Skip to main content
Log in

Updated Analysis of the Oncology Section of the OITE from 2007 to 2019

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Orthopaedic In-Training Exam (OITE) is administered annually to orthopedic surgery residents to assess their medical knowledge. The authors provide a comprehensive review of the orthopedic oncology portion of the exam in order to aid residents in preparation for future in-training and licensing examinations as well as to help guide oncology residency education curriculum. All of the orthopedic oncology questions on the OITE from 2007 to 2019 were reviewed. Analysis included (1) the number of oncology questions each year, (2) question topic, (3) question taxonomy (knowledge versus interpretation), (4) the type of imaging modalities (radiological, histological), (5) most commonly cited references, and (6) level of evidence. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare means between variables. From 2007 to 2019, there was a total of 292 tumor-related questions with a mean of 22.5 tumor-related questions (range 19–28) per year. Of the questions, 54.8% pertained to malignant tumors and 45.2% to benign tumors. Assessment of question taxonomy showed that 79.8% of questions required interpretation of imaging and analysis of the information provided versus 20.2% of questions being knowledge recall type. Of the questions, 76.7% required interpretation of radiological images, pathological images, or both. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery were the three most commonly cited question sources. Only 29 (9.84%) oncology questions over the past 13 years have been supported by level I or II sources of evidence. Better understanding of the OITE make-up, question distribution, and number and style of question, reference sources can improve an orthopedic residents’ performance as well as better guide educational curriculum to prepare residents in their orthopedic oncology education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haughom BD, Goldstein Z, Hellman MD, Yi PH, Frank RM, Levine BR (Dec 2014) An analysis of references used for the orthopaedic in-training examination: what are their levels of evidence and journal impact factors? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(12):4024–4032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mankin HJ (Mar-Apr 1971) The Orthopaedic in-Training Examination (OITE). Clin Orthop Relat Res 75:108–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. DePasse JM, Haglin J, Eltorai AEM, Mulcahey MK, Eberson CP, Daniels AH (2017) Orthopaedic in-Training Examination question metrics and resident test performance. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 9(2):7006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frassica FJ, Papp D, McCarthy E, Weber K (Jun 2008) Analysis of the pathology section of the OITE will aid in trainee preparation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(6):1323–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grandizio LC, Huston JC, Shim SS, Graham J, Klena JC (Dec 2016) Levels of evidence for hand questions on the orthopaedic in-training examination. Hand (N Y) 11(4):484–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dyrstad BW, Pope D, Milbrandt JC, Beck RT, Weinhoeft AL, Idusuyi OB (2011) Predictive measures of a resident’s performance on written Orthopaedic Board scores. Iowa Orthop J 31:238–243

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dougherty PJ, Walter N, Schilling P, Najibi S, Herkowitz H (2010) Do scores of the USMLE step 1 and OITE correlate with the ABOS part I certifying examination?: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(10):2797–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanson D, Marsh JL, Hurwitz S, DeRosa GP, Holtzman K, Bucak SD, Baker A, Morrison C (2013) Utility of AAOS OITE scores in predicting ABOS part I outcomes: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(12):e84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yen D, Athwal GS, Cole G (2014) The historic predictive value of Canadian orthopedic surgery residents’ orthopedic in-training examination scores on their success on the RCPSC certification examination. Can J Surg 57(4):260–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marx RG, Wilson SM, Swiontkowski MF (2015) Updating the assignment of levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(1):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin AS, Mcmains MC, Shacklett AG, Awan HM (2018) Hand surgery questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: analysis of content and reference. J Hand Surg Am 43(6):568.e1–568.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwalla A, Issa K, Changoor S, Djurasovic M, Emami A (2018) Evaluation of spine questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: an update from 2013 to 2017. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 28(4):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy RF, Nunez L, Barfield WR, Mooney JF (2017) Evaluation of pediatric questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination-an update. J Pediatr Orthop 37(6):e394–e397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Synovec J, Plumblee L, Barfield W, Slone H (2019) Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: an analysis of the sports medicine section-an update. J Surg Educ. 76(1):286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seybold JD, Srinivasan RC, Goulet JA, Dougherty PJ (2012) Analysis of the orthopaedic in-training examination (OITE) musculoskeletal trauma questions. J Surg Educ 69(1):8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ponce B, Savage J, Momaya A, Seales J, Oliver J, McGwin G, Theiss S (2014) Association between orthopaedic in-training examination subsection scores and ABOS part I examination performance. South Med J 107(12):746–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay N. Patel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

All Research and Biostatistics included in the study were performed at Morristown Medical Center

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoskins, T., Goyette, D., Patel, J.N. et al. Updated Analysis of the Oncology Section of the OITE from 2007 to 2019. J Canc Educ 36, 10–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01840-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01840-z

Keywords

Navigation