Abstract
Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rates are low among men and women who seek health care at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). This study explores health care providers’ perspectives about their patient’s motivators and impediments to CRCS and receptivity to preparatory education. A mixed methods design consisting of in-depth interviews, focus groups, and a short survey is used in this study. The participants of this study are 17 health care providers practicing in FQHCs in the Tampa Bay area. Test-specific patient impediments and motivations were identified including fear of abnormal findings, importance of offering less invasive fecal occult blood tests, and need for patient-centered test-specific educational materials in clinics. Opportunities to improve provider practices were identified including providers’ reliance on patients’ report of symptoms as a cue to recommend CRCS and overemphasis of clinic-based guaiac stool tests. This study adds to the literature on CRCS test-specific motivators and impediments. Providers offered unique approaches for motivating patients to follow through with recommended CRCS and were receptive to in-clinic patient education. Findings readily inform the design of educational materials and interventions to increase CRCS in FQHCs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Cancer Society (2011) Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149(9):627–37
Lasser KE et al (2008) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 9:15
Tarasenko YN et al (2011) Colorectal cancer screening: patients’ and physicians’ perspectives on decision-making factors. J Cancer Educ 26(2):285–93
Zapka JM et al (2011) Physicians’ colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(3):509–21
Klabunde CN et al (2011) Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(8):1611–21
Shapiro JA et al (2012) Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(6):895–904
Wolf MS et al (2006) Colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved. J Health Care Poor Underserved 17(1):47–54
Khankari K et al (2007) Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: a pilot study within a federally qualified health center. J Gen Intern Med 22(10):1410–1414
van Rossum LG et al (2011) Colorectal cancer screening comparing no screening, immunochemical and guaiac fecal occult blood tests: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Cancer 128(8):1908–17
Quintero E et al (2012) Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 366(8):697–706
Levin TR (2011) Optimizing colorectal cancer screening by getting FIT right. Gastroenterology 141(5):1551–5
Greenwald B (2005) From guaiac to immune fecal occult blood tests: the emergence of technology in colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterol Nurs 28(2):90–6
O’Malley AS et al (2004) Patient and provider barriers to colorectal cancer screening in the primary care safety-net. Prev Med 39(1):56–63
U.S. Department Health and Human Services (2012) Approved Uniform Data System Changes for 2012 (PAL 2012–03). In: H.R.a.S. Administration (ed). Government Printing Office: Washington DC
Meade CD et al (2009) Creating community-academic partnerships for cancer disparities research and health promotion. Health Promot Pract 12(3):456–462, PubMed PMID: 19822724
Gwede CK et al (2009) Strategies to assess community challenges and strengths for cancer disparities participatory research and outreach. Health Promot Practice 11(6):876–887
Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, London
Gwede CK et al (2011) Perceptions of colorectal cancer among three ethnic subgroups of US Blacks: a qualitative study. J Natl Med Assoc 103(8):669–680
Walsh JM et al (2010) Physicians’ approaches to recommending colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study. J Cancer Educ 25(3):385–90
Kelly KM et al (2007) Physician and staff perceptions of barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky. Cancer Control 14(2):167–75
Lewis CL et al (2009) Physicians’ decisions about continuing or stopping colon cancer screening in the elderly: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med 24(7):816–21
Jibaja-Weiss ML, Volk RJ (2007) Utilizing computerized entertainment education in the development of decision aids for lower literate and naive computer users. J Health Commun 12(7):681–97
Volk RJ et al (2008) Entertainment education for prostate cancer screening: a randomized trial among primary care patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns 73(3):482–9
Klabunde CN et al (2009) Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006–2007. Am J Prev Med 37(1):8–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gwede, C.K., Davis, S.N., Quinn, G.P. et al. Making It Work: Health Care Provider Perspectives on Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Canc Educ 28, 777–783 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0531-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0531-8