Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptions of Telehealth-Based Cancer Support Groups at a Rural Community Oncology Program

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer peer support groups are crucial in improving quality of life outcomes and extending cancer survival. Using the Health Belief Model (HBM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as guiding frameworks, this study examined perceptions of telehealth-based cancer support groups among individuals treated for cancer at a rural oncology program. We distributed online surveys to 34 survivors or individuals undergoing cancer treatment who actively participated in virtual cancer support groups, achieving a 79.4% response rate (27 participants). The survey, blending quantitative and qualitative methodologies, assessed demographic characteristics, overall telehealth satisfaction, satisfaction with telehealth-based peer support, and perceived social support. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses were examined through template analysis, focusing on the HBM and TPB constructs. Participants expressed general satisfaction with telehealth and indicated a willingness to use telehealth services again. Participants cited ease of use and broader access to cancer support groups with telehealth approaches. Barriers to telehealth included the lack of interpersonal connection, internet access, and technical difficulties. The findings underscore the nuanced perceptions of telehealth-based cancer support groups in a rural oncology setting. Despite acknowledging telehealth’s limitations, participants appreciated its role in facilitating access to support. The findings provide valuable insights for optimizing digital health interventions, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that considers both the potential and the challenges of telehealth in cancer care. This study offers critical guidance in optimizing digital health interventions and ensuring accessible, effective support for cancer patients in rural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from bholtz@msu.edu upon request.

References

  1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, Jemal A, Kramer JL, Siegel RL (2019) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer J Clin 69(5):363–385. https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hulbert-Williams NJ, Beatty L, Dhillon HM (2018) Psychological support for patients with cancer: evidence review and suggestions for future directions. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 12(3):276–292. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Albrecht TL, Adelman MB (1987) Communicating Social Support

  4. Nambisan P (2011) Information seeking and social support in online health communities: Impact on patients’ perceived empathy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18(3):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Myrick JG, Holton AE, Himelboim I, Love B (2015) #Stupidcancer: exploring a typology of social support and the role of emotional expression in a social media community. Health Commun 0236(April):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.981664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Akers C, Plant H, Riley V, Alnajjar H (2021) Exploring penile cancer survivors’ motivations and experiences of attending a support group: eUROGEN study. FRCS (Urol) 1:3. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijun.12259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mccaughan E, Parahoo K, Hueter I, Northouse L, Bradbury I (2017) Online support groups for women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011652.PUB2

  8. Hu J, Wang X, Guo S, Chen F, Wu Y-Y, Ji F-J, Fang X (2019) Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 174:325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5033-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singson JRC, Kirley PD, Pham H, Rothrock G, Armistead I, Meek J, Anderson EJ, Reeg L, Lynfield R, Ropp S, Muse A, Felsen CB, Sutton M, Talbot HK, Havers FP, Taylor CA, Reingold A, Chai SJ, Alden NB, Yousey-Hindes K, Openo KP, Bye E, Montoya MA, Barney G, Popham K, Abdullah N, Schaffner W (2022) Factors associated with severe outcomes among immunocompromised adults hospitalized for COVID-19 — COVID-NET, 10 States, March 2020–February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 71(27):878–884. https://doi.org/10.15585/MMWR.MM7127A3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitten P (2006) Telemedicine: communication technologies that revolutionize healthcare services. Generations 30(2):20–24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell HS, Phaneuf MR, Deane K (2004) Cancer peer support programs—do they work? Patient Educ Couns 55(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PEC.2003.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitten P, Holtz B, Krupinski E, Alverson D (2010) Challenges of the rural healthcare pilot program broadband initiative. Telemed e-Health 16(3):370–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirko KA, Kerver JM, Ford S, Szafranski C, Beckett J, Kitchen C, Wendling AL (2020) Telehealth in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for rural health disparities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 27(11):1816–1818. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ford S, Buscemi J, Hirko K, Laitner M, Newton RL, Jonassaint C, Fitzgibbon M, Klesges LM (2020) Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) urges Congress to ensure efforts to increase and enhance broadband internet access in rural areas. Transl Behav Med 10(2):489–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doorenbos AZ, Eaton LH, Haozous E, Towle C, Revels L, Buchwald D (2010) Satisfaction with telehealth for cancer support groups in Rural American Indian and Alaska native communities. Clin J Oncol Nurs 14(6):765–770. https://doi.org/10.1188/10.CJON.765-770

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Bashshur N, Yellowlees PM (2016) The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions in mental disorders. Telemed J E Health 22(2):87. https://doi.org/10.1089/TMJ.2015.0206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Janz NK, Becker MH (1984) The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 11:1–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stretcher VJ, Rosenstock IM (1997) The health belief model. Handb Psychol Health Med

  19. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gustke SS, Balch DC, West VL, Rogers LO (2000) Patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Telemed J 6(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/107830200311806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bergquist TF, Thompson K, Gehl C, Munoz Pineda J (2010) Satisfaction ratings after receiving internet-based cognitive rehabilitation in persons with memory impairments after severe acquired brain injury. Telemed e-Health 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0118

  22. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA (1990) Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess 55(3–4):610–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, William L (1999) Doing qualitative research. :406

  24. King N (2004) Using templates in the thematic analysis of tex. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research,

  25. Grand Traverse County Road Commission (2022) Snowfall Data. https://www.gtcrc.org/237/Snowfall-Data

  26. Taylor SE, Falke RL, Shoptaw SJ, Lichtman RR (1986) Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. J Consult Clin Psychol 54(5):608–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.5.608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson DM, Booth L, Moore D, Mathers J (2022) Peer support for people with chronic conditions: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 22(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-022-07816-7/TABLES/5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kreps GL (2003) The impact of communication on cancer risk, incidence, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Health Commun 15(2):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1502_4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang P, Zheng J (2022) Updates in cancer rehabilitation telehealth. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 10(4):332–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40141-022-00372-5/FIGURES/1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Holtz BE (2021) Patients perceptions of telemedicine visits before and after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. https://home.liebertpub.com/tmj, 27(1):107–112. https://doi.org/10.1089/TMJ.2020.0168

  31. Trevino KM, Raghunathan N, Latte-Naor S, Polubriaginof FCG, Jensen C, Atkinson TM, Emard N, Seluzicki CM, Ostroff JS, Mao JJ (2021) Rapid deployment of virtual mind-body interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: feasibility, acceptability, and implications for future care. Support Care Cancer 29(2):543–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00520-020-05740-2/FIGURES/1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Whitten P, Holtz B (2008) A series of papers for those yearning to propel telehealth to new heights. https://home.liebertpub.com/tmj 14(9):952–956. https://doi.org/10.1089/TMJ.2008.0129

  33. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M (2017) Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 7(8):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Agha Z, Schapira RM, Laud PW, McNutt G, Roter DL (2009) Patient satisfaction with physician–patient communication during telemedicine. Telemed e-Health 15(9):830–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nekhlyudov L, Fleisher LA, Jacobsen PB (2022) Telemedicine across the cancer care continuum: evidence and opportunities for clinical care, research, and policy. Cancer J (United States) 28(2):121–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rovai AP (2002) Building sense of community at a distance. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 3(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V3I1.79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Klem LO, La Cour K, Thorne S, With H, Handberg C (2023) Perceived benefits from peer-support among family caregivers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cognitive impairments in a palliative rehabilitation blended online learning programme. J Eval Clin Pract 29(4):602–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/JEP.13808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Klemm P, Bunnell D, Cullen M, Soneji R, Gibbons P, Holecek A (2003) Online cancer support groups: a review of the research literature. CIN Comput Inform Nurs 21(3):136–142. https://oce-ovid-com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/article/00024665-200305000-00010/HTML

  39. White M (2001) Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Educ Res 16(6):693–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Banbury A, Nancarrow S, Dart J, Gray L, Parkinson L (2018) Telehealth interventions delivering home-based support group videoconferencing: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018;20(2):e25 https://www.jmir.org/2018/2/e25, 20(2):e8090. https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.8090

  41. Smalley KB, Yancey CT, Warren JC, Naufel K, Ryan R, Pugh JL (2010) Rural mental health and psychological treatment: a review for practitioners. J Clin Psychol 66(5):479–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCLP.20688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Banskota S, Healy M, Goldberg EM (2020) 15 smartphone apps for older adults to use while in isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. West J Emerg Med 21(3):514. https://doi.org/10.5811/WESTJEM.2020.4.47372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zamir S, Hennessy CH, Taylor AH, Jones RB (2018) Video-calls to reduce loneliness and social isolation within care environments for older people: an implementation study using collaborative action research. BMC Geriatr 18(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12877-018-0746-Y/TABLES/4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hilty DM, Gentry MT, McKean AJ, Cowan KE, Lim RF, Lu FG (2020) Telehealth for rural diverse populations: telebehavioral and cultural competencies, clinical outcomes and administrative approaches. mHealth 610.21037/MHEALTH.2019.10.04

  45. Hogan TP, Wakefield B, Nazi KM, Houston TK, Weaver FM (2011) Promoting access through complementary eHealth technologies: recommendations for VA’s Home Telehealth and personal health record programs. J Gen Intern Med 26 Suppl 2(2):628–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11606-011-1765-Y/TABLES/3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Communication Arts & Sciences, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Road, Rm 309, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Bree E. Holtz & Katharine M. Mitchell

  2. Munson Healthcare, Traverse City, MI, USA

    Deborah Strand

  3. Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, Traverse City, MI, USA

    Kelly Hirko

Authors
  1. Bree E. Holtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharine M. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deborah Strand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kelly Hirko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bree E. Holtz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holtz, B.E., Mitchell, K.M., Strand, D. et al. Perceptions of Telehealth-Based Cancer Support Groups at a Rural Community Oncology Program. J Canc Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02428-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02428-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation