Abstract
Introduction
Using qualitative data from a 4-year (2017–2020) anonymous trend longitudinal national online survey, this study examines the perceived impact of the Trump administration on U.S. LGBTQ + people.
Methods
Using an anonymous online survey, the question, “How do you feel the current U.S. administration is impacting the lives of LGBTQ + people, and same-sex relationships specifically?” was answered by 1280 participants. Braun and Clarke’s (Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101 2006) six-phase thematic analysis process was employed.
Results
Five dominant themes emerged across the four years: (1) an actively anti-LGBTQ administration, (2) regression of LGBTQ + rights and protections, (3) increased societal anti-LGBTQ + hate/bigotry, (4) negative LGBTQ + psychological impact due to increased rhetoric/social discrimination, and (5) fear of lack of future LGBTQ + equality. Year-to-year trends emerged such that in 2017 anti-LGBTQ + concerns were heightened, and in 2018 to 2020, participants described ways they experienced the effects of increased anti-LGBTQ + threats to their rights, negative mental health outcomes, and discrimination. In 2020, there also was consistent dread expressed at the prospect of Trump being re-elected.
Conclusions
The findings offer a detailed and nuanced picture of the perceived negative impact of the Trump administration on the US socio-political environment for LGBTQ + people which are consistent with minority stress theory.
Policy Implications
The data suggest that the anti-LGBTQ + rhetoric/policies of the Trump administration were perceived to have negative impact on LGBTQ + people and their relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
Available from authors upon request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Thematic analysis of interview data in the context of management controls research: Student guide. Sage Research Methods Datasets, Part 2 (pp. 2–20). Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Brown, C., & Keller, C. J. (2018). The 2016 presidential election outcome: Fears, tension, and resiliency of LGBTQ communities. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14(1–2), 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420847
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123. Available at: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/preview/937606/Teaching%20thematic%20analysis%20Research%20Repository%20version.pdf
Doyle, D. M., & Molix, L. (2014). How does stigma spoil relationships? Evidence that perceived discrimination harms romantic relationship quality through impaired self-image. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 600–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12252
Doyle, D. M., & Molix, L. (2015). Social stigma and sexual minorities’ romantic relationship functioning: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,41(10), 1363–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215594592
Drabble, L., Veldhuis, C. B., Wootton, A., Riggle, E. D. B., & Hughes, T. L. (2019). Mapping the landscape of support and safety among sexual minority women and gender non-conforming individuals: Perceptions after the 2016 US Presidential election. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0349-6
Frost, D. M., Lehavot, K., & Meyer, I. H. (2015). Minority stress and physical health among sexual minority individuals. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9523-8
Gabriele-Black, K. A., Goldberg, A. E., Manley, M. H., & Frost, R. L. (2021). “Life is already hard enough”: Lesbian and gay adoptive parents’ experiences and concerns after the 2016 Presidential election. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 10(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000162
Gamarel, K. E., Reisner, S. L., Laurenceau, J., Nemoto, T., & Operario, D. (2014). Gender minority stress, mental health, and relationship quality: A dyadic investigation of transgender women and their cisgender male partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0337171
Garrison, S. M., Doane, M. J., & Elliott, M. (2018). Gay and lesbian experiences of discrimination, health, and well-being: Surrounding the presidential election. Social Psychology and Personality Science,9(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1948550617732391
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Gonzalez, K. A., Pulice-Farrow, L., & Galupo, M. P. (2018a). “My aunt unfriended me:” Narratives of LGBTQ family relationships post 2016 presidential election. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14(1–2), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420845
Gonzalez, K. A., Ramirez, J. L., & Galupo, M. P. (2018b). Increase in LGBTQ minority stress following the 2016 U. S. presidential election. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14, 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420849
Haas, S. H., & Whitton, S. W. (2015). The significance of living together and the importance of marriage in same-sex couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 62, 1241–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1037137
Harper, G. W., & Wilson, B. D. M. (2017). Situating sexual orientation and gender identity diversity in context and communities. In M. A. Bond, I. Serrano-García, C. B. Keys, & M. Shinn (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology: Theoretical foundations, core concepts, and emerging challenges (pp. 387–402). American Psychological Association.
Katz-Wise, S. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.637247
Krueger, E. A., Westmoreland, D. A., Choi, S. K, Harper, G. W., Lightfoot, M., Hammack, P. L., & Myer, I. H. (2021). Mental health among Black and Latinx sexual minority adults leading up to and following the 2016 U.S. presidential election: Results from a natural experiment. LGBT Health, 7(8), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2020.0454
Lannutti, P. J. (2011). Examining communication about marriage amendments: Same-sex couples and their extended social networks. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01697.x
Lannutti, P. J. (2018). GLBTQ people who decided to marry after the 2016 U.S. election: Reasons for and meanings of marriage. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14(1–2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420846
Lannutti, P. J., & Galupo, M. P. (Eds.). (2019). The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and the LGBTQ Community. New York: Routledge.
Maisel, N. C., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2011). California’s ban in same-sex marriage: The campaign and its effects on gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01696.x
McLemore, K. A. (2018). A minority stress perspective on transgender individuals’ experiences with misgendering. Stigma and Health, 3(1), 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000070
Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 38–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137286
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/00332909.129.5.674
Miller, A. L., & Lambert, A. D. (2014). Open-ended survey questions: Item nonresponse nightmare or qualitative data dream? Survey Practice, 7(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2014-0024
Pulice-Farrow, L., Gonzalez, K. A., & Lefevor, G. T. (2021, July 29). LGBTQ rumination, anxiety, depression, and community connection during trump’s presidency. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000497
Riggle, E. D. B., Drabble, L., Matthews, A. K., Veldhuis, C. B., Nisi, R. A., & Hughes, T. L. (2021). First come marriage, then comes the election: Macro-level event impacts on African American, Latina/x, and White sexual minority women. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 18, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00435-z
Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Horne, S. G. (2009). Marriage amendments and lesbian, gay, and bisexual citizens in the 2006 election. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 6, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.80
Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Drabble, L., Veldhuis, C. B., & Hughes, T. L. (2018). Sexual minority women’s and gender diverse individuals’ hope and empowerment responses to the 2016 -presidential election. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 14(1–2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2017.1420853
Rostosky, S. S., & Riggle, E. D. B. (2017). Same-sex relationships and minority stress. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.011
Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D. B., Horne, S. G., Denton, F. N., & Huellemeier, J. D. (2010). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals’ psychological reactions to amendments denying access to civil marriage. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01033.x
Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D. B., Horne, S. G., & Miller, A. D. (2009). Marriage amendments and the psychological distress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013609
Russell, G. M. (2000). Voted out: The psychological consequences of anti-gay politics. New York University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
United States Census. (2021). Retrieved August 13, 2023, from census.gov
Veldhuis, C. B., Drabble, L., Riggle, E. D. B., Wootton, A. R., & Hughes, T. L. (2018). “We won’t go back in the closet now without one hell of a fight”: Effects of the 2016 Presidential election on sexual minority women’s and gender minorities’ stigma-related concerns. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0305-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors were equally involved in the design and execution of the study. The first author took the lead in the data analysis and writing of this paper although both authors significantly contributed to its creation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Haas, S.M., Lannutti, P.J. “They are Giving Folks Permission to Discriminate and Hate”: A 4-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Perceived Impact of the Trump Administration on LGBTQ + Individuals and Relationships, 2017–2020. Sex Res Soc Policy 21, 62–75 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00843-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00843-x