Skip to main content
Log in

“Laws Could Always Be Revoked”: Sociopolitical Uncertainty in the Transition to Marriage Equality

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Shifting sociopolitical landscapes may create doubts, questions, or concerns for individuals, especially those who hold a disenfranchised identity or are in marginalized relationships (Meyer in Psychology of Sexualities Review 7:81–90, 2016). As a result of political and societal opposition following the Supreme Court Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, for example, legal and social uncertainties may lead to distress for same-sex couples.

Methods

Guided by the Contextual Relational Uncertainty (CRU) model (Monk & Ogolsky in Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2):243–261, 2019), we test the association between sociopolitical uncertainties (i.e., uncertainty about legal recognition, social acceptance, and norms or scripts) and relational uncertainty (i.e., self, partner, and relationship uncertainty) among people in same-sex (n = 180) and different-sex (n = 180) relationships 1 year after the Obergefell ruling.

Results

We found that most sources of sociopolitical uncertainty were positively associated with the sources of relational uncertainty. Using thematic analysis, we also analyzed responses to open-ended questions about concerns and experiences related to the Obergefell v. Hodges decision. We identified primary themes including increased (a) social certainty and (b) relational security, but also increased uncertainty related to (c) the breadth and permanence of legal recognition, (d) family norms and roles, and (e) potential backlash.

Conclusions

Overall, these findings provide more evidence of the positive and negative consequences of precarious societal transitions on the lives of individuals, particularly people in marginalized relationships.

Policy Implications

Policymakers and court system officials should be conscious of the full import of legislation. Even when producing legislation that is perceived to benefit a population, policies and educational resources should be considered that further support these communities across the transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data can be made available by reaching out to the third author and further information about coding can be obtained from the first or second author.

Notes

  1. We feel it is important to reiterate that same-sex couples thrive despite opposition (see Monk & Ogolsky, 2019) as they have had to be adaptive and resilient (Suslovic & Lett, 2023). For example, there are often few differences between same-sex and different-sex couples (e.g., Kurdek, 2005) and some studies point to sexual minority people as having greater relationship quality than their heterosexual counterparts (Balsam et al., 2008; Patterson et al., 2004).

References

Download references

Funding

The project was partially supported by funds from the U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food and Agriculture HATCH, Grant/Award Number: ILLU-793–356.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kale Monk.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Illinois.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals in this study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monk, J.K., Rice, T.M., Ogolsky, B.G. et al. “Laws Could Always Be Revoked”: Sociopolitical Uncertainty in the Transition to Marriage Equality. Sex Res Soc Policy (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-00975-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-00975-8

Keywords

Navigation