Abstract
A number of medical smartphone applications have been developed to assist clinical oncology specialists. Concerns have arisen that the information provided may not be under sufficient scrutiny. This study aims to analyse the current applications available for clinical oncologists in the UK. Applications aimed specifically at physician clinical oncologists were searched for on the major smartphone operating systems: Apple iOS; Google Android; Microsoft Windows OS; and Blackberry OS. All applications were installed and analysed. The applications were scrutinised to assess the following information: cost; whether the information included was referenced; when the information was last updated; and whether they made any reference to UK guidelines. A novel rating score based on these criteria was applied to each application. Fifty applications were identified: 24 for Apple’s iOS; 23 for Google’s Android; 2 for Blackberry OS; and 1 for Windows OS. The categories of applications available were: drug reference; journal reference; learning; clinical calculators; decision support; guidelines; and dictionaries. Journal reference and guideline applications scored highly on our rating system. Drug reference application costs were prohibitive. Learning tools were poorly referenced and not up-to-date. Smartphones provide easy access to information. There are numerous applications devoted to oncology physicians, many of which are free and contain referenced, up-to-date data. The cost and quality of drug reference and learning applications have significant scope for improvement. A regulatory body is needed to ensure the presence of peer-reviewed, validated applications to ensure their reliability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
iOS http://www.apple.com/ios. Last accessed 08 Apr 14
Google play https://play.google.com/store. Last accessed 08 Apr 14
The Kantar World Panel (2014) Apple launch momentum continues. http://www.kantarworldpanel.com/Global/News/Apple-launch-momentum-continues. Accessed 08 Apr 2014
Davies BS, Rafique J, Vincent TR, Fairclough J, Packer MH et al (2012) Mobile medical education (MoMEd)—how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students—a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ 12:1
Hardyman W, Bullock A, Brown A, Carter-Ingram S, Stacey M (2013) Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: an evaluation. BMC Med Educ 13:6
GMC (2013) ‘Good medical practice; knowledge, skills and performance’. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/knowledge_skills_performance.asp. Accessed on 08 Apr 2014
Boxall NE (2014) Mobile apps: are we culturally out of signal? Emerg Med J. doi:10.1136/emermed-2014-203809
Payne KB, Wharrad H, Watts K (2012) Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12:121
Franko OI, Tirrell TF (2012) Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst 36(5):3135–3139
Boulos MN, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, Buller DB, Dellavalle RP (2014) Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J Public Health Inform 5(3):229
Charani E, Castro-Sánchez E, Moore LS, Holmes A (2014) Do smartphone applications in healthcare require a governance and legal framework? It depends on the application! BMC Med 12:29
Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, Patton T, English JC 3rd et al (2013) Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol 149(4):422–426
Cheung WY, Fishman PN, Verma S (2009) Oncology education in Canadian undergraduate and postgraduate training programs. J Cancer Educ 24(4):284–290
Bender JL, Yue RY, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR (2013) A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res 15(12):e287
Pandey A, Hasan S, Dubey D, Sarangi S (2013) Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: changing trends in health information-seeking behavior. J Cancer Educ 28(1):138–4217
Google Play (2014) Calculate by QxMD. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.qxmd.calculate. Accessed 08 Apr 2014
Bierbrier R, Lo V, Wu RC (2014) Evaluation of the accuracy of smartphone medical calculation apps. J Med Internet Res 16(2):e32
Google Play (2014) NICE Guidance. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nice.android. Accessed 08 Apr 2014
Cantudo-Cuenca MR, Robustillo-Cortés MA, Cantudo-Cuenca MD, Morillo-Verdugo R (2014) A better regulation is required in viral hepatitis smartphone applications. Farm Hosp 38(n02):112–117
Wallace LS, Dhingra LK (2014) A systematic review of smartphone applications for chronic pain available for download in the United States. J Opioid Manag 10(1):63–68
Connor K, Brady RR, de Beaux A, Tulloh B (2013) Contemporary hernia smartphone applications (apps). Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1130-7
Murfin M (2013) Know your apps: an evidence-based approach to evaluation of mobile clinical applications. J Physician Assist Educ 24(3):38–40
Demaerschalk BM, Vegunta S, Vargas BB, Wu Q et al (2012) Reliability of real-time video smartphone for assessing National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores in acute stroke patients. Stroke 43(12):3271–3277
Hawkes CP, Walsh BH, Ryan CA, Dempsey EM (2013) Smartphone technology enhances newborn intubation knowledge and performance amongst paediatric trainees. Resuscitation 84(2):223–226
Dyer C (2013) Doctors are accused of plagiarising a medical guide to produce a smartphone app. BMJ 347:f5426
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rozati, H., Shah, S.P. & Shah, N. Smartphone Applications for the Clinical Oncologist in UK Practice. J Canc Educ 30, 367–373 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0681-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0681-3