Abstract
While it is clear that there are existing prejudices directed toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people across the globe, very few studies have provided in-depth investigations of such attitudes from an international comparative perspective, and no cross-cultural studies to date have investigated attitudes toward bisexual and transgender individuals. Without understanding how correlates of attitudes toward LGBT individuals are both similar and different across multiple international locations, it is unclear how we can learn to counteract negative prejudices toward these groups. In the current study, we explore how measures of politics, feminism, and religion affect attitudes toward LGBT individuals using Worthen’s (2012) Attitudes Toward LGBT People Scales and data from four college student samples in Oklahoma, Texas, Italy, and Spain (N = 1311). Results suggest three trends: (1) negative attitudes toward LGBT individuals are more pervasive in Oklahoma than in any of the other university samples and are most positive among Spanish students; (2) negative attitudes toward LGBT individuals are related to the individual and multiplicative effects of political beliefs, feminism, and religiosity across all four samples; and (3) constructs related to attitudes toward gays/lesbians differ from those that relate to attitudes toward bisexual and transgender individuals. Such findings indicate that there are important similarities and differences in prejudices toward LGBT individuals and that attitudes toward bisexual and transgender individuals should be included in future international comparative research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Cisgender is a label for individuals who have a match between the sex they were assigned at birth, their bodies, and their
personal gender identity (Worthen 2013).
For example, in the 2012 US presidential elections, all 77 counties in Oklahoma supported Republican candidate Romney; thus, Oklahoma is sometimes described as “the reddest state in the USA” (npr.com 2008).
Students were asked to take the survey and they told that if they did not want to complete the survey, they could sit quietly and read while others were completing the survey. The instructor was asked to leave the room while students completed the survey in order to reduce any potential biasing effects that might result from the presence of the instructor.
It is important to note that the structures of the US and European university systems do differ in ways that may affect the study body composition. For example, most European universities are “public” institutions, in which fees to attend are relatively low (most universities charge an enrollment fee between 500 and 1500€), while US universities require tuition payments that are much higher (ranging from $5000/year to more than $30,000 per year) (Sheng 2012). Thus, there may be some differences in socioeconomic status between the US and European samples.
US respondents were recruited from sociology classes, but only 26 % were sociology majors. Even so, it is important to note that some US research has shown that those with academic majors in humanities and liberal arts, especially those in majors that have classes about gender and sexuality (such as sociology), have been found to be more supportive of gay men and lesbian women when compared to students majoring in business and hard sciences (Bierly 1985; Larsen, Reed, and Hoffman 1980).
The survey was originally created by the first author, who is American, in English and the second and third authors, who are both Italian, translated the survey into Italian. The Spanish version was translated by a mother tongue Spanish psychologist who collaborated on the administration of the survey in Spain.
The majority of students in Spain were recruited from Madrid, while in Italy, most students were from Rome. Students were recruited from several universities, for Spain, Complutense, Università Autonoma, Alicante, Rey Juan Carlos, Carlos Tercero, and Santiago de Compostela, and for Italy, University of Milan, University of Turin, University of Rome, University of Siena, and University of Ancona. To test for differences by university, we ran each model with dummy variables to control for potential university effects. Results show that there were not significant differences by particular university in Spain or Italy, supporting the grouping of “Italian” and “Spanish” students.
The most common major among the European respondents was psychology (39 %) followed by liberal arts (19 %), law (11 %), engineering (9 %), medicine (7 %), and business (5 %).
References
Abramson, P., & Pinkerton, S. (1995). Sexual nature, sexual culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Acuña-Ruiz, A., & Vargas, R. (2006). Diferencias enlos prejuicios frente ala homosexualidad masculina en tres rangos deedad en una muestra de hombres y mujeres heterosexuals. Psicología desde el caribe. Universidad del Norte, 18, 58–88.
Adamczyk, A., & Cheng, Y. (2015). Explaining attitudes about homosexuality in Confucian and non-Confucian nations: is there a ‘cultural’ influence? Social Science Research, 51, 276–289.
Adamczyk, A., & Pitt, C. (2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: the role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research, 38, 338–351.
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Allport, G. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 447–457.
Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008). Economic inequality and intolerance: attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 4, 942–958.
Arnalte, A. (2003). Retada de violetas. La represión delos homosexuales durante el Franquismo. La esfera delos libros España.
Astin, A. (1998). The changing American college student: thirty-year trends, 1966–1996. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 115–135.
Baraldi, M. (2008). Family vs solidarity: recent epiphanies of the Italian reductionist anomaly in the debate on de facto couples. Utrecht Law Review, 4(2), 175–193.
Bauer, G., Hammond, R., Travers, R., Kaay, M., Hohenadel, M., & Boyce, M. (2009). “I don’t think this is theoretical; this is our lives”: how erasure impacts health care for transgender people. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 20, 348–361.
Beckers, T. (2010). Islam and the acceptance of homosexuality: the shortage of socioeconomic well-being and responsive democracy, pp. 57–98 in Habib (ed.) Islam and Homosexuality. CA: Greenwood.
Bendroth, M. (1999). Fundamentalism and the family: gender, culture, and the American pro-family movement. Journal of Women’s History, 10(4), 35–54.
Bierly, M. (1985). Prejudice toward contemporary outgroups as a generalized attitude. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(2), 189–199.
Bolton, R. (1994). Sex science and social responsibility: cross-cultural research on same-sex eroticism and sexual intolerance. Cross-Cultural Research, 28, 134–190.
Boswell, J. (1980). Christianity, social tolerance and homosexuality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brake, R. (2010). The shaping of the American mind. Intercollegiate Studies Institute American Civic Literacy Program. Available at http://chronicle.com/items/biz/pdf/2010%20Civic%20Lit%20Report%2012%2015%20FINAL_small_2_0.pdf
Bremer, T. (2004). Blessed with tourists: the borderlands of religion and tourism in San Antonio. U of North Carolina Press.
Brennan, D. J., Ross, L. E., Dobinson, C., Veldhuizen, S., & Steele, L. S. (2010). Men’s sexual orientation and health in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 101(3), 255–258.
Brody, R. & Lawless, J. (2003). Political ideology in the United States: conservatism and liberalism in the 1980s and 1990. pp. 53–80 in Conservative Parties and Right-Wing Politics in North America. Schultze, Sturm, Eberle (eds.). Leske + Budrich: Opalden.
Burdette, A., Ellison, C., & Hill, T. (2005). Conservative Protestantism and tolerance toward homosexuals: an examination of potential mechanisms. Sociological Inquiry, 75, 177–196.
Calvo, K. (2008). The situation concerning homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation in Spain. Sociological Country Report for FRA.
Calvo, K. & Montero, J. (2005). Valores Y Religiosidad. Pp. 147–170 in Torcal Pérez-Nievas and Morales (eds) España: Sociedad Y Política En Perspectiva Comparada. Tirant Lo Blanch: Valencia.
Calvo, K., & Trujillo, G. (2011). Fighting for love rights: claims and strategies of the LGBT movement in Spain. Sexualities, 14(5), 562–579.
Capozzi, P., & Lingiardi, V. (2003). Happy Italy?The Mediterranean experience of homosexuality psychoanalysis and mental health professions. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Psychotherapy, 5(1), 29–57.
Cartabia, M.; Crivelli, E.; Lamarque, E.; & Tega, D. (2010). Legal study on homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. Available at: http://www.fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/LGBT-2010_thematic-study_IT.pdf
Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A., & Price, B. (2000). Regression analysis by example. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
COGAM. (1997). Investigación sobre las Actitudes hacia la Homosexualidad enla Población Adolescente Escolarizada dela Comunidad de Madrid. Available at: http://www.cogam.org/_cogam/archivos/1437_es_Investigaci%C3%B3n%20sobre%20las%20actitudes%20hacia%20la%20homosexualidad.PDF
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cohen, G. (2003). Party over policy: the dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Collier, K., Horn, S., Bos, H., & Sandfort, T. (2015). Attitudes toward lesbians and gays among American and Dutch adolescents. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(2), 140–150.
Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought. Boston: Routledge.
Connell, R. (1990). The state, gender, and sexual politics: theory and appraisal. Theory and Society, 19(5), 507–544.
Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and Discontent, Apter (ed.), pp. 206–61. NY: Free Press.
Cowan, G., Mestlin, M., & Masek, J. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27(7/8), 321–330.
D’Emilio, J. (2002). The world turned. Durham: Duke University Press.
D’Augelli, A., & Rose, M. (1990). Homophobia in a university community: attitudes and experiences of heterosexual freshman. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 484–491.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have Americans’ social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102, 690–755.
Eliason, M. (1997). The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(3), 317–326.
European Commission (2008). Special eurobarometer 296. Discrimination in the European Union, chapter 9. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_296_en.pdf
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2009). Homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity in the EU member states. Available at: http://www.fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/FRA_hdgso_report_part2_en.pdf
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2010). Homophobia transphobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity. Available at: http://www.fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/FRA-LGBT-report-update2010.pdf
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2011). Homophobia, transphobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity in the EU member states. Available at: http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/FRA-homophobia-synthesis-report-2011_EN.pdf
Fingerhut, A., Riggle, E., & Rostosky, S. (2011). Same-sex marriage: the social and psychological implications of policy and debates. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 225–241.
Frank, D., Camp, B., & Boutcher, S. (2010). Worldwide trends in the criminal regulation of sex, 1945 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 867–893.
Froese, P., Bader, C., & Smith, B. (2008). Political tolerance and god’s wrath in the United States. Sociology of Religion, 69(1), 29–44.
Grant, J., Mottet, L., Tanis, J., Harrison, J., Herman, J., & Keisling, M. (2011). Injustice at every turn: a report of the national transgender discrimination survey. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
Green, J., Guth, J., Smidt, C., & Kellstedt, L. (1996). Religion and the culture wars. Rowman Littlefield.
Greenberg, D. (1995). The pleasures of homosexuality, pp. 223–256 in Abramson, Pinkerton (eds.) Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture. Chicago: UC Press.
Hagland, P. (1997). International theory and LGBT politics testing the limits of a human rights-based strategy. GLQ, 3, 357–384.
Harrison, J. (2015). At long last marriage. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 24(1).
Herek, G. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(4), 264–274.
Heyrman, C. (1998). Southern cross. U of North Carolina Press.
Hill, D., & Willoughby, B. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53(7/8), 531–544.
Hinrichs, D., & Rosenberg, P. (2002). Attitudes toward gay lesbian and bisexual persons among heterosexual liberal arts college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(1), 61–84.
Hull, K. (2006). Same-sex marriage. Cambridge Press
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. NY: Cambridge Press.
Jackson, L., Fleury, R., & Lewandowski, D. (1996). Feminism: definitions, support, and correlates of support among female and male college students. Sex Roles, 34(9/10), 687–693.
Jaspers, E., Lubbers, M., & De Graaf, N. (2007). Horrors of Holland: explaining attitude change toward euthanasia and homosexuals in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(4), 451–473.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
Kelly, J. (2001). Attitudes towards homosexuality in 29 nations. Australian Social Monitor, 4(1), 15–22.
Koltko-Rivera, M. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 3–58.
Kuntz, A., Davidov, E., Schwartz, S., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Human values, legal regulation, and approval of homosexuality in Europe: a cross-country comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 120–134.
Landen, M., & Innala, S. (2000). Attitudes toward transsexualism in a Swedish national survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 375–388.
Larsen, K., Reed, M., & Hoffman, S. (1980). Attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuality: a Likert-type scale and construct validity. The Journal of Sex Research, 16(3), 245–257.
Layman, G. (2001). The great divide. NY: Columbia Press.
Lewis, G. (2005). Same-sex marriage and the 2004 presidential election. Political Science and Politics, 38(2), 195–199.
Lgbtmap.org. (2016). State policy profile—Oklahoma. Available at: http://lgbtmap.org/equality_maps/profile_state/37
Lin, K., Button, D., Su, M., & Chen, S. (2016). Chinese college students’ attitudes toward homosexuality: exploring the effects of traditional culture and modernizing factors. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(2), 158–172.
Lingiardi, V., Falanga, S., & D’Augelli, A. (2005). The evaluation of homophobia in an Italian sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(1), 81–93.
Lingiardi, V., Nardelli, N., Ioverno, S., Falanga, S., Di Chiacchio, C., Tanzilli, A., & Baiocco, R. (2015). Homonegativity in Italy: cultural issues, personality characteristics, and demographic correlates with negative attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(2), 95–108.
Lippincott, J., Wlazelek, B., & Schumacher, L. (2000). Comparison: attitudes toward homosexuality of international and American college students. Psychological Reports, 87, 1053–1056.
Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124–133.
Loftus, J. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review, 66(5), 762–782.
Lubbers, M., Jaspers, E., & UIltee, W. (2009). Primary and secondary socialization impacts on support for same-sex marriage after legalization in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 30(12), 1714–1745.
MacDonald, A., Huggins, J., Young, S., & Swanson, R. (1973). Attitudes toward homosexuality: preservation of sex morality or the double standard? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 161.
Malagreca, M. (2006). Lottiamo ancora: reviewing one hundred and fifty years of Italian feminism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 7(4), 69–89.
Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1997). The religious factor in U.S. presidential elections, 1960–1992. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 38–81.
Mayfield, W. & Carrubba, M. (1996). Validation of the attitudes toward bisexuality inventory. 104th American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto.
Mazurczak, F. (2014, June 11). Is Spain regaining its faith? First Things Retrieved from: http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/06/is-spain-regaining-its-faith
McDaniel, E., & Ellison, C. (2008). God’s party? Race, religion, and partisanship over time. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 180–191.
Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics. NY: Doubleday Press.
Minnigerode, F. (1976). Attitudes toward homosexuality: feminist attitudes and sexual conservatism. Sex Roles, 2(4), 347–352.
Mohr, J., & Rochlen, A. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian gay male and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(3), 353–369.
Morgan, B. (1996). Putting the feminism into feminism scales. Introduction of a liberal feminist attitude and ideology scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles, 34, 359–390.
Nagoshi, J., Adams, K., Terrell, H., Hill, E., Brzuzy, S., & Nagoshi, C. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531.
Norton, A., & Herek, G. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753.
Npr.com. (2008). Oklahoma: the reddest state December 6 2008. Available at: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId = 97905041
Ojerholm, A., & Rothblum, E. (1999). The relationships of body image, feminism, and sexual orientation in college women. Feminism & Psychology, 9(4), 431–448.
Pichardo-Galán J., Molinuevo P., Rodríguez M., & Romero-López, M. (2007). Actitudes ante la diversidad sexual dela población adolescente de Coslada (Madrid) y San Bartolomé de Tirajana (Gran Canaria). Available at: http://www.ampgil.org/mm/file/estudis/estudiocoslada.pdf
Platero-Méndez, R. (2007). Love and the state: gay marriage in Spain. Feminist Legal Studies, 15, 3.
Popkin, S. (1994). The reasoning voter. Chicago: UC Press.
Povoledo, E. (2016, February 16). Italian lawmakers’ vote on same-sex civil unions stalls, New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/world/europe/italy-same-sex-civil-unions.html
Prunas, A., Clerici, C., Gentile, G., Muccino, E., Veneroni, L., & Zoja, R. (2015). Transphobic murders in Italy: an overview of homicides in Milan (Italy) in the past two decades (1993–2012). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(16), 2872–2885.
Raja, S., & Stokes, J. P. (1998). Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: the Modern Homophobia Scale. Journal of Gay Lesbian and Bisexual Identity, 3, 113–134.
Rifelli, A. (1998). Psicologia e psicopatologia della sessualità. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
Roy, R., Weibust, K., & Miller, C. (2007). Effects of stereotypes about feminists on feminist self-identification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 146–156.
Sanjuán, T., Callejón, F. & Méndez, C. (2008). Legal study on homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation in Spain FRALEX.
Sheng, J. (2012) Comparison of tuition costs of higher education around the world. Accessed from http://jimsheng.hubpages.com/hub/Comparison-of-cost-of-higher-education-around-the-world
Slenders, S., Sieben, I., & Verbakel, E. (2014). Tolerance towards homosexuality in Europe: population composition, economic affluence, religiosity, same-sex union legislation and HIV rates as explanations for country differences. International Sociology, 29(4), 348–367.
Smith, T., Son, J., & Kim, J. (2014). Public attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights across time and countries. The Williams Institute. Available at: http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/international/public-attitudes-nov-2014/
Sotelo, M. (2000). Political tolerance among adolescents toward homosexuals in Spain. Journal of Homosexuality, 39(1), 95–105.
Steele, L. S., Ross, L. E., Dobinson, C., Veldhuizen, S., & Tinmouth, J. M. (2009). Women’s sexual orientation and health: results from a Canadian population-based survey. Women & Health, 49(5), 353–367.
Svallfors, S. (2006). The moral economy of class. CA: Stanford Press.
Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. (1993). Women’s culture and lesbian feminist activism: a reconsideration of cultural feminism. Signs, 19(1), 32–61.
Terry, J. (1999). An American obsession. Chicago: UC Press.
Turner, L., Whittle, S., & Combs, R. (2009). Transphobic hate crime in the European Union. http://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/transphobic_hate_crime_in_the_european_union_0.pdf
Tygart, C. (1999). Genetic causation attribution and public support of gay rights. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(3), 259–275.
Van de Meerendonk, B., & Scheepers, P. (2004). Denial of equal civil rights for lesbians and gay men in the Netherlands, 1980–1993. Journal of Homosexuality, 47(2), 63–80.
van den Akker, H., van der Ploeg, R., & Scheepers, P. (2013). Disapproval of homosexuality: comparative research on individual and national determinants of disapproval of homosexuality in 20 European countries. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 64–86.
Wald, K., Owen, D., & Hill, S. (1988). Churches as political communities. American Journal of Political Science, 82, 531–548.
Welch, M., Leege, D., Wald, K., & Kellstedt, L. (1993). Are the sheep hearing the shepherds? Cue perceptions, congregational responses, and political communication processes. pp. 235–54 in Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics, edited by Leege and Kellstedt. M.E. Sharpe.
Williams, R., & Wittig, M. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11/12), 885–904.
World Values Survey. (2005), World values survey association. Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. Available at www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
Worthen, M. G. F., Lingiardi, V. & Caristo, C. (under review). Social contact, social distancing, and attitudes toward LGT individuals: A cross-cultural study of heterosexual college students in the United States, Italy, and Spain.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2012). Heterosexual college student sexual experiences, feminist identity, and attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(2), 77–113.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68(11/12), 703–723.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2014). Blaming the jocks and the Greeks? Identifying the underlying constructs of collegiate athletes’ and fraternity/sorority members’ attitudes toward LGBT Individuals. Journal of College Student Development, 55(2), 168–195.
Worthen, M. G. F. (2016). Hetero-cis-normativity and the gendering of transphobia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(1), 31–57.
Young, L. & Cross, W. (2003). Women and conservative parties in Canada and the United States. pp. 207–228 in Conservative Parties and Right-Wing Politics in North America. Schultze, Sturm, Eberle, (eds.). Leske + Budrich: Opalden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
Support for this research was supported by two sources of funding awarded to the first author from the University of Oklahoma, the College of Arts and Sciences, and the Presidential International Travel Fellowship.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worthen, M.G.F., Lingiardi, V. & Caristo, C. The Roles of Politics, Feminism, and Religion in Attitudes Toward LGBT Individuals: A Cross-Cultural Study of College Students in the USA, Italy, and Spain. Sex Res Soc Policy 14, 241–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0244-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0244-y