Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can Smartphones Promote Cancer Prevention Behaviours in Healthy Young Adults? A Prospective Study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer prevention should start as early as possible. Young adults would benefit largely from the use of a smartphone app aiming at promoting cancer prevention behaviours. The aims of the study described in this paper are to (1) examine the user participation and engagement with a cancer prevention app in real-life settings and (2) assess changes in the users’ cancer prevention behaviours. A cancer prevention smartphone app called Happy was developed and released to the general population. Data from registered app users’ (N = 3326) demographics and baseline cancer prevention behaviours was analysed. App engagement was measured and all behaviour data logged through the app was analysed to assess the effectiveness of the app in the promotion of cancer prevention behaviours. User demographics and baseline behaviour assessment show that the app reached its intended target population: young adults that generally do not comply with cancer prevention guidelines. Logged behavioural data showed an increased frequency in several cancer prevention behaviours and a significant increase in the overall putative cancer prevention level (p < 0.001). However, user engagement with the app was limited and might condition the long-term impact of such changes. Happy reached its intended population and seems to be an effective tool to promote cancer prevention. Further research is needed to fully assess its long-term persuasive potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schüz J, Espina C, Villain P, Herrero R, Leon ME, Minozzi S, Romieu I, Segnan N, Wardle J, Wiseman M, Belardelli F, Bettcher D, Cavalli F, Galea G, Lenoir G, Martin-Moreno JM, Nicula FA, Olsen JH, Patnick J, Primic-Zakelj M, Puska P, van Leeuwen FE, Wiestler O, Zatonski W, Guha N, Kralikova E, McNeill A, Peruga A, Anderson A, Berrino F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Cecchini M, Key TJ, Leitzmann M, Norat T, Powers HJ, Scoccianti C, Auvinen A, de Vries E, Erdmann F, Greinert R, Harrison J, Kesminiene A, McColl N, Friis S, Kogevinas M, Saracci R, Straif K, Vainio H, Almonte M, Anttila A, de Vuyst H, Dillner J, Franceschi S, Gonzalez P, Hall A, Park JY, Armaroli P, Atkin W, Dean PB, de Koning H, Dillner L, Kuipers E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Paci E, Regula J, Suonio E, Törnberg S, Wood LF, Gaudin N, Frie KG, Terrasse V, Winstanley K, Bellisario C, Biagioli E, Cinquini M, Gianola S, Gonzalez Lorenzo M, von Karsa L, Lignini T (2015) European code against cancer 4th edition: 12 ways to reduce your cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol 39:S1–S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colditz GA, Wei EK (2012) Preventability of cancer: the relative contributions of biologic and social and physical environmental determinants of cancer mortality. Annu Rev Public Health 33:137–156. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124627

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz RC, Meyers K, Walls J (1995) Cancer awareness and self-examination practices in young men and women. J Behav Med 18:377–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sherman SM, Lane EL (2014) Awareness of risk factors for breast, lung and cervical cancer in a UK student population. J Cancer Educ 30:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0770-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Werk RS, Hill JC, Graber JA (2016) Impact of knowledge, self-efficacy, and perceived importance on steps taken toward cancer prevention among college men and women. J Cancer Educ 32:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-0996-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fedele DA, Cushing CC, Fritz A, Amaro CM, Ortega A (2017) Mobile health interventions for improving health outcomes in youth. JAMA Pediatr 171:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bauman A, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, Hagströmer M, Craig CL, Bull FC, Pratt M, Venugopal K, Chau J, Sjöström M, IPS Group (2011) The descriptive epidemiology of sitting: a 20-country comparison using the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). Am J Prev Med 41:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogg BJ (2007) Increasing persuasion through mobility. In: Fogg BJ, Eckles D (eds) Mob. Persuas. 20 Perspect. Futur. Behav. Chang. Stanford Captology Media, Stanford, pp 155–163

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chatterjee S, Price A (2009) Healthy living with persuasive technologies: framework, issues, and challenges. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2859

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandey A, Hasan S, Dubey D, Sarangi S (2013) Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: changing trends in health information-seeking behavior. J Cancer Educ 28:138–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0446-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Coughlin S, Thind H, Liu B, Champagne N, Jacobs M, Massey RI (2016) Mobile phone apps for preventing cancer through educational and behavioral interventions: state of the art and remaining challenges. JMIR mHealth uHealth 4:e69. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bert F, Giacometti M, Gualano MR, Siliquini R (2014) Smartphones and health promotion: a review of the evidence. J Med Syst 38:9995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9995-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. B.J. Fogg (2009) A behavior model for persuasive design, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Persuas. Technol. - Persuas. ‘09. 1. doi: 10.1145/1541948.1541999

  15. Abraham C, Michie S (2008) A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol 27:379–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ott JJ, Ullrich A, Mascarenhas M, Stevens GA (2011) Global cancer incidence and mortality caused by behavior and infection. J Public Health (Bangkok) 33:223–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parkin DM, Boyd L, Walker LC (2011) 16. The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010. Br J Cancer 105:S77–S81. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.489

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Doll R, Peto R (1981) The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst 66:1191–1308 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7017215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bjartveit K, Tverdal a (2005) Health consequences of smoking 1-4 cigarettes per day. Tob Control 14:315–320. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.011932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Smyth J, Stone A (2003) Ecological momentary assessment research in behavioral medicine. J Happiness Stud 4:35–52. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1023657221954 (accessed May 30, 2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Facebook statistics, (2015). http://www.statisticbrain.com/facebook-statistics/ (accessed March 21, 2016)

  22. M. Van Hemelrijck, T. Shanmugalingam, A. Soultati, S. Chowdhury, S. Rudman (2013) Global incidence and outcome of testicular cancer. Clin Epidemiol 417. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S34430

  23. McConnell MV, Shcherbina A, Pavlovic A, Homburger JR, Goldfeder RL, Waggot D et al (2016) Feasibility of obtaining measures of lifestyle from a smartphone app. JAMA Cardiol 346:793–801. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eysenbach G (2005) The law of attrition. JMIR 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the users that downloaded and used the app voluntarily participating in the study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Gulbenkian Foundation through Project HYPE and by the Portuguese national funding agency for science, research and technology (FCT) [grant number SFRH/BD/92996/2013].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno Ribeiro.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the University of Aveiro’s (Portugal) Ethics Committee.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 353 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ribeiro, N., Moreira, L., Almeida, A.M.P. et al. Can Smartphones Promote Cancer Prevention Behaviours in Healthy Young Adults? A Prospective Study. J Canc Educ 34, 847–853 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1382-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1382-0

Keywords

Navigation