Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spread of invasive taxa, includingLythrum salicaria, Typha × glauca, Myriophyllum spicatum, Phalaris arundinacea, andPhragmites australis, has dramatically changed the vegetation of many wetlands of North America. Three theories have been advanced to explain the nature of plant invasiveness. Aggressive growth during geographic expansion could result because 1) growth is more favorable under new environmental conditions than those of resident locales (environmental constraints hypothesis); 2) herbivores may be absent in the new locale, resulting in selection of genotypes with improved competitive ability and reduced allocation to herbivore defenses (evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis); and 3) interspecific hybridization occurred between a new taxon and one existing in an area, resulting in novel phenotypes with selective advantages in disturbed sites or phenotypes that can grow under conditions not favorable for either parent (introgression/hybrid speciation hypothesis). A review of published literature found few studies that compare the growth and dynamics of invasive populations in their new range versus those in historic ranges. However, there is evidence that hydrologic alterations could facilitate invasions byTypha × glauca andPhalaris arundinacea and that increased salinity promoted spread ofTypha angustifolia (parental taxon) andPhlaris arundinacea and that increased salinity promoted spread ofTypha angustifolia (parental taxon) andPhragmites australis. The potential for reduced herbivory causing aggressive growth is greatest forLythrum salicaria. Introgressive hybridization is potentially a cause of invasiveness for all five species but has been established only forTypha × glauca andLythrum salicaria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Aiken, S. G. 1979. North American species ofMyriophyllum (Haloragaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, S. G.. 1981. A conspectus ofMyriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in North America. Brittonia 33:57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, S. G. and J. McNeill. 1980. The discovery ofMyriophyllum exalbescens Fernald (Haloragaceae) in Europe and the typification ofMyriophyllum spicatum andMyriophyllum verticillatum. Botanical Journal of the Linnean. Society 80:213–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, S. G., P. R. Newroth, and I. Wile. 1979. The biology of Canadian weeds—Myriophyllum spicatum. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 59:201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alway, E. J. 1931. Early trials and use of reed canary grass as a forage plant. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 23:64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. 1949. Introgressive Hybridization. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. and L. Hubricht. 1938. The evidence for introgressive hybridization. American Journal of Botany 25:396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. O. and P. D. Ascher. 1993a. Male and female fertility of loosestrife (Lythrum) cultivars. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 118:851–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. O. and P. D. Ascher. 1993b. Style morph frequencies in Minnesota populations ofLythrum (Lythraceae). I. DistylousLalatum Pursh. Plant Cell Incompatibility Newsletter. 25: 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. O. and P. D. Ascher. 1994a. Erosion of style/anther length integrity in introgressiveLythrum hybrids. p. 269–272.In A. G. Stephenson and T-h Kao (eds.) Pollen-Pistil Interactions and Pollen Tube Growth. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. O. and P. D. Ascher. 1994b. Self incompatibility (SI) in distylousLythrum alatum, winged loosestrife. HortScience 29: 497 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. O. and P. D. Ascher. 1995. Style morph frequencies in Minnesota populations ofLythrum (Lythraceae). II. TristylousL. salicaria L. Sexual Plant Reproduction 8:105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. O., P. D. Ascher, and B. E. Liedl. 1995. Importance of introgressive hybridization in the development of invasiveLythrum salicaria. HortScience 30:819. (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1932. Find ‘Long Purples’ in Interstate Park. Visitors to Harriman Preseve along Hudson River are attracted by the plant. Flower is an ‘immigrant’.Lythrum salicaria in full blossom now in marshes and streams through the valley. New York Times, New York, NY, USA. Sunday, 21 August, p. 19.

  • Anonymous. 1834. Ribbon grass. New England Farmer 13:41, 129.

  • Arnold, M. L., P. Wilkinson, D. D. Shaw, A. D. Marchant, and N. Contreras. 1987. Highly repeated DNA and allozyme variation between sibling species: evidence for introgression. Genome 29:272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balough, G. R. and T. A. Bookhout. 1989. Purple loosestrife,Lythrum salicaria, in Ohio’s Lake Erie marshes, USA. Ohio Journal of Science 89:62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabe, R. 1951. Progress report on the eradication of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) in Quebec. p. 83–90.In Proceedings of the 4th Meeting, Eastern Section, National Weed Committee, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Barber, H. N. 1970. Hybridization and the evolution of plants. Taxon 19:154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. C. H. 1989. Waterweed invasions. Scientific American 260:90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, S. W. T., D. Schroeder, P. E. Boldt, and W. Mendl. 1986. Insects associated with purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) in Europe. Entomological Society Proceedings 88:748–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, S., V. D. Stotts, P. F. Springer, and J. Steenis. 1978. Changes in submerged aquatic macrophyte populations at the head of Chesapeake Bay, 1958–1975. Estuaries 1:73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayly, I. L. and T. A. O’Neill. 1971. A study of introgression inTypha at Point Pelee Marsh, Ontario. Canadian Field Naturalist 85:309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T. 1982. Seed dormancy in local populations ofPhalaris arundinacea, reed canarygrass, western Norway. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 32:405–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berstein, N. P. 1981. Vegetational history of Mentor Marsh. Ohio Journal of Science 81:105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, S. 1967. Ecological investigations ofPhragmites communis: studies in theoretical and applied limnology. Folia Limnologica Scandinavica 14:1–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, W. H. 1970. The Lythraceae of Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 70:346–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloossey, B. and R. Notzold. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive non indigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 83:887–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossey, B. D. Schroeder, S. D. Hight and R. A. Malecki. 1994. Host specificity and environmental impact of two leaf beetles (Galerucella calmariensis andG. pusilla) for biological control of purple loosestrife,Lythrum salicaria. Weed Science 42:134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossey, B. 1993. Herbivory below ground and biological weed control: life history of a root-boring weevil on purple loosestrife. Oecologia 94:380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, J., W. M. Cheliak, J. Wang, and M. Lalonde. 1990. Genetic divergence and introgressive hybridization betweenAlnus sinuata andA. crispa (Betulaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 170:107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowley, S. and N. L. Taylor. 1987. Introgressive hybridization. p. 23–59.In: B. R. Christie (ed.) CRC Handbook of Plant Science in Agriculture. Volume 1. Boca Raton, FL, USA.

  • Breternitz, D. A., C. K. Robinson, and G. T. Gross. 1986. Dolores archeological program final synthetic report. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J. P., J. Tuomi, and P. Niemala. 1988. Environmental constraint of constitutive and long-term inducible defenses in woody plants. p. 367–389.In K. C. Spencer (ed.) Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, J. T. 1996. Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77:1653–1654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R. 1980. The decline ofMyriophyllum spicatum in a eutrophic Wisconsin lake. Canadian Journal of Botany 58:527–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casler, M. D. and A. W. Hovin. 1980. Genetics of vegetative stand establishment characters in reed canarygrass clones. Crop Science 20:511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casler, M. D. and A. W. Hovin. 1984. Genotype × environment interaction for reed canarygrass forage yield (Phalaris arundinacea, stability analysis). Crop Science 24:633–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casler, M. D. and A. W. Hovin. 1985. Predicting forage yield from morphological traits in reed canarygrass. Crop Science 25:783–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceska, A. and O. Ceska. 1986. Notes onMyriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in the Far East: the identity ofMyriophyllum sibiricum Komarov. Taxon 35:95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chechowitz, N., D. M. Chappell, S. I. Guttman, and L. A. Weigt. 1990. Morphological, electrophoretic, and ecological analysis ofQuercus macrocarpa populations in the Black Hills of South Dakota and Wyoming. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:2185–2194.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, W. D. 1967. Studies in the Graminae: XIV. Kew Bulletin 21:111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, W. D. 1968. The correct name of the common reed. Taxon 17:168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, W. J. 1978. The status ofLythrum alatum (Lythraceae) in Canada. The Canadian Field Naturalist 92:74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, B. T. and C. D. McNabb. 1974. Eurasian water-milfoil in Michigan. The Michigan Botanist 13:159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, P. D., J. P. Bryant, and F. S. Chapin III. 1985. Resource availability and plant herbivore defense. Science 230:895–899.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conchou, O. and E. Fustec. 1988. Influence of hydrological fluctuations on the growth and nutrient dynamics ofPhalaris arundinacea L. in a riparian environment. Plant and Soil 112:53–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conchou, O. and G. Pautou. 1987. Modes of colonization of an heterogenous alluvial area on the edge of the Garonne River byPhalaris arundinacea. Regulated Rivers 1:37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, R. and E. Nelson. 1985.Myriophyllum spicatum in North America. p. 8–18.In L. W. J. Anderson (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Related Haloragaceae Species. Aquatic Plant Management Society, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, R. and E. Nelson. 1988.Myriophyllum quitense (Haloragaceae) in the United States. Brittonia 40:85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? p. 429–453.In A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley, and P. J. Edwards (eds.) Colonization, Succession and Stability. Blackwell, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, R. P., Jr. and S. P. Sheldon. 1994. The effect of two herbivorous insect larvae on Eurasian watermilfoil. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 32:21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, S. and R. Perez-Moreau. 1967. Revision del generoTypha on la Argentina. Darwiniana 14:413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutright, N. J. 1986. Regulation of purple loosestrife by states in the midwest. Proceedings of the North Central Weed Control Conference 41:123–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutright, N. J. 1978. Purple loosestrife: beautiful exotic or unwanted weed? Wisconsin Natural Resources 2:26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. 1865. On the sexual relations of the three forms ofLythrum salicaria. Journal of the Linean Society of Botany 8: 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, W. 1937. Der entwicklungsgang der Mchligen PflaumenblattlausHyalopterus arundinis Fabr. Im schweizerischen Mittelland. Dissertation. Entomogisches Institut, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, W. G. and J. McNeill. 1980. Grasses of Ontario. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada. Monograph No. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, W. R. 1886. The Cayuga flora. Part I. A catalogue of the Phaenogamia growing without cultivation in the Cayuga Lake basin. Bulletin of Cornell University 2:1–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykyjova, D. 1978. Plant growth and estimates of production: intraspecitic and clonal variability and its importance for production estimates. p. 159–163.In D. Dykyjova and J. Kvet (eds.) Pond Littoral Ecosystems, Structure and Functioning. Springer Verlag, Berlin BHeidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esnault, M. A. and F. Lahrer. 1982. Interpretation des populations deTypha par l’analyse numerique des donnees morphologiques et par l’etude des formes isofonctionnelles de diverse enzymes. Candolea 37:633–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K. 1982. TheMyriophyllum spicatum group in North Europe. Taxon 31:467–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassett, N. C. and B. C. Calhoun. 1952. Introgression betweenTypha latifolia andTypha angustifolia. Evolution 6:367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, M. L. 1919. Two new Myriophyllums and a species new to the United States. Rhodora 21:120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. B., J. D. Berdahl, and R. E. Barker. 1985. Morphological development and water use in clonal lines of four forage grasses. Crop Science 25:339–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnier, G. R. and M. M. Mustaphi. 1992. Isozyme variation in Minnesota populations of Eurasian watermilfoil. Aquatic Botany 43:305–309.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, C., R. Trahan, D. Moreno, A. M. Drolet. 1993.Phragmites australis in Quebec: geographical distribution, chromosome number, and reproduction. Canadian Journal of Botany 71:1386–1393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, H. 1990. Ecological prediction. Science 248:88–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2d ed. NY Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J. B. and R. G. Wetzel. 1981. Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails (Typha). American Midland Naturalist 118:463–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J. B. and R. G. Wetzel. 1982a. Niche differentiation between between two rhizomatous species:Typha latifolia andTypha angustifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 60:46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J. N. and R. G. Wetzel. 1982b. Phenotypic and genotypic components of growth and reproduction inTypha latifolia: experimental studies in marshes of differing successional maturity. Ecology 62:789–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. A. 1975. Taxonomy of the Lythraceae in the southeastern United States. SIDA 6:80–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A., S. Watson, and J. Coulter. 1889. Manual of the Botany of the Northern United States, Including the District East of the Mississippi and North of North Carolina and Tennessee. Sixth Edition. Ivison, Blakeman, Taylor and Company, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. L. 1889. The genusLythrum in California. Pittonia 2:11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gries, C., L. Kappen, and R. Losch. 1990. Mechanisms of flood tolerance in reed,Phragmites australis Trin. ex. Steud. New Phytologist 114:589–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, E. 1996. Invasive plants of Canada project, Report to the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

  • Haghighi, K. and P. D. Ascher. 1988. Fertile, intermediate hybrids betweenPhaseolus vulgaris andP. acutifolius from congruity backerossing. Sexual Plant Reproduction 1:51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L. 1989. Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. p. 87–105.In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis (eds.) Isozymes in Plant Biology. Discorides, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, E. 1984. Restoration of aquatic vegetation in Rondeau Bay, Lake Erie. The Plant Press 2:99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, V. L. and G. F. Ledingham. 1986. The narrow-leaved cattail,Typha angustifolia and hybrid cattail, newly reported from Saskatchewan. Canadian Field Naturalist 100:107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harp, H. F. 1957. The Morden Lythrums. Weekly Note, n.p. Morden Research Station, Morden, Manitoba, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. 1965. Establishment, aggression and cohabitation in weedy species. p. 243–265.In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins (eds.). The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. W. and W. H. Marshall. 1963. Ecology of water level manipulation on a northern marsh. Ecology 44:331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. 1835. Ribbon grass. New England Farmer 14:125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. A. 1927. The cat tail,Typha angustifolia, in Utah. Torreya 27:9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. M. 1965. Ecological studies in the Breck fens. I. Vegetation in relation to habitat. Journal of Ecology 53:599–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. M. 1970. The performance ofPhragmites communis Trin. in relation to water-supply. Annals of Botany 34:867–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. M. 1971. Community regulation inPhragmites communis. I. Monodominant stands. Journal of Ecology 59:65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. M. 1972.Phragmites communis. Journal of Ecology 60: 585–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. M. 1973. Some aspects of the life history and autecology ofPhragmites communis — a review. Polskii Archiwun Hydrobiologii 20:79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. M. 1979. Infrared color photograph andPhragmites communis. Polskie Archiwun Hydrogiologii 26:65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauber, D. P., D. A. White, S. P. Powers, and F. R. DeFrancesch. 1991. Isozyme variation and correspondence with unusual infrared reflectance patterns inPhragmites australis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 178:1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A. 1939. Notes onTypha angustifolia L. in Iowa. Iowa State College Journal of Science 13:341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, C. 1973. Introgression re-examined. Botanical Review 39: 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselgren, N. L. 1787. Pan Suecus. p. 225–262.In C. von Linne (ed.) Amoenitates Academicae. Vol. 2. Third Edition, Erlangen, Sweden.

  • Hight, S. D., B. Blossey, and R. Declerck-Floate. 1995. Establishment of insect biological control agents from Europe againstLythrum salicaria in North America. Environmental Entomology 24: 967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. J. and L. F. Huenneke, 1992. Disturbance, diversity and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, P. J., C. M. Finlayson, and A. J. Chick. 1983. The biology of Australian weeds. 12.Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 49:123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotchkiss, N. and H. L. Dozier. 1949. Taxonomy and distribution of North American cattails. The American Midland Naturalist 41: 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulten, E. 1968. Flora of Alaska and Neighboring Territories. A Manual of Vascular Plants. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isabelle, P. S., L. J. Fooks, P. A. Keddy, and S. D. Wilson. 1987. Effects of roadside snowmelt on wetland vegetation: an experimental study. Journal of Environmental Management 25:57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ithaca Journal. 1989. Flower is pretty and also a problem; Plant is damaging delicate wetlands. The Ithaca Journal, Ithaca, NY, USA. August 18:7A.

  • Jepson, W. L. 1925. A Manual of the Flowering Plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, I. M. 1986. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biological Review 61:369–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junttila, O., L. Landgraff, and A. J. Nilsen. 1978. Germination ofPhalaris seeds. Seed problems. Acta Horticulturae 82:163–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, A. E. and G. T. Gross. 1986. Anasazi communities of Dolores: early Anasazi sites in the Sagenhen Flats area. Report to the U.S. Department of Interior, Denver, CO, USA.

  • Kane, M. E. and L. S. Albert. 1989a. Abscisic acid induction of aerial leaf development inMyriophyllum andProserpinaca species culturedin vitro. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 27: 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. E. and L. S. Albert. 1989b. Comparative shoot and root regeneration from juvenile and adult aerial leaf explants of variable-leaf milfoil. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 27:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. 1984. The introduced aquatic macrophyte,Myriophyllum spicatum, as habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62:1289–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A. 1986. Germination of ten shoreline plants in relation to seed size, soil particle size and water level: an experimental study. Journal of Ecology 74:133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, P., K. N. Page, T. G. Whitham, and K. G. Lark. 1989. Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm ofPopulus: occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123:557–565.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, J. C. 1982. Factors influencing the potential intralake colonization byMyriophyllum spicatum. Aquatic Botany 14:295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimesova, J. 1994. The effects of timing and duration of floods on growth of young plants ofPhalaris arundinacea L. andUrtica diocia: an experimental study. Aquatic Botany 48:21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopatek, J. M. and F. W. Stearns. 1978. Primary productivity of emergent macrophytes in a Wisconsin freshwater marsh ecosystem. The American Midland Naturalist 100:320–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehne, E. 1885. The Lythraceae of the United States. Botanical Gazette 10:268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehne, E. 1903. Lythraceae. p. 1–78.In: A. Engler (ed.) Das Pflanzenriech. Vol. 4. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarov, V. L. 1914. Ex herbario Horti Botanici Petropolitani: Novitates asiae orientalis. Decase II–VII. Repertorum Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis (“Fedde Repert”) 13:84–87, 161–169, 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krattinger, K. 1978. Biosystematische Untersuchungen innerhalb der GattungTypha. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universitaet Zucrich, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht, H. von: 1948. The genic basis of evolution. Agri Hortique Genetica 6:83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht, H. von. 1964. Species concept and the origin of species. The two categories of genes: intra- and interspecific ones. Agri Hortique Genetica 23:272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. W. 1975. Population variation and introgression in AmericanTypha. Taxon 24:633–641. Lee, D. W. and D. E. Fairbrothers. 1973. Enzyme differences between adjacent hybrid and parent populations ofTypha. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 100: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. 1918. Ueber die minimale Belichtungszcit, welche die Keimung der Samen vonLythrum salicaria ausloest. Der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft 36:157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. and R. Lakshmana. 1924. Ueber die Gueltigkeit des Produktgesetzes bei der Lichtleimung vonLythrum salicaria. Der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft 42:5–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A. 1970. Assortative pollination inLythrum. American Journal of Botany 57:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A. and Z. Bulinska-Radomska. 1988. Effects of hybridization and inbreeding on fitness inPhlox. American Journal of Botany 75:1632–1639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A. and H. W. Kerster. 1973. Assortative pollination for stature inLythrum salicaria. Evolution 27:144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. and L. C. Birch. 1966. Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Envolution 20: 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth, C. H. 1957. The Faunal Connections Between Europe and North America. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis-Marie, P. 1944. La salicaire dans le Quebec. Inst. Ag d’Oka, Province de Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis-Marie, P. 1960. Cas d’introgression dans la flore du Quebec. La Revue d’Oka 34:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, D. and J. B. Bernard. 1959. Flora and vegetation of the Otterburne area, Manitoba, Canada. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 53: 335–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N. 1985. Invading plants: their potential contribution to population biology. p. 127–142.In J. White (ed.) Studies on Plant Demography: John L. Harper Festschrift. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N. 1991. The commercial seed trade: an early disperser of weeds in the United States. Economic Botany 45:257–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. D., L. W. Eichler, and C. W. Boylen. 1988. Vegetative spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake George, New York. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 26:47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. D. 1994. Invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes in Lake George and other Adirondack lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management 10:19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, M., B. Lapin., and J. Randall. 1993. Element stewardship abstract:Phragmites australis. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 32 p. Internet document (http://www.tnc.org/science/src/weeds/phraust.htm).

  • Marsh, L. C. 1962. Studies in the genusTypha. Ph.D. Thesis. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G. C. and M. E. Heath. 1985. Reed canarygrass. p. 207–216.In M. E. Heath, R. E. Barnes, D. S. Metcalfe (eds.) Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. E. 1955. Cause and effects of a die-off of emergent vegetation. Journal of Wildlife Management 19:24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, C. 1959. Salt tolerance within aTypha population. American Journal of Botany 46:521–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNabb, C. D. and T. R. Batterson. 1991. Occurrence of the common reed,Phragmites australis along roadsides in lower Michigan. Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 23:211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S. J. 1970. Fitness sets forTypha. American Naturalist 104:337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S. J. and L. L. Wolf. 1970. Dominance and niche in ecological systems. Science 16:131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzie, C. A. 1979. Growth of the aquatic plantMyriophyllum spicatum in a littoral area of the Hudson River estuary. Aquatic Botany 6:365–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, K. and R. Rozsa. 1987. Additional notes on the tidal wetlands of the Connecticut River. Connecticut Botanical Society Newsletter 15:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, M. E. and R. N. Mack. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. Journal of Applied Ecology 25:1009–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mook, J. H. and J. van der Toorn. 1985. Delayed response of the common reedPhragmites australis to herbivory as a cause of cyclic fluctuations in the density of the mothArchanara geminipuncta. Oikos 44:142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori. 1971. The littoral mcrophyte vegetation of Lake Wingra. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Science 59:107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, J. J. and L. E. Mettler. 1969. Relative fitness of introgressed and parental populations ofDrosophila maojavensis andD. arizonensis. Evolution 23:519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, M. S. 1987. Pollen flow, self pollination and gene specialization: factors affecting seed set in the tristylous speciesLythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 156: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. A. 1975. Identification and management of Eurasian water milfoil in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Academy of Science, Arts and Letters 63:116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. A. 1984. Phytochemical and morphological differentiation betweenMyriophyllum spicatum andMyriophyllum exalbescens in two Wisconsin lakes. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 72:153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. A. 1994a. Evaluation of invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes for the Upper Great Lakes region. Lake and Reservoir Management 10:29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. A. 1994b. Factors affecting the distribution of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) biomass in Lake Wingra, Wisconsin. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 9:145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. A. and B. H. Shaw. 1986. Ecological life histories of the three aquatic nuisance plants,Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus, andElodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia 131:3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niering, W. A. and R. S. Warren. 1977. Our dynamic tidal marshes: vegetation as revealed by peat analysis. Connecticut Arborctum Bulletin 12:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, P. 1994. Genetic incompatibility and offspring quality in the tristylous plantLythrum salicaria. American Journal of Botany 81:76–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby, R. T. and A. Vogel. 1976. Changes in submerged plants at the south end of Cayuga Lake following Tropical Storm Agnes. Hydrobiologia 48:251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J. and K. A. Moore. 1984. Distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: an historical perspective. Estuaries 7:531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorp, W. 1989. “Die-back” of reeds in Europe—a critical review of literature. Aquatic Botany 35:5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrem, L. 1987. Studies on genetic variation in reed canarygrass,Phalaris arundinacea. II. Alkaloid type and concentration. Hereditas 107:235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, D. S. and K. J. McCabe. 1988. Investigation into the disappearance of Eurasian watermilfoil from Kawartha Lakes. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 26:3–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C. 1954. The status of some American species ofMyriophyllum as revealed by the discovery of intergrade material betweenM. exalbescens Fern. andMyriophyllum spicatum L. in New Jersey. Rhodora 56:213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C. 1955. Germination of the seed ofMyriophyllum spicatum K, Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 82:50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C. 1956. Notes on the biology ofMyriophyllum spicatum L. in a New Jersey lake. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 83:5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellett, M. 1966. Purple loosestrife, colorful honey plant. American Bee Journal 106:134–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellett, M. 1977. Purple loosestrife spreads down river. American Bee Journal 117:214–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penko, J. M. 1985. Ecological studies ofTypha in Minnesota:Typha-insect interactions and the productivity of floating stands. M.S. Thesis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penko, J. M. and D. C. Pratt. 1986a. Effectrs ofBellura obliqua onTypha latifolia productivity. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 24:24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penko, J. M. and D. C. Pratt. 1986b. The growth and survival of early instars ofBellura obliqua (Lepidoptera: Nocturidae) inTypha latifolia andT. angustifolia. Great Lakes Entomologist 19: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursh, F. 1814. Flora Americae Sepentrionalis: or, A Systematic Arrangement and Description of the Plants of North America. White, Cochran and Co., London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, C. K. 1978.Myriophyllum spicatum p. 14–31.In J. C. Stevenson and N. Confer (eds.) Summary of available information on Chesapeake Bay submersed vegetation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-78/66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C. F. 1977. History and distribution of Eurasian watermilfoil in United States and Canade. Phytologia 36:417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C. F. 1980.Myriophyllum spicatum L. along shores of Gulf of Mexico. Phytologia 45:383–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek, M. and D. M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, J. 1989. TheLythrum story: a new chapter. Minnesota Horticulturalist 117:22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. S. and B. W. Pinkerton. 1993. Reed canarygrass survival under cyclic inundation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48:132–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketson, J. M. 1989. Additions to the aquatic flora of Arizona. J. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 23:33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, H. N. 1930. The Dispersal of Plants Throughout the World. L. Reeve and Co. Ltd., Ashford, Kent, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., D. E. Soltis, and J. D. Palmer. 1988. A molecular reexamination of introgression betweenHelianthus annuus andH. bolanderi (Compositae). Evolution 42:227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., R. Carter, and S. Zona. 1990. Molecular tests of the hypothesized hybrid origin of two diploidHelianthus species (Asteraceae). Evolution 44:1498–1511.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, M. V. 1927. Cytological studies in the genusTypha. Botanical Gazette 84:392–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmaler, W. 1940. De flora occidentali. I.Typhu. Repertorum Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis (“Fedde Repert”) 49:169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schloesser, D. W. and B. A. Manny. 1989. Distribution of Eurasian watermilfoil,Myriophyllum spicatum in the St. Clair Detroit River system in 1978. Journal of Great Lakes Research 10:322–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoch-Bodmer, H. 1938. The proportion of long-, mid-, and shortstyled plants in natural populations ofLythrum salicaria L. Journal of Genetics 36:39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sculthorpe, C. D. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsi, S. R. A. and E. H. Whitehead. 1974. Comparative ecophysiology ofEpilobium hirsutum andLythrum salicaria L. 1. General biology, distribution, and germination. Journal of Ecology 62: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsi, S. R. A. and F. H. Whitehead. 1977. Comparative ecophysiology ofEpilobium hirsutum L. andLythrum salicaria L. IV. Effects of temperature and interspecific competition and concluding discussion. Journal of Ecology 65:71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R., Wineriter, S. A., M. H. Smith, and E. H. Liu. 1980. Comparisons of isozymes amongTypha spp. in the Eastern USA. American Journal of Botany 67:1297–1303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shay, J. M. and C. T. Shay. 1986. Prairie marshes in western Canada, with specific reference to the ecology of five emergent macrophytes. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:443–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheaffer, C. C., P. R. Peterson, M. H. Hall, and J. B. Stordahl. 1992. Drought effects on yield and quality of perennial grasses in the north central United States. Journal of Production Agriculture 5: 556–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, J. 1994. Potential role of plant pathogens in declines of submersed macrophytes. Lake and Reservoir Management 10:9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, S. P. 1994. Invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes in New England, with particular reference to Vermont lakes and herbivorous invertebrates in New England. Lake and Reservoir Management 10:13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sifton, H. B. 1959. The germination of light sensitive seeds ofTypha latifolia. Canadian Journal of Botany 37:719–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skuhrava, M. and V. Skuhravy. 1981. Die Gallmucken (Cecidomyiidae, Diptera) des Schlifs (Phragmites communis Trin.) Studie CSAV, Prag 3:1–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skuhravy, V. 1978. Invertebrates: destroyers of common reed. p. 376–388.In D. Dykjova and J. Kvet (eds.) Pond Littoral Ecosystems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S. and J. W. Barko. 1990. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 28:55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. E., T. F. Hall, and R. A. Stanley. 1967. Eurasian watermilfoil in the Tennessee Valley. Weeds 15:95–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. G. 1961. Natural hybridization and taxonomy in the genusTypha, with particular reference to California populations. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. G. 1967. Experimental and natural hybrids in North AmericanTypha (Typhaceae). American Midland Naturalist 78:257–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. G. 1987.Typha: its taxonomy and the ecological significance of hybrids. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 27:129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, N. R. and M. Lekic. 1974. Prospects for biological control of Eurasian watermilfoil. Weed Science 22:401–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, P. F. and R. E. Stewart. 1959. Condition of waterfowl feeding grounds on the Susquehanna Flats during the fall of 1959 with notes on the invasion of a serious pest plant. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA. Administration Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103:231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1969. The significance of hybridization for plant taxonomy and evolution. Taxon 18:26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Evolution of morphogenic patterns. Brook-haven Symposium on Biology 25:27–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenis, J. H., L. P. Smith, and H. P. Cofer. 1958. Studies on cattail management in the northeast. p. 149–155In Transactions of the First North American Wildlife Conference. Montreal, ON, Canada.

  • Steenis, J. H. and V. D. Stotts. 1961. Progress report on control of Eurasian watermilfoil in Chesapeake Bay. Proceedings of Northeast Weed Control Conference 15:566–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenis, J. H. and G. M. King. 1964. Report of interagency meeting on watermilfoil. Maryland Game and Inland Fish Commission. Annapolis, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strefeler, M. S., E. Darmo, R. L. Becker, and E. J. Katovich. 1996. Isozyme characterization of genetic diversity in Minnesota populations of purple loosestrife,Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). American Journal of Botany 83:265–273.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, R. L. 1969. The introduction and spread ofLycopus asper (Western water horsetail) in the western Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair region. The Michigan Botanist 8:111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, R. L. 1980a. Distributional history ofLythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47:3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, R. L. 1980b. Range expansion of native North American aquatic and wetland species. Ohio Journal of Science 80:22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, R. L. and D. P. Salamon. 1987.Typha angustifolia in North America: a foreigner masquerading as a native. (Abstract). p. 4.In Proceedings of the Ohio Academy of Science, Columbus, OH, USA.

  • Suprenant, J., D. K. Barnes, R. H. Busch, and G. G. Marten. 1988. Bidirectional selection for neutral detergent fiber and yield in reed canarygrass. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68:705–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teale, E. W. 1982. Stems beyond counting, flowers unnumbered. Audubon 84:38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Heerdt, G. N. J. and H. J. Drost. 1994. Potential for the development of marsh vegetation from the seed bank after a drawdown. Biological Conservation 67:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. J. and J. M. Shay. 1985. The effects of fire onPhragmites australis in the Delta Marsh, Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:1864–1869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. Q., R. L. Stuckey, and E. B. Thompson. 1987. Spread, impact and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. Fisheries and Wildlife Research 2. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1990. Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58:3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J. E. 1994. Submersed plant invasions and declines in New York. Lake and Reservoir Management 10:25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke, T. 1989. Changes in shoot growth ofPhragmites australis caused by the gall makerGiraudiella inclusa (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Oikos 54: 370–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke, T. 1990. Fluctuations in abundance of a stem-boring moth damaging shoots ofPhragmites australis: causes and effects of overexploitation of food in a late-successional grass monoculture. Journal of Applied Ecology 27:679–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke, T. 1992. Fragmentation ofPhragmites habitats, minimal viable population sizes, habitat suitability and local extinctions of months, midges, flies, aphids, and birds. Conservation Biology 6: 530–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twilley, R. R. and J. W. Barko. 1990. The growth of submersed macrophytes under experimental salinity and light conditions. Estuaries 13:311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Toorn, J. 1972. Variability ofPhragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel in relation to the environment. Van Zee tot Land 48:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Toorn, J. and J. H. Mook. 1982. The influence of environmental factors and management on stands ofPhragmites australis. I. Effects of burning, frost, and insect damage on shoot density and shoot size. Journal of Applied Ecology 19:477–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1980. The impact of a natural drawdown on the growth of four emergent species in a prairie glacial marsh. Aquatic Botancy 9:301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, M. 1984. Okologische unteruchungen in einemPhragmites Bestand. Berichte der Akademic fur Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege Laufen 8:130–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, I. and J. M. Shay. 1990. A field study of the morphometric response ofTypha glauca shoots to a water depth gradient. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:2339–2343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, I. and J. M. Shay. 1992. Effect of water depth on population parameters of aTypha glauca stand. Canadian Journal of Botany 70:349–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welling, C. H. and R. L. Becker. 1993. Reduction of purple lossestrife establishment in Minnesota wetlands. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21:56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore, A. 1921. Wild ducks and duck foods of the Bear River Marshes, Utah. Bulletin of the U.S. Department of Agriculture 936:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D., E. Haber, and C. Keddy. 1993. Invasive plants of natural habitats in Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijte, A. H. and J. L. Gallagher. 1996. Effect of oxygen availability and salinity on early life history stages of salt marsh plants. I. Different germination strategies ofSpartina alterniflora andPhragmites australis (Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 1337–1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. A. 1986a. The effects of deicing salts on water chemistry in Pinhook Bog, Indiana. Water Resources Bulletin 22:57–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. A. 1986b. The effects of deicing salts on vegetation in Pinhook Bog, Indiana. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:865–874.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. A. 1989. Migration and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) along highway corridors. Environmental Management 13:365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, F. S. and H. D. Hughs. 1932. Agronomic trials with reed canarygrass. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 24:18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiders, K. E. and R. T. Sherwood. 1985. Environmental interactions among reed canarygrass genotypes for nutritive value, height and disease severity. Agronomy Journal 77:94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, 305 Alderman Hall, 55108, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

    Susan M. Galatowitsch, Neil O. Anderson & Peter D. Ascher

Authors
  1. Susan M. Galatowitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neil O. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter D. Ascher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galatowitsch, S.M., Anderson, N.O. & Ascher, P.D. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19, 733–755 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161781

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161781

Key Words

Search

Navigation