Skip to main content
Log in

Spatially Differentiated, Temporally Variegated: The Study of Life Cycles for a Better Understanding of Suburbia in German City Regions

Räumlich differenziert, zeitlich verschiedenartig: Lebenszyklen als Zugang zu einem besseren Verständnis von Suburbia in deutschen Großstadtregionen

  • Beitrag/Article
  • Published:
Raumforschung und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning

Abstract

This paper takes a spatially differentiated and temporally variegated perspective on suburban areas. It proposes a conceptual framework for studying the temporal variation and related trajectories of the subject matter, with suburban lifecycles being the key to our analysis. In empirical terms, the paper summarises the findings of research undertaken in 12 selected locales of four major metropolitan regions in Germany. Against the background of assessing the broader socioeconomic development of these regions, detailed local case studies have been conducted in order to reconstruct past and current development trajectories. Our analyses detected particular life cycles (and related segments) in the study areas, based on age and social composition, the physical conditions of the built environment and broader developments in the real-estate market. The different cycles include, in most cases, growth, maturity, transition and resilience, and they are also discussed in terms of their relevance for strategies responding to recent changes.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag nimmt einen räumlich differenzierten und zeitlich verschiedenartig gerichteten Blick auf suburbane Räume vor. Es wird ein konzeptioneller Rahmen vorgeschlagen, um insbesondere der zeitlichen Variation im Entwicklungsverlauf von Suburbia auf den Grund zu gehen, wobei Lebenszyklen den Schlüssel zu einem neuen Verständnis dieser Raumkategorie bilden. In empirischer Hinsicht beruht der Beitrag auf den Ergebnissen von Fallstudien in 12 ausgewählten Standorten in vier Metropolräumen Deutschlands. Unsere Analysen konnten verschiedene Lebenszyklen dieser Standorte identifizieren, ausgehend von Alter und sozialer Mischung, den baulichen Konditionen sowie der Entwicklung der Immobilienmärkte. Die verschiedenen Zyklen beinhalten in aller Regel Phasen des Wachstums, der Reife, der Transition und der Resilienz, und verhalten sich je spezifisch auch mit Blick auf Strategien zum Umbau von Suburbia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As to German developments, see for example Prigge (1998), Kuhn (2002), Menzl (2007), Hesse (2012); for the international context, the overviews provided by Siedentop and Fina (2012), Keil (2013), Scott, Cartera, Reeda et al. (2013), Nijman (2015) or Salet and Savini (2015) can be considered useful here.

  2. A more differentiated, pluralistic approach to the study of suburbia has been pursued primarily at international levels (see e.g. Wunsch 1995; Harris/Larkham 1999; Clapson 2003; Phelps/Parsons/Ballas et al. 2006; McManus/Ethington 2007; Hanlon 2010; Phelps/Wood 2011 or Keil 2013), while the German-speaking realm followed only recently (Sieverts 1997; Schenk/Kühn/Leibenath et al. 2012); only the debate of the “Zwischenstadt” or ‘in-between city’ has found some recognition in the international community since then (Keil/Addie 2015).

  3. The “Laufende Raumbeobachtung” raw data for the years quoted is available from the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR).

  4. For further details see BMVBS (2013b: 74 ff.).

  5. The data on the district level regarding demographics, economy, settlement structure, and building trajectory were drawn from official planning documents of the municipalities such as settlement area analyses and development concepts (such cases are provided with citations).

  6. Data from Laufende Raumbeobachtung BBSR (1997/2009).

  7. Data from Laufende Raumbeobachtung BBSR (1997/2009).

  8. Data from Laufende Raumbeobachtung BBSR (2009).

  9. Data from Laufende Raumbeobachtung BBSR (1997/2009).

  10. The source BMVBS (2013a) is classified information. However, the report can be obtained from the authors upon request. [please check if this is possible or explain how others can assess the raw data].

  11. Statistical data from the Registry Office at Borsdorf City Hall, years 2002-2011, partly amended 2014.

References

  • Bizer, K.; Dappen, C.; Deffner, J.; Heilmann, S.; Knieling, J.; Stieß, I. (2008): Nutzungszyklus von Wohnquartieren in Stadtregionen. Modellentwicklung. Hamburg. = neopolis working papers: urban and regional studies 3.

  • BMVBS – Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Stadtentwicklung (2012): Suburbaner Raum im Lebenszyklus – Studie. Zwischenbericht Februar 2012. Internal Paper. Berlin.

  • BMVBS – Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Stadtentwicklung (2013a): Suburbaner Raum im Lebenszyklus – Studie. Endbericht Februar 2012. Internal Paper. Berlin.

  • BMVBS – Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Stadtentwicklung (Hrsg.) (2013b): Suburbaner Raum im Lebenszyklus. Bonn. = BMVBS-Online-Publikation 24/2013.

  • Cheshire, P.C. (2006): Resurgent Cities, Urban Myths and Policy Hubris: What We Need to Know. In: Urban Studies 43, 8, 1231-1246.

  • Choldin, H.M.; Hanson, C.; Bohrer, R. (1980): Suburban Status Instability. In: American Sociological Review 45, 6, 972-983.

  • CIMA Beratung + Management; Stadt Grimma (2002): Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept der Stadt Grimma. Mügeln, Kemmlitz, Grimma.

  • CIMA Beratung + Management; Stadt Grimma (2015): Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept der Stadt Grimma. Fortschreibung. Mügeln, Kemmlitz, Grimma.

  • Clapson, M. (2003): Suburban Century: Social Change and Urban Growth in England and the USA. Oxford/New York.

  • Clark, T.N.; Lloyd, R.; Wong, K.K.; Jain, P. (2002): Amenities Drive Urban Growth. In: Journal of Urban Affairs 24, 5, 493-515.

  • Clarke, G.; Martin, R.; Tyler, P. (2016): Divergent cities? Unequal urban growth and development. In: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 9, 2, 259-268.

  • Dittrich-Wesbuer, A.; Knapp, W.; Osterhage, F. (2010): Postsuburbanisierung und die „Renaissance der (Innen‑)Städte“. Neue Entwicklungen in der Stadtregion. Detmold. = Metropolis und Region 6.

  • Forsyth, A. (2012): Defining Suburbs. In: Journal of Planning Literature 27, 3, 270-281.

  • Friedrich, S. (2003): Umbau des Wohnens am Stadtrand. In: disP – The Planning Review 39, 155, 38-48.

  • Gotham, K.F. (2006): The Secondary Circuit of Capital Reconsidered: Globalization and the U.S. Real Estate Sector. In: American Journal of Sociology 112, 1, 231-275.

  • Hanlon, B. (2010): Once the American Dream. Inner-Ring Suburbs of the Metropolitan United States. Philadelphia.

  • Harris, R. (2010): Meaningful types in a world of suburbs. In: Clapson, M.; Hutchison, R. (eds.): Suburbanization in Global Society. Bingley, 15-47. = Research in Urban Sociology 10.

  • Harris, R.; Larkham, P.J. (eds.) (1999): Changing Suburbs. Foundation, Form and Function. London.

  • Hesse, M. (2012): Suburbaner Raum – Annäherungen an Gegenstand, Inhalte und Bedeutungszuweisungen. In: Schenk, W.; Kühn, M.; Leibenath, M.; Tzschaschel , S. (eds.): Suburbane Räume als Kulturlandschaften. Hannover, 13-24. = Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL 236.

  • Holling, C.S. (1986): The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark, W.C.; Munn, R.E. (eds.): Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge, 292-317.

  • Hoover, E.M.; Vernon, R. (1959): Anatomy of a Metropolis. The Changing Distribution of People and Jobs within the New York Metropolitan Region. Cambridge, MA.

  • Keil, R. (ed.) (2013): Suburban Constellations. Governance, Land, and Infrastructure in the 21st Century. Berlin.

  • Keil, R.; Addie, J.-P.D. (2015): ‘It’s Not Going to be Suburban, It’s Going to be All Urban’: Assembling Post-suburbia in the Toronto and Chicago Regions. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39, 5, 892-911.

  • Kuhn, G. (2002): Suburbanisierung: Das Ende des suburbanen Zeitalters? In: Informationen zur modernen Stadtgeschichte 2, 5‑12.

  • Lauster, N.T. (2016): The Death and Life of the Single-Family House. Lessons from Vancouver on Building a Livable City. Philadelphia.

  • Mace, A. (2013): City Suburbs. Placing suburbia in a post-suburban world. London/New York.

  • Martin, R. (2012): (Re)Placing Path Dependence: A Response to the Debate. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36, 1, 179-192.

  • McManus, R.; Ethington, P.J. (2007): Suburbs in transition: new approaches to suburban history. In: Urban History 34, 2, 317-337.

  • Menzl, M. (2007): Leben in Suburbia: Raumstrukturen und Alltagspraktiken am Rand von Hamburg. Frankfurt am Main.

  • Nijman, J. (2015): North American Suburbia in Flux. Introduction. In: Environment and Planning A 47, 1, 3‑9.

  • Park, R.E. (1952): Human Communities: The City and Human Ecology. Glencoe.

  • Phelps, N.A.; Parsons, N.; Ballas, D.; Dowling, A. (2006): Post-Suburban Europe. Planning and Politics at the Margins of Europe’s Capital Cities. Basingstoke.

  • Phelps, N.A.; Wood, A.M. (2011): The New Post-suburban Politics? In: Urban Studies 48, 12, 2591-2610.

  • Phelps, N.A.; Wood, A.M.; Valler, D.C. (2010): A Postsuburban World? An Outline of a Research Agenda. In: Environment and Planning A 42, 2, 366-383.

  • Polívka, J. (2016): Maturity, Resilience & Lifecycles in Suburban Residential Areas. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dortmund.

  • Polívka, J.; Roost, F. (2011): Kerne, Adern und Ränder: Siedlungs- und Bebauungsstruktur des Ruhrgebiets. In: Reicher, C.; Kunzmann, K.R.; Polívka, J.; Roost, F.; Utku, Y.; Wegener, M. (eds.): Schichten einer Region. Kartenstücke zur räumlichen Struktur des Ruhrgebiets. Berlin, 38-78.

  • Prigge, W. (ed.) (1998): Peripherie ist überall. Frankfurt am Main/New York. = Edition Bauhaus 1.

  • Reicher, C.; Kunzmann, K.R.; Polívka, J.; Roost, F.; Utku, Y.; Wegener, M. (eds.) (2011): Schichten einer Region. Kartenstücke zur räumlichen Struktur des Ruhrgebiets. Berlin.

  • Roberts, S. (1991): A critical evaluation of the city life cycle idea. In: Urban Geography 12, 5, 431-449.

  • Salet, W.; Savini, F. (2015): The political governance of urban peripheries. In: Environment and Planning C 33, 3, 448-456.

  • Schenk, W.; Kühn, M.; Leibenath, M.; Tzschaschel, S. (eds.) (2012): Suburbane Räume als Kulturlandschaften. Hannover. = Forschungs- und Sitzungsberichte der ARL 236

  • Scott, A.J.; Carter, C.; Reed, M.R.; Larkham, P.; Adams, D.; Morton, N.; Waters, R.; Collier, D.; Crean, C.; Curzon, R.; Forster, R.; Gibbs, P.; Grayson, N.; Hardman, M.; Hearle, A.; Jarvis, D.; Kennet, M.; Leach, K.; Middleton, M.; Schiessel, N.; Stonyer, B.; Coles, R. (2013): Disintegrated development at the rural-urban fringe: Re-connecting spatial planning theory and practice. In: Progress in Planning 83, 1‑52.

  • Setterfield, M. (1997): Should Economists Dispense with the Notion of Equilibrium? In: Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 20, 1, 47-76.

  • Short, J.R.; Hanlon, B.; Vicino, T.J. (2007): The Decline of Inner Suburbs: The New Suburban Gothic in the United States. In: Geography Compass 1, 3, 641-656.

  • Siedentop, S.; Fina, S. (2012): Who Sprawls Most? Exploring the Patterns of Urban Growth across 26 European Countries. In: Environment and Planning A 44, 11, 2765-2784.

  • Sieverts, T. (1997): Zwischenstadt. Zwischen Ort und Welt, Raum und Zeit, Stadt und Land. Braunschweig. = Bauwelt-Fundamente 118.

  • Temkin, K.; Rohe, W. (1996): Neighborhood Change and Urban Policy. In: Journal of Planning Education and Research 15, 3, 159-170.

  • van den Berg, L.; Drewett, R.; Klaasen, L.H.; Rossi, C.; Fijverberg, C.H.T. (1982): A Study of Growth and Decline. Oxford.

  • Walker, B.H.; Gunderson, L.H.; Kinzig, A.P.; Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.R.; Schultz, L. (2006): A Handful of Heuristics and Some Propositions for Understanding Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. In: Ecology and Society 11, 1, 13.

  • Wunsch, J.L. (1995): Review: The Suburban Cliche: The Suburban Trend by Harlan Paul Douglass. In: Journal of Social History 28, 3, 643-658.

  • Wüstenrot Stiftung (ed.) (2012): Zukunft von Einfamilienhausgebieten aus den 1950er bis 1970er-Jahren. Handlungsempfehlungen für eine nachhaltige Nutzung. Ludwigsburg.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Hesse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hesse, M., Polívka, J. & Reicher, C. Spatially Differentiated, Temporally Variegated: The Study of Life Cycles for a Better Understanding of Suburbia in German City Regions. Raumforsch Raumordn Spat Res Plan 76, 149–163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0511-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-017-0511-2

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation