant-beneficial bacteria. This was demonstrated for Sphagnum, identified as rich source for plant-beneficial microbes, as well as many other microorganisms, and a new model for climate change studies on plant holobionts (Carrell et al. 2019; Hingley 1993, 1999). This plant has an extraordinarily high proportion of plant-beneficial microbes (Opelt et al. 2007a), that are species-specific, independent of the site (Opelt et al. 2007b). Vertical transmission of a beneficial core microbiota described by (Bragina et al. 2012), provides plant-beneficial properties within the moss metagenome (Bragina et al. 2014). The observation that mosses are an important reservoir for plant-beneficial microorganisms was applied by (Shcherbakov et al. 2013) to isolate plant growth promoting bacteria, which are now commercialized for sustainable agriculture. The distinct trait of the moss-associated microbiota to withstand abiotic stress has been exploited by Zachow et al. (2013) to isolate and design stress-protecting agents, which are commercialized. Sphagnum is only one example but there are exploitable symbiont reservoirs within the large group Bryophyta, which comprises liverworts, mosses and hornworts. Mosses were early land colonizers on Earth. Most of them depend on specific symbionts such as mycorrhiza and/or nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria (Delaux and Schornack 2021), their potential as a source for plant-beneficial microorganisms is mostly untapped.
Composts serve as traditional microbial transplants that are still of great importance, especially in organic agriculture. Composts can substantially vary in their composition of microorganisms and other materials. However, for the enrichment of soil biodiversity, this is an advantage. Vermicompost is a specific type of compost produced by earthworms. Its high microbial diversity makes it suitable for a very broad range of crop species and cultivars, which can be selected to benefit best from this compost (Wolfgang et al. 2020). Suppressive soils also showed promising results from compost applications and researchers generally differentiate between natural and acquired suppressiveness. The former, can be found in diverse native ecosystems while the latter can spontaneously establish after several years of monoculture. Establishment of such soils mostly relies on microbial diversity and antagonism that the taxonomically different microbes mediate.
Plant microbiota assembly can result from vertical and/or horizontal transmission (Abdelfattah et al. 2021). As a result of a survey with native Alpine seeds, we know that a highly diverse core of the microbiome of these plants is vertically transmitted and actively colonizes newly emerging seedlings upon germination (unpublished results). This reinforces the observation that the seed is an important carrier for beneficial symbionts in sustainable agriculture (Berg and Raaijmakers 2018). Interestingly, vertical transmission of microbial symbionts seems to be a frequent phenomenon (Bright and Bulgheresi 2010).
What are currently the biggest hurdles for microbiome management and microbiome-based products? Humankind requires further intensification of agriculture. Microorganisms provide the means to achieve this in a sustainable way (Basu et al. 2021). However, only a small proportion of the plant-associated microbial biodiversity can be cultured despite progress in analyzing the plant microbiome based on meta-omics technologies. There are interesting examples where keystone species were discovered by high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatic tools, and subsequently verified by isolating and applying the identified candidate (Matsumoto et al. 2021). They led to the first discoveries of disease-preventing microorganisms, so-called “soterobionts” (Cernava and Berg, 2022). However, cultivation-based approaches have to be further expanded and better integrated, because there are many ways in which microorganisms can positively influence plants (Vessey 2003). Only a small proportion of the plant-associated microbial biodiversity is currently exploited. Missing fermentation and formulation methods, especially for Gram-negative bacteria, are reasons for this bottleneck. Spore-forming bacteria like Bacillus thuringiensis and B. amyloliquefaciens and their relatives currently prevail in the commercially available products. While there are new formulation methods on the market (Berg and Müller 2018), strain-specific production methods have to be developed. Developments are still hampered due to inconsistent results and effects under field conditions. Modelling and machine learning can offer new solutions (Corander et al. 2022). For example, the optimization of synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) (Vorholt et al. 2017) from Arabidopsis has been selected by a computational approach and successfully employed against the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae (Vogel et al. 2021).
4 The plant microbiome is embedded in one health and planetary health issues
The role of the microbiome for plant health is widely accepted, but the importance of inter-linked microbiomes, especially those associated with plants, for health issues of other organisms is less of a research focus. The connection of human, animal and plant microbiomes is evident in the “One Health” concept of the World Health Organization (WHO), In addition the “Planetary Health” concept includes environmental health and its relationship to human cultures and habits (Flandroy et al. 2018). The signatures of the plant microbiome in the Anthropocene in relation to the inter-connected microbiome may result in intensified shifts, and result in a global microbiome imbalance. The absence of important symbionts in crop plants is recognized, missing microbes in native plants or wildlife are currently less considered. Peixoto et al. (2022) argued for microbiome stewardship for these organisms because they harbor great potential for restoration of endangered ecosystems.
5 Conclusion
The shift from symbionts to pathogens is one of the most visible signatures of the plant microbiome in the Anthropocene. The main drivers of this shift that act synergistically, have to be evaluated, changed and/or stopped. The plant microbiome is responsible for plant health, but due to the microbiome interconnectivity is also involved in “One Health” and “Planetary Health” concepts. These observations support the need for action in terms of targeted microbiome management strategies improving abundance and functioning of symbionts (Fig. 3). We have to close scientific knowledge gaps, and improve our understanding of (i) the filtering between interconnected microbiomes, (ii) interactions, communication and cooperation within the entire microbiome including viruses, and (iii) the microbial networks involving symbionts. Finally, we have to improve public perception of the importance intervention strategies. An example of one way to do this is the MOOC (massive open access online course) “Microbiome & Health” that provides basic and applied knowledge about the microbiome (https://imoox.at/course/microbiome) to a very large audience.
References
Abdelfattah A, Wisniewski M, Schena L, Tack AJM (2021) Experimental evidence of microbial inheritance in plants and transmission routes from seed to phyllosphere and root. Environ Microbiol n/a 1462–2920. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15392
Babalola BJ, Li J, Willing CE, Zheng Y, Wang Y, Gan H-Y, Li X-C, Wang C, Adams CA, Gao C, Guo L-D (2022) Nitrogen fertilisation disrupts the temporal dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae but not spore density and community composition in a wheat field. New Phytol 234:2057–2072. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18043
Baldrian P, Bell-Dereske L, Lepinay C, Větrovský T, Kohout P (2022) Fungal communities in soils under global change. Stud Mycol. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2022.103.01
Bebber DP, Ramotowski MAT, Gurr SJ (2013) Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat Clim Chang 3:985–988. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1990
Berg G, Cernava T (2022) The plant microbiota signature of the Anthropocene as a challenge for microbiome research. Microbiome 10:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01224-5
Berg G, Müller H (2018) BFC technology to formulate microbes/consortia. PCT/EP2018/075760
Berg G, Raaijmakers JM (2018) Saving seed microbiomes. ISME J 12:1167–1170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-017-0028-2
Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès M-CC, Charles T, Chen X, Cocolin L, Eversole K, Corral GH, Kazou M, Kinkel L, Lange L, Lima N, Loy A, Macklin JA, Maguin E, Mauchline T, McClure R, Mitter B, Ryan M, Sarand I, Smidt H, Schelkle B, Roume H, Kiran GS, Selvin J, de Souza RSC, van Overbeek L, Singh BK, Wagner M, Walsh A, Sessitsch A, Schloter M (2020) Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 8:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0
Berg G, Smalla K (2009) Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x
Bergna A, Cernava T, Rändler M, Grosch R, Zachow C, Berg G (2018) Tomato seeds preferably transmit Plant Beneficial Endophytes. Phytobiomes J 2:183–193. https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-06-18-0029-R
Berthrong ST, Yeager CM, Gallegos-Graves L, Steven B, Eichorst SA, Jackson RB, Kuske CR (2014) Nitrogen Fertilization has a stronger effect on Soil Nitrogen-Fixing bacterial Communities than elevated Atmospheric CO 2. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3103–3112. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04034-13
Basu A, Prasad P, Das SN, Kalam S, Sayyed RZ, Reddy MS, and Hesham El Enshasy (2021) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability 13:1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031140
Bragina A, Berg C, Cardinale M, Shcherbakov A, Chebotar V, Berg G (2012) Sphagnum mosses harbour highly specific bacterial diversity during their whole lifecycle. ISME J 6:802–813. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.151
Bragina A, Oberauner-Wappis L, Zachow C, Halwachs B, Thallinger GG, Müller H, Berg G (2014) The Sphagnum microbiome supports bog ecosystem functioning under extreme conditions. Mol Ecol 23:4498–4510. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12885
Bright M, Bulgheresi S (2010) A complex journey: transmission of microbial symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:218–230. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2262
Carrell AA, Kolton M, Glass JB, Pelletier DA, Warren MJ, Kostka JE, Iversen CM, Hanson PJ, Weston DJ (2019) Experimental warming alters the community composition, diversity, and N2 fixation activity of peat moss (Sphagnum fallax) microbiomes. Glob Chang Biol 25:2993–3004. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14715
Carrión VJ, Perez-Jaramillo J, Cordovez V, Tracanna V, de Hollander M, Ruiz-Buck D, Mendes LW, van Ijcken WFJ, Gomez-Exposito R, Elsayed SS, Mohanraju P, Arifah A, van der Oost J, Paulson JN, Mendes R, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Raaijmakers JM (2019) Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Sci (80-) 366606–612. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw9285
Cavicchioli R, Ripple WJ, Timmis KN, Azam F, Bakken LR, Baylis M, Behrenfeld MJ, Boetius A, Boyd PW, Classen AT, Crowther TW, Danovaro R, Foreman CM, Huisman J, Hutchins DA, Jansson JK, Karl DM, Koskella B, Welch M, Martiny DB, Moran JBH, Orphan MA, Reay VJ, Remais DS, Rich JV, Singh VI, Stein BK, Stewart LY, Sullivan FJ, van Oppen MB, Weaver MJH, Webb SC, Webster EA, N.S (2019) Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:569–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5
Cernava T, Berg G (2022) The emergence of disease-preventing bacteria within the plant microbiota. Environ Microbiol 24:3259–3263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15896
Chen X, Krug L, Yang M, Berg G, Cernava T (2020) Conventional seed coating reduces prevalence of proteobacterial endophytes in Nicotiana tabacum. Ind Crops Prod 155:112784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112784
Corander J, Hanage WP, Pensar J (2022) Causal discovery for the microbiome. Lancet Microbe 3(11):e881–e887. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00186-0
Cordovez V, Dini-Andreote F, Carrión VJ, Raaijmakers JM (2019) Ecology and Evolution of Plant Microbiomes. Annu Rev Microbiol 73:69–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062524
Delaux P-M, Schornack S (2021) Plant evolution driven by interactions with symbiotic and pathogenic microbes. Science (80-.). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6605. 371, eaba6605
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Guerra CA, Cano-Díaz C, Egidi E, Wang J-T, Eisenhauer N, Singh BK, Maestre FT (2020) The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale. Nat Clim Chang 10:550–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0759-3
Flandroy L, Poutahidis T, Berg G, Clarke G, Dao M-C, Decaestecker E, Furman E, Haahtela T, Massart S, Plovier H, Sanz Y, Rook G (2018) The impact of human activities and lifestyles on the interlinked microbiota and health of humans and of ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 627:1018–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.288
Guerra CA, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Duarte E, Marigliano O, Görgen C, Maestre FT, Eisenhauer N (2021) Global projections of the soil microbiome in the Anthropocene. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 30:987–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13273
Gundel PE, Rudgers JA, Whitney KD (2017) Vertically transmitted symbionts as mechanisms of transgenerational effects. Am J Bot 104:787–792. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1700036
Hacquard S, Wang E, Slater H, Martin F (2022) Impact of global change on the plant microbiome. New Phytol 234:1907–1909. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18187
Harman GE (2011) Trichoderma—not just for biocontrol anymore. Phytoparasitica 39:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-011-0151-y
Hingley (1993). Microscopic Life in Sphagnum. Richmond Publishing, Slough U.K.
Hingley M (1999) Microscopic life in Sphagnum, with an exploration of some associated epiphytes and endophytes. Quekett J Microsc 38:275–284
Ikoyi I, Fowler A, Schmalenberger A (2018) One-time phosphate fertilizer application to grassland columns modifies the soil microbiota and limits its role in ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 630:849–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.263
Jacobs LJ, Sundin GW (2001) Analysis of the Effect of Ultraviolet-B Radiation on the Culturable Bacterial Community of Peanut. In: De Boer SH (ed) Plant pathogenic Bacteria. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0003-1_85
Jung J, Kim J-S, Taffner J, Berg G, Ryu C-M (2020) Archaea, tiny helpers of land plants. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 18:2494–2500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2020.09.005
Kim H, Lee KK, Jeon J, Harris WA, Lee Y-H (2020) Domestication of Oryza species eco-evolutionarily shapes bacterial and fungal communities in rice seed. Microbiome 8:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00805-0
Klarenberg IJ, Keuschnig C, Russi Colmenares AJ, Warshan D, Jungblut AD, Jónsdóttir IS, Vilhelmsson O (2022) Long-term warming effects on the microbiome and nifH gene abundance of a common moss species in sub‐Arctic tundra. New Phytol 234:2044–2056. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17837
Lekberg Y, Arnillas CA, Borer ET, Bullington LS, Fierer N, Kennedy PG, Leff JW, Luis AD, Seabloom EW, Henning JA (2021) Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization consistently favor pathogenic over mutualistic fungi in grassland soils. Nat Commun 12:3484. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23605-y
Lewis SL, Maslin MA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene Nature 519:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258
Liu Y, He F (2021) Warming intensifies soil pathogen negative feedback on a temperate tree. New Phytol 231:2297–2307. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17409
Matsumoto H, Fan X, Wang, Yue, Kusstatscher P, Duan J, Wu S, Chen S, Qiao K, Wang, Yiling, Ma B, Zhu G, Hashidoko Y, Berg G, Cernava T, Wang M (2021) Bacterial seed endophyte shapes disease resistance in rice. Nat Plants 7:60–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00826-5
Ning D, Yuan M, Wu L, Zhang Y, Guo X, Zhou X, Yang Y, Arkin AP, Firestone MK, Zhou J (2020) A quantitative framework reveals ecological drivers of grassland microbial community assembly in response to warming. Nat Commun 11:4717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18560-z
Obermeier MM, Wicaksono WA, Taffner J, Bergna A, Poehlein A, Cernava T, Lindstaedt S, Lovric M, Müller Bogotá CA, Berg G (2021) Plant resistome profiling in evolutionary old bog vegetation provides new clues to understand emergence of multi-resistance. ISME J 15:921–937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00822-9
Opelt K, Berg C, Berg G (2007a) The bryophyte genus Sphagnum is a reservoir for powerful and extraordinary antagonists and potentially facultative human pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:38–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00323.x
Opelt K, Berg C, Schönmann S, Eberl L, Berg G (2007b) High specificity but contrasting biodiversity of Sphagnum-associated bacterial and plant communities in bog ecosystems independent of the geographical region. ISME J 1:502–516
Parizadeh M, Mimee B, Kembel SW (2021) Neonicotinoid seed treatments have significant Non-target Effects on Phyllosphere and Soil Bacterial Communities. Front Microbiol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.619827
Peixoto RS, Voolstra CR, Sweet M, Duarte CM, Carvalho S, Villela H, Lunshof JE, Gram L, Woodhams DC, Walter J, Roik A, Hentschel U, Thurber RV, Daisley B, Ushijima B, Daffonchio D, Costa R, Keller-Costa T, Bowman JS, Rosado AS, Reid G, Mason CE, Walke JB, Thomas T, Berg G (2022) Harnessing the microbiome to prevent global biodiversity loss. Nat Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01173-1
Persson L, Carney Almroth BM, Collins CD, Cornell S, de Wit CA, Diamond ML, Fantke P, Hassellöv M, MacLeod M, Ryberg MW, Søgaard Jørgensen P, Villarrubia-Gómez P, Wang Z, Hauschild MZ (2022) Outside the safe operating space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel entities. Environ Sci Technol 56:1510–1521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04158
Rillig MC, Ryo M, Lehmann A, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Buchert S, Wulf A, Iwasaki A, Roy J, Yang G (2019) The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Sci (80-) 366:886–890. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay2832
Roux S, Paul BG, Bagby SC, Nayfach S, Allen MA, Attwood G, Cavicchioli R, Chistoserdova L, Gruninger RJ, Hallam SJ, Hernandez ME, Hess M, Liu W-T, McAllister TA, O’Malley MA, Peng X, Rich VI, Saleska SR, Eloe-Fadrosh EA (2021) Ecology and molecular targets of hypermutation in the global microbiome. Nat Commun 12:3076. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23402-7
Rybakova D, Mancinelli R, Wikström M, Birch-Jensen A-S, Postma J, Ehlers R-U, Goertz S, Berg G (2017) The structure of the Brassica napus seed microbiome is cultivar-dependent and affects the interactions of symbionts and pathogens. Microbiome 5:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0310-6
Santoyo G (2022) How plants recruit their microbiome? New insights into beneficial interactions. J Adv Res 40:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2021.11.020
Shcherbakov AV, Bragina AV, Kuzmina EY, Berg C, Muntyan AN, Makarova NM, Malfanova NV, Cardinale M, Berg G, Chebotar VK, Tikhonovich IA (2013) Endophytic bacteria of Sphagnum mosses as promising objects of agricultural microbiology. Microbiology 82:306–315. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261713030107
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 3471259855 (80-.). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Taffner J, Bergna A, Cernava T, Berg G (2020) Tomato-Associated Archaea Show a Cultivar-Specific Rhizosphere Effect but an unspecific transmission by seeds. Phytobiomes J 4:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-01-20-0017-R
Taffner J, Erlacher A, Bragina A, Berg C, Moissl-Eichinger C, Berg G (2018) What Is the Role of Archaea in Plants? New Insights from the Vegetation of Alpine Bogs. mSphere 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00122-18
Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A (2015) The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol 206:1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13312
Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil 255:571–586. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026037216893
Vogel CM, Potthoff DB, Schäfer M, Barandun N, Vorholt JA (2021) Protective role of the Arabidopsis leaf microbiota against a bacterial pathogen. Nat Microbiol 6:1537–1548. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00997-7
Vorholt JA, Vogel C, Carlström CI, Müller DB (2017) Establishing causality: Opportunities of Synthetic Communities for Plant Microbiome Research. Cell Host Microbe 22:142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.004
Wicaksono WA, Egamberdieva D, Berg C, Mora M, Kusstatscher P, Cernava T, Berg G (2022) Function-Based Rhizosphere Assembly along a Gradient of Desiccation in the Former Aral Sea. mSystems 0, e00739-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00739-22
Williams A, Manoharan L, Rosenstock NP, Olsson PA, Hedlund K (2017) Long-term agricultural fertilization alters arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community composition and barley (H ordeum vulgare) mycorrhizal carbon and phosphorus exchange. New Phytol 213:874–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14196
Wolfgang A, Zachow C, Müller H, Grand A, Temme N, Tilcher R, Berg G (2020) Understanding the impact of Cultivar, seed origin, and substrate on bacterial diversity of the Sugar Beet Rhizosphere and suppression of soil-borne pathogens. Front Plant Sci 11:1450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.560869
Yang T, Chen Y, Wang X-X, Dai C-C (2013) Plant symbionts: keys to the phytosphere. Symbiosis 59:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-012-0190-2
Zachow C, Müller H, Tilcher R, Donat C, Berg G (2013) Catch the best: Novel Screening Strategy to select stress protecting agents for crop plants. Agronomy 3:794–815. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3040794
Zhang W, Jia X, Chen S, Wang J, Ji R, Zhao L (2020) Response of soil microbial communities to engineered nanomaterials in presence of maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Environ Pollut 267:115608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115608
Acknowledgements
This commentary contains results obtained from different funded projects, which the authors would like to acknowledge here. Funding for research activities was received by the European Union’s Horizon2020 projects EXCALIBUR 81794 (GB) and MSCA-IF-2018-Individual Fellowships 844114 (AA). The developed work presented here was co-funded by the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research, Austria, as part of the 2019 call for proposals for digital and social transformation in higher education for the project “iMooX - die MOOC-Plattform als Service für alle österreichischen Hochschulen” (2021–2023, partner organisations: University of Vienna, Graz University of Technology).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Graz University of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Submitted to Symbiosis:
Proposed contribution to the Proceedings special issue for the 10th Int ISS congress
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Berg, G., Schweitzer, M., Abdelfattah, A. et al. Missing symbionts – emerging pathogens? Microbiome management for sustainable agriculture. Symbiosis 89, 163–171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-023-00903-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-023-00903-1