Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Difference in the relationship between soil CO2 concentration and the karst-related carbon cycle under different land use types in southwest China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an important driving force for karstification, soil CO2 has a close relation with karst-related carbon cycle. However, their relationship may be disturbed when H2SO4 and HNO3 participate in karstification. Here, soil CO2 and spring water samples were collected from two catchments to examine the dynamics of carbon under different land use types. The net CO2 consumption at the Baishuwan spring catchment (BSW; range 1.7–2.69 mmol/L, average of 2.21 mmol/L) was higher than it was at the Hougou spring catchment (HG; range − 0.63 to 0.02 mmol/L, average of − 0.24 mmol/L). Due to the participation of H2SO4 and HNO3, CO2 was released from bedrock and reduced net CO2 consumption when this portion of CO2 escaped from the water. With regard to soil CO2 concentration, a bidirectional gradient of CO2 concentration occurred at BSW, while alternating bidirectional and unidirectional gradients occurred at HG. However, the δ13C of soil CO2 could not confirm whether the vertical changes in soil CO2 concentration as well as net CO2 consumption were related to the CO2 released from bedrock to soil. With regard to seasonal changes, net CO2 consumption was consistent with soil CO2 concentration at BSW, while the reverse relationship was found at HG. These observations indicated that soil CO2 concentration was not the dominant factor controlling net CO2 consumption at HG, which was affected by H2SO4 and HNO3, and more CO2 escaped from the water due to the reduced water–rock reaction time in the rainy season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

[modified from Chen and Chen (1977)]

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali HN, Atekwana EA (2011) The effect of sulfuric acid neutralization on carbonate and stable carbon isotope evolution of shallow groundwater. Chem Geol 284(3):217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allard V, Robin C, Newton PCD et al (2006) Short and long-term effects of elevated CO2 on Lolium perenne rhizodeposition and its consequences on soil organic matter turnover and plant N yield. Soil Biol Biochem 38(6):1178–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiotte-Suchet P, Probst JL, Ludwig W (2003) Worldwide distribution of continental rock lithology: implications for the atmospheric/soil CO2 uptake by continental weathering and alkalinity river transport to the oceans. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17(2):1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (2001) The carbon budget in soils. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 29(1):535–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu E, Goddéris Y, Labat D et al (2011) Modeling of water–rock interaction in the Mackenzie basin: competition between sulfuric and carbonic acids. Chem Geol 289(1–2):0–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthelin J, Bonne M, Belgy G et al (1985) A major role for nitrification in the weathering of minerals of brown acid forest soils. Geomicrobiol J 4(2):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand I, Delfosse O, Mary B (2007) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in acidic, limed and calcareous agricultural soils: apparent and actual effects. Soil Biol Biochem 39(1):276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet F, Potot C, Probst A et al (2011) Stable carbon isotope evidence for nitrogenous fertilizer impact on carbonate weathering in a small agricultural watershed. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25(19):2682–2690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmels D, Gaillardet J, Brenot A et al (2007) Sustained sulfide oxidation by physical erosion processes in the Mackenzie River basin: climatic perspectives. Geology 35(11):1003–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmels D, Gaillardet J, François L (2014) Sensitivity of carbonate weathering to soil CO2 production by biological activity along a temperate climate transect. Chem Geol 390:74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Yuan D, Groves C et al (2012) Carbon fluxes and sinks: the consumption of atmospheric and soil CO2 by carbonate rock dissolution. Acta Geol Sin Engl Edit 86(4):963–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerling TE, Solomon DK, Quade J et al (1991) On the isotopic composition of carbon in soil carbon dioxide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55(11):3403–3405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Chen H (1977) Chongqing hydrogeological investigations report,1:200000(H-48-23). Nanjiang hydrology team of geology and mineral bureau of Sichuan (in Chinese)

  • Cheng J, Lee X, Zhou Z et al (2011) Seasonal variation and relationship between soil CO2 concentrations and surface CO2 fluxes. Earth Environ 39(2):196–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Curl RL (2012) Carbon shifted but not sequestered. Science 335(6069):655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding H, Lang YC, Liu CQ et al (2013) Chemical characteristics and δ34S–SO4 2− of acid rain: anthropogenic sulfate deposition and its impacts on CO2 consumption in the rural karst area of southwest China (Special Issue: recent progress in environmental hydrogeochemistry). Geochem J 47(6):625–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang C, Moncrieff JB (2001) The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 33(2):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonyuy EW, Atekwana EA (2008a) Dissolved inorganic carbon evolution and stable carbon isotope fractionation in acid mine drainage contaminated streams: insights from a laboratory study. Appl Geochem 23(9):2634–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonyuy EW, Atekwana EA (2008b) Effects of acid mine drainage on dissolved inorganic carbon and stable carbon isotopes in receiving streams. Appl Geochem 23(4):743–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassal R, Black A, Novak M et al (2005) Relationship between soil CO2 concentrations and forest-floor CO2 effluxes. Agric For Meteorol 130(3):176–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y (2013) The contribution of human activities to dissolved inorganic carbon fluxes in a karst underground river system: evidence from major elements and δ13CDIC in Nandong, Southwest China. J Contam Hydrol 152:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1999) Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate the accelerated greenhouse effect. Prog Environ Sci 1(4):307–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson C (2011) An unsung carbon sink. Science 334(6058):886–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang S, Zheng L (2002) Comparative study on CO2 sources in soil developed on carbonate rock and non-carbonate rock in Central Guizhou. Sci China Ser D Earth Sci 45(8):673–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SL, Calmels D, Han G et al (2008) Sulfuric acid as an agent of carbonate weathering constrained by δ13CDIC: examples from Southwest China. Earth Planet Sci Lett 270(3):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SL, Liu CQ, Li J et al (2010) Geochemistry of dissolved inorganic carbon and carbonate weathering in a small typical karstic catchment of Southwest China: isotopic and chemical constraints. Chem Geol 277(3):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Wan S, Su B et al (2002) Response of soil CO2 efflux to water manipulation in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem. Plant Soil 240(2):213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Dreybrodt W, Wang H (2010) A new direction in effective accounting for the atmospheric CO2 budget: considering the combined action of carbonate dissolution, the global water cycle and photosynthetic uptake of DIC by aquatic organisms. Earth Sci Rev 99(3):162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wan K, Tao Y et al (2013) Carbon dioxide flux from rice paddy soils in central China: effects of intermittent flooding and draining cycles. PLoS One 8(2):e56562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig W, Probst JL, Kempe S (1996) Predicting the oceanic input of organic carbon by continental erosion. Global Biogeochem Cycles 10(1):23–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Zhou X (2006) Soil respiration and the environment. Academic Press, Cambridge (an imprint of Elsevier)

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson GL, Roberts JA, Blair JM et al (2008) Increasing shallow groundwater CO2 and limestone weathering, Konza Prairie, USA. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72(23):5581–5599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Schimel JP, Porporato A (2012) Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta-analysis. Ecology 93(4):930–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy Z, Pintér K, Czóbel S et al (2007) The carbon budget of semi-arid grassland in a wet and a dry year in Hungary. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121(1):21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paustian K (2014) Carbon sequestration in soil and vegetation and greenhouse gases emissions reduction. In: Freedman B (ed) Global environmental change, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 399–406

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin AS, Probst A, Probst JL (2008) Impact of nitrogenous fertilizers on carbonate dissolution in small agricultural catchments: implications for weathering CO2 uptake at regional and global scales. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72(13):3105–3123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raich JW, Potter CS (1995) Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 9(1):23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR (2000) Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289(5486):1922–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song C, Liu C, Wang J et al (2011) Impact of the addition of a compound fertilizer on the dissolution of carbonate rock tablets: a column experiment. Appl Geochem 26:170–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson BA, Verburg PSJ (2006) Effluxed CO2-13C from sterilized and unsterilized treatments of a calcareous soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38(7):1727–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subke JA, Hahn V, Battipaglia G et al (2004) Feedback interactions between needle litter decomposition and rhizosphere activity. Oecologia 139(4):551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir G, Shenker M, Heller H et al (2011) Can soil carbonate dissolution lead to overestimation of soil Respiration? Soil Sci Soc Am J 75(4):1414–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telmer K, Veizer J (1999) Carbon fluxes, pCO2 and substrate weathering in a large northern river basin, Canada: carbon isotope perspectives. Chem Geol 159(1):61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueman RJ, Gonzalez-Meler MA (2005) Accelerated belowground C cycling in a managed agriforest ecosystem exposed to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Glob Change Biol 11(8):1258–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West TO, McBride AC (2005) The contribution of agricultural lime to carbon dioxide emissions in the United States: dissolution, transport, and net emissions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White WB (2013) Carbon fluxes in Karst aquifers: sources, sinks, and the effect of storm flow. Acta Carsol 42(2–3):177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, He S (1996) The CO2 regime in soil profile and its drive to dissolution in carbonate rock area. Carsol Sin 15(1–2):50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka M (2012) Contributions of C3/C4 organic materials and carbonate rock to dissolved inorganic carbon in a karst groundwater system on Miyakojima Island, southwestern Japan. J Hydrol 412–413:151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Liu Z, Zeng C et al (2012) Response of epikarst hydrochemical changes to soil CO2 and weather conditions at Chenqi, Puding, SW China. J Hydrol 468:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan D (1997) Sensitivity of karst process to environmental change along the PEP II transect. Quatern Int 37:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X (2014) Effect of slag pile on hydrogeochemistry and dissolved inorganic carbon in epikarst spring, Chongqing, China. Southwest University, Chongqing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Qin X, Liu P et al (2015) Estimation of carbon sink fluxes in the Pearl River basin (China) based on a water–rock–gas–organism interaction model. Environ Earth Sci 74(2):945–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Zeng C, Liu Z et al (2010) Effect of different land use/land cover on karst hydrogeochemistry: a paired catchment study of Chenqi and Dengzhanhe, Puding, Guizhou, SW China. J Hydrol 388(1):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors specially thank the support from Project of National Key Research and Development Program of China in the 13th Five-year Plan (2016YFC0502607), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41761104), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2018jcyjAX0479) and the Research Foundation for Talented Scholars of Chongqing Jiaotong University (17JDKJC-A008). Special thanks are given to Yue Liu, Xiangdong Meng for their help in field and lab works.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruiyi Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, R., Liu, Z., Huang, H. et al. Difference in the relationship between soil CO2 concentration and the karst-related carbon cycle under different land use types in southwest China. Carbonates Evaporites 34, 1569–1581 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-019-00506-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-019-00506-2

Keywords

Navigation