Abstract
Ombrotrophic peatlands are recognized archives of past atmospheric mineral dust deposition. Net dust deposition rates, grain size, mineral hosts and source areas are typically inferred from down-core elemental data. Although elemental analysis can be time efficient and data rich, there are some inherent limitations. X–ray diffraction (XRD) analysis allows direct identification of mineral phases in environmental samples but few studies have applied this method to peat samples and a well–developed protocol for extracting the inorganic fraction of highly organic samples (>95%) is lacking. We tested and compared different levels of pre–treatment: no pre–treatment, thermal combustion (300, 350, 400, 450, 500 and 550 °C) and chemical oxidation (H2O2 and Na2S2O8) using a homogenised highly organic (>98%) composite peat sample. Subsequently, minerals were identified by XRD. The results show that combustion is preferred to chemical oxidation because it most efficiently removes organic matter (OM), an important pre–requisite for identifying mineral phases by XRD analysis. Thermally induced phase transitions can be anticipated when temperature is the only factor to take into consideration. Based on the data required in this study the recommended combustion temperature is 500 °C which efficiently removes OM while preserving a majority of common dust minerals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
During the last three decades records from ombrotrophic (rain–fed) peat bogs have been increasingly used to reconstruct past changes in mineral dust deposition (paleodust), most commonly based on multi–element datasets from XRF and ICP–MS analyses (e.g., Shotyk et al. 2001; Marx et al. 2009; Le Roux et al. 2012; Kylander et al. 2016). In peat paleodust studies, a conservative lithogenic element such as Ti or Al, is typically taken as a proxy for mineral dust deposition and used to calculate elemental mass accumulation rates (MAR). The mineral hosts can be inferred from elemental relationships, such as from comparing ratios of light, medium and heavy Rare Earth Elements (REEs) (Kylander et al. 2016). Shifts in the mineral composition of paleodust can be indicative of source areas changes, information that can be used to deduce changes in paleo wind and/or transport processes (Marx et al. 2018).
There are, however, methodological limitations to using elemental data alone to examine net dust deposition rates and mineral composition: (1) chemically similar minerals are difficult to distinguish; (2) dust events can vary widely in their mineralogical composition, leading to an under– or over– estimation of dust variability if a single element is used as a dust proxy (Kylander et al. 2016); and (3) minerogenic and biogenic minerals cannot be separated based on elemental data alone (e.g., calcium carbonates, biogenic silica). Additionally, we are limited by that fact that (4) some methods (e.g., ICP–MS) are destructive, leading to sample loss; and (5) some elements are lost during the pre–treatments (e.g., Si in HF digestions), complicating mineral predictions.
In comparison, X–ray diffraction (XRD) analysis identifies minerals directly and non–destructively with a detection limit ranging between 0.1 to 5w/w % depending on factors such as sample composition, crystallinity of the minerals, peak positions, efficiency of milling and measurement settings. XRD analysis also allows for the identification of clay mineral phases (Moore and Reynolds 1997), enabling detection and distinction of long–range transported fine dust. The inorganic matter (IM) fraction of peat contains not only atmospherically derived minerals but also oceanic salt spray (e.g., Tolonen 1984); autogenic biogenic (amorphous) silica, carbonates, and oxalates (Bauer et al. 2011); charcoal (Kuhry 1995); and tephra (Wastegård 2005). These phases affect the elemental composition of bulk peat but do not typically give reflections in XRD analysis due to low crystallinity (Moore and Reynolds 1997). To date a limited number of studies have applied XRD analysis to peat samples and those undertaken were conducted on either untreated peat (e.g., Lopéz–Buendía et al. 2007; Smieja–Król et al. 2010) or on the ash residue after combustion at 550 °C (Le Roux and Shotyk 2006).
Within the field of mineral analysis the general recommendation is to apply minimal pre-treatments to avoid causing mineral phase changes (e.g., Moore and Reynolds 1997). This conflicts with another general recommendation that OM should be removed, typically with H2O2, prior to mineralogical analysis if it exceeds 3–5% of the total weight (Moore and Reynolds 1997). The dominant peat type in the northern latitudes, Sphagnum peat, is highly resistant to decomposition (Rydin and Jeglum 2013). Therefore, OM removal methods that are effective for other soil types may not be applicable to peat samples. The amount of OM in these kinds of samples (typically >95%) compounds the challenges of extracting IM from peat without altering the chemical or physical composition of mineral phases (Andrejko et al. 1983; Moore and Reynolds 1997; Mikutta et al. 2005).
The two most commonly applied methods for extracting IM from peat are wet chemical oxidation and thermal combustion (dry ashing). Protocols for chemical oxidation of OM vary by discipline, but commonly involve hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (e.g., Battarbee 1986), sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) (Andersen 1963), hydrogen chloride (HCl) and/or nitric acid (HNO3). These chemicals, however, can cause partial or complete mineral dissolution (Mikutta et al. 2005), aggregation (Carrado et al. 2006) and/or oxidation of ferrous iron (Jones and Bowser 1978). For example, oxidation with H2O2 potentially dissolves magnesium oxides, carbonate and sulfide minerals (through acidolysis), and can cause disintegration of clay mineral layers (Mikutta et al. 2005).
Thermal combustion is commonly applied within paleo–studies to establish weight percentages of OM (determined from the loss–on–ignition) (Dean 1974). In peat studies temperatures from 450 °C (e.g., Marx et al. 2009; Kylander et al. 2013) to 550 °C (e.g., Le Roux and Shotyk 2006) have commonly been used, although a study by Beaudoin (2003) reported combustion at 375 °C as sufficient for OM removal. Boyle (2004) later showed that, depending on soil or sediment type, temperatures of up to 550 °C are required to efficiently remove OM. Temperatures as low as possible are recommended to minimise thermally induced mineral phase changes. Physical and chemical alterations of less crystalline minerals (e.g., iron oxides and hydroxides) can start already at 40 °C (Kaiser and Guggenberger 2003), although many minerals are stable (or go through reversible changes) below 200–300 °C (Brown and Brindley 1984). Oxidation through thermal combustion (375–750 °C) can cause dehydroxylation, decomposition and structural as well as chemical transformations of minerals (Andrejko et al. 1983; Brown and Brindley 1984; Moore and Reynolds 1997).
The aim of this study is to establish an optimal protocol (i.e., causing the least amount of mineral alteration) for the analysis of the mineral composition of peat samples. This is achieved by comparing XRD data of samples with different levels of pre–treatment: no pre–treatment; thermal combustion at 300, 350, 400, 450, 500 and 550 °C; and wet–chemical oxidation using either H2O2 or Na2S2O8. We used peat samples from a stratigraphic sequence from Store Mosse (SM) and a composite sample from Dumme Mosse (DM), two ombrotrophic bogs located in southern Sweden which are detailed elsewhere (Bindler 2003; Kylander et al. 2013, 2016, 2018). To verify the effects of the different pre–treatments, known clay mineral standards were added to bulk samples prior to the different pre–treatments.
Materials and Methods
Exploratory work was first conducted on freeze–dried SM peat samples (1 cm thick) from different depths. Based on these results a structured replicate study using the composite peat sample from DM was designed as summarised in Fig. 1.
To evaluate what (if) minerals can be detected in bulk peat, four untreated freeze–dried samples from the SM peat sequence were crushed in a mortar and packed for XRD analysis (Smieja–Król et al. 2010). One half of the analysed sample was then thermally combusted at 450 °C while the other half was chemically oxidised using H2O2 or Na2S2O8. This procedure enabled comparison of XRD patterns of untreated, combusted and chemically oxidised sub-samples from the same composite sample.
Chemical oxidation with H2O2 was conducted after sieving the sample through either a 63 μm or a 125 μm mesh in order to physically remove larger organic particles, after which 17% H2O2 was added to the sample. The solution was left overnight at room temperature and subsequently heated to 80 °C in a water–bath. Additional H2O2 was added until the reaction stopped and the supernatant was clear.
Chemical oxidation by Na2S2O8 was conducted on the <63 μm residue, using 2 moles of Na2S2O8 per mole carbon to be oxidised, combined with sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) as a buffer (Meier and Menegatti 1997). Na2S2O8 and NaHCO3 (mass ratio: 2:1) were dissolved in 100 ml distilled water and added to glass beakers containing the sample. The solution was heated to reaction temperature (80 °C) and additional solution was added until the liquid was clear and the residue changed colour from brown to grey.
The replicate procedure (Fig. 1b) was designed based on the results of the exploratory tests (Fig. 2). Given the performance of oxidation with H2O2 in the exploratory study, it was not included in the second stage of development (described below). An air–dried (35 °C) composite sample of peat collected in 2002 at DM (a 1 m section, approximately from 2–3 m depth) was homogenised and ground to a fine–grained powder for several minutes in a food processor. To verify the effect of thermal combustion and chemical oxidation on the minerals a batch of six sub-samples (500 mg each) per pre–treatment procedure were prepared: three with bulk peat and three with bulk peat and clay mineral standards (Fig. 1b). An equal mixture of illite (IMt–1, c. 25 mg) and montmorillonite (SAz–2, c. 25 mg) from the Clay Mineral Society Source Clay Repository was added. The sub–samples were then chemically oxidised with Na2S2O8 or thermally combusted (Fig. 1b). The chemically oxidised samples initially resisted oxidation and were therefore subjected to a second oxidation procedure in a closed–circulation oven, following the protocol of Eusterhues et al. (2003).
XRD analyses were performed at the Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, using a PANalytical X–ray diffraction system (X’Pert Powder). The samples were generally analysed from 2° to 70° 2θ, CuKα radiation at 45 kV and 40 mA, passing through a curved graphite monochromator to diffract single wavelength radiation to the detector, 1 s spinning time, programmable fixed divergence and receiving slits (1°), step size 0.020° and a count time of 1 s. The system is equipped with a point type detector (Proportional Xe). The ash residue was washed three times in water to remove soluble salts. The samples were transferred to 50 ml centrifuge tubes, filled with distilled water, insonicated and centrifuged 10 min at 4000 rpm. The supernatant was subsequently removed and the sample transferred to weighing boats, oven–dried (50 °C) overnight, and finally oriented on silver membrane filters using a vacuum filter apparatus to enhance the basal reflections of the clay minerals (Moore and Reynolds 1997). Mineral identification and processing of data (determination of background, smoothing, and peak localisation) was conducted in HighScore, a PANalytical software, with an integrated ICSD mineral database (2012). Brown and Brindley (1984) and Moore and Reynolds (1997) were also used to guide mineral identification.
To assess the efficiency of the different pre–treatments, selected samples were analysed for residual elemental carbon in a Carlo Erba NC2500 elemental analyser coupled with a Finnigan MAT Delta + mass spectrometer. The relative error for these measurements was <3%.
Results and Discussion
Results from the Pilot Study
The aim of this study was to test and evaluate methods for efficiently removing OM from highly organic peat samples while causing minimal alteration to its minerals. Figure 2a – c shows the diffraction patterns of a representative peat sample (SM131) from the exploratory study following no pre–treatment (a, blue), chemical oxidation using H2O2 (b, green) and combustion at 450 °C (c, red). The shape of the diffraction pattern of the untreated (a, blue) sample indicates the presence of significant amounts of amorphous OM (Mandile and Hutton 1995), with no detectable mineral peaks. The sinuous shape of the diffraction pattern of the H2O2 treated sample (b, green) with two wide humps, around 15° and 22° 2θ are indicative of weak crystallinity, most likely from residual amorphous OM. The diffraction pattern of the thermally combusted sample (450 °C) (c, red) lacks the broad reflections originating from residual OM and displays a number of identifiable mineral peaks including clay minerals, quartz and feldspars.
These results demonstrated that the OM in untreated samples prevented detection of minerals, motivating further evaluation of pre–treatment methods. The initial tests using H2O2 for chemical oxidation showed that OM removal was incomplete even after 5–10 days of oxidation.
In an attempt to decrease the chemical oxidation time another batch of SM samples were prepared for oxidation by H2O2. This time the samples were sieved through a smaller mesh (63 μm) to physically remove more of the OM fraction. The shape of the subsequent XRD patterns indicated that initially removing particles >63 μm increased oxidation efficiency but the broad reflection from residual OM was still present (Fig. 2d – h ). Ultra acidic conditions were measured (pH 1–2) during the oxidation process, raising concern about acid dissolution of minerals (e.g., calcite, clays) during the chemical pre–treatment (Mikutta et al. 2005).
The shape of the diffraction patterns of the first batch of samples oxidised with Na2S2O8 indicated that increased oxidation was achieved compared to oxidation with H2O2, with a low amounts of residual OM (Fig. 2 i – l). In all samples quartz was identified, but the diagnostic peak (3.34 Å) was considerably lower than in the ash residue. In three out of four samples two minor clay mineral peaks were detected at 8.8° 2θ (Fig. 2i, k and l) and 12° (7 Å). All remaining peaks between 20° and 35° 2θ were related to quartz, feldspar or the filter.
Replicate Procedures Using the DM Composite Sample
Chemical oxidation of OM by Na2S208 in the first batch of DM sub-samples were unsuccessful. From visual inspection, it was clear that OM remained (brown colour) after 10–15 h at reaction temperature. Two samples (DM27 and DM28) were therefore rinsed and oxidised a second time, following the procedures of Eusterhues et al. (2003). After this second oxidation, 40 wt% elemental C still remained. Another batch of samples (n = 3; DM19, 20 and 51) were prepared for oxidation (including clay mineral standards) following the same procedure but the oxidant was dissolved in less water (25 ml). Following this treatment ~8 wt% elemental C remained. The diagnostic peaks of the clay mineral standards were present in the diffraction patterns (Fig. 3, j). Overall, the results show that chemical oxidation with Na2S2O8 was inconsistent. Considerably longer oxidation times were also required for the peat samples than for the soil types investigated by Mikutta et al. (2005). Additionally, in all samples oxidised with Na2S2O8 (both SM and DM), the quartz and feldspar peaks were significantly lowered (or absent) compared to the XRD pattern of the ash residue (Fig. 2), either indicating that these minerals were sieved off prior to oxidation or that the oxidation procedure caused complete or partial dissolution of these minerals.
Subsequent testing of thermal combustion used six sub-samples combusted at each tested temperature: 300, 350, 400, 450, 500 and 550 °C (Fig. 3, a – f). High amounts of residual OM (Table 1) in the samples combusted at 300 and 350 °C prevented identification of minerals (Fig. 3, a and b), while quartz was identified in the samples ashed at 400 °C (c). In the ash residue of samples combusted at 450 (d), 500 (e), and 550 °C (f) quartz, feldspar and minor amounts of clay minerals were identified. Elemental analysis of these samples showed that 4–5 wt% total C remained in the 450 °C residue, while 0.5 wt% and 0.6 wt% respectively were measured in the 500 and 550 °C ash residue. The weight percentage of the ash residues after combustion at the different temperatures are summarised in Table 1.
The XRD analysis of the 450 (Fig. 3, g), 500 (h) and 550 °C (i) ash residues (including standards) allowed identification of illite and quartz, but the diagnostic basal peak of montmorillonite at 6° (15 Å) is absent in the data of all three samples, likely an effect of the combustion causing a collapse of the mineral and concomitant peak shift from 6° (15 Å) to 8° (10 Å) (Moore and Reynolds 1997). This also explains the more intense and broader 8° (10 Å) peak in the data. Montmorillonite, however, can still be identified based on the other peaks of the mineral.
Protocol Recommendations
Direct XRD mineral observations can supplement more established paleodust record methodologies (i.e., elemental analysis), by verifying or adjusting assumptions about the relationship of elemental data to minerals. By removing OM from peat samples, direct observation and identification of minerals is enabled.
The chemical oxidation tests showed that the bulk sample needed to be split by sieving off larger particles (> 63 μm) to avoid oxidation times exceeding several weeks. The results indicate that sieving not only remove organic particles but also parts of the inorganic mineral matrix (data not shown). H2O2 was inefficient in oxidising OM, with significant amounts of residual OM remaining even after 10 days of oxidation. Na2S2O8 was more efficient than H2O2, given that the protocol of Eusterhues et al. (2003) was followed, but still less efficient in removing OM compared to combustion. The clay mineral standards remained unaltered after oxidation by Na2S2O8, in line with the findings of Mikutta et al. (2005), but 8 wt% C remained (c. 16% OM). Furthermore, the outcome of the procedure was inconsistent with several oxidation rounds required for some samples.
Combustion at 500 °C was efficient in removing OM resulting in an ash content of c. 0.9 wt% and residual total carbon of 0.5 wt%; an additional increase in temperature did not increase OM removal efficiency (Fig. 3, Table 1). Combustion at 450, 500 and 550 °C allowed for the identification of illite, quartz and feldspar but caused dehydroxylation, and related peak loss, of montmorillonite. Combustion at 450 °C and lower left significant amounts of residual OM and is not recommended for mineral identification.
Given the importance of efficiently removing OM to allow identification of minerals in a sample matrix we find that combustion is generally recommended over chemical oxidation due to greater OM removal efficiency compared to chemical oxidation. Commonly occurring atmospheric dust minerals, such as quartz, feldspars, calcite, dolomite and some clay minerals (e.g., illite) (Scheuvens and Kandler 2014), all remain unaffected by the combustion temperature suggested here. Many minerals of igneous origin likely remain unaltered after combustion at this temperature and constant pressure (1 atm) while more sensitive minerals, e.g., some clay minerals (smectite, kaolinite, and montmorillonite), sulphates, and iron oxides, could transform, which should be taken into consideration during the identification process.
Thermal treatment is commonly applied to identify minerals, and literature describing the expected effects after thermal treatment is therefore available (i.e., Neumann 1977; Brown and Brindley 1984; Földvári 2011) that can be used to guide mineral identification after combustion. For example, hydrous oxides of aluminium and iron will lose water on heating and transform to anhydrous corondrum and hematite, respectively (Brown and Brindley 1984). Some clay minerals (mica, smectite, vermiculite and chlorite) will give a reflection at 10 Å after combustion between 500–600 °C (Brown and Brindley 1984). A reflection around 10 Å can therefore be indicative of transformed clay minerals and used as a guide of where in a sequence it might be worth to be conduct further analysis to identify clay minerals (e.g., chemical oxidation by Na2S2O8 followed XRD analysis).
By applying the protocol suggested above, the ash residue, which is routinely assessed within peat paleodust studies, can be utilised to give valuable information about the mineral composition of the dust. This information can be used to complement and guide interpretation of elemental datasets. Furthermore, establishing the mineral composition can be helpful in dust source tracing efforts and understanding potential fertilization effects of mineral dust to bog ecosystems.
References
Andersen UJ (1963) An improved pre-treatment for mineralogical analysis of samples containing organic matter. Clays and Clay Minerals 10:380–388
Andrejko M J, Fiene F, and Cohen A D (1983) Comparison of ashing techniques for determination of the inorganic content of peats. In: Jarrett PM (ed) Testing of peats and organic soils. American Society for testing and Materials, Spec publications. pp 221
Battarbee W (1986) Diatom analysis. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of paleo–hydrology and paleo–ecology. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester. pp 527–570
Bauer P, Elbaum R, Weiss MI (2011) Calcium and silicon mineralization in land plants: transport, structure and function. Plant Science 180:746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.01.019
Beaudoin A (2003) A comparison of two methods for estimating the organic matter content of sediments. Journal of Paleolimnology 29:387–390. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023972116573
Bindler R (2003) Estimating the natural background atmospheric deposition rate of mercury utilizing Ombrotrophic bogs in southern Sweden. Environmental Science and Technology 37:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020065x
Boyle J (2004) A comparison of two methods for estimating the organic matter content of sediments. Journal of Paleolimnology 31:125–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPL.0000013354.67645.df
Brown G, Brindley WG (1984) X–ray diffraction procedures for clay mineral identification. In: Brindley, Brown (eds) Crystal structures of clay minerals and their x–ray identification, vol 5. Mineralogical Society, London, pp 305–360
Carrado KA, Decarreau A, Petit S, Bergaya F, Lagaly G (2006) Synthetic clay minerals and purification of natural clays. In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagaly G (eds) Handbook of clay science. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 115–139 Pp: 115–140
Dean EW (1974) Determination of carbonate and organic mat- ter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 44:242–248
Eusterhues K, Rumpel C, Kleber M, Kögel-Knaber I (2003) Stabilisation of soil organic matter by interactions with minerals as revealed by mineral dissolution and oxidative degradation. Organic Chemistry 34:1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.08.007
Földvári M (2011) Handbook of thermogravimetric system of minerals and its use in geological practice. Geological Institute of Hungary, Budapest, p 180
Jones BF, Bowser JC (1978) The mineralogy and related chemistry of lake sediments. In: Lerman (ed) Lakes. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, pp 179–235
Kaiser K, Guggenberger G (2003) Mineral surfaces and soil organic matter. European Journal of Soil Science 54:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00544.x
Kuhry P (1995) The paleoecology of a treed bog in western boreal Canada: a study based on macrofossils, macrofossils, and physio–chemical properties. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 96:183–224
Kylander EM, Bindler R, Martínez Cortizas A, Gallagher K, Mörth C-M, Rauch S (2013) A novel geochemical approach to paleorecords of dust deposition and effective humidity: 8500 years of peat accumulation at store Mosse (the “Great Bog”), Sweden. Quaternary Science Reviews 69:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.02.010
Kylander EM, Martínes–Cortizas A, Bindler R, Greenwood S, Mörth C–M, Rauch S (2016) Potentials and problems of building detailed dust records using peat archives: an example from store Mosse (the “Great Bog”), Sweden. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 190:156–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2016.06.028
Kylander EM, Martínez-Cortizas A, Bindler R, Kaal J, Sjöström KJ, Hansson VS, Silva-Sánchez, Greenwood LS, Rydberg J, Mörth C-M, Rauch S (2018) Mineral dust as driver of carbon accumulation in northern latitudes. Scientific Reports 8:6876. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25162-9
Le Roux G, Shotyk W (2006) Weathering of inorganic matter in bogs. In: Martini Ip, Martinez Crotixas A, Cheswort W (eds) Peatlands: evolution and records of environmental anc climate changes
Le Roux G, Fagel N, De Vleeschouwer F, Krachler M, Debaille V, Stille P, Mattielli N, van der Knaap OW, van Leeuwen FNJ, Shotyk W (2012) Volcano– and climate–driven changes in atmospheric dust sources and fluxes since the late glacial in Central Europe. Geological Society of America 40:335–338. https://doi.org/10.1130/G32586.1
Lopéz–Buendía MA, Whateley GKM, Bastida J, Urquiola MM (2007) Origins of mineral matter in peat marsh and peat bog deposits, Spain. International Journal of Coal Geology 71:246–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2006.09.001
Mandile AJ, Hutton CA (1995) Quantitative X–ray diffraction analysis of mineral and organic phases in organic–rich rocks. International Journal of Coal Geology 28:51–69
Marx KS, McGowan AH, Kamber SB (2009) Long–range dust transport from eastern Australia: a proxy for Holocene aridity and ENSO–type climate variability. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 282:167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.03.013
Marx KS, Kamber SB, McGowan AH, Petherick ML, McTainsh HG, Stromsoe N, Hooper NJ, May H-J (2018) Paleodust records: a window to understanding past environments. Global and Planetary Change 165:13–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2018.03.001
Meier LP, Menegatti AP (1997) A new, efficient, one step method for the removal of organic matters from clay containing sediments. Clay Minerals 32:557–563
Mikutta R, Kleber M, Kaiser K, Jahn R (2005) Review: organic matter removal from soils using hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, and disodium peroxidsulfate. Soil Science Society of America Journal 120–135. US. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0120
Moore MD, Reynolds CR (1997) X–ray diffraction and the identification and analysis of clay minerals, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford 332 p
Neumann SB (1977) Thermal techniques. In: Zussman E (ed) Physical methods in determinative mineralogy, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London
Rydin H, Jeglum K (2013) The biology of peatlands, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Scheuvens D, Kandler K (2014) On composition, morphology, and size distribution of airborne mineral dust. In: Knippertz P, Stuut J–B (eds) Dust book a key player in the Earth system. Springer, New York, pp 15–38
Shotyk W, Weiss D, Kramers DJ, Frei R, Chebrukin KA, Gloor M, Reese S (2001) Geochemistry of the peat bog at Etang de la Gruére, Jura Mountains, Switzerland, and its record of atmospheric Pb and lithogenic trace metals (Sc, Ti, Y, Zr, and REE) since 12,370 14C yr BP. Geochimica et Coshmochimica Acta 65:2337–2360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00586-5
Smieja–Król B, Fiałkiewicz–Kozieł B, Sikorski J, Palowski B (2010) Heavy metal behaviour in peat – a mineralogical perspective. Science of the Total Environment 408:5924–5931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.032
Tolonen K (1984) Interpretation of changes in the ash content of ombrotrophic peat layers. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland 56:207–219
Wastegård S (2005) Late Quaternary tephrochronology of Sweden: a review. Quaternary International 130:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2004.04.030
Acknowledgements
Prof. Henrik Skogby (Swedish Museum of Natural History) reviewed and commented on the XRD interpretations. Heike Siegmund, laboratory engineer at the Department of Geological Sciences (Stockholm University) conducted the elemental analysis. Hildred Crill at the Department of Geological Sciences (Stockholm University) provided valuable feedback on the text and manuscript structure. Dr. Eve Arnold (Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University) introduced the basics of XRD analysis and the XRD equipment at Stockholm University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Sjöström, J.K., Bindler, R., Granberg, T. et al. Procedure for Organic Matter Removal from Peat Samples for XRD Mineral Analysis. Wetlands 39, 473–481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1093-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1093-7