Introduction

Nowadays, studies of the elderly have attained important significance due to the aging of the population across the globe. The elderly are confronted with a number of problems that have to do with both physical threats to health and psychological and biological problems. Elderly people are subject to feelings of insecurity, exclusion, and abandonment. In addition, the decline in their physical abilities gradually leads to the inability to treat illnesses or to psychological disorganization. Moreover, economic difficulties due to inadequate retirement and inefficient healthcare can lead to further isolation and worsening of the state of psychosomatic problems of the elderly.

Thus, people at the third age exhibit new needs that can be analyzed from various perspectives offering new insights on the way that the elderly perceive and behave in modern societies. Unequivocally, socio-economic and geographical factors of the elderly population underlie the core of the relevant studies providing the base to schedule services and interventions to them. This kind of data should be easily accessible and open to the public—a central issue of modern e-government. The use of geographical information systems (GIS) highly facilitates this direction as they permit easy open access to the data. In the present article, such an interpretation for the elderly population in Greece is presented.

Similar surveys have been carried out in Europe and elsewhere. In Europe, a long-term research is carried out having the title Survey on Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the first results of which were published during 2005 (Börsch-Supan and Jürges 2005). SHARE started with eleven countries across Europe, but gradually the number of countries included in the survey exceeded sixteen countries. Collection of data is continuously increased, and new conclusions are extracted (Börsch-Supan et al. 2008). Similar surveys are Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the USA and Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) in the UK. Moreover, surveys similar to the HRS are carried out in Russian Federation and other Asiatic and African countries (Kapteyn 2008).

According to Carone and Costello (2006), the significance of such surveys lies in the fact that they could affect the economic policy of the European Union, since the provided data could be used for important reforms concerning sustainable pension systems. Such surveys could also be used to understand the uncertainty of economic and demographic changes and could provide a valuable tool to assess the quality of life and health of elderly and how they affected by several social and economic factors.

Some examples of the related existing international surveys are listed in the following table (Table 1):

Table 1 Examples of the related existing international surveys

However, the scope of the current research is the investigation of the existing differentiation in the socio-economic characteristics and the lifestyle of adults in Greece, in different geographical areas (urban, semi-urban, rural), the degree of treatment of these differentiated characteristics by geographical area, and the exploration of the possibility of more easily addressing these differences using GIS as a tool for their visualization. Thus, this research fills a research gap regarding the use of GIS to reflect geographical differences in socio-economic characteristics and lifestyle of elderly in Greece, as well as the possibility of use of this system for direct and geographically targeted interventions for solving the problems that arise due to these differences.

Elderly people receive various social services helping their psychosomatic conditions and providing entertainment to them. The most important structures placed in the self-governing regions of Greece and providing such services to elderly according to the Central Union of Municipalities of Greece (2013) are 1110 open elderly care centers, 876 units named “Help at Home”, 183 units for social care, and 62 centers of day elderly care. Among them, the open elderly care centers first appeared in 1979 in the form of voluntary organizations supervised by the Greek Ministry of Health and Welfare. They provide services for the elderly in order to avoid their marginalization or institutionalization and to keep their interest in their social context, by self-activation and by increase of the local community interest for them. Therefore, the concept of the open elderly care centers is to keep elderly within their community, family environment, and friendly surroundings and to avoid closed residential care and other forms of hospice. After 1991, their supervision passed from the Ministry of Health and Welfare to the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Services of open elderly care centers are provided to men and women aged over 60 years living in the surrounding area where they work, regardless of their economic and social situation. Active members of open elderly care centers may not be less than 50 and more than 300 persons. The services provided by the open elderly care centers combine traditional preventive medicine and primary care services, covering the needs of the elderly concerning primary (vaccinations, advice for avoiding accidents) and secondary prevention (medical examinations aimed at early detection). Moreover, the open elderly care centers provide organized entertainment services and participation of older people in various social activities in order to activate them and to keep them as equal members on the community. Meanwhile, the open elderly care centers provide preventive care services for early diagnosis, to avoid long-term therapy.

However, the number of open elderly care centers offering an interesting program of activities internally or in collaboration with other local organizations is small. Usually, the offered activities are limited to the help of some older people at their home and to the organization of excursions, museum visits, watching, or organizing plays.

Specialties of employees in the open elderly care centers are appropriate to the nature of the services provided. They are mainly staffed by doctors of natural medicine, social workers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, health nurses, and family assistants.

Thus, the main research question is related to the differences and problems created due to the geographical distribution of the elderly population (in urban, semi-urban, and rural areas), their effects on the mental and physical health of the elderly, their creative representation using GIS systems, and the possibility provided by GIS systems for the immediate intervention of the responsible people, in order to solve such problems for the benefit of the elderly.

Specifically, the following steps have been pursued:

  • Recording of the current profile of the elderly in the open elderly care centers

  • Investigation of the perception of the health status by elderly

  • Investigation of the proportion of older people suffering from health problems

  • Investigation of the most common health problems in the elderly

  • Investigation of the percentage of elderly whose health status affects their life quality

  • Investigation of the overall life quality of elderly

  • Investigation of the degree of correlation of socio-economic indicators to the quality of life of elderly

  • Investigation of the modulation degree of correlation of socio-economic indicators to the quality of life of elderly, in individual open elderly care centers in Greece included in the survey

Material and Methods

The current survey is based on a quantitative data method, which enables systematic collection of objective numerical data for statistical use (Mantzoukas 2007), based on a typical sequence of research stages. The quantitative research design is fixed and predetermined (Bellali and Papazoglou 2004).

The questionnaire (see Appendix A) consists of five sections which include 29 questions.

  1. 1.

    The first section is related to the demographic characteristics of the population under study (gender, age, marital status).

  2. 2.

    The second section is related to the characteristics of the residence of the elderly (residence area today, residence area in the past, live, living situation, number of family members living in the same house).

  3. 3.

    The third section deals with the socio-economic characteristics of the elderly (educational level, profession, main source of income, being financial independence, annual income).

  4. 4.

    The fourth section deals with the medical history of elderly (health problems, physical energy, health and reduction in home health and activity, smoking, alcohol, diet, sleep, feeling tired after waking up).

  5. 5.

    Finally, the fifth section is related to how the elderly perceive their quality of life (if they are enjoying their lives, if they are happy for most of the time, if the current economic crisis affects them negatively, if pain affects their welfare, and finally if health problems keep them at home).

Data were collected through questionnaires addressed to the elderly of many open elderly care centers in Greece. Printed questionnaires (Appendix A) were used for participants who did not have access to the Internet. Questionnaires in digital form using python language were answered by participants having access to the Internet, which could be completed easily by elderly with or without the aid of another person. The quantitative approach of the research involves predefined answers in order to facilitate statistical analysis.

Answered questionnaires were a representative sample of the population under study (Bellali and Papazoglou 2004). Specifically, 897 questionnaires are completed from the following open elderly care centers in Greece as shown in the following table (Table 2):

Table 2 Questionnaires completed from the open elderly care centers in Greece

The survey was carried out between March 2015 and July 2016. All collected data were in coded form to ensure the anonymity of participants. Then, the completed questionnaires were introduced in the electronic database to be processed and analyzed. Descriptive statistics was applied (calculation rates and frequency distributions, central tendency indicators, dispersion) in order to present the study data and to draw conclusions regarding the surveyed population. Specifically, Spearman test was used to test the association of categorical variables. The confidence interval (CI) in which statistical tests were performed was 95% (i.e., a = 0.05).

Finally, the obtained results were presented in the form of charts for the different regions of Greece, using GIS system, as a mean to visually illustrate socio-economic indicators that affect the health of the elderly, in different geographical positions.

Recognizing that morality and ethics are important parts of our research work, the completion of the questionnaires was done voluntarily by older people. Also, it was known by all participants that the survey was carried out for academic purposes. Therefore, elderly participants experienced the collection of data process in a cooperative way.

On the other hand, the used predefined answers in the questionnaires obviously reduce the degree of honesty of the participants, and this is considered as a limitation of our survey. Also, the existing bureaucracy of the authorities during the license application to carry out the research process is considered as another limitation for the survey.

Results

Main Demographic, Social, and Economic Data

Regarding the gender distribution of the participants, 43.3% (388 participants) of them were men, and 56.7% (504 participants) of them were women. Generally the age group of 70–80 years represents the relative majority of the participants with a percentage of 40.8% (see Table 3). Their age distribution is shown in Fig. 1. It is clear that there is a demographic superiority of women over men in the age groups between 70 and 80 years and less than 70 years, representing 41.5% and 40.9% of total, respectively, while in the age group of over 80 years, there is a demographic superiority of men, representing 34.3% of total compared with 17.7% of women.

Table 3 Summarized main demographic, social, and economic data
Fig. 1
figure 1

Age distribution of participants

Concerning the marital status of the participants, the majority of them is married, representing 47.7%, while the next largest group, representing 34.7%, are widowed (see Table 3). Only 9.4% are single, and 6.5% are divorced, while 1.8% are leaving separated. Their distribution is shown in Fig. 2. Obviously, there is a demographic superiority of women in the widowed group, representing 40.3% of total, while there is a demographic superiority of men in the married group, representing the 53.6% of total.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Marital status of participants

As it is shown in Table 3, the highest percentage of 33.1% of elderly in the current survey is living with his wife/partner, and also another high percentage of 32.4% is living alone. A notable percentage of around 19.8% of participants reported that they stay with children/grandchildren, while at lower percentages of around 5.4%, 3.8%, and 1.4% reported that they live with other relatives, with house assistants, or with a professional caregiver, respectively. A percentage of 91.9% of participants lives at home, while the rest of them are living as guests or in a nursing house, with percentages 6.5% and 1.7%, respectively.

As far as the educational level concerns, it is clear that the majority of the participants, with a percentage of 40.4%, has a primary school education level, as shown in Table 3, while those having a secondary school and college educational follow with percentages of around 20.2% and 14.9%, respectively. It is noteworthy to mention that 12.2% do not have any kind of education. Smaller percentages of 5.7% are university graduates, 4.5% have post-college educational level, and 1.3% are graduates from technological educational institutes. The distribution of educational level between men and women is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Education level of participants

Concerning the previous profession of the participants, it is clear from Table 3 that housekeeping and state employees were their main professions, with percentages of 22.9% and 22.5%, respectively, with housekeeping being the main previous profession of women, as shown in Fig. 4. A percentage of 16.5% of the participants were private employees, 14.4% were freelancers, and 11.1% were farmers. Lower percentages of 5.4% and 5.8% were skilled and unskilled workers, respectively, while a percentage of 1.4% declares us unemployed. The distribution of participants’ previous profession between men and women is shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Previous profession of participants

Most of the participants, i.e., 75.2% are self-financed, as shown in Table 3, while a percentage of 42.6% of them have a yearly income between 6001 € and 12,000 €. Lower percentages of 21.9% and 24.0% have yearly income between 0 € and 6000 € and between 12,001 € and 24,000 €, respectively. A small percentage of 7.4% declares that they have no income at all, while a smaller percentage of 4.2% has a yearly income which exceeds 24,000 €.

Elderly Health, Quality of Life, and Main Health Problems

The main health problems, according to the current survey, are briefly listed in Table 4, sorted by research area. The most common health problems are hypertension with 274 cases and cardiovascular problems with 202 cases, followed by musculoskeletal/mobility disabilities with 187 cases, diabetes with 183 cases, vision problems with 151 cases, periodontitis with 147 cases, hearing problems with 138 cases, psychiatric problems with 106 cases, dementia with 99 cases, neurological problems with 77, and finally, trauma injuries with 66 cases.

Table 4 Health problems sorted by research area

Moreover, the diagram of Fig. 5 illustrates the results of descriptive statistics about the perceived general health of the participants and particularly (i) the existence of natural energy, (ii) whether their overall health restricts them to remain home, and (iii) if they consider themselves quite healthy to have some kind of activity. As it can be seen, the majority of participants feels satisfied about their physical energy which disagrees with the view that their health restricts them to remain at home and believes that they are healthy enough to have some sort of activity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Perceived general health

Additionally, the diagram of Fig. 6 presents the results of descriptive statistics about the perceived quality of life of participants and particularly (i) if they generally enjoy their life, (ii) if they are usually happy, (iii) if economic crisis affects their life, and (iv) if they feel healthy enough in order to take part in different activities. It is clear that the majority of elderly participants answered that they generally enjoy their lives and they are usually feel happy. On the other hand, the majority believes that economic crisis affects negatively their life and that pain affects their prosperity (Table 5).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Quality of life

Table 5 Spearman correlation of demographic, social, economic, and health factors with several aspects of quality of life

Correlations

In order to measure the degree of relevance and interaction between two or more variables, the Spearman (r) coefficients have been used which refer to qualitative variables and categorical variables. The values of a correlation coefficient range from − 1 to + 1. Negative values mean that there is a negative linear correlation, while positive values mean that there is a positive linear correlation between two variables. These correlations are statistically significant if p value < .05.

Regarding the correlation between demographic characteristics and aspects of the quality of life of older people, it was found that (a) elderly under 70s perceive better all aspects of quality of life, if compared with people between 70 and 80 years, who in turn generally live better than those aged over 80. (b) However, there is no statistically acceptable link between the marital status and all the quality of life aspects.

Regarding the correlation between social characteristics and quality of life aspects of the elderly, it was found that (a) elderly living in urban areas today perceive better all aspects of quality of life compared with those living in semi-urban areas, which in turn have better quality of life than those living in rural areas. (b) It is confirmed that elderly living in urban areas in the past perceive better all aspects of quality of life compared with those living in semi-urban areas, which in turn have better quality of life than those living in rural areas. (c) It is confirmed that holders of higher education qualifications have generally a better quality of live compared with those with lower education qualifications.

Concerning the correlation between economic characteristics and quality of life aspects of the elderly, it was found that (a) elderly with self-financing ability have generally a better quality of live compared with those without financial self-reliance. (b) It was confirmed that elderly with highest annual income perceive better all aspects of quality of life compared with those with lower annual income. (c) Those who feel that they are not affected by the economic crisis have a better quality of life and feel that they are enjoying life. However, the perception of the current economic crisis is not statistically correlated with the sense of happiness for most of the time.

Regarding the existence of correlations between health characteristics and quality of life aspects of the elderly, it was found that (a) it was confirmed that elderly feeling healthy enough in order to be active perceive generally a better quality of life compared with those who do not feel health enough. (b) Elderly who have a good physical energy have generally a better quality of life than those who do not have a good physical condition. (c) Elderly suffering from pain have generally a worse quality of live, compared with those without pain. (d) Elderly having health problems confining them to home perceive generally a worse quality of life compared with those who are not confined to home for health reasons.

There is almost complete coincidence of our research findings and their statistical analysis with the theoretical approaches of the related literature, with the exception of the case of the marital status of the elderly and the assumption that married, widowed, divorced, and, finally, unmarried persons have better quality of life by this order. We could not find a statistically acceptable relationship, probably due to the type and size of the sample. It also appears that the sense of happiness of the elderly in most of the time is not exclusively related to the effects of the economic crisis, possibly due to the type and size of the sample.

GIS Presentation

The results of the current survey, concerning the location of certain health problems and aspects of perceived general health and perceived quality of life of participants, are located automatically in geographic maps as geographic information systems (GIS), in order to be shared and analyzed easily. These systems could provide quick information to other researchers, state employees, and responsible politicians, taking critical decisions for the health of elderly. Some examples are given in the following Figs. 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Map of diabetes, showing the higher number of cases in urban areas and northern Greece

Fig. 8
figure 8

Map of physical activity showing that people living in urban areas with better healthcare believe that they have better physical condition than those living in rural areas where people has been involved in manual work for a long time

Fig. 9
figure 9

Map of quality of life showing that people living in urban areas believe that they have a higher level of quality of life

Fig. 10
figure 10

Map of vision problems showing that people living in rural areas have lower vision problems due to a better field of view

Conclusions and Recommendations

A sample of 897 questionnaires, collected from a number of open elderly care centers in Greece, was the basis of the current survey. There is almost complete coincidence of our research findings and their statistical analysis with the theoretical approaches of the related literature, with the exception of the relation of marital status with the perception of the quality of life.

The research findings and their statistical analysis show a complete agreement with the existing theoretical bibliographic approaches, with the exception of the theoretically reported correlation between the best quality of life and married life, probably due to the type and size of the sample. Furthermore, it was found that the elderly’s sense of happiness is often not solely related to the effects of the financial crisis, possibly due to the type and size of the sample.

The results, concerning the location of certain health problems and aspects of perceived general health and perceived quality of life of participants, were located automatically in geographic maps as geographic information systems (GIS), in order to be shared and analyzed easily. Creating a means to illustrate socio-economic indicators that affect the health of the elderly, according to their geographical position, will provide health service providers a key instrument to make informed decisions in managing and resolving the problems faced by the elderly, either in providing socio-economic or medical help.

The limitations of the research were more bureaucratic in terms of issuing each license. Another limitation has been the difficulty of completing the electronic questionnaire over the printed questionnaire, since it is addressed to older people who are not so familiar with new technologies and computers. Another problem was the relative difficulty in understanding some of the questions in the questionnaire by some older people, mainly because of their age.

The quality and accuracy of the survey largely depends on the honesty of the respondents. Furthermore, funding is needed to enable the research sample to be expanded and a sufficient number of researchers involved. The lack of funding for such researches makes their implementation difficult, while the training of responsible staff to acquire the appropriate information and mentality is limited.

In addition, it is necessary to enable public officials to have access to the data of such surveys, in order to make them useful in finding immediate solutions whenever needed. Additionally, the absence of a general information network for the existing problems of the elderly due to their geographical distribution makes such researches less adapted to the regional characteristics of the elderly lifestyle.

It is proposed for the overall treatment of the elderly patient that there should be subsystems capable of communicating and exchanging information, under the supervision of a centralized management. By this way, the elderly patient will be able to have the appropriate services in time and at the required place. The required data for decision-making and strategy-setting must be uniform, so it is necessary to specify standards and define a specific methodology for capturing and storing data through GIS.

Given the usefulness of research in the field of health, and in particular in capturing the health problems of the elderly, it is also recommended to extend the research to other countries, notably the European Union, for the purpose of broader data collection and evaluation and comparative reporting of data and surveys of the EU member states.

Moreover, the use of GIS systems should be extended to include more geographically distributed data on endemic diseases and pandemics, such as the recent Covid-19 pandemic, facilitating rapid conclusions about their transmission and the required traceability.