Abstract
Recent evidence questioning the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen testing leave community-based prostate cancer (CaP) outreach programs with a dilemma between promoting screening and highlighting screening risks. CaP survivors are uniquely positioned to address this problem by drawing upon real-life experiences to share nuanced information and perspectives. While CaP survivors have historically been incorporated into outreach programs, little is known about their impact on psychosocial outcomes and their effectiveness compared to professional health educators. This study addressed these gaps through a quasi-experimental design where African American men attended a CaP screening session conducted by a health educator (HE) or survivor educator (SV). The presentation included prostate cancer statistics, CaP information, and descriptions of CaP screening tests. SV were encouraged to bolster their presentations with personal stories whereas HE maintained fidelity to the curriculum content. All participants completed pre- and post-test questionnaires. Our sample comprised a total of 63 participants (HE group = 32; SV group = 31) with an age range of 40–70 years. Decision self-efficacy increased significantly in the SV group (p = 0.01) whereas perceived screening risks reduced significantly in the HE group (p < 0.001). No significant changes were found in knowledge, subjective norms, outcome expectancies, and screening benefits. Survivor educators were found to have significantly greater appeal (p = 0.03), identification with audience (p = 0.01), and liking (p = 0.03). Training CaP survivors as health educators might be a viable strategy for community-based cancer communication efforts confronted by the CaP screening controversy. We discuss conceptual and programmatic implications of our findings and present directions for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Cancer Society (2011) Cancer facts & figures for African Americans 2011–12. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN et al (2012) Prostate cancer screening in the randomized prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(2):125–132. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr500
Arrington MI (2005) “She’s right behind me all the way”: an analysis of prostate cancer narratives and changes in family relationships. J Fam Commun 5(2):141–162. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0502_5
Boehm S, Coleman-Burns P, Schlenk EA, Funnell MM, Parzuchowski J, Powell IJ (1995) Prostate cancer in African American men: increasing knowledge and self-efficacy. J Community Health Nurs 12(3):161–169. doi:10.1207/s15327655jchn1203_4
Bridge PD, Berry-Bobovski LC, Gallagher RE (2004) Promoting informed decision making: evaluating a community-based prostate health awareness program. J Cancer Educ 19(3):174–179. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce1903_13
Burhansstipanov L (2005) Community-driven native American cancer survivors’ quality of life research priorities. J Cancer Educ 20(sup1):7–11. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce2001s_03
Carey L (2005) Bosom buddies: a practical model of expressive disclosure. J Cancer Educ 20(4):251–255. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce2004_15
Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Fu R, Gleitsmann K et al (2011) Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 155(11):762–771. doi:10.1059/0003-4819-155-11-201112060-00375
Coreil J, Behal R (1999) Man to man prostate cancer support groups. Cancer Pract 7(3):122–129. doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.07307.x
Dancy BL, Wilbur JE, Talashek M, Bonner G, Barnes-Boyd C (2004) Community-based research: barriers to recruitment of African Americans. Nurs Outlook 52(5):234–240
Fishbein M (2008) A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Med Decis Mak 28(6):834–844. doi:10.1177/0272989x08326092
Flores K, Bencomo C (2009) Preventing cervical cancer in the Latina population. J Women’s Health (Larchmt) 18(12):1935–1943. doi:10.1089/jwh.2008.1151
Hansen LK, Feigl P, Modiano MR, Lopez JA, Escobedo Sluder S, Moinpour CM, Pauler DK, Meyskens FL (2005) An educational program to increase cervical and breast cancer screening in Hispanic women: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Cancer Nurs 28(1):47–53
Harwood J, Sparks L (2003) Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun 15(2):145–159. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1502_3
Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, Rovner DR, Breer ML, Rothert ML, Padonu G, Talarczyk G (1996) Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Dec Making 16(1):58–64
Kaur JS (1996) The potential impact of cancer survivors on Native American cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer 78(7 Suppl):1578–1581. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961001)78:7<1578::AID-CNCR36>3.0.CO;2-V
Kiger H (2003) Outreach to multiethnic, multicultural, and multilingual women for breast cancer and cervical cancer education and screening: a model using professional and volunteer staffing. Fam Community Health 26(4):307–318
Kreuter M, Buskirk T, Holmes K, Clark E, Robinson L, Si X, Rath S et al (2008) What makes cancer survivor stories work? An empirical study among African American women. J Cancer Surviv 2(1):33–44. doi:10.1007/s11764-007-0041-y
Kreuter M, Green M, Cappella J, Slater M, Wise M, Storey D, Clark E et al (2007) Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Ann Behav Med 33(3):221–235. doi:10.1007/bf02879904
McQueen A, Kreuter MW (2010) Women’s cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: a structural equation analysis. Patient Educ Couns 81:S15–S21
Pelusi J, Krebs LU (2005) Understanding cancer-understanding the stories of life and living. J Cancer Educ 20(1 Suppl):12–16. doi:10.1207/s15430154jce2001s_04
Radosevich DM, Partin MR, Nugent S, Nelson D, Flood AB, Holtzman J, Dillon N, Haas M, Wilt TJ (2004) Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 54(2):143–152. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00207-6S0738399103002076
Rogers TF, Bauman LJ, Metzger L (1985) An assessment of the Reach to Recovery program. CA Cancer J Clin 35(2):116–124
Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Dunn J, Gardiner RA, Heathcote P, Yaxley J (2001) The supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer (2000). Psycho-Oncology 10(1):66–75. doi:10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<66::aid-pon493>3.0.co;2-z
Tingen MS, Weinrich SP, Heydt DD, Boyd MD, Weinrich MC (1998) Perceived benefits: a predictor of participation in prostate cancer screening. Cancer Nurs 21(5):349–357
Wray RJ, McClure S, Vijaykumar S, Smith C, Ivy A, Jupka K, Hess R (2009) Changing the conversation about prostate cancer among African Americans: results of formative research. Ethn Health 14(1):27–43. doi:10.1080/13557850802056448
Wray RJ, Vijaykumar S, Jupka K, Zellin S, Shahid M (2011) Addressing the challenge of informed decision making in prostate cancer community outreach to African American men. Am J Men’s Health. doi:10.1177/1557988311411909
Yi M, Park EY (2011) Effects of breast health education conducted by trained breast cancer survivors. J Adv Nurs. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05815.x
Acknowledgments
This study was funded through a supplemental grant from National Cancer Institute to the Program to Eliminate Cancer Disparities (PECAD), Siteman Cancer Institute, Washington University in St. Louis (#5 U01 CA114594-03). We thank our community partners, the cancer educators and all participants for contributing to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix 1
(PDF 72 kb)
Appendix 2
(PDF 75 kb)
Appendix 3
(DOCX 11 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vijaykumar, S., Wray, R.J., Jupka, K. et al. Prostate Cancer Survivors as Community Health Educators: Implications for Informed Decision Making and Cancer Communication. J Canc Educ 28, 623–628 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0559-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0559-9