Skip to main content
Log in

Different electrolytic treatments for food sanitation and conservation simulating a wash process at the packinghouse

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microorganisms are predominantly responsible for food deterioration, necessitating the sanitization and removal of these entities from food surfaces. The packinghouse employs free chlorine in the sanitization process; however, free chlorine's propensity to react with organic matter, forming potentially toxic compounds, has led to its restriction or outright prohibition in several European countries. Therefore, this study aims to assess various washing methods, emulating packinghouse conditions, utilizing diverse forms of electrolyzed water to impede microbial proliferation and significantly enhance the food's shelf life. The subject of investigation was cherry tomatoes. The findings revealed that electrolyzed water containing NaCl exhibited superior efficacy compared to electrolysis with Na2SO4. Both forms of electrolyzed water demonstrated noteworthy effectiveness in inhibiting microorganisms, resulting in a reduction of 2.0 Log CFU mL−1 for bacteria and 1.5 Log CFU mL−1 for fungi. The electrolyzed water also exhibited a comparable capability to free chlorine in removing fecal coliforms from the tomato surfaces. Notably, both electrolyzed water treatments extended the shelf life of cherry tomatoes by at least three days, accompanied by minimal or negligible residues of free chlorine. Consequently, the electrolyzed water formulations proposed in this study present themselves as promising alternatives to traditional packinghouse sanitizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support from: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) – process 150092/2022-9. Carolina Rosai Mendes received a PhD scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Brazil.

Funding

C. R. Mendes received a Ph.D. scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)—Brazil. This work was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)—process 150092/2022–9.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CRM and GD: carried out the experiments, conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, writing original draft; RNM: conceptualization, methodology, resources; EDB: conceptualization, visualization, writing/review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme Dilarri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3234 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mendes, C.R., Dilarri, G., Montagnolli, R.N. et al. Different electrolytic treatments for food sanitation and conservation simulating a wash process at the packinghouse. J Food Sci Technol 61, 879–887 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-023-05882-1

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-023-05882-1

Keywords

Navigation