Skip to main content
Log in

Identification and characterization of matrix components in spinach during QuEChERS sample preparation for pesticide residue analysis by LC–ESI–MS/MS, GC–MS and UPLC-DAD

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article matrix components in spinach were investigated in detail. The samples were prepared using two QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) methods, AOAC and CEN. Liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI–MS/MS), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and ultra performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector (UPLC-DAD), were applied for component identification. The strategies of identification by LC–ESI–MS/MS include accurate mass spectra of the parent ion, comparison with previous literature data and investigation of the mass spectral decomposition pattern. Overall, fourteen components were identified by LC–ESI–MS/MS in each methods of AOAC and CEN, which were phytosteroids, flavonoids, fatty acids and fatty acid amides. Fifty components using AOAC method and fifty-seven components using CEN method were identified in GC–MS by comparing mass data with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, U.S.) database. The results indicate that the major components of the matrix are terpenoids, fatty acids and fatty acid esters. Moreover, three pigments (neoxanthin, violaxanthin and lutein) in the AOAC method and eight pigments (neoxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin, lutein, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, pheophytin a and beta-carotene) in the CEN method that gave a characteristics peak at 440 nm were identified by the UPLC-DAD. According to the sample preparation condition using different amounts of graphitized carbon black (GCB) in this study, the AOAC method had higher matrix component removal efficiency than the CEN method. A better understanding of matrix components would increase the current knowledge for improvement of existing QuEChERS methodology, as well as contribute to new method developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anneli K, Allan K, Koit H, Ivo L (2008) Matrix effects in pesticide multi-residue analysis by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1187:58–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antonia GF, Jose LMV, Jose LFM, Roberto RG (2009) Compensation for matrix effects in gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry using a single point standard addition. J Chromatogr A 1216:4798–4808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin FC, Oscar PG, Gary S, Norton BG, Steven JH, Dale LB, Richard AL (1995) Chemical characterization of a family of brain lipids that induce sleep. Science 268:1506–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniele FF, Lara ZSB, Carla P, Eduardo JP, Diogenes AGC (2014) Phytochemical analysis of Pfaffia glomerata inflorescences by LC–ESI–MS/MS. Molecules 19:15720–15734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erich-Christian O, Heinz-Wilhelm D (2004) Safeguarding production—losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot 23:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eulogio JLM, Vitor S, Sandra G, Paula CC (2015) HPLC-ESI-MSn characterization of phenolic compounds, terpenoid saponins, and other minor compounds in Bituminaria bituminosa. Ind Crops Prod 69:80–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European committee for standardization (2008) Foods of plant origin—determination of pesticide residues using GC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS following acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and cleanup by dispersive SPE—QuEChERS-method; EN 15662

  • Filipa S, Ricardo CC, Lillian B et al (2017) Flavonoid composition and antitumour activity of bee bread collected in northest Portugal. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helen S, Stefan K, Gunther K, Lutz A (2012) Reduction of matrix effects in liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry by dilution of the sample extracts: how much dilution is needed. Anal Chem 84:1474–1482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennifer B, Paul DF, Peter MB (2003) Identification and quantification of carotenoids, tocopherols and chlorophylls in commonly consumed fruits and vegetables. Phytochemistry 62:939–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinfeng W, Ziyao J, Zhihao Z et al (2017) Analysis of chemical constituents of Melastoma dodecandrum Lour. by UPLC-ESI-Q-Exactive Focus-MS/MS. Molecules 22:476. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joaquim MDA, Giuseppina N, Antonio S et al (2007) Antiproliferative and antioxidant activities of a tricin acylated glycoside from sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) juice. Phytochemistry 68:1165–1171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jocelyne H, Joseph B, Emmanuel G, Dave MT, Paul GO (1994) Electrospray tandem mass spectroscopy of ecdysteroid moulting hormones. Spectroscopy 12:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katerina M, Philip LW (2012) Evaluation of a new column backflushing set-up in the gas chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric analysis of pesticide residues in dietary supplements. J Chromatogr A 1265:155–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuniyo S, Machiko S, Takeshi S, Sadao N, Akira T, Kazuichi H (2012a) Matrix behavior during sample preparation using metabolomics analysis approach for pesticide residue analysis by GC–MS in agricultural products. J Agric Food Chem 60:10226–10234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuniyo S, Sadao N, Norimichi O, Kazushi M, Munetomo N, Akira T, Kazuichi H (2012b) Search of components causing matrix effects on GC/MS for pesticide analysis in food. J Pestic Sci 37:156–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuniyo S, Kazuyuki Y, Sadao N (2015) Difference in the matrix components by cleanup methods between the notified multiresidue pesticide analysis method in Japan and the QuEChERS method. J Pestic Sci 40:200–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laura VH, De Thomas B, Dieter D, Arne H (2012) Phenolic compounds and anti-oxidant capacity of twelve morphologically heterogeneous bamboo species. Phytochem Anal 23:433–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laura VH, De Karolien B, Guy H, Dieter D, Arne H (2014) In vitro inhibition of the transcription factor NF-kB and cyclooxygenase by bamboo extracts. Phytother Res 28:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei C, Mei C, Lin T, John M, Chensheng L (2014) Quantitative analysis of neonicotinoid insecticide residues in foods: implication for dietary exposures. J Agric Food Chem 62:6082–6090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mi JC, Luke RH, Ronald LP, Teddy M (2008) Flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity of spinach genotypes determined by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Sci Food Agric 88(2014):1099–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelangelo A, Steven JL, Darinka S, Frank JS (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86:412–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven JL (2007) Determination of pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate:collaborative study. J AOAC Int 90:485–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven JL, Andre DK, Maurice H, Peter VB (2005) Validation of a fast and easy method for the determination of residues from 229 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection. J AOAC Int 88:595–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven JL, Kyung AS, Hyeyoung K, Urairat K, Wusheng F, Katerina M, Eunha H, Natchanun L (2010) Comparison of QuEChERS sample preparation methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. J Chromatogr A 1217:2548–2560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias M, Inken P, Matthias H (2009) A comprehensive metabolite profiling of Isatis tinctoria leaf extracts. Phytochemistry 70:924–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasz R, Tomasz T (2015) Recent trends in sample preparation and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for pesticide residue analysis in food and related matrixes. J AOAC Int 98:1143–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonu P, Piret R, Peeter T, Regina P, Uno M, Sirje K, Riina S, Meili R (2009) A study of oxidation products of free polyunsaturated fatty acids in mechanically debonated meat. J Food Compos Anal 22:307–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulla J (2001) Collision-induced fragmentation of deprotonated methoxylate flavonoids, obtained by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 36:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasco G, Serena F, Ferdinando T, Johann L, Christophe B (2014) The velocity of light intensity increase modulates the photoprotective response in coastal diatoms. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103782

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wei C, Gao Y, Weibo X et al (2014) Genome-wide association analyses provide genetic and biochemical insights into natural variation in rice metabolism. Nat Genet 46:714–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiu QL, Qing HZ, Kang M, Hong ML, Zhen G (2015) Identification and determination of 34 water-soluble synthetic dyes in foodstuff by high performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection–ion trap time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem 182:316–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zulaihat A, Bolanle EA, Gimba CE, Abel SA (2015) Determination of organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticide residues in some vegetables by QuEChERS method and gas chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. IOSR-JESTFT 9:14–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Grants from the research fund of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea, under the Project Number PJ 012217.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeyoung Kwon.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 207 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, A.K.M.M., Hong, SM., Lee, HS. et al. Identification and characterization of matrix components in spinach during QuEChERS sample preparation for pesticide residue analysis by LC–ESI–MS/MS, GC–MS and UPLC-DAD. J Food Sci Technol 55, 3930–3938 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3318-4

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3318-4

Keywords

Navigation