Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients’ View of Their Preoperative Education for Radical Prostatectomy: Does It Change After Surgery?

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When preparing the evaluation of a newly designed multimedia tool for supporting preoperative education before radical prostatectomy, we realized that the standard procedure has rarely been investigated. Therefore, we performed semi-structured interviews with 30 consecutive patients the day before and 15 days after radical prostatectomy. Patients’ opinion about their preoperative education is decidedly positive and demonstrates intense patient–physician interaction. All patients wanted to be informed about the procedure and possible risks. None reported to be dissatisfied. All but one of the patients (29/30) was able to ask every single question (6.5 mean). Except for signs of forgetting and a slightly altered retrospective assessment of anxiety, we have found no relevant changes over time. Preoperative education is very important to our patients. Therefore, good communication skills should be developed during medical education. A systematic patient-centered approach could further improve the quality of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

STAI:

State-trait anxiety inventory

References

  1. Leclercq WKG, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM et al (2010) A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg 34:1406–1415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Issa MM, Setzer E, Charaf C et al (2006) Informed versus uninformed consent for prostate surgery: the value of electronic consents. J Urol 176:694–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S et al (2006) Patients’ perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study. BMJ 333:528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Singer S, Götze H, Möbius C et al (2009) Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient’s perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:723–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gyomber D, Lawrentschuk N, Wong P et al (2010) Improving informed consent for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using multimedia techniques: a prospective randomized crossover study. BJU Int 106:1152–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Masood J, Hafeez A, Wiseman O et al (2007) Informed consent: are we deluding ourselves? A randomized controlled study. BJU Int 99:4–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Evrard S, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Larrue C et al (2005) Evaluation of a preoperative multimedia information program in surgical oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:106–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huber J, Ihrig A, Yass M, et al. (2011) Improving the preoperative consultation before radical prostatectomy using multimedia support: a randomized controlled trial. Urology 78:S314

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray RE, Fitch MI, Phillips C et al (1999) Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Pract 7:130–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fagermoen MS, Hamilton G (2003) Preparing patients for urological surgery. Int J Nurs Stud 40:281–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burt J, Caelli K, Moore K et al (2005) Radical prostatectomy: men’s experiences and postoperative needs. J Clin Nurs 14:883–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laux L, Glanzmann P, Schaffner P, et al. (1981) [The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: theoretical foundations and manual.] Beltz Test GmbH, Weinheim

  14. Rasch D, Guiard V (2004) The robustness of parametric statistical methods. Psychol Sci 2:175–208

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM, Houterman S et al (2008) Surgeons underestimate their patients’ desire for preoperative information. World J Surg 32:964–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghulam AT, Kessler M, Bachmann LM et al (2006) Patients’ satisfaction with the preoperative informed consent procedure: a multicenter questionnaire survey in Switzerland. Mayo Clin Proc 81:307–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moore KN, Estey A (1999) The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. J Adv Nurs 29:1121–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berry MG, Unwin J, Ross GL et al (2007) A comparison of the views of patients and medical staff in relation to the process of informed consent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:368–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilhelm D, Gillen S, Wirnhier H et al (2009) Extended preoperative patient education using a multimedia DVD-impact on patients receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:227–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Luck A, Pearson S, Maddern G et al (1999) Effects of video information on precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomised trial. Lancet 354:2032–2035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wildschut T, Sedikides C, Arndt J et al (2006) Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions. J Pers Soc Psychol 91:975–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nuttall M, Wilby D, Chappell B et al (2009) What would truly patient-centered urological care look like? BJU Int 104:287–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Malle BF, Knobe JM, Nelson SE (2007) Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question. J Pers Soc Psychol 93:491–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Hayter C et al (2000) What questions do patients with curable prostate cancer want answered? Med Decis Mak 20:7–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L et al (2008) Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 54:785–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the German Academic Exchange Service for providing Beryl Konyango with a scholarship for this project.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Huber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huber, J., Ihrig, A., Herzog, W. et al. Patients’ View of Their Preoperative Education for Radical Prostatectomy: Does It Change After Surgery?. J Canc Educ 27, 377–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0293-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0293-0

Keywords

Navigation