Abstract
Online lung cancer screening assessments empower patients to learn about their risk for lung cancer and eligibility for screening. However, it is unknown whether these online assessments provide tailored recommendations that are consistent with national guidelines and include information to prepare patients for shared decision-making (SDM) consultations with their healthcare provider. In November 2019, we reviewed 71 NCI-Designated Cancer Center websites to identify US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for lung cancer screening eligibility and evidence-based features of shared decision-making (SDM). Only 11% of the websites included an online lung cancer screening assessment. Most assessments included tailored recommendations for screening eligibility based on USPSTF guidelines. Assessments designed to support SDM included both potential benefits and harms of undergoing lung cancer screening. Nearly all assessments directed adults to discuss the results with their healthcare provider and reinforced the importance of living a tobacco-free lifestyle. Online lung cancer screening assessments have the potential to put patients in control of knowledge about their lung cancer risk and screening eligibility. While nearly all assessments recommend patients to speak with their healthcare provider about their risk for lung cancer, patients may require more support to initiate and navigate SDM conversations with their providers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
US Preventive Services Task Force, Final recommendation statement: lung cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/lung-cancer-screening. Accessed 24 Nov 2019
Jensen, Tamara Syrek, Joseph Chin, Lori Ashby, Jamie Hermansen, and Joseph Dolph Hutter. 2015. Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT). Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=274. Accessed 22 Nov 2020
Lowenstein LM, Richards VF, Leal VB, Housten AJ, Bevers TB, Cantor SB, Cinciripini PM, Cofta-Woerpel LM, Escoto KH, Godoy MCB, Linder SK, Munden RF, Volk RJ (2016) A brief measure of smokers’ knowledge of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Preventive Medicine Reports 4:351–356
Richards TB, Paul Doria-Rose V, Soman A, Klabunde CN, Caraballo RS, Gray SC, Houston KA, White MC (2019) Lung cancer screening inconsistent with U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Am J Prev Med 56:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.030
Jemal A, Fedewa SA (2017) Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in the United States - 2010 to 2015. JAMA Oncol 3:1278–1281. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6416
Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, D’Agostino TA, Hernandez M, Canzona MR, Bylund CL (2016) Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: a systematic review. Prev Med 93:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034
Elwyn GD, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M (2012) Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 27:1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
Stacey, D, France Légaré, Nananda F. Col, Carol L. Bennett, Michael J. Barry, Karen B. Eden, Margaret Holmes Rovner, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Ana Lyddiatt, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena, and Julie H.C. Wu. 2014. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 28: CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
Slatore CG (2019) COUNTERPOINT: can shared decision-making of physicians and patients improve outcomes in lung cancer screening? No. Chest 156:15–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.011
Tanner NT, Silvestri GA (2019) Shared decision-making and lung cancer screening: Let’s get the conversation started. Chest 155:21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.013
Légaré, F., Rheda Adekpedjou, Dawn Stacey, Stephane Turcotte, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Ian D. Graham, Anne Lyddiatt, Mary C. Politi, Richard Thomson, Glyn Elwyn, and Norbert Donner-Banzhoff. 2018. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Systematic Review 7: CD006732. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
Wiener R, Koppelman E, Bolton R, Lasser KE, Borrelli B, Au DH, Slatore CG, Clark JA, Kathuria H (2018) Patient and clinician perspectives on shared decision making in early adopting lung cancer screening programs: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 33:1035–1042
American Lung Association, Lung cancer screening implementation guide 2018, https://www.lungcancerscreeningguide.org/. Accessed 21 Nov 2020
National Cancer Institute, Risk-based NLST outcomes tool (RNOT), https://analysistools.nci.nih.gov/lungCancerScreening/#/. Accessed 24 Nov 2019
Noar SM, Harrington NG, Van Stee SK (2010) Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. American Journl of Lifestyle Medicine 5:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827610387255
Albada A, Ausems MGEM, Bensing JM, van Dulmen S (2009) Tailored information about cancer risk and screening: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 77:155–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.005
Sutton J, Vos SC, Olson MK, Woods C, Elisia Cohen C, Gibson B, Phillips NE, Studts JL, Eberth JM, Butts CT (2018) Lung cancer messages on Twitter: content analysis and evaluation. J Am Coll Radiol 15:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.043
Clark SD, Reuland DS, Enyioha C, Jonas DE (2020) Assessment of lung cancer screening program websites. JAMA Intern Med 180:824–830
Woloshin S, Black WC, Kramer BS (2020) Lung cancer screening websites - balanced information vs. advertisement. JAMA Intern Med 180:821–823
National Cancer Institute. NCI-Designated Cancer Centers. https://www.cancer.gov/research/infrastructure/cancer-centers. Accessed 1 May 2021
Paige SR, Salloum RG, Krieger JL, Williams M, Xue W, Brumback B (2020) Promoting clinical conversations about lung cancer screening: exploring the role of perceived online social support. J Health Commun 25:650–659
Kanodra NM, Pope C, Halbert CH, Silvestri GA, Rice LJ, Tanner NT (2016) Primary care provider and the patient perspectives on lung cancer screening: a qualitative study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 13:1977–1982
Modin HE, Fathi JT, Gilbert CR, Wilshire CL, Wilson AK, Aye RW, Farivar AS, Louie BE, Vallieres E, Gorden JA (2017) Pack-year cigarette smoking history for determination of lung cancer screening eligibility. Comparison of the electronic medical record versus a shared decision-making conversation. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14:1320–1325
Brenner AT, Malo TL, Margolis M, Lafata JE, James S, Vu MB, Reuland DS (2018) Evaluating shared decision making for lung cancer screening. JAMA Intern Med 178:1311–1316
Fiore, M.C., Carlos Roberto Jaén, Timothy B. Baker, William C. Bailey, Neal L. Benowitz, Susan J. Curry, Sally Faith Dorfman, Erica S. Froelicher, Michael G. Goldstein, et al. 2008. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F32HL143938. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paige, S.R., Salloum, R.G. & Carter-Harris, L. Assessment of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Websites. J Canc Educ 37, 1849–1854 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02051-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02051-w