Abstract
Defining knowledge-based network is not easy because of the polysemous meanings of this concept (Antonelli 1995; Kogut 2000). Indeed, we think that this kind of network requires more rupture, instability, and disequilibrium, that is dilemmas (Cohendet et al. 1999; Nonaka 1990). This dual need also corresponds to the two hemispheres of the brain. The left hemisphere is related to rationality, consciousness, and logical reasoning, while the right hemisphere is more concerned with creativity and imagination. In this article, we formalize the knowledge-based network using organizational mutations governed by non-deterministic dynamics and viable constraints. In our model, network is viewed as a locus where knowledge is continuously built, managed, combined, tested, and selected between all of the participants of the network. This continuous process of creation and shaping of knowledge is driven by problem-solving activities. Action and knowledge deeply interact within the network. The knowledge-based network must constantly create, maintain, and resolve dilemmas. In that, the network undergoes evolutions that it must manage by preserving a viable behavior as solution between many dilemmas. We want to express here the idea that, in this logic of viability, the network does not seek an optimal structure but tries rather to preserve coherence between differences. Our assumption is that a network evolution is viable if it checks a constraint (called viability constraint) related to the dilemmas.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrei, G. A., Kackmeister, S., Koenig, R. (2000). Creating creativity - 101 definitions (What Webster never told you), Alden B. Dow Creativity Center, New York
Antonelli, C. (1995). Localized technological change new information and the knowledge-based economy. The Italian case. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 593–607.
Asheim, B. T., Coenen, L., Vang, J. (2007). Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C, 25, 655–70.
Aubin, J.-P. (1991). Viability theory. Boston: Birkhäuser.
Aubin, J.-P. (1997). Dynamic economic theory, a viability approach, studies in economic theory 5. Berlin: Springer.
Aubin, J.-P. (1999). Mutational and morphological analysis. Boston: Birkhäuser.
Aubin, J.-P., & Foray, D. (1998). The emergence of network organizations in processes of technological choice: a viability approach. In P. Cohendet (Ed.), The Economics of Network. Springer.
Aubin, J.-P., & Frankowska, H. (1990). Set-valued analysis. Boston: Birkhäuser.
Aubin J.-P., Chen, L., Dordan, O. (2014), Tychastic measure of viability risk. A viabilist portfolio performance and insurance approach. Berlin: Springer.
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Cluster and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31–56.
Boari, C., & Lipparini, A. (1999). Networks within industrial districts: organising knowledge creation and transfer by means of moderate hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 3, 339–360.
Bourcier, D., & van Ancel, P. (2011). La sérendipité. Hermann Eds: Le hasard heureux.
Brenot, P. (1997). Le Génie et la folie. Paris: Plon éditeur.
Cohendet, P., Kern, F., Mehmanpazir, B., & Munier, F. (1999). Knowledge coordination, competence creation and integrated networks in globalized firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2), 225–241.
Cribb, J., & Hartomo, T. S. (2010). Open science sharing knowledge in the global century. Clayton North, Victoria: CSIRO Publishing.
Dogan, M., & Pahre, R. (1991). L’innovation dans les sciences sociales: La marginalité créatrice. Paris: Presses universitaires de France
Gallate, J., Wong, C., Ellwood, S., Roring, R. W., Snyder, A. (2012). Creative people use nonconscious processes to their advantage. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2-3), 146–151.
Gigerenzer, G., & Richter, H. R. (1990). Context effects and their interaction with development: Area judgments. Cognitive Development, 5, 235–264.
Glückler, J. (2007). Economic geography and the evolution of networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 619–634.
Haddad, G. (2011). Les défis de la créativité, Inaugurazione dell’Anno Accademico 2010-2011. Università degli Studi di Bergamo: UNESCO.
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30, 146–165.
Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: the natural history of innovation, Riverhead Books; Edition Mcpherson
Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. USA: Oxford University Press.
Kern, F., & Munier F. (2009). Knowledge creation in networks: a comparison between firm-network and network of firms. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2/2009(n° 4), 79-94
Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: a literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 71–89.
Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 405–425.
Levi Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon Editeur.
Menger, P.-M. (2009). Le travail créateur. Gallimard Seuil: Hautes Etudes.
Monod, J. (1970). Le hasard et la nécessité. Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne. Paris: éditions du Seuil.
Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1129–1151.
Munier, F. (2013). Creativity and uncertainty in the act of work: the contribution of the viability theory. In The Economics of Creativity, Ideas, Firms and Markets, Edited by Thierry Burger-Helmchen, Routledge, Series: Routledge Studies in Global Competition
Nonaka, I. (1990). Redundant, overlapping organization: a Japanese approach to managing the innovation process. California Management Review, 27–38.
Peirce, C. (1893). Evolutionary love. The Monist, 3, 176–200.
Piaget, J. (1987). Six études de psychologie. Paris Rychen: Folio Essai.
Rychen, F., & Zimmermann, J. (2008). Clusters in the global knowledge-based economy: knowledgegatekeepers and temporary proximity. Regional Studies, 42(6), 767–776.
Smith-Lovin, J. M., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
Snow, C., Miles, R., Coleman, J. H. J. (1992). Managing 21st century network organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 20(3), 5–20.
Sorenson, O. (2003). Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 513–527.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms, In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Wallerstein, I. (1998). Uncertainty and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 320–322.
