Advertisement

Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 533–545 | Cite as

Development of SmokeFree Baby: a smoking cessation smartphone app for pregnant smokers

  • Ildiko TomborEmail author
  • Lion Shahab
  • Jamie Brown
  • David Crane
  • Susan Michie
  • Robert West
Open Access
Original Research

Abstract

Pregnant smokers may benefit from digital smoking cessation interventions, but few have been designed for this population. The aim was to transparently report the development of a smartphone app designed to aid smoking cessation during pregnancy. The development of a smartphone app (‘SmokeFree Baby’) to help pregnant women stop smoking was guided by frameworks for developing complex interventions, including the Medical Research Council (MRC), Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Two integrative behaviour change theories provided the theoretical base. Evidence from the scientific literature and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) from the BCT Taxonomy v1 informed the intervention content. The app was developed around five core modules, each with a distinct intervention target (identity change, stress management, health information, promoting use of face-to-face support and behavioural substitution) and available in a ‘control’ or ‘full’ version. SmokeFree Baby has been developed as part of a multiphase intervention optimization to identify the optimum combination of intervention components to include in smartphone apps to help pregnant smokers stop smoking.

Keywords

Digital interventions Smartphone application Behaviour change interventions Smoking cessation Pregnant smokers Incremental development 

Introduction

Maternal smoking is detrimental to foetal development and is the leading avoidable cause of prenatal and neonatal mortality and morbidity in high-income Western countries [1, 2]. Behavioural support [3] and a combination of different forms of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) [4] are effective in helping pregnant women quit smoking, but challenges in access to effective care remain. For example, in the financial year of 2014–2015, only 18,887 pregnant smokers (approximately 26.6 % of pregnant smokers) set a quit date at face-to-face smoking cessation services in England [5, 6]. Potential barriers to engaging with face-to-face support involve fear of being judged, poor access to health care facilities and negative attitudes towards the support provided by health care providers [7, 8, 9]. It is important to find alternative ways of delivering smoking cessation support that may appeal to pregnant women. Digital interventions represent a viable option due to their wide reach and potential to afford users anonymity and convenience; however, there is little known about what intervention components are most likely to constitute an effective intervention. This paper describes the development of a pregnancy-specific smoking cessation app (‘SmokeFree Baby’) to provide a basis for intervention optimization.

Web sites and text-messaging programmes can be effective for increasing quit rates in the general adult population [10, 11], and recent pilot studies have reported promising results with theory-driven and evidence-based smartphone apps to aid cessation [12, 13, 14]. Only a few digital smoking cessation interventions have been designed specifically for pregnant smokers, but both Web sites and text-messaging programmes [15, 16, 17, 18] have been found to be acceptable and potentially engaging in this population, and pilot comparative trials have shown positive but not statistically significant effects of these interventions [19, 20, 21]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has been published on the development or evaluation of smoking cessation apps for pregnant smokers.

Multiphase approaches to developing and evaluating behaviour change interventions, such as the UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance [22], the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) [23] and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) [24], suggest that multicomponent interventions should be developed systematically through a number of iterative phases of intervention component selection, pilot evaluations and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with the implementation phase feeding back to a new cycle of intervention development. A key tenet of all the aforementioned methodological frameworks is to identify potential intervention components by a systematic application of theory and scientific evidence [22, 23, 24]. Theoretical frameworks can be used to explain the mechanisms through which the intervention is expected to influence behaviour change, and digital interventions embedded in theory have been found to be more effective compared with interventions that used theory less extensively [25]. The BCW [24] recommends assessing both the target behaviour and ways in which people and/or their environment need to change to alter that behaviour so that the content of the intervention can be specified accordingly. MOST [23] suggests that the effects of selected intervention components need to be tested experimentally in order to inform decisions regarding an optimal set of components and component levels that would be expected to constitute an effective intervention.

The development of a smoking cessation smartphone app reported in this paper followed the above principles, and it involved the following steps: (1) identifying the target behaviours, (2) identifying the theoretical base, (3) reviewing relevant scientific literature, (4) conducting exploratory work and need assessment, (5) selecting mode of delivery, (6) selecting intervention components, (7) specifying the intervention content by BCTs, (8) translating the intervention content into app features, (9) designing a prototype intervention and (10) piloting the app before its launch.

Transparency in reporting the development and content of complex interventions is paramount for understanding intervention effects and accumulating evidence in the field of digital intervention science [26]. This paper provides a comprehensive description of (i) the intervention development of a smoking cessation smartphone app for pregnant smokers and (ii) the ways in which methodological and theoretical frameworks and evidence from the scientific literature have been translated into specific intervention components in the app.

Methods

The intervention development was informed by the MRC guidance, MOST and BCW overarching methodological frameworks [22, 23, 24]. Figure S1 in the supplementary files shows the process of intervention development according to a multiphase approach. It comprised three main phases, which were further divided into a total of ten steps as follows: preparation phase (steps 1–4), design phase (steps 5–8) and piloting phase (step 10). Details of each step are reported below.

Step 1. Identify target behaviours

Complete cessation during pregnancy was selected as the primary target behaviour of the intervention, because it yields the greatest health benefits both for pregnant women and their children [27, 28]. For those who cannot or do not want to stop in one step, a secondary target behaviour of reducing smoking to three or fewer cigarettes per day was also included for the following reasons. First, a dose-response relationship has been found between the overall prenatal tobacco exposure and infant birth weight [29], and it has been suggested that a substantial smoking reduction (e.g. cutting down to 2–3 cigarettes per day) can be associated with increased birth weight [28, 30, 31]. Secondly, by recognizing that pregnant smokers have low self-confidence in their ability to stop smoking [32, 33], a smoking reduction option may give pregnant smokers the opportunity to gain confidence and increase self-efficacy before trying to quit completely. Thirdly, smoking cessation can involve multiple attempts to stop smoking and to try to cut down [34], and pregnant smokers may make a number of quit attempts during pregnancy [35]; therefore, it is important to engage them with cessation support even if they lapse or relapse. Lastly, a meta-analysis showed that smokers who want to quit smoking and cut down prior to complete cessation are as likely to be abstinent at 6 months as those who quit abruptly [36]. In addition, a population survey found that in the general population of smokers, those who reduce smoking have higher odds of quit attempts and cessation at 6 months than those who do not cut down [37]. Using NRT for smoking, reduction can also promote cessation [37].

Step 2. Identify the theoretical base

We drew on two integrative behaviour change theories that provide comprehensive frameworks to understand behaviour and behavioural patterns in context, as well as the influences that can bring about change in behaviours. First, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model [38] suggests that at any moment, three interacting conditions are necessary for any behaviour to occur: people need to have the necessary ‘capability’ (psychological and physical capability) to perform the behaviour, ‘opportunity’ (afforded by the social and physical environment) to engage in the behaviour and strong enough ‘motivation’ (automatic and reflective) to generate the behaviour.

The second was a broad motivational theory: PRIME which stands for ‘Plans’, ‘Responses’, ‘Impulses/Inhibitions’, ‘Motives’ and ‘Evaluations’. A hierarchically structured human motivational system is proposed, in which ‘responses’ (e.g. smoking a cigarette) are on the lowest level, then ‘impulses/inhibitions’ (e.g. an urge to smoke in the presence of smoking cues), ‘motives’ (e.g. the want or need to smoke), ‘evaluations’ (e.g. a belief that smoking eliminates stress; or thinking about oneself as a non-smoker) and ‘plans’ (e.g. a plan to stop smoking). The system as a whole operates on a moment-to-moment basis and higher levels of the motivational system can only energize and direct behaviour by influencing lower levels.

Key tenets of the COM-B model [38] and PRIME theory [39] were applied to inform intervention component selection; the principles generated from these theories are reported in the supplementary tables (Table S1). For example, COM-B suggests that knowledge can be an important factor in bringing about change in behaviour; therefore, providing information about different types of smoking cessation support was identified as a potential intervention target. PRIME theory argues that maintaining desired behaviour change requires mental energy and for the individual to exercise self-control in situations when competing wants and needs to smoke arise. One way to conserve mental energy and cope with momentary desires to smoke is by engaging with an alternative behaviour, and it was identified that the intervention needs to provide distraction from urges to smoke and improve pregnant smokers’ skills to substitute smoking with alternative behaviours. PRIME theory recognizes identity as an important source of motivation; thus, fostering a non-smoker identity was also selected as a core component of the intervention.

Step 3. Review relevant scientific literature

In addition to theoretical principles, intervention components were selected based on evidence from the fields of smoking cessation and behaviour change research. This included behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that were previously identified in treatment manuals of behavioural support provided by the English Stop Smoking Services, a nationwide network of specialist services providing behavioural support and pharmacotherapy to aid cessation, and were found to be associated with short-term quit success (e.g. strengthen ex-smoker identity) [40]. Additionally, BCTs that were identified in intervention descriptions of effective behavioural support for pregnant smokers (e.g. self-monitoring of behaviour) were included [41]. Systematic literature searches were conducted via PubMed in relation to smoking in pregnancy, interventions for pregnant smokers and digital cessation aids. This identified, for example, that stress management [42, 43, 44], information about the health consequences of smoking [45, 46, 47] and tips to avoid social cues for smoking [48] might be important to include. Although providing financial incentives can also be effective among pregnant smokers [3, 44, 49, 50, 51], it was not feasible to include financial incentives in an app offering automated support.

Step 4. Conduct exploratory work and need assessment

The exploratory work involved (1) focus groups with health care providers (HCPs) [52] to solicit their views on how digital interventions should be configured in order to improve pregnant smokers’ cessation efforts and (2) interviews with pregnant smokers [53] using the COM-B framework [38] to identify what would need to change in pregnant smokers and/or their environment in order for them to stop smoking. HCPs, including stop smoking advisors and midwives who provide smoking cessation support for pregnant smokers, were recruited because of their potentially valuable insights into effective methods to aid cessation during pregnancy. For example, HCPs recommended that the intervention should increase pregnant smokers’ motivation and confidence to quit by establishing rewarding experiences (e.g. providing badges as rewards) [52], and pregnant smokers emphasized that having easy access to further cessation support (preferably face-to-face) would be important [53].

Step 5. Select mode of delivery

The BCW recommends selecting the mode of delivery to promote the intervention being delivered affordably, practicably, cost-effectively, acceptably, safely and equitably across the target population [24]. We chose to develop a smartphone app (SmokeFree Baby) for the following reasons: (1) the intervention could be delivered on a relatively low cost per user and low marginal cost; if demonstrated to be effective, a fully automated smoking cessation intervention could be highly cost-effective; (2) it could provide ready access to cessation support; (3) it could reach pregnant smokers who might otherwise be missed, since they do not engage with face-to-face support; 4) it could permit increased fidelity in intervention delivery; and (5) apps represent more advanced technology than Web sites or text-messaging, as they can take full advantages of a multi-touch interface and other functionalities of smart digital devices. SmokeFree Baby will be available from app stores for free and operational on Android 4.1 or later and iOS 6.0 or later for both smartphones and tablets.

Step 6. Select intervention components

A set of intervention components was selected, informed by steps 1–4 in the preparation phase and expert consensus in the research team. Some were general app features aimed at all users, and some were core modules to which users are randomly allocated. A ‘module’ refers to the unit of intervention components to be tested experimentally in the app. For each module, the content of a control and full version was also specified. Developing a control and full version of each module was to ensure that all participants receive all intervention content to some extent. A control version was intended to provide minimal credible control against which to compare the full version of the module. For all general app features and core modules, key targets (e.g. prompt participants to record how many cigarettes they smoke each day and provide distraction) were specified. The intervention functions likely to be effective for these targets were identified from the BCW (e.g. persuasion and enablement) [24].

Step 7. Specify the intervention content by BCTs

The BCT Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) [54] was applied to select BCTs judged to be suitable to deliver the content in the app given the key targets and intervention functions. The BCTTv1 is a comprehensive taxonomy, which has been systematically developed based on expert consensus. It provides a cross-domain and hierarchically structured list of 93 distinct BCTs, each with a label, definition and example.

Step 8. Translate the intervention content into app features

Translating the intervention content into app features involved repeated discussions between members of the research team and the app development team. Several iterations of SmokeFree Baby were produced until agreement was reached that both the general app features and core modules could deliver the intervention content as intended, and the features were feasible to implement in terms of computer programming.

Step 9. Design a prototype intervention

To promote user engagement, design strategies relating to persuasion (e.g. aesthetics, reminders) and usability (e.g. easy navigation) were applied [55]. Principles that informed the design of the app reported the supplementary tables (Table S2). Twenty-three principles were adopted from the development of the ‘StopAdvisor’ smoking cessation Web site [56] (e.g. the text for the app was edited by a professional writer to ensure that it was as brief as possible and easy to understand). Three principles were adopted from a study exploring optimal features of health-related Web sites [57] (e.g. keep the background questionnaire short and present it with a progress bar in order to minimize respondent burden and avoid early dropouts). Two principles were identified in a study soliciting HCPs’ recommendations regarding digital aids in pregnancy [52] (e.g. provide daily tips). The research team identified further eight principles, such as using push notifications, placing greater emphasis on the full modules by including visuals and interactive elements and using text only in the control versions. The app development team was provided with an intervention specification document detailing the content, design and operation of specific app features.

Step 10. Pilot the app

The content of the app was checked against the intervention specification by IT. In order to test all features in an iterative manner and identify and fix programming bugs, an initial user testing was also conducted within the research team and with a convenience sample of non-pregnant users (n = 6). Everyone was given access to a test version of the app and was asked to email comments and feedback on the app to IT. Following discussions within the research team, the app was refined before its launch. A number of modifications were made to correct errors (e.g. correct feedback on progress), amend the design (e.g. increase font size), improve user experience (e.g. improve navigation within built-in features) and ensure the stability of the app on different iOS and Android software versions.

Results

The SmokeFree Baby app has been designed to help pregnant smokers stop smoking or cut down. It provides automated support throughout pregnancy without face-to-face contact and includes general app features and five core modules (each in a control and full version). Each module has a specific topic, and within each module, various BCTs are used to deliver the intervention content accordingly. Sample screenshots of the app are reported in the supplementary files (Fig. S2), and details of the content are discussed below.

Registration and general app features

Figure 1 shows the process of registration and subsequent logins to the app. Pregnant women are asked to read information about the study and, if they consent to participate, complete a baseline questionnaire. Participants who smoke four or more cigarettes per day at baseline can decide if they want to stop smoking completely or cut down to three or fewer cigarettes per day. Those who smoke three or fewer cigarettes can only select the ‘smokefree’ goal. Everyone is advised to set a date to initiate behaviour change within 2 weeks of completing the registration and affirm commitment to that goal. Participants can use the app preceding their chosen date, and they are reminded of the days remaining before that date. Once the day of initiating behaviour change has past, the first login each day starts with asking participants if they smoked any cigarettes at all in the last 24 h, and if so, how many. Depending on their response, participants are praised for their success or given supportive messages. Those who cut down successfully for three consecutive days are encouraged to try to stop smoking completely, and those who do not manage to stay abstinent for three consecutive days are offered to change their target behaviour to smoking reduction.
Fig. 1

Registration and subsequent logins. CPD cigarettes per day

The general app features are summarized in Table 1. Features that are available for all participants before initiating behaviour change aim to (1) provide information about the app, the research team, nicotine addiction and withdrawal symptoms and (2) prompt participants to think about why they want to quit and how to prepare for changing their behaviour. Other general features include a saving calculator to monitor how much money they have saved since quitting or cutting down, advice on using NRT and advice to engage in social situations without smoking.
Table 1

Key targets in general app features with proposed process of change, intervention functions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs)

Features

Key targets

Proposed process of change a

Intervention functions b

BCTs c

Sample text

Goal setting

• Set a behaviour change goal: stopping smoking or cutting down

• Prompt participants to affirm commitment to their selected goal

• Review goal and advise participants to consider modifying it if needed

• Psychological capability: self-regulation

• Reflective motivation: intentions; goals

Enablement Persuasion

1.1 Goal setting (behaviour)

1.5 Review behaviour goal

1.6 Discrepancy between current behaviour and goal

1.9 Commitment

“As you are progressing very well here, it’s a good time to revisit your initial goal and think about stopping smoking completely. You can do this!”

Feedback and monitoring

• Prompt participants to record how many cigarettes they smoke each day

• Provide feedback on performance of the selected behaviour

• Praise participants for progress in changing the behaviour

• Prompt self-praise and self-reward

• Boost motivation and self-confidence

• Advise participants to think about previous successes with quitting

• Psychological capability: self-regulation

• Environmental opportunity: resources

• Automatic motivation: habit formation; reinforcement

• Reflective motivation: self-confidence

Enablement Persuasion

2.2 Feedback on behaviour

2.3 Self-monitoring of behaviour

10.4 Social reward

10.7 Self-incentive

10.9 Self-reward

15.1 Verbal persuasion about capability

15.3 Focus on past success

“You have reached your one-week milestone. Sounds like a great achievement! Why do not you think about a reward for yourself if you stick to your smokefree goal for the next 7 days?”

Features available pre-quit

• Provide information about the app, the research team, nicotine addiction and withdrawal symptoms

• Prompt participants to think about why they want to quit smoking

• Prompt planning of performing the behaviour

• Psychological capability: knowledge; planning

• Automatic motivation: desires

Education

Persuasion

1.4 Action planning

3.1 Social support (unspecified)

5.3 Information about the social and environmental consequences

11.1 Pharmacological support

12.1 Restructuring the physical environment

12.2 Restructuring the social environment

12.3 Avoidance/reducing exposure to cues for the behaviour

“SmokeFree Baby has been developed by a research team at University College London who specialize in smoking cessation.”

Savings calculator

• Monitor and provide feedback on how much money participants have saved

• Automatic motivation: reinforcement

Persuasion

2.7 Feedback on outcome of behaviour

“Saved so far up to £10. That’s enough to buy a baby bottle.”

‘Medicine’

• Provide information about smoking cessation medications

• Psychological capability: knowledge

Education

11.1 Pharmacological support

“It is best to combine mouth spray with […] nicotine patches.”

‘Support’

• Advise on eliciting social support

• Social opportunity: social influence

Enablement

1.4 Action planning

3.1 Social support (unspecified)

“Think about the people closest to you who you can rely on when you need support. Add their phone numbers here and call them if you feel that the urge to smoke is getting overwhelming.”

‘Memos’

• Advise on eliciting social support

• Prompt participants to reaffirm their commitment with the behaviour change

• Social opportunity: social influence

• Reflective motivation: intentions; goals

Enablement Persuasion

3.1 Social support (unspecified)

1.9 Commitment

“Help maintain your motivation to stop smoking or cut down by recording supportive video messages from your friends and family. You can also record your personal commitment to the goal you set for yourself.”

‘Social’

• Provide information about cues and social situations that can trigger urges to smoke

• Provide tips to avoid environmental and social cues of smoking

• Advise on eliciting social support

• Psychological capability: knowledge; self-regulation; planning

• Social opportunity: social influence; social cues

• Environmental opportunity: environmental cues

• Reflective motivation: beliefs about consequences

Education

Persuasion Environmental restructuring

1.4 Action planning

3.1 Social support (unspecified)

3.2 Social support (practical)

3.3 Social support (emotional)

4.2 Information about antecedents

5.3 Information about the social and environmental consequences

6.3 Information about others’ approval

12.1 Restructuring the physical environment

12.2 Restructuring the social environment

12.3 Avoidance/reducing exposure to cues for the behaviour

15.2 Mental rehearsal of successful performance

16.2. Imaginary reward

16.3. Vicarious consequences

“Imagine that you are out with friends and you are the only one who does not smoke. Prepare in advance what you are going to do when they go to have a cigarette. For example you can browse the internet on your phone to kill time.”

abased on the COM-B model [38] and PRIME theory [39]; bbased on the BCW [24]; cselected from the BCTTv1 [54]

Core intervention modules

Table 2 reports the specification of the core intervention modules. The structure of the modules is reported in the supplementary files (Fig. S3), and the content is discussed below.
  1. 1.

    ‘Identity’ module

     
Table 2

Core intervention modules, proposed process of change, intervention functions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs)

Modules

Key targets

Proposed process of change a

Intervention functions b

BCTs c

Sample text

‘Identity’

Control

• Foster identity change

• Reflective motivation: identity

Persuasion

13.5 Identity associated with changed behaviour

“Building up a new identity as someone for whom smoking is not an option any more is an important part of leaving smoking behind for good.”

Full

• Foster identity change

• Prompt positive self-labels, self-images and self-thoughts

• Increase salience of identities that do not promote smoking

• Prompt identification with positive role models for cessation

• Facilitate bonding with the baby

• Reflective motivation: identity; self-esteem; beliefs about consequences

• Automatic motivation: desires

• Social opportunity: social influence; modelling

Persuasion

Modelling

13.5 Identity associated with changed behaviour

13.4 Valued self-identity

13.3 Incompatible beliefs

13.2 Framing/reframing

13.1 Identification of self as a role model

3.1 Social support (unspecified)

9.3 Comparative imagining of future outcomes

15.4 Self talk

“You might feel that smoking has always been a part of who you are, and stopping smoking would mean that you lose something of yourself. Think about what you can gain by making ‘not smoking’ an essential part of your identity. Make a list of all the things about yourself that will not change even if you become a non-smoker.”

‘Stress relief’

Control

• Provide information about smoking and stress

• Advise on using stress management techniques

• Psychological capability: knowledge; self-regulation

Education

11.2 Reduce negative emotions

12.6 Body changes

“Bear in mind that smoking does not reduce stress, it simply relieves your withdrawal symptoms.”

Full

• Provide information about smoking and stress

• Advise on using stress management techniques

• Provide training to perform a brief breathing exercise

• Prompt planning to cope with stress without smoking

• Psychological capability: knowledge; self-regulation; skills; memory processes; planning

• Reflective motivation: beliefs about consequences

Education

Training Enablement

11.2 Reduce negative emotions

12.6 Body changes

1.2 Problem solving

1.4 Action planning

8.3 Habit formation

11.3 Conserving mental resources

“Here are 3 top tips to reduce your stress without smoking. Try them out the next time you begin to feel stressed.”

‘Health effects’

Control

• Provide information about the health effects of smoking and benefits of cessation

• Psychological capability: knowledge

• Automatic motivation: desires

Education

Persuasion

5.1 Information about health consequences

“By stopping smoking completely during pregnancy […] your baby is less likely to be born too early with a low birth weight.”

Full

• Provide information about the health effects of smoking and benefits of cessation

• Address misconceptions about the effects of smoking

• Psychological capability: knowledge

• Automatic motivation: desires

• Reflective motivation: beliefs about consequences

Education

Persuasion

5.1 Information about health consequences

5.3 Information about social and environmental consequences

5.6 Information about emotional consequences

“Delivering a baby with a low birth weight is the main pregnancy complication known to be linked with both active and passive smoking. The less you smoke, the greater your chances of having a normal birth are.”

‘Face-to-face’

Control

• Provide information about sources of support and how to access them

• Psychological capability: knowledge

Education

3.1 Social support (unspecified)

“One of the most effective ways of stopping smoking is by getting support from an expert stop smoking advisor.”

Full

• Provide information about sources of support and how to access them

• Provide ready access to support in the localities

• Address misconceptions about face-to-face support

• Advise on making an appointment

• Psychological capability: knowledge

• Environmental opportunity: access to support

• Social opportunity: social influence

Education

Persuasion

Enablement

3.1 Social support (unspecified)

3.2 Social support (practical)

“It’s never too late to change your mind about getting face-to-face support from a stop smoking advisor. Even if you decided not to get support at first, you can always ask your GP or midwife for a referral to your local stop smoking clinic, or contact them yourself.”

‘Behaviour’

Control

• Provide information about sources of urges to smoke

• Promote behavioural substitution

• Psychological capability: knowledge; self-regulation

Education

4.2 Information about antecedents

8.2 Behaviour substitution

12.4 Distraction

“Have a think about what you can do instead of smoking. One option might be to play a game on your phone.”

Full

• Provide information about sources of urges to smoke

• Promote behavioural substitution

• Provide distraction

• Prompt planning to cope with urges to smoke

• Psychological capability: knowledge; self-regulation; planning; memory processes

• Environmental opportunity: resources

• Automatic motivation: habit formation

Education

Training

Enablement

4.2 Information about antecedents

8.2 Behaviour substitution

12.4 Distraction

1.2 Problem solving

1.4 Action planning

8.3 Habit formation

“Decorate your baby’s room. Search on the internet for ideas then try to do little bits and pieces every time you think about smoking”

aBased on the COM-B model [38] and PRIME theory [39]; bbased on the BCW [24]; cselected from the BCTTv1 [54]

The control version contains brief advice on establishing a mental image of becoming a non-smoker. The full version provides further motivational messages to support identity change in smoking cessation and aims to increase the salience of a positive identity in relation to the behaviour change through interactive features. In order to prompt identification with positive role models for cessation, video clips with an ex-smoker pregnant woman are included who talks about her experiences, struggles and successes with stopping smoking. In order to increase the salience of a ‘mother’ identity and facilitate bonding with the baby, information about foetal development is provided each week (tailored to the individual’s stage of pregnancy), and participants are encouraged to document their pregnancy using a video diary feature.
  1. 2.

    ‘Stress relief’ module

     
The control version provides brief information about the association between smoking and stress, and participants are given advice on using stress management techniques to cope with cravings. The full version adds to these by promoting the development of plans to prepare for coping with stressful situations and negative emotional states. A variety of tips are also provided that participants could use to create their own stress management plan within the app. In order to improve stress management skills, an interactive feature is included to train participants to perform a deep breathing exercise.
  1. 3.

    ‘Health effects’ module

     
Brief information about the health effects of smoking during pregnancy and the benefits of cessation is included in the control version. The full version, in which the content is delivered through quizzes, daily ‘health facts’ and interactive visuals that allow participants to explore as much or as little as they want of the available information, provides a comprehensive overview of the harmful effects of active and passive smoking both for mothers and their children. In order to minimize potential emotional distress for pregnant women, the messages are framed around the potential short-term and long-term benefits that could be gained by quitting.
  1. 4.

    ‘Face-to-face’ module

     
In the control version, participants are given brief information about evidence-based face-to-face support for cessation and how they could book an appointment with an expert stop smoking advisor. The full version provides further advice to encourage participants to engage with face-to-face support and includes video clips of a real-life specialist ‘stop smoking in pregnancy’ advisor who explains what face-to-face support involves, what pregnant smokers can expect when they make an appointment and how expert advisors can help them. Easy access to quitlines and local services in the UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Republic of Ireland are also provided through the full version.
  1. 5.

    Behavioural substitution

     

The control version provides brief information about internal and external sources of urges to smoke and promotes behavioural substitution by means of using distraction strategies to cope with urges. In the full version, participants are encouraged to create their own distraction plan by using the tips provided. In order to help them distract their attention from urges, quizzes and a built-in game are included.

Discussion

The SmokeFree Baby app has been designed to target a broad range of influences on behaviour, including psychological capability (e.g. improve self-regulation), social opportunity (e.g. provide role models for cessation), environmental opportunity (e.g. provide ready access to cessation support), automatic motivation (e.g. increase desires to stop smoking) and reflective motivation (e.g. foster a non-smoker identity). The selected intervention targets were judged likely to be best achieved by the intervention functions of education, persuasion, enablement, modelling, training and environmental restructuring [24], and 42 distinct BCTs from the BCTTv1 [54] were used to deliver the intervention content.

In accordance with the MOST development process [23, 58, 59], the next phase is for SmokeFree Baby to be evaluated in a factorial screening experiment to assess the effects of five intervention modules (identity change vs stress management vs health information vs promoting engagement with face-to-face support vs behavioural substitution) on the targeted behavioural outcomes (stopping smoking completely or cutting down). Pregnant smokers are randomly allocated to one of 32 experimental groups in a 25 (2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2) full factorial design, in which each group receives a combination of the five modules and the different levels of each module (control vs full). Findings from this experiment will be used to inform intervention optimization by identifying components and component levels with the most potential to influence behaviour change. Depending on the findings, SmokeFree Baby will be revised and will either be tested in a second screening experiment or, if further evaluation is warranted, the app will be evaluated in a full-scale RCT.

Developing and optimizing digital smoking cessation interventions through iterative and multiphase processes are likely to take longer to complete than traditional RCTs. However, it is argued that this newer approach can advance intervention science faster by allowing researchers to systematically screen out ineffective intervention components and to keep only those components with the greatest potential to form better interventions [58]. The development of SmokeFree Baby shows that it is feasible to design an app to be evaluated in a factorial experiment to test a number of conditions simultaneously. This is because digital platforms permit high fidelity in delivering intervention components and a relatively straightforward random allocation of users to different experimental groups. Automatically collected data on pregnant smokers’ engagement with the app and helpfulness ratings on intervention components will be evaluated and used to inform decision-making in further iterations of the intervention development.

Limitations include the relatively limited extent to which pregnant smokers were actively involved in the early development of SmokeFree Baby in terms of what to include in the app, how to present the content and in what ways the intervention should be delivered to increase user engagement. However, a qualitative think-aloud study (reported separately) has since been conducted with pregnant smokers to explore their perspectives’ about the usability of the trial version of the app. As others have previously suggested [56], some decisions during the development of large and complex interventions, such as SmokeFree Baby, are likely to have been made without being documented. In order to mitigate this as much as possible, we kept detailed records of all stages of the intervention development process and reported a comprehensive description of these in the paper. Although SmokeFree Baby has been designed to be potentially useful for English-speaking pregnant smokers globally, the content was to a large extent designed to be relevant in the UK. It is also possible that the intervention will not be equally accessible across the social spectrum, as pregnant smokers from lower social grade groups might not have access to smartphones or have data allowance to download the app. Equity in access to digital support needs to be assessed, and data collected through SmokeFree Baby will provide insights into the socioeconomic characteristics of pregnant smokers who engage with the app.

To our knowledge, SmokeFree Baby is the first smoking cessation app that was specifically designed to meet the needs of pregnant smokers. The development was informed by a systematic application of theories, scientific evidence, BCTs and expert consensus in the research team. A rigorous methodology was followed from the early stages of intervention development that should facilitate multiphase intervention optimization in the future.

The findings reported in this manuscript have not been previously published, and the manuscript is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere.

The data have not been previously reported.

The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

RW and IT are funded by a Centre grant from Cancer Research UK. JB’s post is funded by a fellowship from the UK Society for the Study of Addiction (SSA). The SSA and the National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training provided funding for the app development.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are members of the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Control Studies. We are grateful to all our funders, the app developer team (Silverback IS) and Jamie West (copy editing). The full content specification of the app is available from the corresponding author on request

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

IT, DC and SM do not have any conflict of interest. LS has received honoraria for talk and travel expenses from manufacturers of medications for smoking cessation to attend meetings and workshops. JB and LS have received unrestricted research grants from Pfizer. RW has undertaken research and consultancy for companies that develop and manufacture smoking cessation medications.

Ethical approval

Statements on human rights, the welfare of animals and informed consent are not applicable to this manuscript. Helsinki statement is not applicable. IRB approval is not applicable.

Supplementary material

13142_2016_438_MOESM1_ESM.docx (563 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 563 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Royal College of Physicians. Passive smoking and children.2010. A report by the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physicians. London, UK. http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/passive-smoking-and-children.pdf.
  2. 2.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking – 50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General – Executive summary. 2014. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/exec-summary.pdf: Rockville, USA.
  3. 3.
    Chamberlain, C., et al. (2013). Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, CD001055.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brose, L. S., McEwen, A., & West, R. (2013). Association between nicotine replacement therapy use in pregnancy and smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Depend, 132(3), 660–664.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Health and Social Care Information Centre. Statistics on NHS Stop Smoking Services in England, April 2014 to March 2015, 2015, Lifestyle Statistics Team, Health and Social Care Information Centre: London, UK. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB18002/stat-stop-smok-serv-eng-2015-q4-rep.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Health and Social Care Information Centre. Statistics on women’s smoking status at time of delivery, England – Quarter 4, 2014–15, 2015: London, UK.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butterworth, S. J., et al. (2014). Pregnant smokers’ perceptions of specialist smoking cessation services. J Smok Cessat, 9(2), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ingall, G., & Cropley, M. (2010). Exploring the barriers of quitting smoking during pregnancy: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Women and Birth, 23(2), 45–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ussher, M., Etter, J. F., & West, R. (2006). Perceived barriers to and benefits of attending a stop smoking course during pregnancy. Patient Educ Couns, 61(3), 467–472.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Civljak, M., et al. (2013). Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7, CD007078.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whittaker, R., et al. (2012). Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, CD006611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bricker, J. B., et al. (2014). Randomized controlled pilot trial of a smartphone app for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend, 143, 87–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ubhi, H. K., et al. (2015). A mobile app to aid smoking cessation: preliminary evaluation of SmokeFree28. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buller, D. B., et al. (2014). Randomized trial of a smartphone mobile application compared to text messaging to support smoking cessation. Telemedicine and e-Health, 20(3), 206–214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Herbec, A., et al. (2014). The needs and preferences of pregnant smokers regarding tailored internet-based smoking cessation interventions: a qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health, 14, 1070.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abroms, L. C., et al. (2015). Quit4baby: results from a pilot test of a mobile smoking cessation program for pregnant women. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 3(1), e10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naughton, F., Jamison, J., & Sutton, S. (2013). Attitudes towards SMS text message smoking cessation support: a qualitative study of pregnant smokers. Health Educ Res, 28(5), 911–922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soklaridis, S., et al. (2015). R u a smkn m0 m?: aspects of a text messaging smoking cessation/reduction intervention for younger mothers. J Smok Cessat, 10(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pollak, K. I., et al. (2013). A pilot study testing SMS text delivered scheduled gradual reduction to pregnant smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15(10), 1773–1776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naughton, F., et al. (2012). Randomized controlled trial evaluation of a tailored leaflet and SMS text message self-help intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit). Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14(5), 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Herbec, A., et al. (2014). Pilot randomized controlled trial of an internet-based smoking cessation intervention for pregnant smokers (’MumsQuit’). Drug Alcohol Depend, 140(100), 130–136.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Craig, P., et al., Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. British Med J. 2008;337 (a1655).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Collins, L. M., et al. (2011). The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions. Ann Behav Med, 41(2), 208–226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michie, S., Atkins, L., & West, R. (2014). The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Webb, T. L., et al. (2010). Using the internet to promote health behaviour change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behaviour change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1), e4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Michie, S., & Abraham, C. (2008). Advancing the science of behaviour change: a plea for scientific reporting. Addiction, 103(9), 1409–1410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Benjamin-Gardner, R., & Stotts, A. (2013). Impact of smoking exposure change on infant birth weight among a cohort of women in a prenatal smoking cessation study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15(3), 685–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yan, J., & Groothuis, P. A. (2015). Timing of prenatal smoking cessation or reduction and infant birth weight: evidence from the United Kingdom millennium cohort study. Matern Child Health J, 19(3), 447–458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hebel, J. R., Fox, N. L., & Sexton, M. (1988). Dose-response of birth weight to various measures of maternal smoking during pregnancy. J Clin Epidemiol, 41(5), 483–489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Windsor, R. A., et al. (1999). The use of significant reduction rates to evaluate health education methods for pregnant smokers: a new harm reduction behavioral indicator? Health Education and Behavior, 26(5), 648–662.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    England, L. J., et al. (2001). Effects of smoking reduction during pregnancy on the birth weight of term infants. Am J Epidemiol, 154(8), 694–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maxson, P. J., et al. (2012). Psychosocial differences between smokers and non-smokers during pregnancy. Addict Behav, 37(2), 153–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Woodby, L. L., et al. (1999). Predictors of smoking cessation during pregnancy. Addiction, 94(2), 283–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hughes, J. R., et al. (2013). The natural history of efforts to stop smoking: a prospective cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend, 128(1–2), 171–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pickett, K., et al. (2003). Fluctuations of maternal smoking during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 101(1), 140–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lindson-Hawley, N., Aveyard, P., & Hughes, J. R. (2012). Reduction versus abrupt cessation in smokers who want to quit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, CD008033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beard, E., et al. (2013). Association between use of nicotine replacement therapy for harm reduction and smoking cessation: a prospective study of English smokers. Tob Control, 22(2), 118–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci, 6(42).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    West, R., & Brown, J. (2013). Theory of addiction – second edition. Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    West, R., et al. (2010). Behaviour change techniques used by the English stop smoking services and their associations with short-term quit outcomes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(7), 742–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lorencatto, F., West, R., & Michie, S. (2012). Specifying evidence-based behaviour change techniques to aid smoking cessation in pregnancy. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14(9), 1019–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hauge, L. J., Torgersen, L., & Vollrath, M. (2012). Associations between maternal stress and smoking: findings from a population-based prospective cohort study. Addiction, 107(6), 1168–1173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gyllstrom, M. E., Hellerstedt, W. L., & Hennrikus, D. (2012). The association of maternal mental health with prenatal smoking cessation and postpartum relapse in a population-based sample. Matern Child Health J, 16(3), 685–693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mantzari, E., F. Vogt, and T.M. Marteau. The effectiveness of financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy: is it from being paid or from the extra aid? BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2012; 12(24).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bull, L., et al. (2007). Social attitudes towards smoking in pregnancy in east surrey: a qualitative study of smokers, former smokers and non-smokers. Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 13(3), 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gould, G. S., et al. (2013). Knowledge and views about maternal tobacco smoking and barriers for cessation in aboriginal and Torres Strait islanders: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15(5), 863–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Polen, K. N. D., et al. (2015). Knowledge and attitudes of adults towards smoking in pregnancy: results from the HealthStyles (c) 2008 survey. Matern Child Health J, 19(1), 144–154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Naughton, F., McEwen, A., & Sutton, S. (2015). Use and effectiveness of lapse prevention strategies among pregnant smokers. J Health Psychol, 20(11), 1427–1433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tappin, D., et al., Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015;350(h134).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Higgins, S. T., et al. (2012). Financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant and newly postpartum women. Prev Med, 55(Suppl), S33–S40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bauld, L. and T. Coleman. The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy: a briefing paper, 2009. University of Bath. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph26/documents/quitting-smoking-in-pregnancy-and-following-childbirth-the-effectiveness-of-smoking-cessation-interventions-during-pregnancy-a-briefing-paper-2: Bath and Nottingham, UK.
  52. 52.
    Tombor, I., et al. (2015). Healthcare providers’ views on digital smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women. J Smok Cessat, 10(2), 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tombor, I., Development of a smoking cessation smartphone application for pregnant smokers focusing on the role of identity (Doctoral dissertation). In Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 2015. University College London: London, UK.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Michie, S., et al. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med, 46(1), 81–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Short, C. E., et al. (2015). Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: a proposed model of user engagement. The European Health Psychologist, 17(1), 32–38.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Michie, S., et al. (2012). Development of StopAdvisor. A theory-based interactive internet-based smoking cessation intervention. Translational Behavioral Medicine: Practice, Policy and Research, 2(3), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schneider, F., van Osch, L., & de Vries, H. (2012). Identifying factors for optimal development of health-related websites: a Delphi study among experts and potential future users. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 14(1), e18.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Collins, L. M., et al. (2014). Evaluating individual intervention components: making decisions based on the results of a factorial screening experiment. Translational Behavioral Medicine: Practice, Policy and Research, 4(3), 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chakraborty, B., et al. (2009). Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs. Stat Med, 28(21), 2687–2708.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ildiko Tombor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lion Shahab
    • 2
  • Jamie Brown
    • 1
  • David Crane
    • 3
  • Susan Michie
    • 3
  • Robert West
    • 1
  1. 1.Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research CentreUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations