Skip to main content
Log in

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patients' and Physicians' Perspectives on Decision-Making Factors

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While patient barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have been identified, how well this knowledge is utilized during the patient–physician interaction is not fully understood. This study aims to assess among primary care physicians the degree of consensus between perceived and actual patients' CRC screening decision-making influential factors. During 2004–2006, 30 patients were interviewed to identify factors influencing screening decisions and 66 physicians were interviewed to understand what factors they thought were important to patients. The factors were categorized using the PRECEDE–PROCEED framework, and perspectives were compared. The researchers found little consensus on CRC screening decision-making influential factors between family practitioners, general internists, and patients. The recommendations to reach consensus are provided on the individual (e.g., updating the contents of a physician's screening recommendation to proactively address patients' decision-making needs) and population (e.g., providing cross-cultural training to medical students enabling them to better understand their patients) levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer facts and figures 2009. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570–1595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen GD (2002) Barriers to preventive intervention. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 31:1061–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy people 2010 understanding and improving health, 2nd edn. US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  5. Messina CR, Lane DS, Grimson R (2005) Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and practices: preferences for decision making. Am J Prev Med 28:439–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rex DK (2002) Current colorectal cancer screening strategies: overview and obstacles to implementation. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2(suppl1):S2–S11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCaffery K, Borril J, Williamson S et al (2001) Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process. Soc Sci Med 53:679–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cibula DA, Morrow CB (2003) Determining local colorectal cancer screening utilization patterns. J Public Health Manag Pract 9:315–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greiner KA, Engelman KK, Hall MA, Ellerbeck EF (2004) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care. Prev Med 38:269–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. James AS, Campbell MK, Hudson MA (2002) Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:529–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beeker C, Kraft JM, Southwell BG, Jorgensen CM (2000) Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Community Health 25:263–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weitzman ER, Zapka J, Estabrook B, Goins KV (2001) Risk and reluctance: understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 32:502–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wardle J, Sutton S, Williamson S et al (2000) Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. Prev Med 31:323–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wackerbarth SB, Peters JC, Haist SA (2005) Do we really need all that equipment?: factors influencing colorectal cancer screening decisions. Qual Health Res 15:539–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Green LW, Kreuter MW, Deeds SG, Partiridge KB (1980) Health education planning: a diagnostic approach. Mayfield, Mountain View

    Google Scholar 

  16. Green LW, Kreuter MW (1991) The PRECEDE–PROCEED model in community settings. In: Health promotion planning: an educational and environmental approach (2nd edn). Mayfield, Mountain View

  17. Brouse CH, Basch CE, Wolf RL, Shmukler C (2004) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: an educational diagnosis. J Cancer Educ 19:170–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, Breen N, Seeff LC, Brown ML (2005) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care 43:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paasche-Orlow M, Roter D (2003) The communication patterns of internal medicine and family practice physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract 16:485–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L et al (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594–642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization (1948) Preamble to the constitution. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gebbie K, Rosenstock L, Hernandez LM (eds) (2003) Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The National Cancer Institute (R21CA102349 to SBW) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R24HS01184503, Steve Fleming, Ph.D., P.I.) supported this work. The project was approved by the University of Kentucky Institutional Review Board (#03-0079-P1B). We acknowledge and thank Mark Eckman, M.D., Fredrick Michel, M.D., and Mary Barron, R.N., for the assistance with recruitment, Jane Peters, Ph.D. and April Morgan, M.A., for conducting the interviews, Michael Doukas, M.D., for his consultation, and Brian Stevenson, Ph.D., for the editorial comments. Last, but not the least, we wish to thank our interview participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yelena N. Tarasenko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarasenko, Y.N., Wackerbarth, S.B., Love, M.M. et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patients' and Physicians' Perspectives on Decision-Making Factors. J Canc Educ 26, 285–293 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0145-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0145-3

Keywords

Navigation