Abstract
Fortified Bengal gram sattu was prepared following standardized sattu making procedure and fortified as per FDA using wheat flour with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, Ca and Fe and stored at 25°C, 65% RH and 35°C, 65% RH and at ambient condition (16–39°C, 18–98% RH) in low density polyethylene and laminated aluminum foil pouches. Alcoholic acidity increased by 0.04% in different sattu samples during 180 days storage but was within the acceptable limit as per BIS standard. Free fatty acids content (as oleic acid) also increased from 0.06% (in fresh) to 0.14%; however it did not affect sensory acceptability of sattu stored under different conditions. Protein digestibility, Ca and Fe contents in fortified samples were 80.6%, 170.1 and 12.5 mg/100 g, as against 80.6%, 69.5 and 10.2 mg/100 g, in control sample respectively. Storage temperatures and packaging materials did not affect the overall quality of fortified sattu except moisture content and total microbial load during 6 months storage. Fortified Bengal gram sattu, both fresh and stored, were within the acceptable sensory quality when used in the drink form.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akeson WE, Stachman MA (1964) A pepsin-pancreatin digest index of protein quality evaluation. J Nutr 83:257–261
Anderson RA, Conway HF, Pfeifer VF, Griffin EL (1969) Gelatinization of corn grits by roll and extrusion cooking. Cereal Sci Today 14:4–6
AOAC (1984) Official methods of analysis. Association of the Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, USA
BIS (1971) IS:6273 Part I and Part II. Guide for sensory evaluation of foods. Indian Standard Institution, New Delhi
BIS (1998) IS:14613. Roasted Bengal gram flour (channa sattu) — specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
Cruickshank R, Duguid JP, Marmion BP, Swain RHA (1975) Medical microbiology — the practice of medical microbiology, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Deshpande S, Bargale PC, Joshi KC, Singh V, Varghese S (2004) Enhancing the nutritive value of barley based sattu by soy-fortification. Indian J Nutr Dietet 41:146–159
Ensminger AH, Ensminger ME, Konlande JE, Robson John RK (1995) The concise encyclopedia of food and nutrition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, p 318
Gopaldas T, Srinivas N, Varadarajan I, Shingwekar AG, Seth R, Mathur RS, Bhargava V (1975) Project Poshak. CARE-India, New Delhi
Hernandez LF, Larsen AO, Lindstrom LI, Iriarte LB (2008) Physiological maturity in sunflower-correspondence between the quantitative and the visual definition. Proc 17th Int Sunflower Conf, Cordoba, Spain, June 8 to 12, p 337–340
Liener IE (1973) Toxic factors associated with legume proteins. Indian J Nutr Dietet 10:303–322
Mridula D, Wanjari OD, Ilyas SM, Goyal RK, Manikantan MR, Bharti DK (2004) Techno-economic facets of sattu processing units. Technical Bull CIPHET/Pub/9/2003
Siegel A, Fawcett B (1976) Food legume and processing and utilization (with special emphasis on application in developing countries). Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Science Division. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, p 16–24
Sowbhagya CM, Bhattacharya KR (1976) Lipid autoxidation in rice. J Food Sci 41:1018–1023
Thakur BR, Arya SS (1990) Packaging requirements and stability of fried wheat snacks (Trisnacks). J Food Sci Technol 27: 76–81
Thapar VK, Sehgal VK, Paul Shashi (1988) Post harvest quality analysis of foodgrains — research bulletin. Department of Processing and Agricultural Structures, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, p 13–32
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mridula, D., Jain, R. & Singh, K.K. Effect of storage on quality of fortified Bengal gram sattu . J Food Sci Technol 47, 119–123 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0006-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0006-4