Abstract
Despite the high burden of prostate cancer in African American communities, there is a paucity of knowledge about prostate health. This paper describes the enhancement of a curriculum for training lay health advisors, called prostate cancer ambassadors, on informed decision-making for prostate cancer screening. Adult learning theory informed the structuring of the training sessions to be interactive, self-directed, and engaging. Trainings were developed in a manner that made the material relevant to the learners and encouraged co-learning. The research team developed strategies, such as using discussions and interactive activities, to help community members weigh the pros and cons of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and to make an informed decision about screening. Furthermore, activities were developed to bolster four social cognitive theory constructs: observational learning, self-efficacy for presenting information to the community and for making an informed decision themselves, collective efficacy for presenting information to the community, and outcome expectations from those presentations. Games, discussions, and debates were included to make learning fun and encourage discovery. Practice sessions and team-building activities were designed to build self-efficacy for sharing information about informed decision-making. Topics added to the original curriculum included updates on prostate cancer screening, informed decision-making for screening, skills for being a lay health advisor, and ethics. This dynamic model and approach to lay health advisor (ambassador) training is flexible: while it was tailored for use with prostate cancer education, it can be adjusted for use with other types of cancer and even other diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NCI (2015) SEER Stat Fact Sheets: prostate cancer. [cited 2015 March 24]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html.
Wang DS et al (2013) Severe lack of comprehension of common prostate health terms among low-income inner-city men. Cancer 119(17):3204–3211
Winterich JA et al (2009) Men’s knowledge and beliefs about prostate cancer: education, race, and screening status. Ethn Dis 19(2):199–203
Altpeter M et al (1999) Lay health advisor activity levels: definitions from the field. Health Educ Behav 26(4):495–512
Luque JS et al (2011) Barbershop communications on prostate cancer screening using barber health advisers. Am J Mens Health 5(2):129–139
Luque JS, et al. (2014) Feasibility study of engaging barbershops for prostate cancer education in rural African-American communities. J Cancer Educ 30(4):623-628
Gwede CK et al (2013) Designing a community-based lay health advisor training curriculum to address cancer health disparities. Health Promot Pract 14(3):415–424
North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics. (2014) NC Central Cancer Registry: 2008-2012 North Carolina cancer mortality rates by race and ethnicity. Available at http://www.schs.state.nc.us/schs/CCR/mort2012re.pdf
Vines A, Hunter J, White B, Richmond A. (2015) Building capacity in a rural North Carolina community to address prostate health using a lay health advisor model. Health Promot Pract. doi:10.1177/1524839915598500
Moyer V (2012) Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 157(2):120–134
Slomski A (2011) USPSTF finds little evidence to support advising PSA screening in any man. JAMA 306(23):2549–2551
Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH (2004) Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. A suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med 26(1):56–66
Knowles M, Holton E, Swanson R (2015) The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development, 8th edn. Routledge, New York
CDC (2013) Should I get screened for prostate cancer? March 16, 2015 [cited 2015 September 11]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/prostate/basic_info/get-screened.htm.
Hunter J, Vines A, Carlisle V. (2015). African Americans’ Perceptions of PSA Prostate Cancer Screening.Health Educ Beh. 42(4):539–544.
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
McAlister A, Perry C, Parcel G (2008) How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: social cognitive theory. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K (eds) Health education and behavior: theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Worth, New York
Acknowledgments
Funding to implement the ambassador program was provided by the National Cancer Institute Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, Community Networks Program Centers (grant no. U54-CA153602). The authors also wish to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of the community partners and the prostate cancer ambassadors. The authors have much respect for their talent and dedication to improving the health of their respective communities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vines, A.I., Hunter, J.C., Carlisle, V.A. et al. Prostate Cancer Ambassadors: Enhancing a Theory-Informed Training Program for Informed Decision-Making. J Canc Educ 32, 454–459 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0955-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0955-4