Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of etchant variability on shear bond strength of all ceramic restorations - an in vitro study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

The present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of pre-luting surface treatments by 3 different etchant used at 3 different etching periods and their effect on shear bond strength of IPS Empress 2 luted to tooth by dual cure resin cement. Fifty samples of ceramic were divided into four groups as group I control group: No surface treatment, group II: Etched with Hydrofluoric (HF) acid (4.9%), group III: Etched with Ammonium bifluoride acid (9.4%) and group IV: Etched with Phosphoric acid (37%). Group II, III and IV were further divided into 3 Subgroups; namely A, B and C according to the etching periods (20, 60 and 120 s) respectively. The shear bond strength was determined by using a Universal testing Machine. The morphological changes of the surface treated ceramic samples prior to luting to tooth and mode of the fracture failure after shear bond test were observed by using a Scanning Electron Microscope. The mean shear bond strength was highest when IPS Empress 2 ceramic samples were surface treated using 4.9% Hydrofluoric acid gel and 9.4% Ammonium bifluoride acid for 120 s. The least mean shear bond strength was noticed in case of control group, where no surface treatment was done and samples treated by 37% Phosphoric acid. Thus it could be concluded, that Ammonium bifluoride could be an appropriate alternative to be used instead of HF acid. 120 s etching showed highest bond strength values for HF acid (4.9%) and Ammonium bifluoride (9.4%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Mowafy O, Brochu JF (2002) Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations—a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 68:233–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrando JM, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Jarvis RH (1983) Tensile strength and micro leakage of porcelain repair system. J Prosthet Dent 50:44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spohr AM, Sobrinho LC, Consani S, Sinhoreti MA, Knowles JC (2003) Influence of surface conditions and silane agent on the bond of resin to IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 16:277–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS (1987) Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 66:1460–1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Newburg R, Pameijer CH (1978) Composite resin bonded porcelain with a silane solution. J Am Dent Assoc 96:288–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey JH (1989) Porcelain-to-composite bond strengths using four organosilane materials. J Prosthet Dent 61:174–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey LF, Bennett RJ (1988) Dicor surface treatments for enhanced bonding. J Dent Res 67:925–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M (1988) Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 60:288–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M (1996) Bond strength and durability of porcelain bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 75:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertolini JC (1992) Hydrofluoric acid: a review of toxicity. J Emerg Med 10:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cura C, Saraçoglu A, Cötert HS (2003) Effect of different bonding agents on shear bond strengths of composite-bonded porcelain to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 89:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M (2001) Early bond strength and durability of bond between a ceramic material and chemically-cured or dual-cured resin luting agent. Am J Dent 14:85–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM, Denys FR (1990) Extracted human vs bovine teeth in laboratory studies. Am J Dent 3:253–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rueggeberg FA (1991) Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure—review of literature. Dent Mater 7:2–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jardel V, Degrange M, Picard B, Derrien G (1999) Correlation of photography to bond strength a etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 12:59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N (1994) Measurement methods for adhesion to dentine: the current status in Japan. J Dent 22:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hara AT, Pimenta LA, Rodrigues AL Jr (2001) Influence of cross-head speed on resin-dentine shear bonded strength. Dent Mater 17:165–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, MGM Dental College, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

    Seema Pattanaik

  2. Department of Prosthodontics, Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Aarti P. Wadkar

  3. Flat #102, Vaishnavi Apartment, Mahatmanagar, Nashik, Maharastra, 422007, India

    Seema Pattanaik

Authors
  1. Seema Pattanaik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aarti P. Wadkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema Pattanaik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pattanaik, S., Wadkar, A.P. Effect of etchant variability on shear bond strength of all ceramic restorations - an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 11, 55–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0064-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-011-0064-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation