Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Synchronous and Metachronous Breast and Ovarian Cancers: Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Cancer Centre in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women with either breast cancer (BC) or ovarian cancer (OC) have a 1.5–2 times higher risk of developing the other. Discerning discrete primaries versus metastases from either can be challenging. Clinico-pathological and outcome details of patients diagnosed with both BC and OC from December 1994 to August 2018 were retrospectively evaluated at a single tertiary cancer centre. We report the pattern of presentation and recurrences with case-based illustrations. Out of 139 patients, presentation was BC-first in 66.2%, OC-first in 24.5% and synchronous cancers (SC) in 9.3% of women. The median age at diagnosis in BC-first, OC-first and SC was 42 years, 48 years and 49 years, respectively. The most common histological subtype was invasive breast carcinoma-no special type (74.8%) in BC and serous cystadenocarcinoma (81.3%) in OC. BC presented at an early stage in 67.6% while OC presented at an advanced stage in 48.2% of patients. Germline mutation results were available in 82% with 61.4% of the cohort exhibiting a mutation- BRCA1 mutation being the most common. The median time to development of second cancer was 77.4 months and 39.4 months in BC-first and OC-first, respectively. At a median follow-up of 9.47 years, disease-free survival was 32.6%, 32.4% and 30.8% in BC-first, OC-first and SC, respectively (p < 0.001). In hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, BC-first patients have a better prognosis while synchronous malignancies have worse oncological outcomes. Deaths are mainly due to OC progression. Appropriate surveillance and prophylactic intervention in young patients with breast cancer may improve overall outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhillon PK, Mathur P, Nandakumar A et al (2018) The burden of cancers and their variations across the States of India: the global burden of disease study 1990–2016. Lancet Oncol 19(10):1289–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Disaia P (2002) Epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Gynecol Oncol 289–350

  4. Mavaddat N, Barrowdale D, Andrulis IL et al (2011) Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the consortium of investigators of modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(1):134–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Network CGA (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490(7418):61–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Engel C, Rhiem K, Hahnen E et al (2018) Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations among 802 women with unilateral triple-negative breast cancer without family cancer history. BMC Cancer 18(1):265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4029-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Singer CF, Tan YY, Muhr D et al (2019) Association between family history, mutation locations, and prevalence of BRCA1 or 2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Med 8(4):1875–1881. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Prior P, Waterhouse JA (1981) Multiple primary cancers of the breast and ovary. Br J Cancer 44(5):628–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. King M-C, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302(5645):643–6

  10. Shah S, Evans DG, Blair V et al (1993) Assessment of relative risk of second primary tumors after ovarian cancer and of the usefulness of double primary cases as a source of material for genetic studies with a cancer registry. Cancer 72(3):819–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gronwald J, Byrski T, Huzarski T et al (2008) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 88(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-6-2-88

  12. Szabo CI, King MC (1997) Population genetics of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 60(5):1013–1020

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MI, Jung YJ, Kim DI et al (2021) Metastasis to breast from ovarian cancer and primary ovarian cancer concurrently diagnosis. Gland Surg 10(5):1806–1811. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-640

  14. Tasca G, Dieci MV, Baretta Z et al (2020) Synchronous and metachronous breast and ovarian cancer: experience from two large cancer center. Front Oncol 10:608783

  15. Agarwal G, Pradeep PV, Aggarwal V, Yip CH, Cheung PS (2007) Spectrum of breast cancer in Asian women. World J Surg 31(5):1031–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0585-9

  16. Kriplani D, Patel MM (2013) Immunohistochemistry: A diagnostic aid in differentiating primary epithelial ovarian tumors and tumors metastatic to the ovary. South Asian Journal of Cancer 02(04):254–258

  17. Lotan TL, Ye H, Melamed J et al (2009) Immunohistochemical panel to identify the primary site of invasive micropapillary carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 33(7):1037–1041

  18. Bennett JA, Young RH, Chuang A-Y et al (2018) Ovarian metastases of breast cancers with signet ring cells. Int J Gynecol Pathol 37(6):507–515

  19. Al-Agha OM, Nicastri AD (2006) An in-depth look at Krukenberg Tumor: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130(11):1725–1730

  20. Caruso G, Musacchio L, Santangelo G et al (2020) Ovarian Cancer Metastasis to the Breast: a Case Report and Review of the Literature. Case Rep Oncol 31(3):1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509770

  21. Phung, H.T, Q.P.T, Van Nguyen T et al (2022) Recurrent ovarian cancer presenting with isolated axillary lymph node metastasis: a rare case report. Annals of Medicine and Surgery 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103640

  22. López F, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE et al (2016) Cervical lymph node metastases from remote primary tumor sites. Head Neck 38. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24344

  23. Zuhdy M, Alghandour R, Abdelazeem G et al (2019) Axillary nodal metastasis in ovarian cancer: A report of three cases and review of literature. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 31(1)

  24. Caruso G, Musacchio L, Santangelo G et al (2020) Ovarian cancer metastasis to the breast: A case report and review of the literature. Case Reports in Oncology 13(3):1317–1324

  25. Espinosa I, Gallardo A, D’Angelo E et al (2015) Simultaneous carcinomas of the breast and ovary. Int J Gynecol Pathol 34(3):257–265

  26. Liu H, Shi J, Prichard JW et al (2014) Immunohistochemical evaluation of GATA-3 expression in ER-negative breast carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 141(5):648–655

  27. Cimino-Mathews A (2020) Novel uses of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: Interpretation and pitfalls. Modern Pathology 34(S1):62–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng Y, Butt YM, Chen B et al (2017) Update on immunohistochemical analysis in breast lesions. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 141(8):1033–1051

  29. Antoniou A, Pharoah PDP, Narod S et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for Family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72(5):1117–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Foulkes WD (2008) Inherited susceptibility to common cancers. N Engl J Med 359(20):2143–2153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Peshkin BN, Alabek ML, Isaacs C et al (2011) BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers. Breast Dis 32(1–1):25–33

  32. Saxena S, Chakraborty A, Kaushal M et al (2006) Contribution of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2sequence alterations to breast cancer in Northern India. BMC Med Genet 7(1)

  33. Mittal A, Deo SVS, Gogia A et al (2022) Profile of Pathogenic Mutations and Evaluation of Germline Genetic Testing Criteria in Consecutive Breast Cancer Patients Treated at a North Indian Tertiary Care Center. Ann Surg Oncol 29(2):1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10870-w

  34. Soumittra N, Meenakumari B, Parija T et al (2009) Molecular genetics analysis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients in India. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 7(1)

  35. Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP et al (2021) Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 2.2021 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 19(1):77–102

  36. Daly MB, Pilarski R, Berry M et al (2016) NCCN guidelines insights: Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast and ovarian, version 2.2017. Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15(1):9–20

  37. Liou W-S, Hamilton CA, Cheung MK et al (2006) Outcomes of women with metachronous breast and ovarian carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 103(1):190–194

  38. Metcalfe KA, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P et al (2005) The risk of ovarian cancer after breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol 96(1):222–226

  39. Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM (2009) Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101(2):80–87

  40. Domchek SM, Jhaveri K, Patil S et al (2012) Risk of metachronous breast cancer after brca mutation-associated ovarian cancer. Cancer 119(7):1344–1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Seynaeve C, van Asperen CJ et al (2015) Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 107(5)

  42. Kotsopoulos J, Huzarski T, Gronwald J et al (2016) Bilateral oophorectomy and breast cancer risk in brca 1 and brca 2 mutation carriers. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 109(1)

  43. Cvelbar M, Hocevar M, Vidmar G et al (2011) BRCA1/2 status and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with double primary breast and ovarian cancer. Neoplasma 58(3):198–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fishman A, Dekel E, Chetrit A et al (2000) Patients with double primary tumors in the breast and ovary— clinical characteristics and BRCA1–2 mutations status. Gynecol Oncol 79(1):74–78

  45. McGee J, Giannakeas v, Karlan B et al (2017) Risk of breast cancer after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers: Is preventive mastectomy warranted? Gynecol Oncol 145(2):346–351

Download references

Acknowledgements

The names of the institutions at which the work was performed were Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India, and Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Navi Mumbai, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Shalaka Joshi and TS Shylasree; administrative support: Rajiv Sarin, Pradnya Kotwal, Rohini Hawaldar and R. A. Badwe; provision of the study materials or patients: Shalaka Joshi, TS Shylasree, Nita Nair, Vani Parmar, Rajiv Sarin; collection and assembly of the data: Shalaka Joshi, Sridevi Murali-Nanavati, Anand Thomas, Urvashi Jain, Ayushi Sahay, Vaibhav Vanmali and Sagar Tripathi; data analysis and interpretation: Shalaka Joshi, TS Shylasree, Sridevi Murali-Nanavati, Rohini Hawaldar and Urvashi Jain; manuscript writing: Shalaka Joshi, Sridevi Murali-Nanavati, Ayushi Sahay and TS Shylasree; final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shalaka Joshi or Rajiv Sarin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshi, S., Murali-Nanavati, S., Shylasree, T.S. et al. Synchronous and Metachronous Breast and Ovarian Cancers: Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Cancer Centre in India. Indian J Surg Oncol 14, 809–821 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-023-01749-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-023-01749-1

Keywords

Navigation