Abstract
The demand for biomedical researchers and health science professionals has increased over the past several decades. This need is particularly acute in the fields of cancer research and oncology in which technological advances have fueled an unprecedented pace of laboratory discoveries and their applications in novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Internships that expose undergraduate students to cancer research and patient care serve an important function in meeting this need by educating trainees about careers in this field and inspiring them to pursue these professional paths. Moreover, the translational impetus of cancer research incorporates research, regulatory, business, and clinical components, providing students with even more cancer-focused career options. With the goal of providing hands-on experiences in cancer research and oncology to undergraduate students who comprise the next generation of cancer physician-scientists and will fill this demand in our professional workforce, the Nathan Schnaper Intern Program in Translational Cancer Research (NSIP) has grown from a small laboratory-based local summer internship to a competitive national program. In this study, we evaluate three new modules of the NSIP research, education, and clinical components that have been implemented in the first 2 years of National Cancer Institute Cancer Research Education Grants Program funding. The impact of these modules on intern satisfaction, learning, and near-term career trajectory is assessed to identify the most effective approaches and key measures of program outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:7–34
Goldstein, Michael Workforce Advisory Group Report (2008) Future supply of and demand for oncologists. J Oncol Pract 4:300
Jimmy R, Palatty PL, D’Silva P, Baliga MS, Singh A (2013) Are medical students inclined to do research? J Clin Diagn Res 7:2892–2895
Heimburger DC, Waterbor J, Fish L, Brooks CM (2000) An interdisciplinary program in nutrition sciences and cancer. J Cancer Educ 15:130–133
ASCO predicts shortage of oncologists as demand grows 2014 Oncology Practice.com March 12, 2014 http://www.oncologypractice.com/practice-economics/health-reform/single-article/asco-predicts-shortage-of-oncologists-as-demand-grows/995da42c6562b9cad9d0afa910fae7f1.html
Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D (2003) Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med 51:149–156
Sheikh AS, Sheikh SA, Kaleem A, Waqas A (2013) Factors contributing to lack of interest in research among medical students Adv. Med Educ Pract 4:237–243
Committee C, Institute for International Medical Education (2002) Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach 24:130–135
Gronemeyer SA (2011) Creating synergy: essential components of a successful R25E cancer education program. J Cancer Educ 26:215–222
Alfred L, Beerman PR, Tahir Z, LaHousse SF, Russell P, Sadler GR (2011) Increasing underrepresented scientists in cancer research: the UCSD CURE program. J Cancer Educ 26:223–227
Leonard JC, Ellsbury KE (1996) Gender and interest in academic careers among first- and third-year residents. Acad Med 71:502–504
NIH Guide (1993) PAR-94-004. Cancer Education Grant Program. 22(37):1–6. October 15, 1993. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pafiles/PAR-94-004.html. Accessed 21 December 2016
PAR-12-049. Cancer Education Grants Program (R25). December 1, 2011. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-12-049.html. Accessed 21 December 2016
Grandis, J.R. 2010. Merril J. Egorin: in memoriam. Clin. Cancer res.16:5362
Schnaper N (2003) I pay you to listen, not talk. Publish America Press, Frederick
Koerting, K. 2018. More women than men in life sciences but less in STEM. https://www.newstimes.com/local/article/More-women-than-men-in-life-sciences-but-less-in-12777665.php
Santen RJ, Brodie H, Simpson ER, Siiteri PK, Brodie A (2009) History of aromatase: saga of an important biological mediator and therapeutic target. Endocr Rev 30:343–375
Abderrahman B, Jordan VC (2017) Nature 548:32
Padilla LA, Venkatesh R, Daniel CL, Desmond RA, Brooks CM, Waterbor JW (2016) An evaluation methodology for longitudinal studies of short-term cancer research training programs. J Cancer Educ 31:84–92
Desmond RA, Padilla A, Daniel C, Prickett CT, Raam V, Michael Brooks C, Waterbor JW (2016) Career outcomes of graduates of R25E short-term cancer research training programs. J. Cancer Educ 31:93–100
Padilla LA, Desmond RA, Michael Brooks C, Waterbor JW (2018) Automated literature searches for longitudinal tracking of cancer research training program graduates. J Cancer Educ 33:564–568
Cameron C, Collie CL, Chang S (2012) Introducing students to cancer prevention careers through programmed summer research experiences. J Cancer Educ 27:233–242
Desmond RA, Venkatesh R, Padilla LA, Daniel CL, Litton AG, Heimburger DC, Michael Brooks C, Warterbor JW (2018) Twenty-five-year follow-up of short-term cancer research trainees at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: a brief report. J Cancer Educ 34:1010–1013
Soliman AS, Chamberlain RM (2016) Short- and long-term outcomes of student field research experiences inn special populations. J Cancer Educ 31:328–337
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ezelle, H.J., Geiman, T., Schnaper, L.A. et al. A Translational Approach to Cancer Research, Education and Training. J Canc Educ 36, 621–629 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01675-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01675-3