Abstract
The stabilized and the trailing edge glacial relicts are candidate model organisms to be used to link taxonomy to phylogeography. We attempted to establish such a link by considering the taxonomy and phylogeography of the genus Anterastes, consisting of glacial relict taxa/populations. Species delimitation tests indicated 13–22 candidate species in the genus. Analyses suggested inversely related genetic and phenotypic divergence. By integrating these results, we reached the following conclusions. (i) The plausible taxonomical composition is recognizing 16 species in the genus; of these three are new, A. kizkayasiensis sp. n., A. muratdagensis sp. n., and A. boreoanatoliensis sp. n., and the last two are cryptic. (ii) Generic radiation corresponds to three stages as Pliocene, Pleistocene prior to mid-Pleistocene Transition (MPT), and post-MPT. The ultimate ancestor of two species, corresponds to the first and of other 14 to the second and proximate ancestor of all species to the third period. These ages suggest that the pre-MPT ancestors are stabilized edge while those of post-MPT are trailing edge populations. (iii) Since members of the genus demand cold habitats, the isolated relict ancestors on highlands evolved under similar selection pressures, and this led to a conserved phenotype, consequently to cryptic or morphologically poorly diverged species, as genetic data indicate each constitutes a reproductively isolated distinct phylogenetic unit. (iv) Although morphological diagnosability is poor, each species fulfills criteria of several species concepts and can be differentiated by clear allopatric range, providing one of five criteria assumed by Darwin for species delimitation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
References
Ackerly, D. (2009). Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences USA, 106(suppl.2), 19699–19706. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901635106
Andersson, L. (1990). The driving force: Species concepts and ecology. Taxon, 39, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1223084
Avise, J. C. (2009). Phylogeography: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02032.x
Avise, J. C., & Liu, J.-X. (2011). On the temporal inconsistencies of Linnean taxonomic ranks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102, 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01624.x
Baum, D. A., & Shaw, K. L. (1995). Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In P. C. Hoch & A. G. Stephenson (Eds.), Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics (pp. 289–303). Missouri Botanical Garden.
Beheregaray, L. B. (2008). Twenty years of phylogeography: The state of the field and the challenges for the Southern Hemisphere. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3754–3774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03857.x
Blomberg, S. P., Garland Jr, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioural traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x
Bouckaert, R., Vaughan, T. G., Barido-Sottani, J., Duchêne, S., Fourment, M., & Gavryushkina A., et al. (2019). BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology, 15(4), e1006650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650
Brunner von Wattenwyl, C. (1882). Prodromus der Europäischen Orthopteren. Engelmann.
Cadotte, M., Albert, C. H., & Walker, S. C. (2013). The ecology of differences: Assessing community assembly with trait and evolutionary distances. Ecology Letters, 16, 1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12161
Carstens, B. C., Pelletier, T. A., Reid, N. M., & Satler, J. (2013). How to fail at species delimitation? Molecular Ecology, 22, 4369–4383. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12413
Cigliano, M. M., Braun, H., Eades, D. C. & Otte D. (2020). Orthoptera species file online Version 5.0/5.0. Retrieved May 14, 2020 from http://Orthoptera.SpeciesFile.org
Chobanov, D.P., Kaya, S., & Çıplak, B. (2012). Anterastes davrazensis sp. n. (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae): morphology, song and 16S rDNA phylogeny. Zootaxa, 3401, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3401.1.4
Chobanov, D. P., Kaya, S., Grzywaczc, B., Warchałowska-Śliwa, E., & Çıplak, B. (2017). The Anatolio-Balkan phylogeographic fault: A snapshot from the genus Isophya (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Zoologica Scripta, 46(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12194
Çıplak, B. (2003). Distribution of Tettigoniinae (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) bush-crickets in Turkey: The importance of the Anatolian Taurus Mountains in biodiversity and implication for conversation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021206732679
Çıplak, B. (2004). Systematics, phylogeny and biogeography of Anterastes (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Tettigoniinae): Evolution within a refugium. Zoologica Scripta, 33, 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2004.00131.x
Çıplak, B. (2008). The analogy between glacial cycles and global warming for the glacial relicts in a refugium: A biogeographic perspective for conservation of Anatolian Orthoptera. In S. Fattorini /Ed.) Insect Ecology and Conservation (pp. 135–163). Research Signpost, Kerela.
Çıplak, B., Kaya, S., & Gündüz, I. (2010). Phylogeography of Anterastes serbicus species group (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae): Phylogroups correlate with mountain belts, but not with the morphospecies. Journal of Orthoptera Research, 19, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1665/034.019.0115
Çıplak, B., Kaya, S., Boztepe, Z., & Gündüz, I. (2015). Mountainous genus Anterastes (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae): Autochthonous survival in refugial habitats across several glacial ages via vertical range shifts. Zoologica Scripta, 44, 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12118
Darwin, C. (1964). On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
De Lattin, G. (1967). Grundriß der Zoogeographie. Fischer.
De Queiroz, K. (2007). Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology, 56, 879–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083
Ehl, S., Ehl, Sa., Kramp, K., & Schmitt, T. (2021). Interglacials are driving speciation and intraspecific differentiation in the cold-adapted butterfly species group Boloria pales/napaea (Nymphalidae). Journal of Biogeography, 48(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13988
Fišer, C., Robinson, C. T., & Malard, F. (2018). Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept. Molecular Ecology, 27, 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14486
Fritz, S. A., & Purvis, A. (2010). Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: A new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conservation Biology, 24(4), 1042–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01455.x
Fujisawa, T., & Barraclough, T. G. (2013). Delimiting species using single-locus data and the generalized mixed Yule coalescent approach: A revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Systematic Biology, 62, 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033
Hampe, A., & Petit, R. J. (2005). Conserving biodiversity under climate change: The rear edge matters. Ecology Letters, 8, 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x
Hampe, A., & Jump, A. S. (2011). Climate relicts: Past, present, future. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematic, 42, 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145015
Harmon, L. J., Weir, J., Brock, C., Glor, R. E., & Challenger, W. (2008). GEIGER: Investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics, 24, 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm538
Hewitt, G. M. (1996). Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58, 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01434.x
Hewitt, G. M. (2000). The genetic legacy of the ice ages. Nature, 405, 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1038/35016000
Hewitt, G. M. (2004). Genetic consequences of climatic changes in the Quaternary. Philosophical Transaction of Royal Society London B, 359, 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1388
Holdhaus, K. (1954). Die Spuren der Eiszeit in der Tierwelt Europas. Wagner, Innsbruck.
Holderegger, R., & Thiel-Egente, C. (2009). A discussion of different types of glacial refugia used in mountain biogeography and phylogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 476–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02027.x
Hortal, J., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Bini, L. M., Rodríguez, M. Á., Baselga, A., Nogués-Bravo, D., Rangel, T. F., Hawkins, B. A., & Lobo, J. M. (2011). Ice age climate, evolutionary constraints and diversity patterns of European dung beetles. Ecology Letters, 14(8), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01634.x
Karabağ, T. (1950). Some new Decticinae (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) from Turkey. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 19(B), 157–161.
Karabağ, T. (1951). Revision of the genus Anterastes Brunner (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4, 1043–1051.
Kaya, S. & Çıplak, B. (2011). Taxonomy of Anterastes and related genera: A new synonym and a new species of Anterastes. Zootaxa, 2771, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2771.1.4
Kaya, S., Chobanov, D. & Çıplak, B. (2012). Anterastes davrazensis sp. n. (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae): Morphology, song and 16S rDNA phylogeny. Zootaxa, 3401, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3401.1.4
Kaya, S., & Çıplak, B. (2016). Budding speciation via peripheral isolation: The Psorodonotus venosus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) species group example. Zoologica Scripta, 45(5), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12174
Kaya, S., & Çıplak, B. (2017). Phylogeography and taxonomy of the Psorodonotus caucasicus (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) group: Independent double invasion of the Balkans from the Caucasus. Systematic Entomology, 42(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12197
Korkmaz, E. M., Sarı, M., & Babaşıbüyük, H. H. (2010). Genetic structure of Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Gomphocerinae) populations in Anatolia: A stable rear edge population. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 103(4), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN09172
Korkmaz, E. M., Lunt, D. H., Çıplak, B., Değerli, N., & Babaşıbüyük, H. H. (2014). The contribution of Anatolia to European phylogeography: The centre of origin for the meadow grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Journal of Biogeography, 41, 1793–1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12332
Köhler, P., & van de Wal, R. S. W. (2020). Interglacials of the Quaternary defined by northern hemispheric land ice distribution outside of Greenland. Nature Communication, 11, 5124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18897-5
Kumar, S., Techer, G., & Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Ladle, R. J., & Whittaker, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Conservation biogeography. Wiley.
Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S. Y. W., & Guindon, S. (2012). PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
Leaché, A. D., & Fujita, M. K. (2010). Bayesian species delimitation in West African forest geckos (Hemidactylus fasciatus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3071– 3077. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0662
Losos, J. B. (2011). Convergence, adaptation, and constraint. Evolution, 65(7), 1827–1840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01289.x
Luo, A., Ling, C., Ho, S. Y. W., & Zhu, C. -D. (2018). Comparison of methods for molecular species delimitation across a range of speciation scenarios. Systematic Biology, 67(5), 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy011
Mallet, J. (1995). A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(95)90031-4
Mayden, R. L. (1997). A hierarchy of species concept: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In M.F. Claridge, H.A. Dawah, M.R. (Eds) Wilson, Species: The Units of Biodiversity (pp. 381–424). Chapman & Hall.
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press.
Mouquet, N., Devictor, V., Meynard, C. N., Munoz, F., Bersier, L. -F., Chave, J., Couteron, P., Dalecky, A., Fontaine, C., Gravel, D., Hardy, O. J., Jabot, F., Lavergne, S., Leibold, M., Mouillot, D., Münkemüller, T., Pavoine, S., Prinzing, A., Rodrigues, A. S. L., & Thuiller, W. (2012). Ecophylogenetics: Advances and perspectives. Biological Reviews, 87, 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00224.x
Naomi, S. -I. (2011). On the integrated frameworks of species concepts: Mayden’s hierarchy of species concepts and de Queiroz’s unified concept of species. Journal Zoological Systematic and Evolutionary Research, 49(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2011.00618.x
Orme, D., Freckleton, R., Thomas, G., Petzoldt, T., Fritz, S., & Isaac, N. (2013). The caper package: Comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R Package Version, 5(2), 1–36.
Pagel, M. D. (1999). Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature, 401, 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/44766
Provan, J., & Bennett, K. D. (2008). Phylogeographic insights into cryptic glacial refugia. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23(10), 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.010
Puillandre, N., Lambert, A., Brouillet, S., & Achaz, G. (2012). ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular Ecology, 21(8), 1864–1877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://www.R-project.org
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G., & Suchard, M. A. (2018). Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology, syy032. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
Rambaut, A. (2020). FIGTREE v.1.4.3. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from.
Rannala, B., & Yang, Z. (2013). Improved reversible jump algorithms for Bayesian species delimitation. Genetics, 194, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.149039
Revell, L. J. (2012). phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
Richards, R. A. (2010). The species problem – A philosophical analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Rohlf, F. J. (2004). tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines, version 2.0. Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Stayton, C. T. (2015). What does convergent evolution mean? The interpretation of convergence and its implications in the search for limits to evolution. Interface Focus, 5, 20150039. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2015.0039
Stewart, J. R., Lister, A. M., Barnes, I., & Dalen, L. (2010). Refugia revisited: Individualistic responses of species in space and time. Proceeding of Royal Society B, 277, 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1272
Suchard, M. A., Lemey, P., Baele, G., Ayres, D. L., Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. (2018). Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evolution, 4, vey016. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vey016
Swofford, D. L. (2000). PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0b. Champaign, IL: Computer program distributed by Illinois Natural History Survey.
Türkozan, O., Karacaoğlu, Ç. & Parham, J. F. (2021). Reconstructions of the past distribution of Testudo graeca mitochondrial lineages in the Middle East and Transcaucasia support multiple refugia since the Last Glacial Maximum. The Herpetological Journal, 31(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.33256/hj31.1.1017
Uvarov, B. P. (1934). Studies in the Orthoptera of Turkey, Iraq and Syria. Revista Espanola De Entomologia, Madrid, 10, 21–119.
Uvarov, B. P. (1939). New and less-known Palaearctic Tettigoniidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4, 132–138.
Ünal, M. (2000). A new Anterastes Brunner von Wattenwyl from Turkey (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Centre for Entomological Studies, Miscellaneous Papers, 65(66), 5–7.
Ünal, M. (2002). First data on Orthoptera of Mount Köroglu, NW Anatolia, with description of three new taxa. Entomological News, 113(4), 275–288.
Ünal, M. (2012). Tettigoniidae (Orthoptera) from Turkey and the Middle East II. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 1382(1–4), 21–54.
Ünal, M. (2018). Tettigoniinae (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from Turkey with key to genera and descriptions of six new species. Zootaxa, 4432(1), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4432.1.1
Wake, D. B., Wake, M. H., & Specht, C. D. (2011). Homoplasy: From detecting pattern to determining process and mechanism of evolution. Science, 331, 1032–1036. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1188545
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. ISBN 978–3–319–24277–4. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., et al. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. (2020). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.0.2. Retrieved November 15, 2020 from https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=dplyr.
Woolbright, S. A., Whitham, T. G., Gehring, C. A., Allan, G. J., & Bailey, J. K. (2014). Climate relicts and their associated communities as natural ecology and evolution laboratories. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29(7), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.003
Yang, Z., & Rannala, B. (2010). Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107(20), 9264–9269. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913022107
Yang, Z. (2015). The BPP program for species tree estimation and species delimitation. Current Zoology, 61, 854–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/61.5.854
Zhang, J., Kapli, P., Pavlidis, P., & Stamatakis, A. (2013). A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics, 29, 2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499
Acknowledgements
Data relating to Anterastes in MEVBIL (Laboratory of Molecular Evolution and Biogeography at Department of Biology, Akdeniz University Antalya, Turkey) have been obtained by a grant to Battal Çıplak by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, TUBITAK (project no: 107T462). This study also uses the same data collection, partly some have been published earlier. We appreciate anonymous referee for her/his constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B. Çıplak conceived the ideas and planed the research; the research was funded by grants to B. Çıplak; data were generated and deposited in B. Çıplak’s lab MEVBIL; all four authors contributed to data production, analyses, and illustration; B. Çıplak led the writing; all authors read and contributed to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict on interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
13127_2023_602_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Supplementary file1 Details for samples of Anterastes used in the study (population numbers show localities on the map given in Fig. 1). (DOCX 20 KB)
13127_2023_602_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Supplementary file2 The GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used in obtaining dated phylogeny of Anterastes. (DOCX 17 KB)
13127_2023_602_MOESM3_ESM.docx
Supplementary file3 The binary coded parsimony informative characters and the data matrix used to estimate Fritz & Purvis’ D values. (DOCX 24 KB)
13127_2023_602_MOESM4_ESM.docx
Supplementary file4 The measurements of 23 metric characters for Anterastes species [upper line in the cell (N), average and the below line min. – max.; for description of characters see Table 4] (DOCX 37 KB)
13127_2023_602_MOESM5_ESM.docx
Supplementary file5 Results of principal component analyses (eigenvalue, variance percent, and cumulative variance percent) applied to 31 metric/proportional characters. (DOCX 16 KB)
13127_2023_602_MOESM6_ESM.docx
Supplementary file6 Mode of evolution for 31 metric/proportional characters estimated under Brownian Motion (BM), Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU), and Early Burst (EB) models indicated per character. (DOCX 20 KB)
Appendix 1. Descriptions of three new species given in the study
Appendix 1. Descriptions of three new species given in the study
Genus Anterastes (Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1882)
Anterastes kizkayasiensis Çıplak & Uluar sp.n.
(Fig. 5).
LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BF085BEB-AFE3-4965–9752-07B12DB3D0C6.
Holotype, ♂, TURKEY: Konya, Kızkayası Mt., 38° 05′ 019.7″ N, 32°16′ 056.0″ E, 1644 m, 01.07.2008 (Çıplak et al.) (MEVBIL).
Paratypes, 7♂, 9♀, same data as holotype.
Diagnosis: As stated by genetic data, the new species constitutes an independent phylogenetic and reproductive unit within A. babadaghi group (given as A. cf. ucari in Çıplak et al., 2015). It can be differentiated from other members of the group by the allopatric species range distribution. The new species share morphological features of A. babadaghi group (see Çıplak, 2004), but more similar to A. ucari and A. babadaghi. Although differences are not prominent, it is not a cryptic species and can be distinguished from these two by a smaller size and especially short, slender, and almost straight ovipositor and narrower incision of the female subgenital plate. The PCA applied to 23 metric characters well distinguish it from other members of the species group (Fig. 4). In addition to phenotype, the ML tree obtained from full data set subjected to PAUP analysis defined the following unique base changes for the new species; 248 (A- > G), 683 (T- > C), 692 (A- > C) and 1268 (A- > G). The lists of the unique and non-unique base changes is presented in Fig. 2 and File S1.
Etymology. The species was named after the type locality, the Kızkayası Mt. in Konya provinces of Turkey.
Anterastes boreoanatoliensis Çıplak & Uluar sp.n.
(Fig. 6).
LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:98C005E3-DDED-4C45-B51F-BE4122C4890E.
Holotype, ♂, TURKEY: Giresun, Şebinkarahisar, 40° 27′ 046.2″ N 38° 42′ 048.3″ E, 2294 m, 22.07.2005 (Çıplak et al.) (MEVBIL).
Paratypes, 45♂, 40♀, same data as holotype; 18♂, 29♀, Sivas, Kösedağ Mt., 40° 09,029.7″ N, 37° 51′ 002.6″ E, 1802 m, 23.07.2009 (Çıplak et al.); 13♂, 5♀, Kastamonu, Ilgaz Mt., 41° 03′ 024.3″ N, 33° 43′ 005.8″ E, 2045 m, 13.08.2004 (Çıplak et al.); 11♂, 29♀, Çankırı, Çerkes, Işık Mt., 40° 41′ 027.8″ N 32° 44′ 006.4″ E, 1595 m, 22.06.08 (Çıplak); 2♂, Erzincan, Pöske Mt., 39° 53′ 26.4′′ N, 39° 21′ 43.3′′ E, 2169 m, 19.07.2016 (Çıplak & Kaya) (MEVBIL).
Diagnosis: The new species exhibits morphological features of A. serbicus group (given as A. cf. serbicus in Çıplak et al., 2015). It is morphologically cryptic and cannot be diagnosed from other members of the group. Especially, it is similar to A. serbicus and A. antitauricus by the titillators without curved apical arms. However, genetic data suggest it as a well-supported independent phylogenetic unit. It can be properly diagnosed from other members of the group by its allopatric range. Although this new species occurs as sympatric with A. niger in Sivas, each belongs to different species groups. The ML tree of full molecular data displayed following unique base changes for the new species; 21 (A- > G), 205 (A- > G), 626 (C- > T), 627 (C- > T) 653 (T- > A), 662 (T- > G), and 1160 (A- > T) (see Fig. 2 and File S1).
Etymology: Range of this new species covers western and northern Black Sea Basin or boreal part of Anatolia and the species name was established after this eco-geographic feature of the species’ range.
Anterastes muratdagensis Çıplak & Uluar sp.n.
(Fig. 7).
LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:682441CF-FFDF-48BC-B32D-629070BFA231.
Holotype, ♂, TURKEY: Uşak, Murat Mt., 38° 56′ 054.7″ N, 29° 37′ 029.4″ E, 1785 m, 17.07.2009 (Çıplak et al.) (MEVBIL).
Paratypes, 16♂, 21♀, same data as holotype.
Diagnosis: The new species exhibits morphological features of A. burri especially by the apically bent apical arms of titillators, and also general characteristics of A. serbicus group (given as A. cf. burri in Çıplak et al., 2015). It can poorly be distinguished from other members of the group by pronotum (the length, width, and length/width of the pronotal disk in male and female). Genetic data suggest it as an independent phylogenetic and reproductive unit. Although it cannot be diagnosed by morphology, it can be well diagnosed from other members of the group by its range allopatric to all other members of the genus. The new species has the following unique base changes in the ML tree of full data set; 25 (A- > T), 284 (A- > G), 335 (G- > T), 569 (A- > T), 653 (T- > A), 770 (A- > C), 1076 (A- > C), 1157 (C- > T), 1394 (C- > T), and 1565 (T- > C) (see Fig. 2 and File S1).
Etymology: The species was named after the type locality of the species, the Murat Dağ Mt. in Uşak province in Aegean Basin of Turkey.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Uluar, O., Yahyaoğlu, Ö., Başıbüyük, H.H. et al. Taxonomy of the rear-edge populations: the case of genus Anterastes (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Org Divers Evol 23, 555–575 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-023-00602-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-023-00602-1