Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing operational parameters of finger millet threshing drum using RSM

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The operational parameters of threshing drum play a dominant role in the design and development of the finger millet thresher-cum-pearler. The finger millet threshing drum was developed and effects of operational parameters such as feed rate, drum speed and concave clearance on threshing efficiency, pearling efficiency and grain damage were individually studied using response surface method. A statistical tool of the central composite rotatable design was used for analysis. It was found that the maximum threshing efficiency, maximum pearling efficiency and minimum grain damage were 98%, 85% and 0.086%, respectively at the feed rate 36 kg/h, drum peripheral speed 7.12 m/s and concave clearance 5 mm. The performance evaluation of the drum was validated by setting above condition in the threshing drum. It was found that the maximum threshing efficiency 99% against predicted 98%, maximum pearling efficiency 86% against predicted 85% and 0.1% grain damage was found against predicted 0.086%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aware VV (2012) Ergonomic intervention developing pedal operated arecanut dehuskar. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Maharana Pratap University of Agricultural and Technology, Udaipur

  • Chandrakanthappa K, Batagurki SB, Kammar C (2001) Evaluation of different threshing methods for primary processing of finger millet. Mysore J Agric Sci 35(2):128–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Gbabo A, Gana IM, Amoto MS (2013) Design, fabrication and testing of a millet thresher. Net J Agric Sci 1(4):100–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi P, Jethi R, Chandra N, Roy ML, Kharbikar HL, Atheequlla G (2015) Ergonomics assessment of post harvest finger millet threshing for reducing women drudgery. Indian Res J Ext Educ 15(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamble HG, Srivastava AP, Panwar JS (2003) Development and evaluation of a pearl millet thresher. J Agric Eng 40(1):18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Kumar DB, Prasanna A, Kumar HS, Sandeep TN, Sudhadevi G (2013) Efficiency of mechanical thresher over traditional method of threshing finger millet. Int J Agric Eng 6(1):184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook C (2009) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmanand VA (2015) Development and testing of pedal operated thresher for finger millet. Int J Agric Sci Res 5(3):299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Pishgar-Komleh SH, Keyhan A, Mostofi-Sarkariand MR, Jafari A (2012) Application of response surface methodology for optimization of picker-husker harvesting losses in Corn seed. Iran J Energy Environ 3(2):134–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Powar RV, Aware VV, Shahare PU, Sonawane SP, Dhande KG (2018) Moisture-dependent physical properties of finger millet grain and kernel (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn). J Indian Soc Coast Agric Res 36(1):48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan A, Nag SK, Patil SK (2010) Traditional methods of harvesting and processing for small millet in tribal region of Bastar. Indian J Tradit Knowl 9(4):663–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Salari KR, Chayjan A, Khazaei J, Amiri PJ (2013) Optimization of independent parameters for chickpea threshing using response surface method (RSM). J Agric Sci Technol 15:467–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic IM, Savic IM, Stojiljkovic ST, Gajic DG (2014a) Modeling and optimization of energy-efficient procedures for removing lead (II) and zinc (II) ions from aqueous solutions using the central composite design. Energy 77:66–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savic I, Gajic D, Stojiljkovic S, Savic I, Di Gennaro S (2014b) Modelling and optimization of methylene blue adsorption from aqueous solution using bentonite clay. Comput Aided Chem Eng 33:1417–1422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savic IM, Nikolic VD, Savic-Gajic IM, Nikolic LB, Ibric SR, Gajic DG (2015) Optimization of technological procedure for amygdalin isolation from plum seeds (Pruni domesticae semen). Front Plant Sci 6:276

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Savic IM, Nikolic VD, Savic-Gajic IM, Nikolic LB, Moder K, Hopkins M (2016) Optimization of quercetin extraction from green tea (Camellia sinensis) using central composite design, and the pharmacological activity of the extract. Chem Biochem Eng Q 30(1):103–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savic-Gajic IM, Savic IM, Nikolic VD (2018) Modeling and optimization of quercetin extraction and biological activity of quercetin-rich red onion skin extract from Southeastern Serbia. J Food Nutr Res 57(1):15–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Deepa V (2014) Optimization of machine parameters of Parvatiya Sugam motorized thresher using response surface methodology. J Appl Nat Sci 6(1):207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Pardeshi IL, Kumar M, Srinivas K, Srivastva AK (2008) Optimization of machine parameters of a pedal-operated paddy thresher using RSM. Biosyst Eng 100(4):591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Mishra HN, Saha S (2010) Moisture-dependent properties of Barnyard millet grain and kernel. J Food Eng 96:598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Mishra HN, Saha S (2011) Design, development and evaluation of barnyard millet dehuller. J Agric Eng 48(3):17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KP, Poddar RR, Agrawal KN, Hota Smrutilipi, Singh MK (2015) Development and evaluation of multi millet thresher. J Appl Nat Sci 7(2):939–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudajan S, Salokhe VM, Triratanasirichai K (2002) Effect of type of drum, drums speed and feed rate on sunflower threshing. Biosyst Eng 83(4):413–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewari VK, Singh C, Vidhu KP (2013) Performance modeling of a groundnut stripper using response surface methodology. Int Agric Eng J 22(1):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Varshney AC, Tiwari PS, Narang S, Mehta CR (2004) Data book for agricultural machinery. Central Institute of Agricultural Machinery, Bhopal

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma SS, Singh A, Shahi NC (2014) Response surface methodology for selection of machine parameters for enhancing pearling efficiency of finger millet dehuller-cum-pearler. Int J Sci Res 3(10):2319–7064

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. V. Powar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powar, R.V., Aware, V.V. & Shahare, P.U. Optimizing operational parameters of finger millet threshing drum using RSM. J Food Sci Technol 56, 3481–3491 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03836-0

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03836-0

Keywords

Navigation