Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fatalistic Cancer Beliefs Across Generations and Geographic Classifications: Examining the Role of Health Information Seeking Challenges and Confidence

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information seeking is an active health behavior that influences cancer fatalism; however, people commonly experience challenges in accessing high-quality and actionable health information that is personally relevant. This is especially common among older and rural adults who have a high cancer risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the theoretical assumption that enhancing perceived confidence to overcome health information seeking challenges will alleviate cancer fatalism. In 2017, 895 adults from a large southeastern medical university’s cancer catchment area participated in a random digit dial survey. Participants were Millennials (18–35; 19%), Generation X (36–51; 23%), Baby Boomers (52–70; 40%), and Silent Generation (71–95; 16.9%) who had equal representation across metro (78.9%) and nonmetro (21.1%) counties. Younger generations (Millennials and Generation X) held stronger fatalistic cancer beliefs (“It seems like everything causes cancer,” “When I think about cancer, I automatically think about death”) than older generations. Most participants believed that precautionary efforts exist to reduce their chances of getting cancer, which was strongest among individuals residing in metro counties. In controlling for generation and geographic residence, individuals who experienced challenges in the process of accessing health information had stronger fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention; however, this relationship was most pronounced among individuals with confidence to ultimately obtain information that they needed. This study contributes to evidence for health information equity in combatting fatalistic cancer beliefs. Findings have important implications for the optimized dissemination of culturally adapted cancer education and skill-based training to efficiently access and evaluate relevant cancer education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Niederdeppe J, Gurmankin AL (2007) Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16:998–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Powe BD, Finnie R (2003) Cancer fatalism: the state of the science. Cancer Nurs 26:454–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wigfall LT, Friedman DB (2016) Cancer information seeking and cancer-related health outcomes: a scoping review of the Health Information National Trends Survey literature. J Health Commun 21:989–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen M (2013) Cancer fatalism: attitudes toward screening and care. In: Carr BI, Steel J (eds) Psychological aspects of cancer. Springer Publications, Boston, pp 83–99

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Valera P, Lian Z, Brotzman L, Reid A (2018) Fatalistic cancer beliefs and information seeking in formerly incarcerated African-American and Hispanic men: implications for cancer health communication and research. Health Commun 33:576–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramondt S, Susana Ramirez A (2017) Fatalism and exposure to health information from the media: examining the evidence for causal influence. Ann Int Commun Assoc 41:298–320

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paige Samantha R, Stellefson M, Krieger JL, Anderson-Lewis C, Cheong JW, Stopka C (2018) Proposing a transactional model of electronic health (eHealth) literacy. J Med Internet Res 20:e10175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramirez A, Walther JB, Burgoon JK, Sunnafrank M (2002) Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication. Hum Commun Res 28:213–228

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi LC, Smith SG (2016) Cancer fatalism, literacy, and cancer information seeking in the American public. Health Educ Behav 43:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arora NK, Hesse BW, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, Clayman ML, Croyle RT (2008) Frustrated and confused: the American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences. J Gen Intern Med 23:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Befort CA, Nazir N, Engelman K, Choi W (2013) Fatalistic cancer beliefs and information sources among rural and urban adults in the USA. J Cancer Educ 28:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anker AE, Reinhart AM, Feeley TH (2011) Health information seeking: a review of measures and methods. Patient Educ Couns 82:346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chesser AK, Woods NK, Smothers K, Rogers N (2016) Health literacy and older adults: a systematic review. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zahnd WE, Scaife SL, Francis ML (2009) Health literacy skills in rural and urban populations. Am J Health Behav 33:550–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system: overview of BRFSS 2016. https://Www.Cdc.Gov/Brfss/Annual_data/2016/Pdf/Overview_2016.pdf 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db20.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2018

  16. National Cancer Institute. Health information national trends survey. HINTS. https://hints.cancer.gov. Accessed 30 Sept 2019

  17. Dimock M (2019) Defining generations: where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/. Accessed 2 Aug 2019

  18. National Cancer Institute. Rural-Urban Continuum Code - SEER Datasets. https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/variables/countyattribs/ruralurban.html. Accessed 2 Aug 2019

  19. Paige SR, Flood-Grady E, Krieger JL, Stellefson M, Miller MD. Measuring health information seeking challenges in chronic disease: a psychometric analysis of a brief scale. Chronic Illness. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30889966. Accessed 8 Apr 2020

  20. Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones CL, Jensen JD, Scherr CL, Brown NR, Christy K, Weaver J (2015) The health belief model as an explanatory framework in communication research: exploring parallel, serial, and moderated mediation. Health Commun 30:566–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen JD, Carcioppolo N, King AJ, Scherr CL, Jones CL, Niederdieppe J (2014) The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Educ Couns 94:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Loiselle CG (2019) Cancer information-seeking preferences linked to distinct patient experiences and differential satisfaction with cancer care. Patient Educ Couns 102:1187–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F32HL143938.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha R. Paige.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paige, S.R., Alpert, J.M. & Bylund, C.L. Fatalistic Cancer Beliefs Across Generations and Geographic Classifications: Examining the Role of Health Information Seeking Challenges and Confidence. J Canc Educ 36, 3–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01820-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01820-3

Keywords

Navigation