Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving Diversity in Cancer Research Trials: The Story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The participation of racial and ethnic minorities and underserved populations in clinical trials is a critical link between scientific innovation and improvements in health care delivery and health outcomes. However, these population groups continue to be underrepresented in research. We describe the development of the Cancer Disparities Research Network (CDRN) to improve minority and underserved populations’ participation in biobanking research. Between February and October 2011, we conducted a regional assessment to identify challenges and opportunities for cancer trials and biobanking research across the CDRN. Representatives from ten CDRN biorepository facilities completed an online survey assessing their facilities’ minority biospecimen collection, biobanking practices, and education/outreach initiatives. Representatives of eight facilities also participated in stakeholder interviews. The majority (70 %) of facilities reported that specimens were available for research, although only one tenth of these specimens were from non-White patients. Most facilities collected a patient’s age, gender, race, medical history, and ethnicity with samples; however, less than half also collected family health history, education level, household income, or primary language spoken. In addition, few institutions collected Asian or Hispanic subgroup information. Only a few reported biospecimen collection outreach programs specifically targeting minority and underserved populations. Biospecimen directors and administrators indicated that funding, biospecimen sharing procedures, and standardization barriers limited their facilities from collaborating in biospecimen collection programs, despite their great interest. These findings suggest that the CDRN can provide opportunities for collaboration, resource sharing, and fostering of research ideas to address cancer disparities in biospecimen research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watson RW, Kay EW, Smith D (2010) Integrating biobanks: addressing the practical and ethical issues to deliver a valuable tool for cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer 10(9):646–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Unequal Burden of Cancer (1999) An Assessment of NIH Research and Programs for Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved, ed. M.A. Haynes and B.D. Smedley: The National Academies Press

  3. Colon-Otero G et al (2008) Disparities in participation in cancer clinical trials in the United States: a symptom of a healthcare system in crisis. Cancer 112(3):447–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ford JG et al (2008) Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer 112(2):228–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford JG et al (2005) Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 122:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sateren WB et al (2002) How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol 20(8):2109–2117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Byrne, MM. et al. (2013) Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Why Are Patients Not Participating? Med Decis Making

  8. Rivers D et al (2013) A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans’ participation in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 35(2):13–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleisher L et al (1998) Building effective partnerships: a national evaluation of the Cancer Information Service outreach program. Part 2 J Health Commun 3(Suppl1):21–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Myers RE et al (2006) Increasing access to clinical and educational studies. Cancer 107(8 Suppl):1962–1970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleisher L et al (2007) The NCI’s Cancer Information Service’s Research Continuum Framework: integrating research into cancer education practice (1999–2004). J Cancer Educ 22(1 Suppl):S41–S48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon MA, R.D., Willis C, Hajjar N, Murphy K, Dong X (2013) Leveraging a community-based participatory research approach to explore research perceptions among suburban poor and underserved populations. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, In press

  13. Samaras A, M K, Nonzee N, Endress R, Hajiar N, Bularzik R, Frankovich C, Dong XQ, Simon MA (2013) Community–campus partnership in action: lessons learned from the DuPage county patient navigation collaborative. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, In press

  14. Dong XQ, L.Y., Chen R, Chang ES, Simon MA, Simon MA (2013) Evaluation of community health education workshops among Chinese older adults in Chicago: a community-based participatory research approach. Journal of Education Training and Studies, In press

  15. Kaur JS, Petereit DG (2012) Personalized medicine: challenge and promise. J Cancer Educ 27(1):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Compton C (2007) Getting to personalized cancer medicine: taking out the garbage. Cancer 110(8):1641–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaught JB, Henderson MK, Compton CC (2012) Biospecimens and biorepositories: from afterthought to science. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(2):253–255

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiore S (2008) Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: how the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research 39(3):251–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cummings JN, Kiesler S (2005) Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc Stud Sci 35(5):703–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robb JA et al (2013) A call to standardize preanalytic data elements for biospecimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:1185–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khleif SN, Doroshow JH, Hait WN (2010) AACR-FDA-NCI cancer biomarkers collaborative consensus report: advancing the use of biomarkers in cancer drug development. Clin Cancer Res 16(13):3299–3318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wendler D et al (2006) Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Med 3(2):e19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Buetow KH (2009) An infrastructure for interconnecting research institutions. Drug Discov Today 14(11–12):605–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hewitt RE (2011) Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 23(1):112–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill TG et al (2010) Evaluation of Cancer 101: an educational program for native settings. J Cancer Educ 25(3):329–336

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa A. Simon.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated in loving memory to Piotr Kulesza, a true inspirational leader in the pathology and clinical research field who was committed to advancing research and addressing cancer health disparities. His genuine enthusiasm and love for teaching and mentoring were contagious.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simon, M.A., de la Riva, E.E., Bergan, R. et al. Improving Diversity in Cancer Research Trials: The Story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network. J Canc Educ 29, 366–374 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y

Keywords

Navigation