Skip to main content
Log in

Control of Reed Canarygrass Promotes Wetland Herb and Tree Seedling Establishment in an Upper Mississippi River Floodplain Forest

  • Article
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass) is recognized as a problematic invader of North American marshes, decreasing biodiversity and persisting in the face of control efforts. Less is known about its ecology or management in forested wetlands, providing an opportunity to apply information about factors critical to an invader’s control in one wetland type to another. In a potted plant experiment and in the field, we documented strong competitive effects of reed canarygrass on the establishment and early growth of tree seedlings. In the field, we demonstrated the effectiveness of a novel restoration strategy, combining site scarification with late fall applications of pre-emergent herbicides. Treatments delayed reed canarygrass emergence the following spring, creating a window of opportunity for the early growth of native plants in the absence of competition from the grass. They also allowed for follow-up herbicide treatments during the growing season. We documented greater establishment of wetland herbs and tree seedlings in treated areas. Data from small exclosures suggest, however, that deer browsing can limit tree seedling height growth in floodplain restorations. Slower tree growth will delay canopy closure, potentially allowing reed canarygrass re-invasion. Thus, it may be necessary to protect tree seedlings from herbivory to assure forest regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernethy VJ, Willby NJ (1999) Changes along a disturbance gradient in the density and composition of propagule banks in floodplain aquatic habitats. Plant Ecology 140:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annen CA (2008) Effects of tillage and growth regulator pretreatments on reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) control with Sethoxydim. Natural Areas Journal 28:6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic, San Diego, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay J-P, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:113–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jager NR, Thomsen MA, Yin Y (2012). Threshold effects of flood duration on the vegetation and soils of the Upper Mississippi River Floodplain, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 270:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierke MK, Kauffman JB (2005) Structural dynamics of riparian forests along a black cottonwood successional gradient. Forest Ecology and Management 215:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster RD, Wetzel PR (2005) Invading monotypic stands of Phalaris arundinacea: a test of fire, herbicide, and woody and herbaceous native plant groups. Restoration Ecology 13:318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch SM, Anderson NO, Ascher PD (1999) Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19:733–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch SM, Whited DC, Lehtinen R, Husveth J, Schik K (2000) The vegetation of wet meadows in relation to their land-use. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 60:121–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green EK, Galatowitsch SM (2002) Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:134–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groninger JW (2005) Increasing the impact of bottomland hardwood afforestation. Journal of Forestry 103:184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy MT, Zedler JB (2010) Setbacks in replacing Phalaris arundinacea monotypes with sedge meadow vegetation. Restoration Ecology 18:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs NT (1996) Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:695–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovick SM, Reinartz JA (2007) Restoring forest in wetlands dominated by reed canarygrass: the effects of pre-planting treatments on early survival of planted stock. Wetlands 27:24–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannone BV III, Galatowitsch SM (2008) Altering light and soil N to limit Phalaris arundinacea reinvasion in sedge meadow restorations. Restoration Ecology 16:689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins NJ, Yeakley JA, Stewart EM (2008) First-year responses to managed flooding of Lower Columbia River bottomland vegetation dominated by Phalaris arundinacea. Wetlands 28:1018–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:110–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg CH, Bridgham SD (2004) Disturbance, herbivory, and propagule dispersal control dominance of an invasive grass. Biological Invasions 6:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kercher SM, Zedler JB (2004) Multiple disturbances accelerate the invasion of reed canarygrass in a mesocosm study. Oecologia 138:455–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kercher SM, Carpenter QJ, Zedler JB (2004) Interrelationships of hydrologic disturbance, reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and native plants in Wisconsin wet meadows. Natural Areas Journal 24:316–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KD, Ewing K, Giblin DE (2006) Controlling Phalaris arundinacea (reed canarygrass) with live willow stakes: a density-dependent response. Ecological Engineering 27:219–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson MG, Klaas EE (1998) Floodplain forest loss and changes in forest community composition and structure in the Upper Mississippi River: a wildlife habitat at risk. Natural Areas Journal 18:138–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson MG, McColl LE, Suarez SA (2005) Breeding bird assemblages associated with stages of forest succession in large river floodplains. Natural Areas Journal 25:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2004) Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a biological model in the study of plant invasions. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:415–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2006) Control strategies for the invasive reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in North American wetlands: the need for an integrated management plan. Natural Areas Journal 26:208–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:3883–3888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang SY, Seagle SW (2002) Browsing and microhabitat effects on riparian forest woody seedling demography. Ecology 83:212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler JB (2002) Phalaris arundinacea seedling establishment: effects of canopy complexity in fen, mesocosm, and restoration experiments. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons KE (1998) Element stewardship abstract for Phalaris arundinacea. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Merigliano MF, Lesica P (1998) The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland Northwest, USA. Natural Areas Journal 18:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton B, Wu XB (2008) Landscape pattern of seed banks and anthropogenic impacts in forested wetlands of the northern Mississippi River Alluvial Valley. Ecoscience 15:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (1993) Wetlands, 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry LG, Galatowitsch SM (2004) The influence of light availability on competition between Phalaris arundinacea and a native wetland sedge. Plant Ecology 170:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt Adams C, Galatowitsch SM (2006) Increasing the effectiveness of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) control in wet meadow restorations. Restoration Ecology 14:441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt Adams C, Kauth PJ, Sorenson JW (2011) Assessing competition between reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) and swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor). Ecological Restoration 29:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano SP (2010) Our current understanding of the Upper Mississippi River System floodplain forest. Hydrobiologia 640:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzicka KJ, Groninger JW, Zaczek JJ (2010) Deer browsing, forest edge effects, and vegetation dynamics following bottomland forest restoration. Restoration Ecology 18:702–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seavy NE, Garaldi T, Golet GH, Griggs FT, Howell CA, Kelsey R, Small SL, Viers JH, Weigand JF (2009) Why climate change makes riparian restoration more important than ever: recommendations for practice and research. Ecological Restoration 27:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2011) Water Levels of Rivers and Lakes. http://www2.mvr.usace.army.mil/WaterControl/new/layout.cfm. Updated daily

  • Urich R, Swenson G, Nelson E (eds) (2002) Upper Mississippi River and Illinois River floodplain forests. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller DM, Alverson WS (1997) The white-tailed deer: a keystone herbivore. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Wu Y, Bartell SM, Cosgriff R (2009) Patterns of forest succession and impacts of flood in the Upper Mississippi River floodplain ecosystem. Ecological Complexity 6:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak D, McInnes R, Gelbrecht J (2011) Preface: restoration, biogeochemistry and ecological services of wetlands. Hydrobiologia 674:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher S (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23:431–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a UW-L Faculty Research Grant, an Undergraduate Research Grant, and a College of Science and Health Dean’s Research Fellowship. The United States Geologic Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center provided funding for field assistants. DuPont and BASF Corporation donated the Oust® and Pendulum® herbicides used in the study. The authors thank the Environmental Stewardship staff at the La Crescent Field Office of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District for help in the field and site treatment expenses, Lee Shambeau for assistance with revisions, and the reviewers of our manuscript for their thoughtful comments. Any use of trade names or products does not imply endorsement by the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith Thomsen.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table 3 Species found at sample points during the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomsen, M., Brownell, K., Groshek, M. et al. Control of Reed Canarygrass Promotes Wetland Herb and Tree Seedling Establishment in an Upper Mississippi River Floodplain Forest. Wetlands 32, 543–555 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-012-0289-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-012-0289-5

Keywords

Navigation