Abstract
This study assessed medical students’ perception of individual vs. group training in breaking bad news (BBN) and explored training needs in BBN. Master-level students (N = 124) were randomised to group training (GT)—where only one or two students per group conducted a simulated patient (SP) interview, which was discussed collectively with the faculty—or individual training (IT)—where each student conducted an SP interview, which was discussed during individual supervision. Training evaluation was based on questionnaires, and the videotaped interviews were rated using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Students were globally satisfied with the training. Still, there were noticeable differences between students performing an interview (GT/IT) and students observing interviews (GT). The analysis of the interviews showed significant differences according to scenarios and to gender. Active involvement through SP interviews seems required for students to feel able to reach training objectives. The evaluation of communication skills, revealing a baseline heterogeneity, supports individualised training.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stiefel F, Barth J, Bensing J et al (2010) Communication skills training in oncology: a position paper based on a consensus meeting among European experts in 2009. Ann Oncol 21:204–207
Fallowfield L (1993) Giving sad and bad news. Lancet 341:476–478
Vetto JT, Elder NC, Toffler WL, Fields SA (1999) Teaching medical students to give bad news: does formal instruction help? J Cancer Educ 14:13–17
Baile WF, Kudelka AP, Beale EA et al (1999) Communication skills training in oncology. Description and preliminary outcomes of workshops on breaking bad news and managing patient reactions to illness. Cancer 86:887–897
Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA (2005) The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psycho-Oncology 14:831–845
Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (2004) Communicating sad, bad, and difficult news in medicine. Lancet 363(9405):312–319
Fallowfield L, Jenkins V, Farewell V et al (2002) Efficacy of Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(23):650–656
Gysels M, Richardson A, Higginson IJ (2004) Communication training for health professional who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of effectiveness. Support Care Cancer 12:692–700
Stiefel F (ed) (2006) Communication in cancer care. Springer, Berlin
Butow P, Cockburn J, Girgis A et al (2008) Increasing oncologists’ skills in eliciting and responding to emotional cues: evaluation of a communication skills training program. Psycho-Oncology 17:209–218
Liénard A, Merckaert I, Libert Y et al (2010) Is it possible to improve residents breaking bad news skills? A randomised study assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program. Br J Cancer 103:171–177
Langewitz W, Heydrich L, Nübling M, Szirt L, Weber H, Grossman P (2010) Swiss cancer league communication skills training programme for oncology nurses: an evaluation. JAN 66(10):2266–2277
Kiss A (1999) Communication skills training in oncology: a position paper. Ann Oncol 10(8):899–901
Rosenbaum ME, Ferguson KJ, Lobas JG (2004) Teaching medical students and residents skills for delivering bad news: a review of strategies. Acad Med 79:107–117
Supiot S, Bonnaud-Antignac A (2008) Using simulated interviews to teach junior medical students to disclose the diagnosis of cancer. J Cancer Educ 23:102–107
Bonnaud-Antignac A, Campion L, Pottier P, Supiot S (2010) Videotaped simulated interviews to improve medical students’ skills in disclosing a diagnosis of cancer. Psycho-Oncology 19:975–981
Despland JN, Bernard M, Favre N, Drapeau M, de Roten Y, Stiefel F (2009) Clinicians’ defenses: an empirical study. Psychol Psychother Theor Res Pract 82:73–81
Bernard M, Roten Y, Despland JN, Stiefel F (2010) Communication skills training and clinicians’ defenses in oncology: an exploratory, controlled study. Psycho-Oncology 19:209–215
Roter D, Larson S (2002) The roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns 46:243–251
Roter D (2006) The Roter method of interaction process analysis. RIAS manual. John Hopkins University, Baltimore
Roter D (2010) The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS): applicability within the context of cancer and palliative care. In: Kissane D et al (eds) Handbook of communication in oncology and palliative care. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 717–726
Mead N, Bower P (2000) Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical litterature. So Sci Med 51(7):1087–1110
Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinny IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR (2003) Patient-centered medicine transforming the clinical method. Radcliffe Medical Press, Abingdon
De Haes H (2006) Dilemmas in patient centeredness and shared decision making: a case for vulnerability. Pat Educ Couns 62(3):291–298
Schmid Mast M, Hall JA, Klöckner C, Choi E (2008) Physician gender affects how physician nonverbal behavior is related to patient satisfaction. Med Care 46:1212–1218
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Fonds d’Innovation Pédagogique (FIP) of the University of Lausanne.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stiefel, F., Bourquin, C., Layat, C. et al. Medical Students’ Skills and Needs for Training in Breaking Bad News. J Canc Educ 28, 187–191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0420-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0420-6