Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prostate Cancer Survivors as Community Health Educators: Implications for Informed Decision Making and Cancer Communication

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent evidence questioning the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen testing leave community-based prostate cancer (CaP) outreach programs with a dilemma between promoting screening and highlighting screening risks. CaP survivors are uniquely positioned to address this problem by drawing upon real-life experiences to share nuanced information and perspectives. While CaP survivors have historically been incorporated into outreach programs, little is known about their impact on psychosocial outcomes and their effectiveness compared to professional health educators. This study addressed these gaps through a quasi-experimental design where African American men attended a CaP screening session conducted by a health educator (HE) or survivor educator (SV). The presentation included prostate cancer statistics, CaP information, and descriptions of CaP screening tests. SV were encouraged to bolster their presentations with personal stories whereas HE maintained fidelity to the curriculum content. All participants completed pre- and post-test questionnaires. Our sample comprised a total of 63 participants (HE group = 32; SV group = 31) with an age range of 40–70 years. Decision self-efficacy increased significantly in the SV group (p = 0.01) whereas perceived screening risks reduced significantly in the HE group (p < 0.001). No significant changes were found in knowledge, subjective norms, outcome expectancies, and screening benefits. Survivor educators were found to have significantly greater appeal (p = 0.03), identification with audience (p = 0.01), and liking (p = 0.03). Training CaP survivors as health educators might be a viable strategy for community-based cancer communication efforts confronted by the CaP screening controversy. We discuss conceptual and programmatic implications of our findings and present directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2011) Cancer facts & figures for African Americans 2011–12. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN et al (2012) Prostate cancer screening in the randomized prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(2):125–132. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr500

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arrington MI (2005) “She’s right behind me all the way”: an analysis of prostate cancer narratives and changes in family relationships. J Fam Commun 5(2):141–162. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0502_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm S, Coleman-Burns P, Schlenk EA, Funnell MM, Parzuchowski J, Powell IJ (1995) Prostate cancer in African American men: increasing knowledge and self-efficacy. J Community Health Nurs 12(3):161–169. doi:10.1207/s15327655jchn1203_4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridge PD, Berry-Bobovski LC, Gallagher RE (2004) Promoting informed decision making: evaluating a community-based prostate health awareness program. J Cancer Educ 19(3):174–179. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce1903_13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burhansstipanov L (2005) Community-driven native American cancer survivors’ quality of life research priorities. J Cancer Educ 20(sup1):7–11. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce2001s_03

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carey L (2005) Bosom buddies: a practical model of expressive disclosure. J Cancer Educ 20(4):251–255. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce2004_15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Fu R, Gleitsmann K et al (2011) Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 155(11):762–771. doi:10.1059/0003-4819-155-11-201112060-00375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coreil J, Behal R (1999) Man to man prostate cancer support groups. Cancer Pract 7(3):122–129. doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.07307.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dancy BL, Wilbur JE, Talashek M, Bonner G, Barnes-Boyd C (2004) Community-based research: barriers to recruitment of African Americans. Nurs Outlook 52(5):234–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishbein M (2008) A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Med Decis Mak 28(6):834–844. doi:10.1177/0272989x08326092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Flores K, Bencomo C (2009) Preventing cervical cancer in the Latina population. J Women’s Health (Larchmt) 18(12):1935–1943. doi:10.1089/jwh.2008.1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen LK, Feigl P, Modiano MR, Lopez JA, Escobedo Sluder S, Moinpour CM, Pauler DK, Meyskens FL (2005) An educational program to increase cervical and breast cancer screening in Hispanic women: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Nurs 28(1):47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harwood J, Sparks L (2003) Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun 15(2):145–159. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1502_3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, Rovner DR, Breer ML, Rothert ML, Padonu G, Talarczyk G (1996) Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Dec Making 16(1):58–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaur JS (1996) The potential impact of cancer survivors on Native American cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer 78(7 Suppl):1578–1581. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961001)78:7<1578::AID-CNCR36>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kiger H (2003) Outreach to multiethnic, multicultural, and multilingual women for breast cancer and cervical cancer education and screening: a model using professional and volunteer staffing. Fam Community Health 26(4):307–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kreuter M, Buskirk T, Holmes K, Clark E, Robinson L, Si X, Rath S et al (2008) What makes cancer survivor stories work? An empirical study among African American women. J Cancer Surviv 2(1):33–44. doi:10.1007/s11764-007-0041-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kreuter M, Green M, Cappella J, Slater M, Wise M, Storey D, Clark E et al (2007) Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med 33(3):221–235. doi:10.1007/bf02879904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McQueen A, Kreuter MW (2010) Women’s cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: a structural equation analysis. Patient Educ Couns 81:S15–S21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pelusi J, Krebs LU (2005) Understanding cancer-understanding the stories of life and living. J Cancer Educ 20(1 Suppl):12–16. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce2001s_04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Radosevich DM, Partin MR, Nugent S, Nelson D, Flood AB, Holtzman J, Dillon N, Haas M, Wilt TJ (2004) Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 54(2):143–152. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00207-6S0738399103002076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rogers TF, Bauman LJ, Metzger L (1985) An assessment of the Reach to Recovery program. CA Cancer J Clin 35(2):116–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, Gardiner RA, Heathcote P, Yaxley J (2001) The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000). Psycho-Oncology 10(1):66–75. doi:10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<66::aid-pon493>3.0.co;2-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tingen MS, Weinrich SP, Heydt DD, Boyd MD, Weinrich MC (1998) Perceived benefits: a predictor of participation in prostate cancer screening. Cancer Nurs 21(5):349–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wray RJ, McClure S, Vijaykumar S, Smith C, Ivy A, Jupka K, Hess R (2009) Changing the conversation about prostate cancer among African Americans: results of formative research. Ethn Health 14(1):27–43. doi:10.1080/13557850802056448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wray RJ, Vijaykumar S, Jupka K, Zellin S, Shahid M (2011) Addressing the challenge of informed decision making in prostate cancer community outreach to African American men. Am J Men’s Health. doi:10.1177/1557988311411909

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yi M, Park EY (2011) Effects of breast health education conducted by trained breast cancer survivors. J Adv Nurs. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05815.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded through a supplemental grant from National Cancer Institute to the Program to Eliminate Cancer Disparities (PECAD), Siteman Cancer Institute, Washington University in St. Louis (#5 U01 CA114594-03). We thank our community partners, the cancer educators and all participants for contributing to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Vijaykumar.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix 1

(PDF 72 kb)

Appendix 2

(PDF 75 kb)

Appendix 3

(DOCX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vijaykumar, S., Wray, R.J., Jupka, K. et al. Prostate Cancer Survivors as Community Health Educators: Implications for Informed Decision Making and Cancer Communication. J Canc Educ 28, 623–628 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0559-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0559-9

Keywords

Navigation