Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From Adolescent Daughter to Mother: Exploring Message Design Strategies for Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early detection of breast and cervical cancers is one preventive behavior that may provide the adolescent daughter with a unique opportunity to provide encouragement to her mother or guardian to obtain screening. This study explored the design strategies necessary for developing an effective daughter-initiated message about screening for breast and cervical cancers. Thirty-two (N = 64) African-American mother–daughter dyads were interviewed about parenting style, goodwill, and daughters’ credibility and risk behaviors that might influence receptivity toward a screening appeal. Mothers indicated that a tailored, emotional appeal combined with cancer facts delivered in a private setting would be most effective. Daughters were perceived as highly credible messengers and were perceived to have high levels of goodwill toward their mothers, regardless of risk behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsiung ROB, Richard P (2003) Validating the relationship qualities of influence and persuasion with the family social relations model. Hum Commun Res 29(1):81–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Etzioni R et al (2003) The case for early detection. Nat Rev Cancer 3(4):243–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer facts & figures for African Americans. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, pp 2011–2012

    Google Scholar 

  4. Browne JL, Chan AYC (2012) Mother–daughter communication about mammography in an Australian sample. J Fam Commun 12(2):129–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherlin AJ (2005) American marriage in the early twenty-first century. Future Child 15(2):33–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haldeman DC (2012) The evolving family. In: Fouad NA, Carter JA, Subich LM (eds) APA handbook of counseling psychology: practice, interventions, and applications. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, pp 105–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Glenwick DS, Mowrey JD (1986) When parent becomes peer: loss of intergenerational boundaries in single parent families. Fam Relat 35:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pittman L, Chase-Lansdale P (2001) African American adolescent girls in impoverished communities: parenting style and adolescent outcomes. J Res Adolesc 11(2):199–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Bureau of the Census (2010) Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010, Report P60. n. 238. p. 61

  10. Dickerson B (1995) African American single mothers: understanding their lives and families. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nixon E, Green S, Hogan DM (2012) Negotiating relationships in single–mother households: perspectives of children and mothers. Fam Relat Int J App Fam Stud 61(1):142–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Petty RE, Cacioppa JT (1986) he elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental psychology. Academic, Wisconsin, pp 123–205

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sinclair R, Mark M, Clore G (1994) Mood-related persuasion depends on (mis)attributions. Soc Cogn 12:309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Firestone RW, Firestone L, Catlett J (2012) The mother–daughter bond and differentiation. In: The self under siege: a therapeutic model for differentiation. Routledge, New York, pp 118–132

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rothman A et al (2006) The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: how theory can inform practice. J Commun 56(s1):s202–s220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreuter M et al (2000) Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials? Health Educ Res 15(3):305–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tormala ZL, Brinol P, Petty RE (2006) When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. J Exp Soc Psychol 42(5):684–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hovland C, Janis I, Kelly H (1953) Communications and persuasion: psychological studies in opinion change, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  19. McCroskey J, Teven J (1999) Goodwill: a reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Commun Monogr 66(1):90–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kritzinger C, Frith H (1999) Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse Soc 10:293–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baumrind D (1991) The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. J Early Adolesc 11(1):56–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smetana JG (2011) Parenting beliefs, parenting, and parent–adolescent communication in African American families. In: Hill NE, Mann T, Fitzgerald H (eds) African American children and mental health. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garcia Coll CG, Meyer EC, Brillon L (1995) Ethnic and minority parenting. In: Bornstein MH (ed) Hand-book of parenting: biology and ecology of parenting. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 189–209

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor B, Smith J (2009) Income, poverty and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2008 U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports. p. 60–236

  25. Baumrind D (1971) Current patterns of parental authority. Dev Psychol Monogr 4(1):1–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Darling N, Steinberg L (1993) Parenting style as context: an integrative model. Psychol Bull 113(3):487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. DeBono K, Harnish R (1988) Source expertise, source attraciveness, and the processing of persuasive information: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 55(4):541–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Booth-Butterfield S, Gutowski C (1993) Message modality and source credibility can interact to affect argument processing. Commun Q 41(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heesacker M, Petty R, Cacioppa J (1983) Field dependence and attitude change: source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. J Pers 51(4):653–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the mothers and daughters who participated in this research study. We also thank Ellyn Leighton-Hermann for her assistance with the manuscript preparation. Finally, we acknowledge funding received from NIH K01 CA132960.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maghboeba Mosavel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mosavel, M., Genderson, M.W. From Adolescent Daughter to Mother: Exploring Message Design Strategies for Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening. J Canc Educ 28, 558–564 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0503-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0503-z

Keywords

Navigation