Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spinner Model: Prediction of Propensity to Innovate Based on Knowledge-Intensive Business Services

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes a model for the prediction of propensity to innovate based on KIBS in the service sector of an emerging country (Brazil). The Spinner model presents, in a dynamic form, three dimensions: knowledge creation, knowledge transfer, and innovation, similar to the three axes of interaction of a fidget spinner, KIBS being the center. KIBS were divided in p-KIBS (professional KIBS) and t-KIBS (technological KIBS), according to the analysis carried out in 71 small, medium, and large firms. The Spinner model test was done based on three econometric models of logistic regression (logit), which examined the defined dimensions and variables. The model allowed us to evaluate prediction of propensity to innovate based on KIBS, considering the relationship between knowledge creation and transfer, where dimensions presented a positive sign, as expected. The findings contribute to theory development on knowledge intensive solutions, by revealing elements such as the relationship of knowledge creation and transfer with innovation in KIBS, and their relationships in the assessment prediction of propensity to innovate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For additional information on the error term check Gujarati and Porter (2011).

References

  • Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1993). Analysing innovation output indicators: The US experience. In A. Kleinknecht & D. Bain (Eds.), New concepts in innovation output measurement (pp. 10–41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, S., Erramilli, M. K., & Dev, C. S. (2003). Market orientation and performance in service firms: Role of innovation. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(1), 68–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amara, N., Landry, R., & Traoré, N. (2008). Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge intensive business services. Research Policy, 37(9), 1530–1547.

  • Antonietti, R., Bronzini, R., & Cainelli, G. (2017). Inward Foreign Direct Investment and the Birth-Death Rate of Italian manufacturing firms. Scienze Regionali, 16(2), 261–282.

  • Asikainen, A-L. (2013). Innovation modes and strategies in knowledge intensive business services. Service Business, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0219-5.

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. Internactional Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, M. A. (2008). Managing intellectual property in the financial services industry sector: Learning from Swiss Re. Technovation, 28(4), 196–207.

  • Barras, R. (1986). Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy, 15(4), 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barras, R. (1990). Interactive innovation in financial and business services: The vanguard of the service revolution. Research Policy, 19(3), 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, E., Davis, I., & Mendonça, L. (2009). The 10 trends you have to watch. Harvard Business Review, 87(7/8), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Marklund, G., & Miles, I. (1998) Services in innovation: Knowledge intensive business services (KIBS) as co-producers of innovation. SI4S Project, Synthesis Paper S3, STEP group, Oslo.

  • Blind, K., & Jungmittag, A. (2004). Foreign direct investment, imports and innovations in the service industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 25(2), 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolfarine, H., & Sandoval, M. C. (2000). Introdução à Inferência Estatística. São Paulo: SBM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brax, S. (2005). A manufacturer becoming service provider – Challenges and a paradox. Managing Service Quality, 15(2), 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli, G., Iacobucci, D., & Morganti, E. (2006). Spatial agglomeration and business groups: New evidence from Italian industrial districts. Regional Studies, 40(5), 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassiolato, J. E., & Lastres, H. (1999). Globalização e inovação localizada: experiências de sistemas locais no Mercosul. Brasília: IBICT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Economy, society and culture (the power of identity, vol. II). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Service Culture and its Impact on Service Innovation: Based on the Model of Service Value Chain. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS 2009), Wuhan University, China. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5304776/?reload=true.

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A research manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli, D., & Elche-Hortelano, D. (2010). Variety in the knowledge base of Knowledge Intensive Business Services. Research Policy, 39(10), 1303–1310.

  • Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R., & Miles, I. (2000). Innovation, measurement and services: The new problematique. In J. S. Metcalfe & Miles (Eds.), Innovation systems in the service economy: Mesauremente and case study analysis (pp. 85–103). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrocher, N., Cusmano, L., & Morrison, A. (2009). Modes of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services evidence from Lombardy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 173–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, J. (2006). European Urbanization, 1500–1800 (Vol.4). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De-xue, H., & Jie-chang, X. (2009). Services economics. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hertog, P. (2002). Co-producers of innovation: The role of knowledge-intensive business services in innovation. In J. Gadrey & F. Gallouj (Eds.), Productivity, innovation and knowledge in services: New economic and socio-economic approaches (pp. 223–255). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hertog, P., Van der Aa, W., & De Jong, M. W. (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 490–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devore, J. L., Farnum, N. R., & Doi, J. (2014). Applied statistics for engineers and scientists (3rd ed.). Stamford: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2001). Patterns of innovation organisation in service firms: Postal survey results and theoretical models. Science and Public Policy, 28(1), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2008a). Mapping regional and sectoral characteristics of knowledge-intensive business services: Evidence from the province of Quebec (Canada). Growth and Change, 39(3), 464–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., Zenker, A., & Muller, E. (2008b). Services à forte intensité de connaissances, contexte régional et comportements d'innovation: une comparaison internationale (No. R1/2008). Arbeitspapiere Unternehmen und Region.

  • Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2010). Exploring and comparing innovation patterns across different knowledge intensive business services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(7), 605–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D., & Laperrière, A. (2013). Internationalisation and innovation in the knowledge-intensive business services. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., Kristensson, P., & Witell, L. (2010). Service innovation and customer co-development. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science (pp. 561–577). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, C., Ferreira, J. J., & Marques, C. S. (2013). Innovation management capabilities in rural and urban knowledge intensive business services: empirical evidence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Freeman, C. (1988). Introduction. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadrey, J., Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1995). New modes of innovation: How services benefit industry. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(3), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, J., Rubalcaba, L., & Hipp, C. (2013). Organizational innovation in small European firms: A multidimensional approach. International Small Business Journal, 31(5), 563–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallouj, F. (2000). Beyond technological innovation: Trajectories and varieties of services innovation. In M. Boden & I. Miles (Eds.). Services and knowledge based economy. New York: Continuum, 2000 (chap. 7, 129-145).

  • Gallouj, F., & Djellal, F. (2010). Introduction: filling the innovation gap in the service economy–a multidisciplinary perspective. The handbook of innovation and services. A multi-disciplinary perspective, chapter Introduction, 1-23.

  • Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 537–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garthwaite, P., Jolliffe, I., & Jones, B. (2002). Statistical inference (2a ed)C. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, A. C. (2002). Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goes, J. B., & Park, S. H. (1997). Interorganizational link and innovation: The case of hospital services. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 673–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay, A., Seaton, J., & Suppakitjarak, J. (2005). The determinants of export behaviour in UK service firms. The Service Industries Journal, 25(7), 879–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(4), 429–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1979). Sibling models and data in economics: Beginnings of a survey. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5, part 2), S37–S64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 353–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães, J. D. A., & Meirelles, D. S. (2014). Caracterização e localização das empresas de serviços tecnológicos intensivos em conhecimento no Brasil. Gestão & Produção, 21(3), 503–519.

  • Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometria Básica-5. Porto Alegre: AMGH Editora.

  • Hipp, C. (1999). The role of knowledge-intensive business services in the new mode of knowledge production. AI & SOCIETY, 13(1), 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, T. S. (2017). Interactive relationships, knowledge flow and development effects among KIBS firms and their clients in Taiwan: A comparative study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, J., Chiu, H., Wei, C., Yen, H. R., & Cheng, Y. (2013). A practical perspective on the classification of service innovations. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(5), 371–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • IfM, & IBM. (2008). Succeeding through service innovation: A service perspective for education, research, business and government. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing ISBN: 978-1-902546-65-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F., & Ulaga, W. (2008). The transition from product to service in business markets: An agenda for academic inquiry. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, W., Koster, H. R., & van Oort, F. (2013). Co-agglomeration of knowledge-intensive business services and multinational enterprises. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 443–475.

  • June, S., & Kheng, Y. K. (2014). Innovative work behavior (IWB) in the knowledge intensive business services (KIBS) sector in Malaysia: The effect of leader-member exchange (LMX) and social capital (SC).

  • Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation as the core competency of a service organisation: The role of technology, knowledge and networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(1), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., Murray, F., & Willmott, H. (1993). Networking as knowledge work: a study of strategic interorganizational development in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 975–995.

  • Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., & Johansson, N. (2008). Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(4), 474–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, L. C. (2009). As KIBS e a inovação tecnológica das firmas de serviços. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, 18(2), 349–369.

  • Leiponen, A. (2001). Why do firms not collaborate? Competencies, R&D collaboration, and innovation under different technological regimes. In A. Kleinknecht & P. Mohnen (Eds.), Innovation and firm performance: Econometric explorations of survey data. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen, A. (2006). Managing knowledge for innovation: The case of business-to-business services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 238–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, A., & Moenaert, R. K. (2000). New service teams as information-processing systems: Reducing innovative uncertainty. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 46–65.

  • Lightfoot, H. W., & Gebauer, H. (2011). Exploring the alignment between service strategy and service innovation. Journal of Service Management, 22(5), 664–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lojkine, J. (1995). A revolução informacional. São Paulo: Cortez.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. H., & Mansury, M. A. (2007). External linkages, R&D and innovation performance in US business services. Industry and Innovation, 14(5), 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). Explaining inter-firm cooperation and innovation: Limits of the transaction cost approach. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å., & Foray, D. (1996). The knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. In Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (1998). The globalising learning economy: Implications for innovation policy, targeted socio-economic research. TSER Programme. Mimeo. Luxembourg: European Commission.

  • Mansury, M. A., & Love, J. H. (2008). Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: A firm-level analysis. Technovation, 28(1), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Tur, A., & Soriano, D. R. (2013). The level of innovation among young innovative companies: the impacts of knowledge-intensive services use, firm characteristics and the entrepreneur attributes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Matthing, J., Sandén, B., & Edvardsson, B. (2004). New service development: Learning from and with customers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(5), 479–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthyssens, P., Vandenbempt, K., & Berghman, L. (2006). Value innovation in business markets: Breaking the industry recipe. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 751–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercedez, R. (2014). Innovation, knowledge spillovers and high-tech services in European regions. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 25(1), 31–39.

  • Menor, L. J., Tatikond, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (1999) Services in national innovation systems: From traditional services to knowledge intensive business services. In G. Schienstock, & O. Kuusi (Eds). Transformation towards a Learning Economy. Helsinki, Sitra report N. 213. (pp. 57-98).

  • Miles, I. (2005). Knowledge intensive business services: Prospects and policies. Foresight, 7(6), 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (2007). Knowledge intensive services and innovation. In J. Bryson & P. W. Daniels (Eds.), The handbook of service industries (pp. 277–294). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (2008). Knowledge services. In G. Hearn & D. Rooney (Eds.), Knowledge policy: Challenges for the 21st century (pp. 11–27). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I. (2011). From knowledge-intensive services to knowledge-intensive service systems. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 16(2), 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Flanagan, K., Huntink, W., & Bouman, M. (1995). Knowledge-intensive business services: Users, carriers and sources of innovation. European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS) Reports. Retrieved from www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/datastream?publicationPid=uk-ac-man-scw:75252&datastreamId=FULL-TEXT.PDF.

  • Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H. F., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337–1351.

  • Miozzo, M., & Grimshaw, D. (2005). Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK. Research Policy, 34(9), 1419–1439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukkala, K., & Tohmo, T. (2013). Inter-industry job mobility in the knowledge economy in Finland. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 918–938.

  • Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi-Tavani, Z., Giroud, A., & Andersson, U. (2014). The interplay of networking activities and internal knowledge actions for subsidiary influence within MNCs. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 122–131.

  • Neder, H. D. (2008). Amostragem em Pesquisas Socioeconômicas. Campinas: Grupo Átomo & Alínea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neu, W. A., & Brown, S. W. (2008). Manufacturers forming successful complex business services: Designing an organization to fit the market. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(2), 232–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997). National Innovation Systems. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). Innovation and knowledge-intensive services activities. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review, 19(1–2), 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan, B. M., Dahiyat, S. E., Bontis, N., & Al-Dalahmeh, M. A. (2017). Intellectual capital, knowledge management and social capital within the ICT sector in Jordan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 437–462.

  • Rodriguez, M., Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2016). Innovation strategies, innovator types and openness: a study of KIBS firms in Spain. Service Business, 10(3), 629–649.

  • Rodriguez, M., Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2017). Variety in external knowledge sourcing and innovation novelty: Evidence from the KIBS sector in Spain. Technovation, 68, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S., Durst, C., & Bodenforf, F. (2012). Service innovation – A Rodmap for practitioners. Service Science and Management Research, 1(1), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmie, J., & Strambach, S. (2006). The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: An evolutionary and institutional perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(5), 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedlund, A., & Toivonen, M. (2007). The role of KIBS in the IC development of regional clusters. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soete L., & Miozzo M. (1990). Trade and development in services: A technological perspective. UNU-MERIT, The Netherlands.

  • Sundbo, J. (1998). The theory of innovation: Entrepreneurs, technology and strategy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J. (2000). Organization and innovation strategy in services. In M. Boden & I. Miles (Eds.). Services and the knowledge based economy. New York: Continuum, 2000 (chap. 6, pp. 109-128).

  • Sundbo, J., & Gallouj, F. (1998). Innovation in services – SI4S project, Synthesis Paper N. 2. STEP Group, Oslo.

  • Sundbo, J., & Gallouj, F. (2000). Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 1(1), 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen, M., Smedlund, A., & Tuominen, T. (2006). Development of knowledge intensive business service innovations and innovation networks. Management: Journal for Management Theory and Practice, 40, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergara, S. C. (2000). Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em Administração. 3a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig Aslesen And, H., & Isaksen, A. (2007). Knowledge intensive business services and urban industrial development. The Service Industries Journal, 27(3), 321–338.

  • Windrum, P., & Tomlinson, M. (1999). Knowledge-intensive services and international competitiveness: A four-country comparison. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(3), 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2006). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (4th ed.). Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam, R. C., Lo, W., Tang, E. P., & Lau, K. W. (2010). Technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 42, 1009–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanqiu, L., Jingmin, Z., & Huijun, W. (2010). Influence mechanism of service innovation based on the knowledge value chain model. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE) (pp. 3033-3036).

  • Zaefarian, G., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2013). Assessing the strategic fit between business strategies and business relationships in knowledge-intensive business services. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), 260–272.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management Department, NECE (Research Center in Business Sciences), Beira Interior University, Covilhã, Portugal

    Ronnié Figueiredo & João José de Matos Ferreira

Authors
  1. Ronnié Figueiredo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. João José de Matos Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronnié Figueiredo.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Research highlights

• This study proposes a model for the prediction of propensity to innovate based on KIBS in the service sector of an emerging country (Brazil).

• The Spinner model presents, in a dynamic form, three dimensions: knowledge creation, knowledge transfer and innovation, similar to the three axes of interaction of a fidget spinner, KIBS being the center.

• The model allowed us to evaluate prediction of propensity to innovate based on KIBS, considering the relationship between knowledge creation and transfer, where dimensions presented a positive sign, as expected.

• The findings contribute to theory development on knowledge intensive solutions, by revealing elements such as the relationship of knowledge creation and transfer with innovation in KIBS, and their relationships in the assessment prediction of propensity to innovate.

• The Spinner Model approach is based on the perspective of KIBS as a driver of relationships with firms (service production sector), aiming at the creation of new knowledge, transfer of knowledge, innovation and economic development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Figueiredo, R., de Matos Ferreira, J.J. Spinner Model: Prediction of Propensity to Innovate Based on Knowledge-Intensive Business Services. J Knowl Econ 11, 1316–1335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00607-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00607-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation