Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Instructional Design for Assessment of Dental Esthetic Treatment Needs in a Indian Undergraduate School: A Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

In the recent years esthetic dentistry has been the area of focus amongst the public. Esthetics is an important dimension in dental practice and the upcoming dentists need to be enabled to demonstrate their competencies for an efficient clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to institute a cultural change within traditional didactic dental education towards student centred learning to cope up with the accelerating pace of medical technological change and achieving positive impact on patient care and patient satisfaction. Intervention that was considered for the project included David Merrill’s first principles of instruction. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with all the students from four cohorts of final year dental undergraduate students, divided into an intervention group (n = 40) and a control group (n = 40). A professional assessment questionnaire is used to evaluate the relationship between the students and professional’s assessment of esthetic treatment needs. The results of the study indicated that the ranking of the most and least noticeable dental features differed significantly (p = 0.0061) between the intervention and non intervention group and the indicates the intervention group to be in better agreement with professional assessment than the non intervention group of students with z value of 2.7435. The relative agreement between intervention group of undergraduate students and the professional assessment of esthetic treatment need shows the importance of intervention of Merrill’s first principles of instruction in learning, emphasising the significance of PBL and therefore indicating a positive impact on successful esthetic treatment for patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlsson GE, Wagner IV, Odman P, Ekstrand K, MacEntee M, Marinello C, Nanami T, Ow RK, Sato H, Speer C, Strub JR, Watanabe T (1998) An international comparative multicenter study of assessment of dental appearance using computer-aided image manipulation. Int J Prosthodont 11(3):246–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein RE (1969) Study of need for esthetics in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 21(6):589–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA (1999) Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 11(6):311–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lloyd PM (1994) Fixed prosthodontics and esthetic considerations for the older adult. J Prosthet Dent 72(5):525–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennick RG, Exley K (1997) Tomorrow’s doctors today: innovations in medical teaching and learning—responding to the challenge of tomorrow’s doctors. Biochem Educ 25:6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, Donovan MS, Pellegrino JW (2003) How People learn brain, mind, experience, and school, expanded edn. Natl Acad, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gillian HR, Elizabeth T (2003) Providing support for problem-based learning: The Manchester experience. Eur J Dent Educ 7:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fincham AG, Shuler CF (2001) The changing face of dental education: the impact of PBL. J Dent Educ 65(5):406–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morales-Mann ET, Kaitell CA (2001) Problem-based learning in a new Canadian curriculum. J Adv Nurs. 33(1):13–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Christopher DF, Harte K, George CF (2002) The implementation of tomorrow’s doctors. Med Educ 36(3):282–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinkade S (2005) A snapshot of the status of problem-based learning in U.S. medical schools, 2003 − 04. Acad Med 80(3):300–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. David Merrill M (2001) First Principles of Instruction. ETR&D, vol 50, no 3. ISSN 1042–1629:43–59

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brisman AS (1980) Esthetics: a comparison of dentist’s and patient’s concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 100(3):345–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tortopidis D, Hatzikyriakos A, Kokoti M et al (2007) Evaluation of the relationship between subjects perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs. J Esthet Restor Dent 19:154–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Downing SM, Yudkowsky R (2009) Assessment in health professions education. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fincham AG, Shuler CF (2001) The changing face of dental education: the impact of PBL. J Dent Educ 65(5):406–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakravarthi S, Haleagrahara N (2010) Implementation of PBL curriculum involving multiple disciplines in undergraduate medical education programme. Int Educ Stud 3(1):165–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Allareddy V, Havens AM, Howell TH, Karim bux NY (2000) Evaluation of a new assessment tool in problem-based learning tutorials in dental education. J Dent Educ 75(5):665–671

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koh CG, Khoo EH, Wong LM, Koh D (2008) The effects of problem based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review. CMAJ 178(1):34–41

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kersten HW (1997) The enhancement of learning by teaching. Eur J Dent Educ 1(4):149–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dennick RG, Exley K (1997) Tomorrow’s doctors today: Innovations in medical teaching and learning—responding to the challenge of tomorrow’s doctors. Biochem Educ 25:6–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Regan-Smith M, Young WW, Keller AM (2002) An efficient and effective teaching model for ambulatory education. Acad Med 77(7):593–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas M, Reddy R, Reddy BJ (2011) Perception differences of altered dental esthetics by dental professionals and laypersons. Indian J Dent Res 22(2):242–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA (2006) Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130(2):141–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Alan Schwartz, Professor, Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago, for his assistance with data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunila B. Sangappa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sangappa, S.B., Mehendale, A.V. Instructional Design for Assessment of Dental Esthetic Treatment Needs in a Indian Undergraduate School: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (Suppl 1), 137–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0384-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0384-9

Keywords

Navigation