Abstract
Various population structures or spatial heterogeneities in population distribution have been an important source of model misspecification and have had an impact on estimation performance in fisheries stock assessment. In this study, we simulated the Indian Ocean albacore spatial heterogeneity in age-structure using Stock Synthesis according to the stage-dependent migration rate and region-dependent fishing mortality rate and generated the stock assessment data. Based on these data, we investigated the performances of different spatial configurations, selectivity curves and selections of CPUE (catch per unit effort) indices of the assessment models which were used to account for spatial heterogeneity. The results showed: (1) although the spatially explicit configurations, which exactly matched the operating model, provided unbiased and accurate estimates of relative spawning biomass, relative fishing mortality rate and maximum sustainable yield in all simulation scenarios, their performance may be very poor if there were mismatches between them and the operating model due to gaps in knowledge and data; (2) for spatially explicit assessment configuration, the correct boundary was required, but for non-spatially explicit assessment configuration, it seemed more important for analysts to partition the area to properly reflect the transition in field data and to effectively account for the impacts of ignoring the spatial structure by using the additional spatially referenced parameters; (3) although the areas-as-fleets methods and flexible time-varying selectivity curves could be used as better alternative approaches to account for spatial structure, these configurations could not completely eliminate the impacts of model misspecification and the quality of estimates of different quantities from the same assessment model may be inconsistent or the performance of the same assessment configuration may fluctuate significantly between simulation scenarios; (4) although the worst estimates could generally be avoided by using multiple CPUE indices, there were no best solutions to select or regenerate the CPUE indices to account for the impacts of the ignored spatial structure to obviously improve the quality of stock assessment. Compared with the results of assessment model configurations which are used to account for the spatial structure by different modelers, the performances of the configurations are always casespecific except for spatially explicit configurations which exactly match the operating model. In this sense, our study will not only provide some insights into the current Indian Ocean albacore stock assessment but also enrich existing knowledge regarding the performance of assessment configurations to account for spatial structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Academiai Kiado, 267–281
Berger A M, Jones M L, Zhao Yingming, et al. 2012. Accounting for spatial population structure at scales relevant to life history improves stock assessment: The case for Lake Erie walleye Sander vitreus. Fisheries Research, 115–116: 44–59, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.11.006
Butterworth D S. 2007. Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64(4): 613–617, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm003
Carvalho F, Punt A E, Chang Y J, et al. 2017. Can diagnostic tests help identify model misspecification in integrated stock assessments?. Fisheries Research, 192: 28–40, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.09.018
Chen I C, Lee P F, Tzeng W N. 2005. Distribution of albacore (Thunnus alalunga) in the Indian Ocean and its relation to environmental factors. Fisheries Oceanography, 14(1): 71–80, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2419.2004.00322.x
Cope J M, Punt A E. 2011. Reconciling stock assessment and management scales under conditions of spatially varying catch histories. Fisheries Research, 107(1-3): 22–38, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2010.10.002
Farley J H, Williams A J, Davies C R, et al. 2012. Population biology of albacore tuna in the Australian region. Hobar, Tasmania: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Fornteneau A. 2016. Indian Ocean albacore stock: review of its fishery, biological data and results of its 2014 stock assessment. Shanghai, China: Working Party on Temperate Tuna
Fournier D A, Hampton J, Sibert J R. 1998. MULTIFAN-CL: a lengthbased, age-structured model for fisheries stock assessment, with application to South Pacific albacore, Thunnus alalunga. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55(9): 2105–2116, doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/f98-100
Francis R I C C. 2011. Data weighting in statistical fisheries stock assessment models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 68(6): 1124–1138, doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/f2011-025
Goethel D R, Quinn T J, Cadrin S X. 2011. Incorporating spatial structure in stock assessment: Movement modeling in marine fish population dynamics. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 19(2): 119–136, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2011.557451
Guan Wenjiang, Cao Jie, Chen Yong, et al. 2013. Impacts of population and fishery spatial structures on fishery stock assessment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 70(8): 1178–1189, doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2012-0364
Guan Wenjiang, Tang Lin, Zhu Jiangfeng, et al. 2016a. Application of a Bayesian method to data-poor stock assessment by using Indian Ocean albacore (Thunnus alalunga) stock assessment as an example. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 35(2): 117–125, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0814-0
Guan Wenjiang, Zhu Jiangfeng, Xu Liuxiong, et al. 2016b. Using a Bayesian biomass dynamics model to assess Indian Ocean albacore (Thunnus alalunga). Shanghai, China: Working Party Temperature Tuna
Helu S L, Sampson D B, Yin Yanshui. 2000. Application of statistical model selection criteria to the Stock Synthesis assessment program. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57(9): 1784–1793, doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-137
Hoyle S D, Sharma R, Herrera M. 2014. Stock assessment of albacore tuna in the Indian Ocean for 2014 using Stock Synthesis. Busan, Korea: Working Party on Temperate Tuna
Hurtado-Ferro F, Punt A E, Hill K T. 2014. Use of multiple selectivity patterns as a proxy for spatial structure. Fisheries Research, 158: 102–115, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.10.001
Langley A, Hoyle S. 2016. Stock assessment of albacore tuna in the Indian Ocean using stock synthesis. Shanghai, China: Working Party on Temperate Tuna
Lee H H, Piner K R, Maunder M N, et al. 2017. Evaluation of alternative modelling approaches to account for spatial effects due to age-based movement. Canadian Journal of fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 74(11): 1832–1844, doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0294
Lehodey P, Senina I, Murtugudde R. 2008. A spatial ecosystem and populations dynamics model (SEAPODYM) -Modeling of tuna and tuna-like populations. Progress in Oceanography, 78(4): 304–318, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.06.004
Matsumoto T. 2016. Stock and risk assessments of albacore in the Indian Ocean based on ASPIC. Shanghai, China: Working Party on Temperature Tuna
McAllister M K, Ianelli J N. 1997. Bayesian stock assessment using catch-age data and the sampling-importance resampling algorithm. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54(2): 284–300
Methot R D Jr, Wetzel C R. 2013. Stock Synthesis: a biological and statistical framework for fish stock assessment and fishery management. Fisheries Research, 142: 86–99, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.10.012
Nikolic N, Fonteneau A, Hoarau L, et al. 2014. Short review on biology, structure, and migration of Thunnus alalunga in the Indian Ocean. Busan, Korea: Working Party on Temperature Tuna
Nishida T, Kitakado T, Matsumoto T, et al. 2014. Consideration of albacore parameters for stock assessments in the Indian Ocean. Busan, Korea: Working Party on Temperature Tuna
Nishida T, Sato K, Chang Y, et al. 2016. Stock assessment of albacore Thunnus alalunga in the Indian Ocean using Statistical-Catch- At-Age (SCAA). Shanghai, China: Working Party on Temperature Tuna
Ono K, Licandeo R R, Muradian M L, et al. 2015. The importance of length and age composition data in statistical age-structured models for marine species. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72(1): 31–43, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu007
Penney A J. 1994. Morphometric relationships, annual catches and catch-at-size for South African caught south Atlantic albacore (Thunnus alalunga). Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, 42(1): 371–382
Punt A E, Butterworth D S, de Moor C L, et al. 2016. Management strategy evaluation: best practices. Fish and Fisheries, 17(2): 303–334, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12104
Punt A E, Haddon M, Tuck G N. 2015. Which assessment configurations perform best in the face of spatial heterogeneity in fishing mortality, growth and recruitment? A case study based on pink ling in Australia. Fisheries Research, 168: 85–99, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.04.002
Punt A E, Hurtado-Ferro F, Whitten A R. 2014. Model selection for selectivity in fisheries stock assessments. Fisheries Research, 158: 124–134, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.06.003
Schwarz G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2): 461–464, doi: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
Senina I, Sibert J, Lehodey P. 2008. Parameter estimation for basinscale ecosystem-linked population models of large pelagic predators: application to skipjack tuna. Progress in Oceanography, 78(4): 319–335, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2008.06.003
Spiegelhalter D J, Best N G, Carlin B P, et al. 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology, 64(4): 583–639, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353
Stephenson R L, Melvin G D, Power M J. 2009. Population integrity and connectivity in Northwest Atlantic herring: a review of assumptions and evidence. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66(8): 1733–1739, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp189
Szuwalski C S, Punt A E. 2015. Can an aggregate assessment reflect the dynamics of a spatially structured stock? Snow crab in the eastern Bering Sea as a case study. Fisheries Research, 164: 135–142, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.10.020
Waterhouse L, Sampson D B, Maunder M, et al. 2014. Using areas-asfleets selectivity to model spatial fishing: asymptotic curves are unlikely under equilibrium conditions. Fisheries Research, 158: 15–25, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.01.009
Wells R J D, Kohin S, Teo S L H, et al. 2013. Age and growth of North Pacific albacore (Thunnus alalunga): implications for stock assessment. Fisheries Research, 147: 55–62, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.05.001
Ying Yiping, Chen Yong, Lin Longshan, et al. 2011. Risks of ignoring fish population spatial structure in fisheries management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 68(12): 2101–2120, doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/f2011-116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: The National Key Research and Development Program of China under contract No. 2016YFC1400903; the NSFC-Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization under contract No. U1609202.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guan, W., Wu, J. & Tian, S. Evaluation of the performance of alternative assessment configurations to account for the spatial heterogeneity in age-structure: a simulation study based on Indian Ocean albacore tuna. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 38, 9–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1485-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1485-4