Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stock assessment for Atlantic yellowfin tuna based on extended surplus production model considering life history

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modern fishery stock assessment could be conducted by various models, such as Stock Synthesis model with high data requirement and complicated model structure, and the basic surplus production model, which fails to incorporate individual growth, maturity, and fishery selectivity, etc. In this study, the Just Another Bayesian Biomass Assessment (JABBA) Select which is relatively balanced between complex and simple models, was used to conduct stock assessment for yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Atlantic Ocean. Its population dynamics was evaluated, considering the influence of selectivity patterns and different catch per unit effort (CPUE) indices on the stock assessment results. The model with three joint longline standardized CPUE indices and logistic selectivity pattern performed well, without significant retrospective pattern. The results indicated that the stock is not overfished and not subject to overfishing in 2018. Sensitivity analyses indicated that stock assessment results are robust to natural mortality but sensitive to steepness of the stock-recruitment relationship and fishing selectivity. High steepness was revealed to be more appropriate for this stock, while the fishing selectivity has greater influence to the assessment results than life history parameters. Overall, JABBA-Select is suitable for the stock assessment of Atlantic yellowfin tuna with different selectivity patterns, and the assumptions of natural mortality and selectivity pattern should be improved to reduce uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Butterworth D S, Punt A E. 1990. Some preliminary examinations of the potential information content of age-structure data from Antarctic minke whale research catches. Reports-International Whaling Commission, 40: 301–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth D S, Rademeyer R A, Brandão A, et al. 2014. Does selectivity matter? A fisheries management perspective. Fisheries Research, 158: 194–204, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers T R, Punt A E, Walters C J, et al. 2014. Evaluating methods for setting catch limits in data-limited fisheries. Fisheries Research, 153: 48–68, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Yi-Jay, Brodziak J, O’Malley J, et al. 2015. Model selection and multi-model inference for Bayesian surplus production models: a case study for Pacific blue and striped marlin. Fisheries Research, 166: 129–139, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello C, Ovando D, Hilborn R, et al. 2012. Status and solutions for the world’s unassessed fisheries. Science, 338(6106): 517–520, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaha N C, Zudaire I, Chassot E, et al. 2015. Present and future of reproductive biology studies of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the eastern Atlantic Ocean. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 71(1): 489–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss-Grant A P, Zipkin E F, Thorson J T, et al. 2016. Hierarchical analysis of taxonomic variation in intraspecific competition across fish species. Ecology, 97(7): 1724–1734, doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0733.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froese R, Demirel N, Coro G, et al. 2017. Estimating fisheries reference points from catch and resilience. Fish and Fisheries, 18(3): 506–526, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galland G, Rogers A, Nickson A. 2016. Netting Billions: A Global Valuation of Tuna. Washington: The Pew Charitable Trust

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J. 1991. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guan Wenjiang, Gao Feng, Lei Lin, et al. 2012. Retrospective problem in fishery stock assessment. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 21(5): 841–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéry L. 2020. SCRS/2019/066. Accounting for fishing days without a fishing set in the CPUE standardization of yellowfin tuna in free schools for the EU purse seine fleet operating in the eastern Atlantic Ocean during the 1993–2018 PERIOD. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 76(6): 294–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberger P, Welch P D. 1983. Simulation run length control in the presence of an initial transient. Operations Research, 31(6): 1109–1144, doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.31.6.1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R. 2001. Calculation of biomass trend, exploitation rate, and surplus production from survey and catch data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58(3): 579–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle S D, Lauretta M, Lee M K, et al. 2019. Collaborative study of yellowfin tuna CPUE from multiple Atlantic Ocean longline fleets in 2019. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 76(6): 241–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado-Ferro F, Szuwalski C S, Valero J L, et al. 2015. Looking in the rear-view mirror: bias and retrospective patterns in integrated, age-structured stock assessment models. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72(1): 99–110, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICCAT. 2016. Report of the 2016 ICCAT Yellowfin Tuna Data Preparatory Meeting. San Sebastian: International Committee and Conservation of Atlantic Tunas

    Google Scholar 

  • ICCAT. 2019a. Report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS). Madrid: International Committee and Conservation of Atlantic Tunas

    Google Scholar 

  • ICCAT. 2019b. Report of the 2019 ICCAT Yellowfin Tuna Stock Assessment Meeting. Grand- Bassam: International Committee and Conservation of Atlantic Tunas

    Google Scholar 

  • ICCAT. 2019c. Report of the 2019 ICCAT Yellowfin Tuna Data Preparatory Meeting. Madrid: International Committee and Conservation of Atlantic Tunas

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolody D S, Eveson J P, Preece A L, et al. 2019. Recruitment in tuna RFMO stock assessment and management: a review of current approaches and challenges. Fisheries Research, 217: 217–234, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.11.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley A. 2019. Stock assessment of albacore tuna in the Indian Ocean using Stock Synthesis for 2019. IOTC-2019-WPTmT07 (AS)-11. https://iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019/07/IOTC-2019-WPTmT07AS-11.pdf[2019-07-09/2021-03-05]

  • Lee Q, Lee A, Liu Zunlei, et al. 2020. Life history changes and fisheries assessment performance: a case study for small yellow croaker. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 77(2): 645–654, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Hui-Hua, Maunder M N, Piner K R, et al. 2012. Can steepness of the stock-recruitment relationship be estimated in fishery stock assessment models?. Fisheries Research, 125–126: 254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewy P, Nielsen A. 2003. Modelling stochastic fish stock dynamics using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60(4): 743–752, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00080-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto T, Satoh K. 2017. Stock assessment for Atlantic yellowfin tuna using a non-equilibrium production model. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 73(2): 451–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunder M N. 2002. The relationship between fishing methods, fisheries management and the estimation of maximum sustainable yield. Fish and Fisheries, 3(4): 251–260, doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00089.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister M K, Pikitch E K, Babcock E A. 2001. Using demographic methods to construct Bayesian priors for the intrinsic rate of increase in the Schaefer model and implications for stock rebuilding. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58(9): 1871–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merino G, Urtizberea A, Murua H, et al. 2019. Stock assessment for Atlantic yellowfin using a biomass production model. IOTC-2019-WPTT-49. https://iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019/10/IOTC-2019-WPTT21-49.pdf[2019-10-10/2021-05-10]

  • Millar R B, Meyer R. 2000. Non-linear state space modelling of fisheries biomass dynamics by using Metropolis-Hastings within-Gibbs sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 49(3): 327–342, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00195

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohn R. 1999. The retrospective problem in sequential population analysis: an investigation using cod fishery and simulated data. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56(4): 473–488, doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez M. 2020. SCRS/2019/123. Standardized catch rates for yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) from the Venezuelan pelagic longline fishery in the Caribbean Sea and adjacent waters of the western central Atlantic for the period of 1991–2018. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 76(6): 662–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Omori K L, Hoenig J M, Luehring M A, et al. 2016. Effects of underestimating catch and effort on surplus production models. Fisheries Research, 183: 138–145, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pella J J, Tomlinson P K. 1969. A generalized stock production model. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Bulletin, 13(3): 416–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Punt A E, Hilborn R. 1997. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 7(1): 35–63, doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018419207494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punt A E, Hurtado-Ferro F, Whitten A R. 2014a. Model selection for selectivity in fisheries stock assessments. Fisheries Research, 158: 124–134, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punt A E, Smith A D M, Smith D C, et al. 2014b. Selecting relative abundance proxies for BMSY and BMEY. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71(3): 469–483, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punt A E, Su Nan-Jay, Sun Chilu. 2015. Assessing billfish stocks: a review of current methods and some future directions. Fisheries Research, 166: 103–118, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/[2017-06-30/2021-04-28]

  • Rankin P S, Lemos R T. 2015. An alternative surplus production model. Ecological Modelling, 313: 109–126, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo V R, Legault C M. 1998. A stochastic implementation of an age-structured production model. Fishery Stock Assessment Models, AK-SG-98-01: 435–450

  • Sant’Ana R, Mourato B, Kimoto A, et al. 2020. Atlantic yellowfin tuna stock assessment: an implementation of Bayesian state-space surplus production model using JABBA. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 76(6): 699–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Satoh K, Yokoi H, Nishida T, et al. 2017. SCRS/2016/111. Stock assessment for Atlantic yellowfin tuna using age structured production model. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 73(2): 577–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart I J, Martell S J D. 2014. A historical review of selectivity approaches and retrospective patterns in the Pacific halibut stock assessment. Fisheries Research, 158: 40–49, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szuwalski C S, Ianelli J N, Punt A E. 2018. Reducing retrospective patterns in stock assessment and impacts on management performance. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75(2): 596–609, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J T, Cope J M, Branch T A, et al. 2012. Spawning biomass reference points for exploited marine fishes, incorporating taxonomic and body size information. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 69(9): 1556–1568, doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/f2012-077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J T, Rudd M B, Winker H. 2019. The case for estimating recruitment variation in data-moderate and data-poor age-structured models. Fisheries Research, 217: 87–97, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J T, Taylor I G. 2014. A comparison of parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric approaches to selectivity in age-structured assessment models. Fisheries research, 158: 74–83, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropical Tunas Species Group. 2012. SCRS/2011/205. Alternative virtual population analyses of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), 1970–2010. ICCAT, 68(3): 1044–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter J. 2019. SCRS/2019/121. Stock synthesis model for Atlantic yellowfin tuna. ICCAT, 76(6): 558–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter J, Sharma R. 2017. Atlantic Ocean yellowfin tuna stock assessment 1950–2014 using stock synthesis. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 73(2): 510–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Shengping, Maunder M N, Aires-da-Silva A. 2014. Selectivity’s distortion of the production function and its influence on management advice from surplus production models. Fisheries Research, 158: 181–193, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winker H, Carvalho F, Kapur M. 2018. JABBA: just another Bayesian biomass assessment. Fisheries Research, 204: 275–288, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winker H, Carvalho F, Thorson J T, et al. 2020. JABBA-Select: incorporating life history and fisheries’ selectivity into surplus production models. Fisheries Research, 222: 105355, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winker H, Kerwath S E, Attwood C G. 2013. Comparison of two approaches to standardize catch-per-unit-effort for targeting behaviour in a multispecies hand-line fishery. Fisheries Research, 139: 118–131, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Luoliang, Li Bai, Chen Xinjun, et al. 2019. A comparative study of observation-error estimators and state-space production models in fisheries assessment and management. Fisheries Research, 219: 105322

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate ICCAT’s supporting for data sharing, and gratefully thank Kindong Richard and Dongyan Han for their efforts to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiuyun Ma.

Additional information

Foundation item: The Fund of National Key R&D Programs of China under contract No. 2019YFD0901404; the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under contract No. 2019M651475.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Z., Wang, F., Tian, S. et al. Stock assessment for Atlantic yellowfin tuna based on extended surplus production model considering life history. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 41, 41–51 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1924-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1924-x

Key words

Navigation