Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soil organic matter balances in organic versus conventional farming—modelling in field experiments and regional upscaling for cropland in Germany

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of whether organic farming leads to higher soil organic matter (SOM) levels in arable soils compared with conventional farming is an ongoing debate. Building on several studies reported in the literature, we hypothesize that the impact on SOM levels is not an intrinsic characteristic of any farming system but is the result of the actual structure of the farming system, in particular, the composition and management of crop rotations, and the availability and utilization of organic manure. The SOM balances for organic versus conventional farming in Germany are compared by considering data on the structure of organic and conventional farming systems from agricultural census reports and then applying the SOM balance model HU-MOD. Preliminary testing confirmed the applicability of the model using a survey on soil organic carbon (SOC) change and SOM balances in four long-term field experiments in Germany and Switzerland and found that more positive SOM balances coincided with higher SOC levels. We therefore conclude that, where the SOM supply level of organic farming systems is higher than in conventional management, a shift from conventional to organic agriculture would increase SOM levels. Upscaling using agricultural census data in Germany, we found that SOM balances of organic farming were more positive than for conventional farming in the scenarios without consideration of animal manure application, but SOM balances for the two systems were not different where animal manure application rates were assumed to be at the current average rate for all cropped land. However, in fact, animal manure availability and application shows strong regional variations, and it is likely that this would affect the mean cropland SOM balance if it were possible to calculate it based on such spatially disaggregated data. We confirm the applicability of simple SOM balance models to compare the impact of farming systems and cropland structures on SOC levels. More work is needed to develop data inputs at a sufficient spatial and structural resolution to support more detailed evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellamy P, Loveland P, Bradley R, Lark R, Kirk G (2005) Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978−2003. Nature 437:245–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Best H (2007) Organic agriculture and the conventionalization hypothesis: a case study from West Germany. Agric Hum Values 25:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BLE (2012) Strukturdaten Ökologischer Landbau 2010. http://www.oekolandbau.de/fileadmin/redaktion/dokumente/service/Bio-Strukturdaten_2010.xlsx Accessed 29 March 2012

  • BMELV (2007) Agrarpolitischer Bericht der Bundesregierung 2007. German Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food (BMELV) publication, Bonn

  • Britz W, Verburg P, Leip A (2011) Modelling of land cover and agricultural change in Europe: combining the CLUE and CAPRI-Spat approaches. Agr Ecosyst Environ 142:40–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock C, Fließbach A, Oberholzer H, Schulz F, Wiesinger K, Reinicke F, Koch W, Pallutt B, Dittman B, Zimmer J, Hülsbergen K, Leithold G (2011) Relation between soil organic matter and yield levels of nonlegume crops in organic and conventional farming systems. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174:568–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brock C, Hoyer U, Leithold G, Hülsbergen KJ (2012) The humus balance model (HU-MOD): a simple tool for the assessment of management change impact on soil organic matter levels in arable soils. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 92:239–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren K, Mattsson L (2001) Swedish soil fertility experiments. Acta Agr Scand B-S P 51:49–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debruck J (2003) Der viehlose Öko-Betrieb–die Problematik um Fruchtfolge und N-Kreislauf. Mitt Ges Pflanzenbauwiss 15:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Deike S, Pallutt B, Christen O (2008) Investigations on the energy efficiency of organic and integrated farming with specific emphasis on pesticide use intensity. Eur J Agron 28:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009): LUCAS 2009 (Land Use/Cover Area Frame Survey). Technical reference document C-1: general implementation, land cover and use, water management, soil, transect, photos. Surveyor instructions. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/lucas/documents/Instructions_LUCAS2009m.pdf Accessed 6 June 2012

  • Fließbach A, Oberholzer H, Gunst L, Mäder P (2007) Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21years of organic and conventional farming. Agr Ecosyst Environ 118:273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foereid B, Høgh-Jensen H (2004) Carbon sequestration potential of organic agriculture in northern Europe—a modelling approach. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 68:13–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foissner W (1992) Comparative studies on the soil life in ecofarmed and conventionally farmed fields and grasslands of Austria. Agr Ecosyst Environ 40:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freibauer A, Rounsevell M, Smith P, Verhagen J (2004) Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122:1–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling P, Shepherd M (2005) Long-term changes in soil fertility in organic arable farming systems in England, with particular reference to phosphorus and potassium. Agr Ecosyst Environ 105:425–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Drury CF, Baldock JA (2001) Changes in soil carbon under long-term maize in monoculture and legume-based rotation. Can J Soil Sci 81:21–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepperly PR, Douds D, Seidel R (2006) The Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial 1981 to 2005: long-term analysis of organic and conventional maize and soybean cropping systems. In: Raupp J, Pekrun C, Oltmanns M, Köpke U (eds) Long-term field experiments in organic farming, ISOFAR Scientific Series 1, Dr. Köster, Berlin, pp 15-32

  • Hülsbergen KJ, Abraham J, Wittmann C, Papaja S (2000) Die räumliche und zeitliche Variabilität der Humus- und Nährstoffgehalte auf Testflächen in Seeben. In: Hülsbergen KJ, Diepenbrock W (eds) Die Entwicklung von Fauna, Flora und Boden nach Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, pp 69-86

  • IFEU (2008) Nachhaltig nutzbares Getreidestroh in Deutschland. Positionspapier. Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH (IFEU), Heidelberg. http://www.ifeu.de/landwirtschaft/pdf/IFEU%20-%20Positionspapier%20Stroh.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2012

  • ISO 10694 (1995) Soil quality—determination of organic and total carbon after dry combustion (elementary analysis). International Standardization Organization

  • Kirchmann H, Bergstroem L (2008) Organic crop production. Ambitions and limitations. Springer Science + Business Media B.V, [Dordrecht]

  • Kutsch W, Aubinet M, Buchmann N et al (2010) The net biome production of full crop rotations in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–1498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2006) Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degrad Dev 17:197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifeld J, Fuhrer J (2010) Organic farming and soil carbon sequestration: what do we really know about the benefits? Ambio 39:585–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leifeld J, Reiser R, Oberholzer H (2009) Consequences of conventional versus organic farming on soil carbon: results from a 27-year field experiment. Agron J 101:1204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leip A, Marchi G, Koeble R, Kempen M, Britz W, Li C (2008) Linking an economic model for European agriculture with a mechanistic model to estimate nitrogen and carbon losses from arable soils in Europe. Biogeosciences 5:73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithold G (1991) Über den Zusammenhang von Humus und Stickstoff im System Boden-Pflanze und Möglichkeiten einer quantitativen Beschreibung. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Halle XXXX´91M3:67-75

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Herbert SJ, Hashemi AM, Zhang X, Ding G (2006) Effects of agricultural management on soil organic matter and carbon transformation—a review. Plant Soil Environ 52:531–543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mäder P, Fließbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mäder P, Fließbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Jossi W, Widmer F, Oberson A, Frossard E, Oehl F, Wiemken A, Gattinger A, Niggli U (2006) The DOK experiment (Switzerland). In: Raupp J, Pekrun C, Oltmanns M, Köpke U (eds) Long-term field experiments in organic farming, ISOFAR Scientific Series 1, Dr. Köster, Berlin, pp 41-58

  • Marinari S, Mancinelli R, Campiglia E, Grego S (2006) Chemical and biological indicators of soil quality in organic and conventional farming systems in central Italy. Ecol Indic 6:701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoncini M, Canali S, Giovannetti M, Castagnoli M, Tittarelli F, Antichi D, Nannelli R, Cristani C, Bàrberi P (2010) Comparison of organic and conventional stockless arable systems: a multidisciplinary approach to soil quality evaluation. Appl Soil Ecol 44:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro TL, Cook HF, Lee HC (2002) Sustainability indicators used to compare properties of organic and conventionally managed topsoils. Biol Agric Hortic 20:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen TM, Wander MM (2003) Management and soil-quality effects on fertilizer-use efficiency and leaching. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1524–1532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osterburg B, Schmitt T (2008) Weiterentwicklung der Berechnung regionaler Stickstoffbilanzen am Beispiel Niedersachsen. Landbauforschung - vTI Agri For Res 58:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Panten K, Rogasik J, Godlinski F, Funder U, Greef JM, Schnug E (2009) Gross soil surface nutrient balances: the OECD approach implemented under German conditions. Landbauforschung-vTI Agr For Res 59:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Papritz A, Webster R (1995) Estimating temporal change in soil monitoring.1. Statistical theory. Eur J Soil Sci 46:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS (1987) Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains Grasslands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1173–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piorr A, Werner W (1998) Nachhaltige landwirtschaftliche Produktionssysteme im Vergleich. Bewertung anhand von Umweltindikatoren. DLG-Verl., Frankfurt a. Main [u.a.]

  • Pulleman M, Jongmans A, Marinissen J, Bouma J (2003) Effects of organic versus conventional arable farming on soil structure and organic matter dynamics in a marine loam in The Netherlands. Soil Use Manage 19:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reganold J (1988) Comparison of soil properties as influenced by organic and conventional farming systems. Am J Alternative Agr 3:144–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke F, Hülsbergen KJ, Christen O (2003) Bewertung von Anbausystemen des integrierten und ökologischen landbaus unter den bedingungen des mitteldeutschen Trocken-Lößgebietes in einem Dauerfeldversuch. Mitt Ges Pflanzenbauwiss 15:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrumpf M, Schulze E, Kaiser K, Schumacher J (2011) How accurately can soil organic carbon stocks and stock changes be quantified by soil inventories? Biogeosciences 8:723–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd MA, Harrison R, Webb J (2002) Managing soil organic matter—implications for soil structure on organic farms. Soil Use Manage 18:284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shevtsova L (2003) Effect of natural and agricultural factors on long-term soil organic matter dynamics in arable soddy-podzolic soils—modeling and observation. Geoderma 116:165–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sleutel S, De Neve S, Hofman G (2007) Assessing causes of recent organic carbon losses from cropland soils by means of regional-scaled input balances for the case of Flanders (Belgium). Nutr cycl Agroecosyst 78:265–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2004) Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context. Eur J Agron 20:229–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Smith J, Powlson D, McGill W, Arah J, Chertov O, Coleman K, Franko U, Frolking S, Jenkinson D, Jensen L, Kelly R, Klein-Gunnewiek H, Komarov A, Li C, Molina J, Mueller T, Parton W, Thornley J, Whitmore A (1997) A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81:153–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter (2011) Agrarstrukturen in Deutschland-Einheit in Vielfalt–Regionale Ergebnisse der Landwirtschaftszählung 2010. http://www.statistikportal.de/statistik-portal/landwirtschaftszaehlung_2010.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2012

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2011) Wirtschaftsdünger tierischer Herkunft in landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben - Erhebung zur Wirtschaftsdüngerausbringung 2010. Fachserie 3 Reihe 2.2.2. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/LandForstwirtschaft/ViehbestandTierischeErzeugung/Wirtschaftsduenger2030222109004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 29 March 2012

  • van Diepeningen A, Devos O, Korthals G, van Bruggen A (2006) Effects of organic versus conventional management on chemical and biological parameters in agricultural soils. Appl Soil Ecol 31:120–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerger C, Haas G (2003) Ökologischer Landbau und Agrarstruktur in Nordrhein-Westfalen. 1st edn. Dr. Köster, Berlin

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the project by the German Federal Agency of Agriculture and Food (BLE). Further, we thank E. Stockdale for linguistic proofreading and corrections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Organic Farming, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Karl-Glöckner-Strasse 21c, 35394, Giessen, Germany

    Christopher Brock & Günter Leithold

  2. Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon ART, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zürich, Switzerland

    Hans-Rudolf Oberholzer

  3. Julius-Kühn-Institut, Stahnsdorfer Damm 81, 14532, Kleinmachnow, Germany

    Jürgen Schwarz & Bernhard Pallutt

  4. Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau FIBL, Ackerstrasse, 5070, Frick, Switzerland

    Andreas Fließbach

  5. Department of Organic Farming, Technische Universität München, Alte Akademie 12, 85354, Freising, Germany

    Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen

  6. Regional Institute for Agriculture, Forestry and Horticulture Saxony-Anhalt, Strenzfelder Allee 22, 06406, Bernburg, Germany

    Wernfried Koch

  7. Department of Agronomy and Organic Farming, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Betty-Heimann-Strasse 5, 06120, Halle, Germany

    Frank Reinicke

Authors
  1. Christopher Brock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans-Rudolf Oberholzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jürgen Schwarz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Fließbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wernfried Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bernhard Pallutt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Frank Reinicke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Günter Leithold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Brock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brock, C., Oberholzer, HR., Schwarz, J. et al. Soil organic matter balances in organic versus conventional farming—modelling in field experiments and regional upscaling for cropland in Germany. Org. Agr. 2, 185–195 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-012-0033-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-012-0033-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation