Abstract
Recently, several prospective randomized prostate cancer screening studies have been reported. We report the results of a questionnaire administered to primary care physicians (PCPs) to determine their attitudes on prostate cancer screening and compared these results to those obtained when the same questionnaire was administered to a different large cohort of PCPs in 2006 prior to the reporting of these randomized studies. A 24-item questionnaire designed to assess prostate cancer knowledge and screening attitudes was administered to PCPs within central Florida and those PCPs attending a state conference. Completed surveys were returned and analyzed. All reported p values were two-sided, and those p values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Seven hundred and eighty PCPs received the study questionnaire, and 168 (22 %) PCPs returned the completed questionnaire. Sixty-eight percent of responders stated that they recommend prostate cancer screening to >75 % of their patients over the age of 50 years, up from 47 % in 2006 (p < 0.001). Seventy-four percent of responders felt screening was effective. The overall mean score of the knowledge survey was 66 %, which was similar to the cohort from 2006. Knowledge scores were not associated with screening attitudes and behaviors. On multivariate analysis, practice setting and percentage of Medicaid patients in the practice were associated with attitude scores. Our current findings imply that despite the recent landmark studies published on prostate cancer screening, PCPs’ screening attitudes have changed minimally over the past 5 years.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PCP:
-
Primary care physician
- PSA:
-
Prostate-specific antigen
- PCLO:
-
Prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian
- ERSPC:
-
The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
- DRE:
-
Digital rectal examination
- USPSTF:
-
US Preventive Services Task Force
References
Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Basler JW (1993) Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening. JAMA 270(8):948–954
Viani GA, Stefano EJ, Afonso SL (2009) Higher-than-conventional radiation doses in localized prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(5):1405–1418
Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063
Antonarakis ES, Blackford AL, Garrett-Mayer E, Eisenberger MA (2007) Survival in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with hormone therapy: a quantitative systematic review. J Clin Oncol 25(31):4998–5008
Colli JL, Amling CL (2008) Exploring causes for declining prostate cancer mortality rates in the United States. Urol Oncol 26(6):627–633
Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Páez A, Määttänen L, Bangma CH, Aus G, Carlsson S, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Kujala PM, Blijenberg BG, Stenman UH, Huber A, Taari K, Hakama M, Moss SM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, ERSPC Investigators (2012) Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 366(11):981–990, Erratum in N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2137
Hugosson J, Carlsson S, Aus G, Bergdahl S, Khatami A, Lodding P, Pihl CG, Stranne J, Holmberg E, Lilja H (2010) Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncol 11((8)):725–732, Epub 2010 Jul 2
Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN, Gelmann EP, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, O’Brien B, Clapp JD, Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, Izmirlian G, Miller AB, Pinsky PF, Prorok PC, Gohagan JK, Berg CD, PLCO Project Team (2009) Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 360(13):1310–1319
Philips GK, Reinier K, Ashikaga T et al (2005) Attitudes and beliefs of primary care physicians regarding prostate and colorectal cancer screening in a rural state. J Cancer Educ 20:167–172
Curran V, Solberg S, Mathews M et al (2005) Prostate cancer screening attitudes and continuing education needs of primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ 20:162–166
Pendleton J, Curry RW, Kaserian A, Chang M, Anai S, Nakamura K, Abdoush P, Rosser CJ (2008) Knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians regarding prostate cancer screening. J Natl Med Assoc 100(6):666–670
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29
Moyer VA, on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2012) Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 157(2):120–134
AAFP (2013) AAFP, USPSTF issue final recommendation against routine PSA-based screening for prostate cancer. http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/health-of-the-public/20120522psascreenrec.html. Accessed September 4, 2012.
Schrag D, Hanger M (2007) Medical oncologists’ views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: a pilot survey. J Clin Oncol 25(2):233–237
Florida Department of Health (2012) Physician workforce annual report 2012. http://www.doh.state.fl.us/Workforce/Workforce/Annual_Reports/PhysicianWorkforceAnnualReport2012.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2013.
Kellerman SE, Herold J (2001) Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 20(1):61–67
Acknowledgments
None
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, K., Chang, M., Sun, Y. et al. Attitudes and Knowledge of Primary Care Physicians Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening. J Canc Educ 28, 679–683 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0533-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0533-6