Skip to main content
Log in

Standardized Patient Simulation in an Oncology Symptom Management Seminar-Style Course: Prelicensure Nursing Student Outcomes

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A critical role of the professional nurse is to manage symptoms associated with cancer and its treatments. Currently, prelicensure nursing curricula lack adequate oncology content and associated opportunities for clinical application. Thus, many graduate nurses do not possess the requisite knowledge and skills required to effectively manage cancer-related symptoms upon entry to practice. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of standardized patient simulation on nursing students’ knowledge, confidence, and competence (objective and self-perceived) related to oncology evidence-based symptom management principles, and to determine nursing students’ perceptions, satisfaction, and self-confidence with learning using standardized patient simulation in a seminar-style course. A longitudinal, one-group, convergent mixed-methods design with questionnaire variant was used. Data were collected at three time points: (T1) pre-seminar, (T2) pre-simulation, and (T3) post-simulation. A convenience sample of sixty-three senior baccalaureate nursing students in an oncology symptom management seminar participated in two standardized patient simulation scenarios. There was a significant increase in students’ knowledge, confidence, and self-perceived competence over time with a large effect size. All student groups (n = 14) demonstrated objective competence in the colorectal cancer scenario and all participants, with the exception of one student group, demonstrated objective competence in the breast cancer scenario. Participants also reported positive perceptions of, a high level of satisfaction with, and self-confidence in learning with the standardized patient simulations. Qualitative themes identified included unique focus, realism, and application of knowledge. Standardized patient simulation holds promise to enhance nursing students’ knowledge, confidence, and competence related to oncology evidence-based symptom management principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available upon request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. National Cancer Institute. 2020. Cancer statistics. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics#:~:text=The%20number%20of%20cancer%20survivors%20is%20expected%20to,point%20during%20their%20lifetimes%20%28based%20on%202013%E2%80%932015%20data%29. Accessed 10 Mar 2021

  2. Lockhart JS, Oberleitner MG, Fulton JS, Nolfi DA (2020) Oncology resources for students enrolled in pre-licensure and graduate nursing programs in the United States: a Scoping Review of the Literature. Semin Oncol Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) (2016) The impact of nursing workforce issues on quality cancer care. Oncol Nurs Forum. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.ONF.16-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooley ME, Ginex P, Galioto M, Struth D, Sheldon LK (2019) Update on the role of research in the oncology nursing society. Oncol Nurs Forum. https://doi.org/10.1188/19.ONF.11-14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. INACSL Standards Committee (2016) INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM. Clin Simul Nurs 12(Supplement):S1–S50

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lioce, Lori, Joseph O. Lopreiato, Dayna Downing, Todd Chang, Jaime Robertson, Mindi Anderson, Desiree Diaz, and Andrew Spain and the Terminology and Concepts Working Group (2020). Healthcare simulation dictionary 2nd ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 20–0019. https://doi.org/10.23970/simulationv2.

  7. Jang KI, Yoo YS, Roh YS (2019) Development and effectiveness of an oncology nursing standardized patient simulation program for nursing students. Korean J Adult Nurs. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2019.31.6.595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oh P-J, Jeon KD, Koh MS (2015) The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: a meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharour LA (2019) Implementing simulation in oncology emergencies education: a quasi-experimental design. Technol Health Care. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-181543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreland SS, Lemieux ML, Myers A (2012) End-of-life care and the use of simulation in a baccalaureate nursing program. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. https://doi.org/10.1515/1548-923X.2405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leighton K, Dubas J (2009) Simulated death: an innovative approach to teaching end-of-life care. Clin Simul Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.04.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Montgomery M, Cheshire M, Johnson P, Beasley A (2016) Incorporating end-of-life content into the community health nursing curriculum using high-fidelity simulation. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 18(1):60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jang A, Song M, Suhyun Kim S (2021) Development and effects of leukemia nursing simulation based on clinical reasoning. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siegel V, Eckardt P (2017) A prospective observational cross-sectional study examining the effect of using human simulation and moulages to assist in skin cancer education of nursing students. J Dermat Nurses’ Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1097/JDN.0000000000000353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. San O, Eda RM, Gross RE, Myers P (2019) Transgender standardized patient simulation: management of an oncological emergency. J Transcult Nurs. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619849479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ross JG, Burrell SA (2018) Standardized patient simulation to facilitate learning in evidence-based oncology symptom management. J Nurs Educ. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180322-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. National League for Nursing. (n.d.). Descriptions of available instruments. http://www.nln.org/professional-development-programs/research/tools-and-instruments/descriptions-of-available-instruments. Accessed 10 Mar 2021

  19. Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument©. 2013. Omaha, NE: Creighton University College of Nursing

  20. McHugh Mary L (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Angoff WH (1971) Scales, norms and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike RL (ed) Educational measurement, 2nd edn. American Council on Education, Washington, D.C., pp 508–600

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rezigalla AA (2015) Angoff’s method: The impact of raters’ selection. Saudi J Med Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-631X.162027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim Min Kyung, Arsenault Catherine, Atuyambe Lynn M, MubianaMacwan’gi M, Kruk Margaret E (2020) Determinants of healthcare providers’ confidence in their clinical skills to deliver quality obstetric and newborn care in Uganda and Zambia. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05410-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng C-Y, Tsai H-M, Chang C-H, Liou S-R (2014) New graduate nurses’ clinical competence, clinical stress, and intention to leave: a longitudinal study in Taiwan. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/748389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Villanova University Institute for Teaching and Learning (VITAL) and the Alpha Nu Chapter, Sigma Theta Tau International. Funding was awarded to Sherry A. Burrell and Jennifer G. Ross.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Sherry A. Burrell and Jennifer G. Ross. Methodology: Sherry A. Burrell, Jennifer G. Ross, and MaryAnn Heverly. Data collection: Jennifer G. Ross and Christine D’Annunzio. Formal analysis and investigation: Sherry A. Burrell, Jennifer G. Ross, and MaryAnn Heverly. Writing—original draft preparation: Sherry A. Burrell, Jennifer G. Ross, Christine D’Annunzio, and MaryAnn Heverly. Writing—review and editing: Sherry A. Burrell, Jennifer G. Ross, Christine D’Annunzio, and MaryAnn Heverly. Funding acquisition: Sherry A. Burrell and Jennifer G. Ross.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherry A. Burrell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Villanova University Institutional Review Board (IRB) as Exempt as a pilot study (IRB-FY2017-81) on January 3, 2017, and as a full study (IRB-FY2018-27) on August 10, 2017. The authors certify that the pilot and full studies were performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Freely given, informed consent to participate in this study was obtained from all participants prior to data collection in both the pilot and full study.

Consent for Publication

The IRB-approved Informed Consent Document for this study included the following statement: “results of the study will be submitted for publication and, if published, will be available to the participants and the public.” All participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data as a part of the informed consent process for this study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burrell, S.A., Ross, J.G., D’Annunzio, C. et al. Standardized Patient Simulation in an Oncology Symptom Management Seminar-Style Course: Prelicensure Nursing Student Outcomes. J Canc Educ 38, 185–192 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02096-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02096-x

Keywords

Navigation