Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A proposed innovation model for public organizations: empirical results from federal government innovation experts in the United Arab Emirates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovation management and associated modeling have garnered significant research interest in recent decades. The considerable interest in the topic resulted in the development of several innovation models for private and public sector organizations. A comprehensive literature review conducted by the authors of this paper on various innovation management models in the private and public sectors revealed that the majority of models share common stages. The authors presented the results of this study at a relevant international conference in 2018 that is published by IEEE and indexed by Scopus. However, it was seen that when modeling for the public sector, sufficient focus has not been placed on commercialization and practical utilization. The objective of the present study is, therefore, to develop an innovation model that allows public organizations to maximize commercialization and practical utilization. In this regard, interviews with innovation experts from different federal government entities in multiple emirates within the United Arab Emirates were conducted in order to understand the current situation for the innovation management process in the UAE government. The data from interviews were collected, conceptualized, and organized for ease of management using a Thematic Analysis approach (Braun and Clarke in Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 11(4):589–597, 2019). The outputs were analyzed to identify common themes in the results. Based on the results of the literature review, its comparative and content analysis and the results from the interviews an innovation model for public organizations is developed. The proposed model, focuses on three main areas: the type of innovation model, the stages in the entire process, and the tools associated with each stage. The proposed model is useful in that it addresses the critical aspect of commercialization and operational sustainability of the ideas, which was absent in the majority of existing models. The proposed model could help government entities identify, generate and conceptualize ideas for improvements, thereby exploiting new services that are more effective and efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Author(s)

Fig. 2

Source: Author(s)

Fig. 3

Source: Author(s)

Fig. 4

Source: Author(s)

Fig. 5

Source: Author(s)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou Hana M (2017) Innovation in the UAE: from first foundations to ‘beyond oil’. Glob Policy 8(3):414–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albors-Garrigos J, Igartua J, Peiro A (2018) Innovation management techniques and tools: its impact on firm innovation performance. Int J Innov Manag 22(06):1850051. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelson M, Netz J, Sandström C (2017) Collective action problems in public sector innovation: a business model perspective. Creativ Innov Manag 26(4):370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bason C (2018) Leading public sector innovation: co-creating for a better society. Policy Press, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers V, Tummers L (2017) Perspectives on public sector reform: an innovation perspective. In: Van de Walle S, Groenveld SM (eds) Theory and practice of public sector reform. Routledge, London, pp 61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Borins SF (2014) The persistence of innovation in government, vol 8. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos-Nehles A, Bondarouk T, Nijenhuis K (2017) Innovative work behavior in knowledge-intensive public sector organizations: the case of supervisors in the Netherlands Fire Services. Int J Hum Resour Manag 28(2):379–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualit Res Sport Exerc Health 11(4):589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byat AB, Sultan O (2014) The United Arab Emirates: fostering a unique innovation ecosystem for a knowledge-based economy. In: Dutta S, Lanvin B, Wunsch-Vincent S (eds) The global innovation index 2014. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, pp 101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Lettl C, Ritter T (2018) Value creation and value capture in open innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 35(6):930–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F, Schneider M (2009) Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: assessing the role of managers. J Public Administr Res Theory 19(3):495–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Liso N, Vergori AS (2017) The Different approaches to the study of innovation in services in Europe and the USA. Metroeconomica 68(1):121–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (2015) Innovation and entrepreneurship, 1st edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Etisalat British Telecom’s Innovation Center (2019) Innovation Projects. https://www.ebtic.org/pages/innovation-projects. Accessed 19 June 2019

  • Eveleens C (2014) Innovation management; a literature review of innovation process models and their implications. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on innovative design and manufacturing (ICIDM). Montreal, Canada.: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

  • Fabiæ MG, Zekiæ Z, Samarzija L (2016) Implementation of management innovation—a precondition for the development of local government effectiveness: evidence from Croatia. Administratiesi Management Public, Bucharest, Romania 1(27):7–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Friberg T (2019) Exploring tensionless ethnography. Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138119859378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud R, Tuertscher P, Van de Ven AH (2013) Perspectives on innovation processes. Acad Manag Ann 7(1):775–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerguri-Rashiti S, Ramadani V, Abazi-Alili H, Dana L-P, Ratten V (2017) ICT innovation and firm performance: the transition economies context. Thunderbird Int Business Rev 59(1):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba E, Lincoln Y (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansén S-O, Wakonen J (1997) Innovation, a winning solution. Int J Technol Manage 13(1):345–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley J, Sorensen J, Torfing J (2013) Collaborative innovation: a viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administr Rev 73:821–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh W-L, Ganotakis P, Kafouros M, Wang C (2017) Foreign and domestic collaboration, product innovation novelty, and firm growth. J Prod Innov Manag 35(4):652–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson J, de Sousa Santos B (2018) Globalizing institutions: case studies in regulation and innovation. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR, Onwuegbuzie A (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33(7):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R Burke, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res 1(2):112–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly P (2017) Beyond the competitiveness framework? Models of innovation revisited. J Innov Econ 22(1):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi M (2017) Drivers to innovation by entrepreneurs. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juntunen JK, Halme M, Korsunova A, Rajala R (2018) Strategies for integrating stakeholders into sustainability innovation: a configurational perspective. J Prod Innov Manag 36(3):331–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laperche B, Mignon S (2018) Innovation drivers: a multi-scale approach. J Innov Econ 25(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leminen S, Westerlund M (2017) Categorization of innovation tools in living labs. Technology Innov Manag Rev 7(1):15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melander L (2019) Customer involvement in product development. Benchmarking 27(1):215–231

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Menna A, Walsh R, Ekhtari H (2019) Identifying enablers of innovation in developed economies: a National Innovation Systems approach. J Innov Manag 7(1):108–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Cabinet Affairs, Prime Minister’s Office, UAE. (2015) UAE National Innovation Strategy. http://www.uaeinnovates.gov.ae/docs/default-source/pdfs/national-innovation-strategy-en.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed 19 June 2019

  • Moretti F, Biancardi D (2020) Inbound open innovation and firm performance. J Innov Knowl 5(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan G (2014) Innovation in the public sector: how can public organizations better create, improve and adapt. Version 1. Nesta, London

  • Niek D, Preez D, Louw L (2008) A framework for managing the innovation process. In: Proceedings of the PICMET’08-2008 Portland international conference on management of engineering & technology, Cape Town, South Africa: IEEE, pp 546–558

  • Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qualit Methods 16(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne SP, Brown L (2011) Innovation, public policy and public service delivery in The UK. The word that would be king. Public Administr 89(4):1335–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: the social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad Manag Rev 42(1):53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajković-Borisavljević J, Veličković M (2019) Canvas business model. Serb J Eng Manag 4(1):53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steeve J, Greenspon J (2018) Innovation and commercialization—transition briefing, Ontario 360. https://on360.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ON360-Innovation-and-Commercialization.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2019

  • Stewart-Weeks M, Kastelle T (2015) Innovation in the public sector. Austral J Public Administr 74(1):63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J, Bessant JR (2013) Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change, 5th edn. Wiley, Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J, Bessant J (2018) Innovation management challenges: from fads to fundamentals. Int J Innov Manag 22(05):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618400078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J, Sørensen E, Hartley J (2013) Collaborative innovation: a viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administr Rev 73(6):821–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RM (2014) Innovation type and diffusion: an empirical analysis for local government. Public Administr Rev 84(2):311–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang A, Gao X (2016) Measuring the contribution degree of system and technological innovation to the economic growth. In: Proceedings of international conference on logistics, informatics and service sciences (LISS). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Zikmund WG, Babin BJ, Carr JC, Adhikari A, Griffin M (2013) Business research methods: a South-Asian perspective, 1st edn. South-Western, Mason

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Management and Engineering Management, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

    Tariq Al Hawi

  2. Telecommunications Regulatory Authority, Dubai, UAE

    Tariq Al Hawi

  3. University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

    Imad Alsyouf

Authors
  1. Tariq Al Hawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Imad Alsyouf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Al Hawi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Hawi, T., Alsyouf, I. A proposed innovation model for public organizations: empirical results from federal government innovation experts in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11, 1362–1379 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00994-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00994-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation