Abstract
Breast cancer survivors on adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) have distinct information-seeking experience compared to those in the diagnosis and intensive treatment phase. This study aimed to understand the challenges in obtaining and seeking information among Malaysian breast cancer survivors. We conducted semi-structured, one-to-one interviews among patients using AET from two hospitals and a local cancer organization. Interviews were conducted until theme saturation was achieved (N = 25). Interviews were de-identified, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis. To ensure rigor, coding was conducted through regular discussions between two researchers and the findings were shared with several participants after analysis was completed. Three main themes were identified: limitations in the healthcare system, pitfalls of seeking information online, and limited information from local sources. The participants perceived that their information needs were not met by their healthcare providers and sought information on the Internet to complement their information needs. However, they were faced with risks of misinformation, information overload, and unethical promotion of health products. Those with limited English proficiency had difficulties in accessing quality information, and suggested that there should be more content created by local health advocates in local languages, with information that is tailored for local cultures. As the Internet has become an important medium of health education, healthcare providers and patients should be equipped with the skills to share and search for information online. Digital health literacy needs to be incorporated in patient education modules to create a more informed and empowered patient community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scabia V, Ayyanan A, De Martino F et al (2022) Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers have patient specific hormone sensitivities and rely on progesterone receptor. Nat Commun 13:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30898-0
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Davies C, Godwin J et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8
Yussof I, Mohd Tahir NA, Hatah E et al (2022) Factors influencing five-year adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast 62:22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.01.012
Lu H, Xie J, Gerido LH et al (2020) Information needs of breast cancer patients: theory-generating meta-synthesis. J Med Internet Res 22. https://doi.org/10.2196/17907
Mathijssen EGE, van den Bemt BJF, van den Hoogen FHJ et al (2020) Interventions to support shared decision making for medication therapy in long term conditions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 103(2):254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.034
Blödt S, Kaiser M, Adam Y et al (2018) Understanding the role of health information in patients' experiences: secondary analysis of qualitative narrative interviews with people diagnosed with cancer in Germany. BMJ Open 8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019576
Aunan ST, Wallgren GC, Saetre HB (2019) Breast cancer survivors’ experiences of dealing with information during and after adjuvant treatment: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 28:3012–3020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14700
Pieters HC, Green E, Sleven M et al (2020) Aromatase inhibitors: the unexpected breast cancer treatment. J Geriatr Oncol 11:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.07.024
Kimiafar K, Sarbaz M, Shahid Sales S et al (2016) Breast cancer patients’ information needs and information-seeking behavior in a developing country. Breast 28:156–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.05.011
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH (ed) (2022) ATLAS.ti 22 Windows. 22.2.5.0 ed. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Ministry of Health Malaysia (2019) Health facts. Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur
Ahmad BA, Khairatul K, Farnaza A (2017) An assessment of patient waiting and consultation time in a primary healthcare clinic. Malays Fam Physician 12(1):14–21 (PMID: 28503269; PMCID: PMC5420318)
Ibrahim N, Ai MS, Siau CS et al (2020) The effectiveness of a depression literacy program on stigma and mental help-seeking among adolescents in Malaysia: a control group study with 3-month follow-up. Inquiry 57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958020902332
Moragón S, Di Liello R, Bermejo B et al (2021) Fertility and breast cancer: a literature review of counseling, preservation options and outcomes. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103461
Nguyen SK, Ingledew PA (2013) Tangled in the breast cancer web: an evaluation of the usage of web-based information resources by breast cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 28:662–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0509-6
Yussof I, Ab Muin NF, Mohd M et al (2023) Breast cancer prevention and treatment misinformation on Twitter: an analysis of two languages. Digit Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231205742
Holmes MM, Bishop FL, Calman L (2017) “I just googled and read everything”: exploring breast cancer survivors’ use of the internet to find information on complementary medicine. Complement Ther Med 33:78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2017.06.007
Keselman A, Arnott Smith C, Murcko AC et al (2019) Evaluating the quality of health information in a changing digital ecosystem. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/11129
Chu JN, Sarkar U, Rivadeneira NA et al (2022) Impact of language preference and health literacy on health information-seeking experiences among a low-income, multilingual cohort. Patient Educ Couns 105:1268–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.028
Biancovilli P, Makszin L, Csongor A (2021) Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories. BMC Womens Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y
Ohlheiser A (2020) Doctors are now social-media influencers. They aren’t all ready for it. MIT Technology Review (https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/04/26/1000602/covid-coronavirus-doctors-tiktok-youtube-misinformation-pandemic. Accessed 10 Dec 2023
Martinez-Cannon BA, Barragan-Carrillo R, Villarreal-Garza C (2021) Young women with breast cancer in resource-limited settings: what we know and what we need to do better. Breast Cancer 13:641–650. https://doi.org/10.2147/bctt.s303047
Yao Y, Zhang H, Liu X et al (2021) Bridging the digital divide between old and young people in China: challenges and opportunities. Lancet Healthy Longev. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00032-5
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Institut Kanser Negara, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, and National Cancer Society Malaysia for their assistance during data collection. We would like to thank the Director General of Health Malaysia for his permission to publish this article.
Funding
This work was supported by the University Research Grant, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (grant number GUP-2020-004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Izzati Yussof, Noraida Mohamed Shah; methodology: Izzati Yussof, Noraida Mohamed Shah, Nur Fa’izah Ab Muin, Sarahfarina Abd. Rahim, Ernieda Hatah, Nor Asyikin Mohd Tahir; formal analysis and investigation: Izzati Yussof, Noraida Mohamed Shah, Nur Fa’izah Ab Muin, Sarahfarina Abd. Rahim, Ernieda Hatah, Nor Asyikin Mohd Tahir; writing — original draft preparation: Izzati Yussof; writing — review and editing: Noraida Mohamed Shah, Nur Fa’izah Ab Muin, Sarahfarina Abd. Rahim, Ernieda Hatah, Nor Asyikin Mohd Tahir, Kavinash Loganathan, Murallitharan Munisamy; funding acquisition: Noraida Mohamed Shah; resource: Nur Fa’izah Ab Muin, Sarahfarina Abd. Rahim, Kavinash Loganathan, Murallitharan Munisamy; supervision: Noraida Mohamed Shah.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclaimer
The funders played no role in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or writing of the report.
Ethics Approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Permission to conduct this study was obtained from the Ministry of Health Malaysia (NMRR ID-22-00345-VIG) and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Research Ethics Committee (JEP-2022-240).
Consent to Participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants prior to the interview.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(PDF 184 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yussof, I., Mohamed Shah, N., Ab Muin, N. et al. Challenges in Obtaining and Seeking Information Among Breast Cancer Survivors in an Asian Country: a Qualitative Study. J Canc Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02421-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02421-0