Skip to main content
Log in

Voices About a Stigma: Cancer in the Opinion of Three Different Segments in Brazilian Society

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The viewpoints of Brazilian opinion leaders regarding cancer are not yet well defined. Examining public perceptions of three segments of society through a qualitative study may provide clues to understanding the negative view that the population still has about the disease. Journalists, scientists and teachers participated in discussions in six focus group sessions. The findings were studied using the content analysis method, showing similar elements among these professionals, regardless of area of operation. We identified a negative view that may be contributing to or mirroring the vision of society that associates the illness with death and suffering. Although these opinion leaders believe they are able to filter certain negative aspects of media dissemination about cancer, when the disease affects them personally, the feeling of despair resembles common sense. Words such as “cure” are viewed with prejudice. On the other hand, a morbid approach arouses interest on the subject. It was also noted that the disclosure of a celebrity with cancer stands out as a decoy in the consumption of news. Such distortions may support actions that enhance communication about cancer, structured on pillars such as prevention, early diagnosis and cure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. INCA e Ministério da Saúde apresentam estimativas de câncer para 2014. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. http://www2.inca.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/agencianoticias/site/home/noticias/2013/inca_ministerio_saude_apresentam_estimativas_cancer_2014

  2. Instituto Nacional de Câncer (Brasil) (2011) ABC do câncer: abordagens básicas para o controle do câncer / Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Inca, Rio de Janeiro, p 128, il

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldenberg JL, Arndt J (2008) The implications of death for health: a terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. Psychol Rev 115(4):1032–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. CENSO DEMOGRÁFICO 2010 (2011) Características da população e dos domicílios: resultados do universo. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro, http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/caracteristicas_da_populacao/resultados_do_universo.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pyne D (2008) A model of religion and death (papers on economics of religion from Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada 08/06)., http://ideas.repec.org/p/gra/paoner/08-06

    Google Scholar 

  6. INCA (2007) INCA divulga pesquisa de opinião dos brasileiros sobre o câncer. Instituto Nacional do Câncer., http://www.inca.gov.br/impressao.asp?op=pid=1396

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allemani C et al (2015) Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 385:977–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. INCA (2014) Atlas da mortalidade por câncer no Brasil. Instituto Nacional do Câncer., https://mortalidade.inca.gov.br/MortalidadeWeb/

    Google Scholar 

  9. Colucci E (2007) Focus groups can be fun: the use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qual Health Res 17:1422–1433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bardin L (2009) Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70, LDA, Lisbon, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grant JA, Hundley H (2009). Images of the war on cancer in the Associated Press: centering survivors and marginalizing victims. American Communication Journal; 11(4). In: http://acjournal.org/journal/2009/Winter/Articles/110405%20Images% 20of%20the%20War%20on%20Cancer%20in%20the%20Associated%20Press.pdf

  12. Verjovsky M, Jurberg C (2012) Spotlight on the news: a critical review of cancer disclosure. J Media Commun Stud 4(8):150–158

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niederdeppe J, Levy AG (2007) Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16(5):998–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davison P (1983) The third-person effect in communication. J Public Opin Q 47(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biancovilli P, Machado GCO, Jurberg C (2015) Celebrity and health promotion: how media can play an active role in cancer prevention and early detection. J Media Commun Stud 7(3):41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McCombs M, Shaw D (1972) The agenda setting function of mass media. Public Opin Q 36(2):176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43:51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sontag S (1991) Illness as metaphor. Penguin (first published in New York by Farrar, Straus & Giroux), London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Webster R, Heeley E (2010) Perception of risk: understanding cardiovascular disease. Risk Manage Healthc Policy 3:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Awad A, Al-Nafisi H (2014) Public knowledge of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Kuwait: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 14:1131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro, Fundação do Câncer and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Jurberg.

Ethics declarations

The study protocol was approved by the National Ethics Committee of the Institute of Public Health Studies at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (CEP/IESC-UFRJ) under report number 12/2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machado, G.d.O.C., Biancovilli, P. & Jurberg, C. Voices About a Stigma: Cancer in the Opinion of Three Different Segments in Brazilian Society. J Canc Educ 32, 413–416 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0962-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0962-5

Keywords

Navigation