Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Access to Cancer Screening for Women with Mobility Disabilities

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women with mobility disabilities are less likely to access cancer screening, even when they have a primary care provider. The Gateways to Cancer Screening project was initiated to document the challenges for women with disabilities in their access and experiences of screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer. The study followed the tenets of participatory action research. Five peer-led focus groups were held with 24 women with mobility disabilities. Study participants identified multiple and interacting institutional barriers to cancer screening. Their discussions highlighted the complex work of (1) arranging and attending health-related appointments, (2) confronting normative assumptions about women's bodies and (3) securing reliable health care and information. These overlapping, mutually reinforcing issues interact to shape how women with disabilities access and experience cancer screening. We explore implications for redesign of cancer screening services and education of health providers, providing specific recommendations suggested by our participants and the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bierman AE, Silverman ME, Jette AM, Splaine M, Wasson JH (1998) Assessing access as the first step towards improving quality of care for very old adults. J Ambul Care Manag 21(3):17–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bierman AS, Angus JE, Ahmad F, Degani N, Vahabi M, Glazier RH, Li Y, Ross S, Manuel D (2010) Access to health care services. In: Bierman AS (ed) Project for an Ontario Women's Health Evidence-Based Report: Volume 1. Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  3. Canadian Council on Social Development. 2003. Disability information sheet No. 9: Health and wellbeing of persons with disabilities. Ottawa, ON.

  4. Cashman SB, Allen AJ, Corburn J, Israel BA, Montano J, Rhodes SD, Swanston SF, Eng E (2008) Analyzing and interpreting data with communities. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds) Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 285–302

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devaney J, Seto L, Barry N, Odette F, Muraca L, Fernando S, Chandani S, Angus J (2009) Navigating health care: gateways to cancer screening. Disabil Soc 24(6):739–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diab ME, Johnston MV (2004) Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(5):749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Esther M (2000) Focus groups in feminist research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 835–850

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glazier RH, Creatore MI, Gozdyra P, Matheson FI, Steele LS, Boyle E (2004) Geographic methods for understanding and responding to disparities in mammography use in Toronto, Canada. J Gen Intern Med 19(9):952–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gould J (2004) The experiences of lower income women with breast cancer interacting with cancer treatment and income security systems. Can Woman Stud 24(1):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gould J, Sinding C, Mitchell TL, Gustafson DL, Peng I, Mcgillicuddy P, Fitch MI, Aronson J, Burhansstipanov L (2009) “Below Their Notice”: exploring women's subjective experiences of cancer system exclusion. J Cancer Educ 24(4):308–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gulliford M, Figueroa-Munoz J, Morgan M, Hughes D, Gibson B, Beech R, Hudson M (2002) What does ‘access to health care’ mean? J Health Serv Res Policy 7(3):186–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herbert JR, Brandt HM, Armstead CA, Adams SA, Steck SE (2009) Interdisciplinary, translational, and community-based participatory research: finding a common language to improve research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(4):1213–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Idestrom M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellstrom A, Athlin E (2006) Cervical cancer—for better or worse: women's experience of screening. Cancer Nurs 29(6):453–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB, Allen AJ, Guzman JR (2008) Critical issues in developing and following CBPR principles. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds) Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 48–66

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lofters A, Glazier R, Agha M, Creator M, Moineddin R (2007) Inadequacy of cervical cancer screening among urban recent immigrants: a population-based study of physician and laboratory claims in Toronto, Canada. Prev Med 44:536–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan D (1998) The focus group guidebook. The focus group kit. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Cancer Institute of Canada (2009) Canadian Cancer Statistics, 2009. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson J, Agyapong F (2004) Women of colour living with breast cancer: the search for support. Can Woman Stud 24(1):167–172

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nosek MA, Howland CA (1997) Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78(Suppl 5):S-39–S-44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramirez A, Farmer GC, Grant D, Papchristou T (2005) Disability and preventive cancer screening: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health 95(11):2057–2064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanmartin C, Ross N (2006) Experiencing difficulties accessing first contact health services in Canada. Healthcare Policy 1(2):103–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinding C, Barnoff L, Grassau P (2004) Homophobia and heterosexism in cancer care: the experiences of lesbians. Can J Nurs Res 36(4):170–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sinding C, Wiernikowski J, Aronson J (2005) Cancer care from the perspectives of older women. Oncol Nurs Forum Online 32(6):1169–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Smeltzer S (2006) Preventive health screening for breast and cervical cancer and osteoporosis in women with physical disabilities. Fam Community Health 29(1S):35S–43S

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith DE (2005) Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. The gender lens. Alta Mira Press, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  26. Statistics Canada (2007) Participation and activity limitation survey 2006: analytical report. Ministry of Industry, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Angus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angus, J., Seto, L., Barry, N. et al. Access to Cancer Screening for Women with Mobility Disabilities. J Canc Educ 27, 75–82 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0273-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0273-4

Keywords

Navigation