Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stochastic hybrid energy system modelling with component failure and repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid energy framework is the designing plan of hybridizing power supply part or blending them, for instance, organizing different energy assets to work in parallel (equivalent) is exceptionally normal in force. In this way, hybridizing is characterized as the shaping crossbreed of sets of specialists for cooperating to accomplish a reason. Hybrid energy framework is a foundation plan that incorporates different or various energy converts to energy storage, energy conditions, energy management framework. In this paper an independent PV/wind hybrid energy framework is thought of and its reliability quality attributes are talked about by utilizing Markov method. The assumed hybrid energy framework has three type of states i.e., operating, degraded and failed. The framework is assumed to be repaired from degraded and failed states. Various reliability indices such as reliability, availability, mean time to failure (MTTF), expected cost and sensitivity are evaluated. Graphical representation of the reliability characteristics is also illustrated for the considered system. The area of investigation inside the field of sustainable power is worldwide and the aftereffects of this investigation are plentifully useful for the architects, planners, analysts and understudies of different fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angarita JL, Usaola J, Martínez-Crespo J (2009) Combined hydro-wind generation bids in a pool-based electricity market. Electr Power Sys Res 79(7):1038–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari B, Lee KT, Lee CS, Song CK, Maskey RK, Ahn SH (2014) A novel off-grid hybrid power system comprised of solar photovoltaic, wind, and hydro energy sources. Appl Energy 133:236–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho JH, Chun MG, Hong WP (2016) Structure optimization of stand-alone renewable power systems based on multi object function. Energies 9(8):649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., Frenkel, I., & Lisnianski, A. (Eds.) (2020). Stochastic Models in Reliability Engineering. CRC Press.

  • Dhillon, B. S. (2003). Human reliability and error in medical system (Vol. 2) World Scientific.

  • Dhillon BS (2008) Mining equipment reliability. Springer, London, pp 57–70

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon BS, Misra RB (1984) Reliability evaluation of systems with critical human error. Microelectron Reliab 24(4):743–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohi T, Zheng J, Okamura H (2021) A note on the time to failure of a two-unit parallel redundant system with deterioration on a lattice. Int J Math Eng Manag Sci 6(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang G, Pan R, Hong Y (2020) Copula-based reliability analysis of degrading systems with dependent failures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 193:106618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahm C, Denz F, Dirr M, Tuma A (2016) Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: a review and research framework. Eur J Oper Res 248(3):744–757

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal N, Ram M (2017) Stochastic modelling of a wind electric generating power plant. Int J Quality & Reliab Manag 34(1):103–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal N, Ram M, Kaushik A (2017) Performability of solar thermal power plant under reliability characteristics. Inter J Sys Assura Eng Manag 8(2):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PP, Tyagi L (1986) MTTF and availability evaluation of a two-unit, two-state, standby redundant complex system with constant human failure. Microelectron Reliab 26(4):647–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi SMR, Goto H, Guo HJ, Ichinokura O (2010) Review and critical analysis of the research papers published till date on maximum power point tracking in wind energy conversion system. In: 2010 IEEE energy conversion congress and exposition, pp 4075–4082. IEEE

  • Kumar P, Jain M (2020) Reliability analysis of a multi-component machining system with service interruption, imperfect coverage, and reboot. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 202:106991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Varshney A, Ram M (2015) Sensitivity analysis for casting process under stochastic modelling. Int J Ind Eng Comput 6(3):419–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar KS, Majhi S, Kothari DP (2012) Load frequency control of a realistic power system with multi-source power generation. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 42(1):426–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian HM, Huang T, Huang HZ (2021) A single-loop strategy for time-variant system reliability analysis under multiple failure modes. Mech Syst Signal Process 148:107159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram M, Kumar A (2013) Reliability measures improvement and sensitivity analysis of a coal handling unit for thermal power plant. Int J Eng 26(9):1059–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Saketi SK, Chaturvedi P, Yadeo D, Atkar D (2020) Loss study and reliability analysis of a new reconfigurable fault-tolerant multilevel inverter topology. IET Power Electron 13(18):4291–4303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari N, Singh SB, Ram M (2010) Reliability analysis of a complex system, attended by two repairmen with vacation under marked process with the application of copula. Int J Reliab Appl 11(2):107–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nupur Goyal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The mathematical model of hybrid renewable energy system can be formulated with the help of Markov process that possess the set of differential equations by the probability of the considerations and continuity arguments. The probability that the system is in states good, degraded and failed at time t, and remains there in the interval \((t,\;t\; + \Delta t)\) or/and if it is in some other state at time then it should be transit to these states in the interval \((t,\;t\; + \Delta t)\) provided that the transition occurs between the states as \(\Delta t \to 0.\) Accordingly, the Eqs. (1) to (4) are construed as given below.

The probability of the system to be in good state with probability \(P_{0}\) in the interval \(\left( {t,t + {\Delta }t} \right)\) is given by

$$\begin{gathered} P_{0} \left( {t + \Delta t} \right) = \left( {1 - 3\lambda_{1} \Delta t} \right)\left( {1 - \lambda_{2} \Delta t} \right)\left( {1 - \lambda_{3} \Delta t} \right)P_{0} \left( t \right) + \mu \Delta tP_{1} \left( t \right) + \mu \Delta tP_{2} \left( t \right) \hfill \\ + \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)P_{3} \left( {x,t} \right)\Delta tdx + \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)P_{4} \left( {x,t} \right)\Delta tdx + \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)P_{5} \left( {x,t} \right)\Delta tdx \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
$$\left[ {1 - 3\lambda_{1} \Delta t - \lambda_{2} \Delta t - \lambda_{3} \Delta t} \right]P_{0} \left( t \right) + \mu \Delta t\left[ {P_{1} \left( t \right) + P_{2} \left( t \right)} \right] + \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)\Delta t\left[ {P_{3} + P_{4} + P_{5} } \right]dx$$
$$\begin{gathered} P_{0} \left( {t + \Delta t} \right) = P_{0} \left( t \right) - 3\lambda_{1} \Delta tP_{0} \left( t \right) - \lambda_{2} \Delta tP_{0} \left( t \right) - \lambda_{3} \Delta tP_{0} \left( t \right) + \mu \Delta t\left[ {P_{1} \left( t \right) + P_{2} \left( t \right)} \right] \hfill \\ \quad+ \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)\Delta t\left[ {P_{3} + P_{4} + P_{5} } \right]dx \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
$$\begin{gathered} \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\Delta t \to 0} \frac{{P\left( {t + \Delta t} \right) - P_{0} \left( t \right)}}{\Delta t} = - 3\lambda_{1} P_{0} \left( t \right) - \lambda_{2} P_{0} \left( t \right) - \lambda_{3} P_{0} \left( t \right) + \mu \left[ {P_{1} \left( t \right) + P_{2} \left( t \right)} \right] \hfill \\ \,\, + \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)\Delta t\left[ {P_{3} + P_{4} + P_{5} } \right]dx \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
$$\frac{d}{dt}[P_{0} \left( t \right) + 3\lambda_{1} P_{0} \left( t \right) + \lambda_{2} P_{0} \left( t \right) + \lambda_{3} P_{0} \left( t \right) = \mu \left[ {P_{1} \left( t \right) + P_{2} \left( t \right)} \right] + \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)\Delta t\left[ {P_{3} + P_{4} + P_{5} } \right]dx$$
$$\left[ {\frac{d}{dt} + 3\lambda_{1} + \lambda_{2} + \lambda_{3} } \right]P_{0} \left( t \right) = \mu \left[ {P_{1} \left( t \right) + P_{2} \left( t \right)} \right] + \mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{\infty } \emptyset \left( x \right)\Delta t\left[ {P_{3} + P_{4} + P_{5} } \right]dx$$
(34)

Similarly,

$$\left[ {\frac{d}{dt} + 2\lambda_{1} + \lambda_{2} + \lambda_{3} + \mu } \right]P_{1} \left( t \right) = 3\lambda_{1} \Delta tP_{0} \left( t \right)$$
(35)
$$\left[ {\frac{d}{dt} + \lambda_{1} + \lambda_{2} + \lambda_{3} + \mu } \right]P_{2} \left( t \right) = 2\lambda_{1} \Delta tP_{1} \left( t \right)$$
(36)

For failed states

$$\left[ {\frac{\partial }{\partial x} + \frac{\partial }{\partial t} + \emptyset \left( x \right)} \right]P_{3} \left( {x,t} \right) = 0$$
(37)
$$\left[ {\frac{\partial }{\partial x} + \frac{\partial }{\partial t} + \emptyset \left( x \right)} \right]P_{4} \left( {x,t} \right) = 0$$
(38)
$$\left[ {\frac{\partial }{\partial x} + \frac{\partial }{\partial t} + \emptyset \left( x \right)} \right]P_{5} \left( {x,t} \right) = 0$$
(39)

Boundary conditions

$$P_{3} \left( {0,t} \right) = \lambda_{1} P_{2} \left( t \right)$$
(40)
$$P_{4} \left( {0,t} \right) = \lambda_{2} \left[ {P_{0} \left( t \right) + P_{1} \left( t \right) + P_{2} \left( t \right)} \right]$$
(41)
$$P_{5} \left( {0,t} \right) = \lambda_{3} \left[ {P_{0} \left( t \right) + P_{1} \left( t \right) + P_{2} \left( t \right)} \right]$$
(42)

When the system is perfectly good i.e., in the initial state \(P_{0}\), then

$$P_{0} \left( 0 \right) = 1\;\,and \, other \, state \, probabilities \, are \, zero \, at\;t = 0$$
(43)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tyagi, S., Goyal, N., Kumar, A. et al. Stochastic hybrid energy system modelling with component failure and repair. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 13 (Suppl 2), 842–852 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01129-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01129-4

Keywords

Navigation