Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Translational Approach to Cancer Research, Education and Training

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The demand for biomedical researchers and health science professionals has increased over the past several decades. This need is particularly acute in the fields of cancer research and oncology in which technological advances have fueled an unprecedented pace of laboratory discoveries and their applications in novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Internships that expose undergraduate students to cancer research and patient care serve an important function in meeting this need by educating trainees about careers in this field and inspiring them to pursue these professional paths. Moreover, the translational impetus of cancer research incorporates research, regulatory, business, and clinical components, providing students with even more cancer-focused career options. With the goal of providing hands-on experiences in cancer research and oncology to undergraduate students who comprise the next generation of cancer physician-scientists and will fill this demand in our professional workforce, the Nathan Schnaper Intern Program in Translational Cancer Research (NSIP) has grown from a small laboratory-based local summer internship to a competitive national program. In this study, we evaluate three new modules of the NSIP research, education, and clinical components that have been implemented in the first 2 years of National Cancer Institute Cancer Research Education Grants Program funding. The impact of these modules on intern satisfaction, learning, and near-term career trajectory is assessed to identify the most effective approaches and key measures of program outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2019) Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69:7–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein, Michael Workforce Advisory Group Report (2008) Future supply of and demand for oncologists. J Oncol Pract 4:300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jimmy R, Palatty PL, D’Silva P, Baliga MS, Singh A (2013) Are medical students inclined to do research? J Clin Diagn Res 7:2892–2895

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Heimburger DC, Waterbor J, Fish L, Brooks CM (2000) An interdisciplinary program in nutrition sciences and cancer. J Cancer Educ 15:130–133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. ASCO predicts shortage of oncologists as demand grows 2014 Oncology Practice.com March 12, 2014 http://www.oncologypractice.com/practice-economics/health-reform/single-article/asco-predicts-shortage-of-oncologists-as-demand-grows/995da42c6562b9cad9d0afa910fae7f1.html

  6. Solomon SS, Tom SC, Pichert J, Wasserman D (2003) Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists. J Investig Med 51:149–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheikh AS, Sheikh SA, Kaleem A, Waqas A (2013) Factors contributing to lack of interest in research among medical students Adv. Med Educ Pract 4:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Committee C, Institute for International Medical Education (2002) Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach 24:130–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gronemeyer SA (2011) Creating synergy: essential components of a successful R25E cancer education program. J Cancer Educ 26:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alfred L, Beerman PR, Tahir Z, LaHousse SF, Russell P, Sadler GR (2011) Increasing underrepresented scientists in cancer research: the UCSD CURE program. J Cancer Educ 26:223–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leonard JC, Ellsbury KE (1996) Gender and interest in academic careers among first- and third-year residents. Acad Med 71:502–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. NIH Guide (1993) PAR-94-004. Cancer Education Grant Program. 22(37):1–6. October 15, 1993. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pafiles/PAR-94-004.html. Accessed 21 December 2016

  13. PAR-12-049. Cancer Education Grants Program (R25). December 1, 2011. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-12-049.html. Accessed 21 December 2016

  14. Grandis, J.R. 2010. Merril J. Egorin: in memoriam. Clin. Cancer res.16:5362

  15. Schnaper N (2003) I pay you to listen, not talk. Publish America Press, Frederick

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koerting, K. 2018. More women than men in life sciences but less in STEM. https://www.newstimes.com/local/article/More-women-than-men-in-life-sciences-but-less-in-12777665.php

  17. Santen RJ, Brodie H, Simpson ER, Siiteri PK, Brodie A (2009) History of aromatase: saga of an important biological mediator and therapeutic target. Endocr Rev 30:343–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abderrahman B, Jordan VC (2017) Nature 548:32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Padilla LA, Venkatesh R, Daniel CL, Desmond RA, Brooks CM, Waterbor JW (2016) An evaluation methodology for longitudinal studies of short-term cancer research training programs. J Cancer Educ 31:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Desmond RA, Padilla A, Daniel C, Prickett CT, Raam V, Michael Brooks C, Waterbor JW (2016) Career outcomes of graduates of R25E short-term cancer research training programs. J. Cancer Educ 31:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Padilla LA, Desmond RA, Michael Brooks C, Waterbor JW (2018) Automated literature searches for longitudinal tracking of cancer research training program graduates. J Cancer Educ 33:564–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cameron C, Collie CL, Chang S (2012) Introducing students to cancer prevention careers through programmed summer research experiences. J Cancer Educ 27:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Desmond RA, Venkatesh R, Padilla LA, Daniel CL, Litton AG, Heimburger DC, Michael Brooks C, Warterbor JW (2018) Twenty-five-year follow-up of short-term cancer research trainees at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: a brief report. J Cancer Educ 34:1010–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Soliman AS, Chamberlain RM (2016) Short- and long-term outcomes of student field research experiences inn special populations. J Cancer Educ 31:328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bret A. Hassel.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ezelle, H.J., Geiman, T., Schnaper, L.A. et al. A Translational Approach to Cancer Research, Education and Training. J Canc Educ 36, 621–629 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01675-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01675-3

Keywords

Navigation