Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of the Polish Version of Questionnaire for the Assessment of Psychosocial and Functional Effects of Metastatic Breast Cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt culturally and validate a questionnaire assessing experiences of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in Poland. The questionnaire development was divided into three phases: bidirectional translation of the survey, testing it for acceptability and relevance, and field testing. In the field study, 320 women with MBC completed the questionnaire, 50 of them twice for retest. Basic psychometric properties of the items used in questionnaire were analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed using kappa coefficient. In case of some items, known-group validity was verified. We made minor revisions to the construction and wording of the questionnaire. The analysis of the variables distributions used in the final version of the questionnaire showed that there were no redundant response categories across items. We checked for the floor and ceiling effect. It was found that there were a total of < 40% respondents selecting the lowest or the highest possible score. The observed values of the Kappa coefficients indicated high tool’s stability. We compared predefined groups for known-group validity; few expected associations reached statistical significance, which supported the overall validity of the tool. The questionnaire has been successfully developed. The results confirm the validity, reliability, and applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO | Breast cancer: prevention and control. WHO 2016

  2. Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, Lutz J-M, De Angelis R, Capocaccia R et al (2008) Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol 9:730–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70179-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cancer Research UK. Survival for breast cancer n.d. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/survival. Accessed 6 July 2019

  4. Macek P, Hashim D, Mańczuk M, Błaszkiewicz E, Sosnowska-Pasiarska B, Biskup M, Król H, Smok-Kalwat J, Góźdź S (2018) Incidence trends of invasive and in situ breast cancer among females in Poland during 1999–2014. Med Stud 33:270–278. https://doi.org/10.5114/ms.2017.72480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ABC Global Charter | ABC Charter | ABC Guidelines n.d. https://www.abcglobalalliance.org/abc-global-charter/. Accessed 6 July 2019

  6. Au A, Lam W, Tsang J, Yau T, Soong I, Yeo W, Suen J, Ho WM, Wong KY, Kwong A, Suen D, Sze WK, Ng A, Girgis A, Fielding R (2013) Supportive care needs in Hong Kong Chinese women confronting advanced breast cancer. Psychooncology 22:1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brufsky AM, Ormerod C, Bell Dickson R, Citron ML (2017) Understanding the needs of patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of the Make Your Dialogue Count Survey. Breast J 23:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Mertz S, Fenech D (2016) Evolving psychosocial, emotional, functional, and support needs of women with advanced breast cancer: results from the Count Us, Know Us, Join Us and Here & Now surveys. Breast 28:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seah DS, Lin NU, Curley C, Weiner EP, Partridge AH (2014) Informational needs and the quality of life of patients in their first year after metastatic breast cancer diagnosis. J Community Support Oncol 12:347–354. https://doi.org/10.12788/jcso.0077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dragomir B-I, Fodoreanu L (n.d.) Correlations between state anxiety and quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 117:610–615

  11. Reed E, Simmonds P, Haviland J, Corner J (2012) Quality of life and experience of care in women with metastatic breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. J Pain Symptom Manag 43:747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harding V, Afshar M, Krell J, Ramaswami R, Twelves CJ, Stebbing J (2013) ‘Being there’ for women with metastatic breast cancer: a pan-European patient survey. Br J Cancer 109:1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer M, Huñis A, Oratz R, Glennon C, Spicer P, Caplan E, Fallowfield L (2010) Living with metastatic breast cancer: a global patient survey. Community Oncol 7:406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1548-5315(11)70415-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Citron ML, Mayer M, Dickson RB, Jones S, Brufsky AM (2016) Exploration of communication gaps among women with metastatic breast cancer, caregivers and oncologists. Breast Cancer Manag 5:151–160. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmt-2016-0023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer M (2010) Lessons learned from the metastatic breast cancer community. Semin Oncol Nurs 26:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2010.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spence D, Morstyn L, Wells K (2015) The support and information needs of women with secondary breast cancer

  17. Espié M, Moley-Massol I, Zernik N, Debiais D, Diéras V (2018) Metastatic breast cancer: patient journey, patient needs, and expectations: results of the RÉALITÉS National Survey. Oncologie 20:73–83. https://doi.org/10.3166/onco-2018-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson C, Aaronson N, Blazeby JM, Bottomley A, Fayers P, Koller M et al (2011) Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. Eur Organ Res Treat Cancer. http://groups.eortc.be/qol/sites/default/files/archives/guidelines_for_developing_questionnaire-_final.pdf

  19. Kuli D, Bottomley A, Velikova G, Greimel E, Koller M (2017) EORTC quality of life group translation procedure. Eur Organ Res Treat Cancer 2017:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1993) Using multivariate statistics, 3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zebrack BJ, Yi J, Petersen L, Ganz PA (2008) The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors. Psychooncology 17:891–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Williamson TJ, Love SM, Clague DeHart JN, Jorge-Miller A, Eshraghi L, Cooper Ortner H et al (2018) Metastatic Breast Cancer Collateral Damage Project (MBCCD): scale development and preliminary results of the Survey of Health, Impact, Needs, and Experiences (SHINE). Breast Cancer Res Treat 171:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4823-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ashing-Giwa KT, Lim J (2009) Examining the impact of socioeconomic status and socioecologic stress on physical and mental health quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1188/09.ONF.79-88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justyna Bochenek-Cibor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

District Medical Council in Tarnów Bioethics Committee (Decision No. 8/0177/2018).

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 103 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bochenek-Cibor, J., Zawisza, K., Georgiew, F. et al. Development and Validation of the Polish Version of Questionnaire for the Assessment of Psychosocial and Functional Effects of Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Canc Educ 37, 46–51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01780-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01780-8

Keywords

Navigation